Post: #26

A few months ago, I was talking to my sister and she said she thought a 10 was like 0.001% of the population, and I was like... say what? That's just way too low, but chicks are like that. Don't be bullshit like her.

5- Average
6- Above Average
7- Your standard pretty girl
8- Beautiful girl
9- Really Gorgeous Girl
10- Unbelievable

High Five-Low Six
   

Six

   

Seven

   

Eight

   

Nine

   

Ten

   

Post: #27

The Asian edition...

6

   

7

   

8

   

9

   

10

   

Post: #28

(11-13-2011 04:18 AM)scorpio Wrote:  The Asian edition...

See, but I consider your 6, 8, and 9 to be better than your 10, with your 8 being the best.

I've noticed that I like banging girls that are just a little bit ugly in a way, as opposed to what most guys would consider perfect 10's. It's like I get off more on polluting an average chick as opposed to a supermodel.

Post: #29

(06-11-2011 03:11 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(06-10-2011 03:53 PM)Nonpareil Wrote:  Beauty in the eye of the beholder is false

I don't agree with that. We find attractive whatever our culture or sub-culture programs us to think is attractive. If you are a raised in a Western culture, then you most likely put white women at the top of the hierarchy. If you were raised in tribal village in central Africa where beauty means putting an 8" plate in your lip and marking your face with tribal scarification, you would would put those women on top of your list.

That said, just about all of us on this forum are Westerners and we have a similar idea of what an attractive women is. Even if some of us prefer black women, we usually find white women attractive as well. What I find funny though is that black women are always put at the bottom of these lists, but the group who I'd put at the bottom of the list but never gets mentioned is Australian aborigines. I have never seen an aborigine that I consider even remote attractive. Not even one.






Even if one doesn't like black women, there are some genuinely pretty ones like these two Nigerian women:



But when I do a google search, I can't find one picture of an attractive Aborigine.


Edit - Maybe this is the closest thing I've found to a hot Aboriginal woman, but I think she's half white looking at the eye color.

The reason you rate the 2 black girls is because their features are closer to caucasian prettiness i.e. symetry,with long hair as well....

We all know a pretty girl when we see one...some just have slight variations of colour.

It's based on symetry.If they fit it,they'll be attractive no matter what race.
But we all have preferences.
Mine are :

Pure Nordic/European
Southern European /Mediteranean ( a lot of Brazilian/S. American girls are from this stock too )
Japanese

Post: #30

I dont get this whole aryan-fixation .. i really think they're too simple to gawk over. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.. that chick you posted in the first pic (asian features) i'd bang her in a heartbeat over Gwyneth Paltrow or January Jones ANY day. I'm still 100% convinced that mediterranean beauties win (by a long shot) against their aryan or even slavic counterparts.

Post: #31

@speakeasy: I live in the state with the highest population of Aboriginals in Australia. While I sort of want the flag (it's hard for me to legitimately make this decision, between being totally repulsed, and also someone who wants to bang as many women as possible), I'm still yet to see one of their women I'd like to bang. Even among the half-casts. Even if their body isn't too bad, it's hard to get over their lack of a pretty face, hygeine, manners, intelligence, social skills, or any real civility.

Post: #32

Post: #33

it's pure personal thing. looks is one thing, personality traits is another thing. i've met girls with ok looks but awesome personality and they got much much more attractive in my eyes.

Post: #34

90% of the times i completely ignore the face factor. I judge my targets according to their bodies.

Post: #35

It's all pink inside.

Post: #36

(09-02-2012 02:16 PM)pitt Wrote:  90% of the times i completely ignore the face factor. I judge my targets according to their bodies.

That is a point I always wanted to bring up on this Forum. That for black men/urban men the rate of butterfaces (everything looks good but her face) being valued highly is far more than any other culture.

Only in our culture where a woman that looks like this:






can actually receive over 10K per month in contracts (Black Men Magazine, Smooth Magazine, Straight Stunting Magazine), endorsements, hosting parties not to mention the money in gifts she receive from upper echelon black/urban men...just for having a body like this:



Would Maxim, FHM, SI swimsuit, ever feature a model that is unattractive otherwise just because she met the body requirements but not the face?

let me ask you this question, would a white guy who makes 3 Million dollars a year playing professional sports be in a LTR with a women who looked this?



but thats what Defensive End for the Atlanta Ray Edwards, just because she happens to have a big butt, thick thigh, flat stomach combination,



That is because a woman's body is given much more weight in the urban community...so much to the point that a woman could literally be a 4/5 in the face but as long as she has a 9/10 body (which in the urban community is flat stomach, thick thighs, big fat ass) she will be treated like a woman who looks like Halle/Beyonce/(insert your favorite model here)

What this basically means is that urban men get "conceited shields" from girls who look like Whoopi Goldberg in the face but have 9/10 bodies, and still get it by your normal girls who are 7/8/9's in the face but average bodies.

In white culture a nice body is value on the same level or less than as the face, so you will never see an upper echelon/alpha white guy with a woman who is a 4 in the face but has a nice body. So butterfaces have way less value and know their respective places.

Post: #37

This is coming from someone who's mainly into Asians...

This girl is a 5 to me.
She's pretty in her own way, but I don't find her attractive in the least.



7.5 - Attractive.
I'd have no problem hitting it.



6.5 - somewhat above average
I'd have to see her in real life, but she's not really my type



6.5
Looks too fake to me, but I'd probably hit it.



4.5 - boring
Not my type at all



8 - hot. I'd definitely hit it
Not the best pic of her though



8.5 - I'd hit it in a heartbeat



6 - kinda cute
There are MUCH better looking Asians than her, though



8.5 - hot

Post: #38

There is no way that woman above (I don't want to quote the whole post) is a 4.5.

Post: #39

(11-13-2011 04:18 AM)scorpio Wrote:  The Asian edition...

I would only find your 6, 7, and 8 attractive (hard to tell whether I like the 7 or the 8 the most).

9 and 10 have such chisled faces, they don't even seem human.

Post: #40

(09-03-2012 08:33 AM)Menace Wrote:  There is no way that woman above (I don't want to quote the whole post) is a 4.5.

She's not really unattractive. I just find her incredibly boring.

Post: #41

(09-02-2012 02:16 PM)pitt Wrote:  90% of the times i completely ignore the face factor. I judge my targets according to their bodies.

I bet u are not gonna ignore that face when it looks like 1s with deformed faces and tumors growing out of it, or the reverse a face look like Adriana Lima or Natasha Poly.

Post: #42

5 - Would fuck only if drunk

6 - Not hot, but don't need booze to fuck; second to last resort.. serviceable

7 - Cute

8 - Hot enough to make money from her looks.
8.1 - Basic service industry
8.4 - Bartenders
8.6 - Go-Gos, strippers
8.8 - Basic models

9 - High-end models that make almost all the other women you encounter look like men. You can only compare 9s to other 9s, and at this level it's about very subtle differences.

10 - The ideal woman that does not exist in real life. She is the most attractive woman to all humanity, past, present and future. The only purpose she serves is as reminder that no one woman is perfect, and all of them have some flaw (like aging). If game is a religion, she is the goddess.

Post: #43

A bit simpler...

1: severely deformed
2: hideous
3: ugly
4: unattractive
5: slightly below average (fuckable while sober)
6: average
7: cute
8: hot
9: jaw droppingly gorgeous
10: perfect (doesn't exist)

Post: #44

I pretty much agree with the big picture detailing 1-10 above.
I think there are universal standards which are more subtly influenced by a person's own genetics.

Post: #45

(09-03-2012 09:52 AM)avantgarde Wrote:  

(09-02-2012 02:16 PM)pitt Wrote:  90% of the times i completely ignore the face factor. I judge my targets according to their bodies.

I bet u are not gonna ignore that face when it looks like 1s with deformed faces and tumors growing out of it, or the reverse a face look like Adriana Lima or Natasha Poly.

This is pretty interesting.

Guess what, i dont find neither Adriana Lima or Natasha Poly attractive AT ALL, i wouldnt give them more than 3 points on my rating scale..they are just not my type and i truly dont think they have pretty faces.

Also, you will hardly find a girl with a really hot body and a deformed face..this is just non sense and killing our discussion. But i would hit a girl with a phat ass if her face is ugly, i have done it before (although she wasnt that ugly).

Post: #46

I'm on the 4-8 scale. 4 wouldnt hit, 5 would hit some beer/slumpbuster/if thrown at me, 6 would hit sober, 7 is hot, and 8 is a bad bitch.

8-10 is personal preference. I think we all have an 8 in our mind but cant really point out a dime. If I think of a celebrity right now I couldn't name a 10. Personally if three out of 5 players say the lizard is an 9 then she is a nine in my book.

For forum purposes we should just use the 8+. I dislike seeing "opened on a solid 8.5", or "shes a nine". Whenever I hear "an 8" I get my side eyes on.

Post: #47

(09-03-2012 09:52 AM)avantgarde Wrote:  

(09-02-2012 02:16 PM)pitt Wrote:  90% of the times i completely ignore the face factor. I judge my targets according to their bodies.

I bet u are not gonna ignore that face when it looks like 1s with deformed faces and tumors growing out of it, or the reverse a face look like Adriana Lima or Natasha Poly.

I'm sorry, but Natasha Poly is pretty damn ugly in my book. She looks like one of those fotos from WWII of concentration camp victims.

Post: #48

The only thing universal about beauty standards is YOUTH , SYMMETRY, and CLEAR SKIN.

ALL else is determined by culture and media and then personal predeliction.

What ever the dominant culture is and whomever controls the media gets to determine who and what is more attractive that the other.


8
   

9-10
   

9-10
   

Post: #49

Heres my take. Alot of times people will be like oh so and so is hot. I can see how someone would find them attractive have nice features symetrical etc but just not my look. I can however say in the classic sense she is beautiful. I tend to not like tall and slender so nobody of that bodytype would appeal to me but I do realize most models fit that description and that is attractive but doesnt do it for me. At the same time something i consider a 10 ie latina med height olive skin dark hair brown eyes may not be sone9ne elses cup of tea

Post: #50

The looks are subjective. It's the way she makes me feel/the emotions she elicits within me that differentiate my brain from ranking her as an 8 and a 9 i.e how much she whips me. I don't consider 10s or unicorns.