Post: #26

Roosh taking a page out of Trudeau's playbook dealing with Montreal crazies, invoke the war measures act

Post: #27

(08-11-2015 04:24 AM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  ...except for rich, white girls, who are immune to media criticism.

If the events of the past few days have given me any hope, it's that this might not be so true in the not foreseeable future.

Roosh, QC, ROK & RvF have proved that if we remain strong, bound by our principles & integrity, showing our enemy no mercy on the battlefield we will see real, actual change in this area.

If the masterful & honest takedowns of the Aurelie Nix's, SaraFoSho's & the Jessica Lelièvre's of this world by the RvF haven't schooled us in that fact, I don't know what will.

Lest We Forget.

Post: #28

I have said over many posts that Roosh is conducting himself with great intelligence and maturity during this pressing time, a time where a lesser person could have easily been provoked into doing something stupid. As it stands, despite all the vitriol and criminality from the enemy, Roosh easily maintains the moral highground, although that's not to say that doing so is easy per se. I welcome these measures as a mere continuation of Roosh's shrewdness thus far.

Ironically, it is your controversial and (clearly beyond their scope) somewhat satirical post conveying your ideas of how to reduce the number of rapes that has allowed the media exposure to get as big as it has. But this does not mean that things such as this should continue where they give yet more bait for the MSM to twist and contort the actual meaning for their sensationalistic purposes.

I am in the UK, and after I close my Yahoo Mail it reverts to the homepage where the biggest news stories are listed. To my disbelief, Roosh is listed there as one of the top articles. This story will be exposed to literally millions across the country. It contains the usual mindless feminist drivel, as you would expect from an article on Yahoo, but it just shows you that this is no longer just restricted to Canada. If it has reached Britain, then it is going worldwide. Roosh is even called a "Celebrity" PUA in the title. Prior to the beginning of this month, I did not know about Roosh and it seems that it was a small but dedicated community that was allowed to exist simply because it was too small for anyone to take notice of. Now the eyes of the world are upon everything that Roosh has created, and it is wise to make exceptional changes during these most exceptional of circumstances.

The rabid, irrational, delusional, aggressive lynch-mobs are almost certain to commit yet more illegal acts. It is important that everyone in support of Roosh allows them to hang themselves by their own ropes. The priority of our side is to get the speeches done while maintaining the moral highground we currently hold. Good luck and be careful to all!

Post: #29

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

Post: #30

(08-11-2015 07:24 AM)vinman Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

If WB is banned we can close the forum.

Post: #31

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

^ Appeaser.

A man's response to threats against his freedom of speech is to redouble his exercise of that freedom. The coward's response is to shut his mouth. You advocate us going silent lest we incur the anger of our leftist masters. You should choose which side you support.

Post: #32

WB is so much more concise than "she's attractive enough for consensual sex." Only someone of low critical thinking ability or someone with prejudice against us would find anything sinister in the statement.

Post: #33

samurai power

Post: #34

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

No man. I can see where you're going with this, but that's what Cuckservatives do, and just look how it's been working out for them so far.

You could completely ban WB, the 1-10 scale, gifs and all metaphors arising from words for physical contact (ex. push around, bitchslap, restrain...) and the SJWs would still attack you for something. For God's sake, they trotted out the statement "Long hair is positively correlated with beauty and fertility" as an example of "hateful rhetoric" from the manosphere.

There can be no reasoning with these lunatics, not just because they are wrong but primarily because they are merciless and their hunger for power is infinite.

The WB stays.

Post: #35

I approve this message.

Everybody stay sharp.

Post: #36

samurai power

Post: #37

If someone feels offended by the content of this forum. Just get the fuck out. People should take care of their lives instead of bothering others.

Post: #38

Relevant:

"We're going to fucking war"

Post: #39

Thanks for posting this.

Keep us posted.

Post: #40

Why are we afraid of Canadians or Canada....especially feminist ones ?

Post: #41

(08-11-2015 07:52 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

^ Appeaser.

A man's response to threats against his freedom of speech is to redouble his exercise of that freedom. The coward's response is to shut his mouth. You advocate us going silent lest we incur the anger of our leftist masters. You should choose which side you support.

The very basis of this thread was to warn members to temper language that may be deliberately misinterpreted to present Roosh and his forum in the worst possible light. Being cautious in how you present yourself and aware of how your language may be twisted is not appeasement. Caution is not cowardice.

As for which side I support: leave the hysterical dramatics to jezebel.

Post: #42

(08-11-2015 12:34 PM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 07:52 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

^ Appeaser.

A man's response to threats against his freedom of speech is to redouble his exercise of that freedom. The coward's response is to shut his mouth. You advocate us going silent lest we incur the anger of our leftist masters. You should choose which side you support.

The very basis of this thread was to warn members to temper language that may be deliberately misinterpreted to present Roosh and his forum in the worst possible light. Being cautious in how you present yourself and aware of how your language may be twisted is not appeasement. Caution is not cowardice.

As for which side I support: leave the hysterical dramatics to jezebel.

I think this is a fair position. It's not about appeasing, it's about considering your choice of language to ensure that, since everything you post is written evidence for or against your cause, everything you post serves to advance the cause, or at the very least not harm it.

However, I'm with Phoenix in thinking that WB is pretty innocuous and if someone wants to get offended about that, then fuck 'em, they can suck a bag full of dicks.

Post: #43

(08-11-2015 12:40 AM)DannyAlberta Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:16 AM)Roosh Wrote:  We are currently being watched by the world. Everything we say is being heavily scrutinized by the media and Canadian authorities. This means you must be extra careful with what you share.

This is especially relevant for my other Canadian forum brothers. I have been doing research for my forthcoming post about the destruction of freedom of expression in Canada (for the record it won't be posted in war time). It is no accident that the Canadian illiberal Left and the SJW contingent here so frequently use the phrase "hate speech". Recent changes to Canadian law render just about anything said on the Internet that hurt someone's feelings potentially "hateful" and if done while sitting at a computer in Canada can be subject to criminal charges.

I knew things were bad here. I honestly had NO IDEA they were this bad. It is presently impossible for anyone here to know if they are breaking the Internet "bullying law" or not.

Canada currently has the most chilling laws on free speech ever imposed on a Western democracy. I can't believe it's gone as far as it has.

Long story short, be careful what you say on here fellow Canucks. There are people out to get us and they are armed with the full power and consent of the state.

Waiting for that article Danny. I too notice the trend of the left (or pseudo-left) to restrain and censor free speech. My national goverment recently tried to impose a law restricting the "hate speech" on the coment sections of webpages. Luckly, it di not pass.

Post: #44

(08-11-2015 07:52 AM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

^ Appeaser.

A man's response to threats against his freedom of speech is to redouble his exercise of that freedom. The coward's response is to shut his mouth. You advocate us going silent lest we incur the anger of our leftist masters. You should choose which side you support.

I'm sure I read on RVF that an SJW considered "WB" as "rapey", so it might be an idea, only until hostilities cease using "WB,WWC" (would bang, with written consent) instead of WB.

Post: #45

(08-11-2015 09:44 AM)JamesRodri Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:40 AM)DannyAlberta Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:16 AM)Roosh Wrote:  We are currently being watched by the world. Everything we say is being heavily scrutinized by the media and Canadian authorities. This means you must be extra careful with what you share.

This is especially relevant for my other Canadian forum brothers. I have been doing research for my forthcoming post about the destruction of freedom of expression in Canada (for the record it won't be posted in war time). It is no accident that the Canadian illiberal Left and the SJW contingent here so frequently use the phrase "hate speech". Recent changes to Canadian law render just about anything said on the Internet that hurt someone's feelings potentially "hateful" and if done while sitting at a computer in Canada can be subject to criminal charges.

I knew things were bad here. I honestly had NO IDEA they were this bad. It is presently impossible for anyone here to know if they are breaking the Internet "bullying law" or not.

Canada currently has the most chilling laws on free speech ever imposed on a Western democracy. I can't believe it's gone as far as it has.

Long story short, be careful what you say on here fellow Canucks. There are people out to get us and they are armed with the full power and consent of the state.

I'm really looking forward to your post. Make sure you post it somewhere prominent for all to see. Alternatively send me a PM with a link. I'm sending you a PM now.

I watched the Video someone made from a feminist gathering in Canada yesterday. I had no idea things were so bad over there. I've always taken waht people here have said about Toronto with a grain of salt but now I finally believe you guys.

As a European I always throught we were way more of a threat to freedom than any North American country. Now I see that isn't necessarily the case.

Free speech is under threat all over the West and the State is as usual behind it all. I'm glad to see this forum taking up the fight.

To all who have asked here and in PM, it will be posted in "peace" time, after the Toronto stuff dies down. Indeed I will be using some of the illiberal twitter speech coming from the Canadian SJWs as examples of what could be considered "hate speech" in Canada if it didn't emanate from a "protected" class.

Keep an eye out for it in the Deep forum. It can't really fit anywhere else. It is already sitting at 3.5 pages and I just finished the beginning. However, I still have more research to do and more Toronto stuff is yet to come (and I have to get some actual work done as well).

Post: #46

Anyone have a clear summary of what happened in this War with Canada and what let to war time rules? I tried to catch up but there's several threads with each going to double digit page count, it was just too much to read and go through. Would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Post: #47

(08-11-2015 02:43 PM)Legendver2 Wrote:  Anyone have a clear summary of what happened in this War with Canada and what let to war time rules? I tried to catch up but there's several threads with each going to double digit page count, it was just too much to read and go through. Would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

https://storify.com/rooshv/the-battle-of-montreal

Post: #48

(08-11-2015 09:59 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 12:39 AM)OBERYN_ Wrote:  I actually think prohibiting WB for awhile wouldn't be such a bad thing given the SJWs' "ability" to manipulate and force any statement to fit their convoluted narrative.

No man. I can see where you're going with this, but that's what Cuckservatives do, and just look how it's been working out for them so far.

You could completely ban WB, the 1-10 scale, gifs and all metaphors arising from words for physical contact (ex. push around, bitchslap, restrain...) and the SJWs would still attack you for something. For God's sake, they trotted out the statement "Long hair is positively correlated with beauty and fertility" as an example of "hateful rhetoric" from the manosphere.

There can be no reasoning with these lunatics, not just because they are wrong but primarily because they are merciless and their hunger for power is infinite.

The WB stays.

Well said. The WB/WNB also demonstrates that until these feminists can actually provide rational, educated and reasonable opposition to our movement (which we know will never happen) they deserve no more complex a response than WB/WNB.

Post: #49

(08-11-2015 02:43 PM)Legendver2 Wrote:  Anyone have a clear summary of what happened in this War with Canada and what let to war time rules? I tried to catch up but there's several threads with each going to double digit page count, it was just too much to read and go through. Would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Roosh picture has now been spread all over the 6 o clock news. This is CTV channel which is broadcasted from coast to coast.

I am still in shock, the reporter ended by saying he will be giving a lecture this Saturday at a undisclosed place.

Post: #50

(08-11-2015 05:37 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  Roosh picture has now been spread all over the 6 o clock news. This is CTV channel which is broadcasted from coast to coast.

I am still in shock, the reporter ended by saying he will be giving a lecture this Saturday at a undisclosed place.

They are literally treating him like some kind of wanted fugitive rapist. It's not even funny, it's scary.