Post: #76

Milo nailed it...

Quote:In other words, revolutionaries will always breed counter-revolutions.

Post: #77

What really gets me is that none of them seem to be bringing up what roosh & the forum have been saying for years about Toronto. Admittedly I've only been able to glance at the media coverage.

Hopefully, Roosh's new media fame will allow him and all of us to raise awareness that Toronto and most of Ontario is a terrible place for men who like slender, attractive, and feminine women.

Post: #78

(08-11-2015 04:41 PM)Onto Wrote:  While I'm glad Roosh is getting the publicity for fighting the good fight, a part of me wishes this forum could remain a secret, hidden gem from the rest of the world. I kind of liked that aspect of it and maybe it won't change that much. Guess we'll see what happens next.

The strict moderation and joining requirements are strict enough to sort of keep it this way, it's just that everything you say is findable on Google.

So with the war time rules thing, you ALWAYS should self censor your self when posting. It's not really that hard though, most people are smart enough to not even have strange thoughts that would be misconstrued come into their heads anyway, much less post about it.

The ones that do, get banned pretty easily.

Post: #79

Media coverage in Brazil too(link is in portuguese)
http://odia.ig.com.br/noticia/mundoecien...tupro.html

They're saying the same things, that Roosh is in favor of rape blah blah...Without saying the article it's a satire, without check anything. One of the many things this episode accomplished, is the proof that the corruption of the media is a global thing, the media isn't about facts but control and censorship everywhere.

Post: #80

(08-11-2015 06:18 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  Media coverage in Brazil too(link is in portuguese)
http://odia.ig.com.br/noticia/mundoecien...tupro.html

They're saying the same things, that Roosh is a rapist blah blah... Without check anything. One of the many things this episode accomplished, is the proof that the corruption of the media is a global thing, the media isn't about facts but control and censorship everywhere.

Not a word about Roosh in Argentina, but i presume i will read something briefly.

Post: #81

"Free speech is the law of the land, but promoting violence is unacceptable."

A wise man once told me that when you make a statement and use the word 'but', everything before the 'but' is bullshit.

Post: #82

(08-11-2015 03:13 PM)chagataev Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 01:10 PM)Neophyte Wrote:  Toronto TV Show reads Roosh's tweets on tv:

"This guy puts our love of free speech to the test."

No, he reveals your "love of free speech" to be a load of shit and nonexistent.

Didn't know Lloyd from Entourage was a Canadian citizen.

Post: #83

(08-11-2015 06:35 PM)mrbiggs Wrote:  Didn't know Lloyd from Entourage was a Canadian citizen.

well played sir

Post: #84

Hahaha...I thought the first guy sounded effeminate but when the second guy started talking I cracked up.

Post: #85

This is what you get if you google 'roosh' in the USA:

   

Post: #86

(08-11-2015 03:10 PM)Veloce Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 01:10 PM)Neophyte Wrote:  Toronto TV Show reads Roosh's tweets on tv:

This is funny. They're attempting a strategy here.

"What's his name? Roosh?"
"Noone's ever heard of him..."

...as if to downplay his notoriety, and yet at the same time give him more PR than he could ever ask for.

(Painfully) "We need to allow this guy free speech, but at the same time..."

"We need to allow this guy free speech, BUT..."

There is no "but". You're either free speech or against it. This is high school level discourse, and amateur debate at best. It's a classic use of the word "but". It sets up a sentence structure into two main elements.

(a) establishing some sort of morally accepted position to gain favor and trust from your audience

(b) recanting that position, but only just this once!, in order to issue a moral decree

What makes this even more profound is this jackass taking the liberty of speaking for the populace. "We need to allow this guy free speech..." Yeah? Well thankfully it's not up to you, and we have laws for this sort of thing. Although as we can see, the political leaders of Canada have completely failed on their part to protect this human right.

Really the best part though, is look at these two. Why the fuck would anyone care what these two have to say? You have a completely effeminate and spineless faggot on the left, a "digital media correspondent", clearly meant to represent the hip, upwardly mobile class that spend the bulk of their social time on Facebook and Twitter, and on the right a pudgy, balding, thoroughly dickless specimen who uses way too many erratic and ineffective hand gestures.

These are the people that this network chose to deliver the news? Ouch.

Edit: I love how they resort to, "You know there must be some very desperate people out there who are very socially inept..."

Translation: You have a small dick and masturbate in your mom's basement.

Hey asshole, if the people attending Roosh's speech are so desperate, so inept, so thoroughly insignificant, then why is your country so up-in-arms about him holding this event there? Why is he the #1 trending story in Canada, why are so many people pissed off about this? About a blogger and 40 guys congregating to talk about issues that are important to them?

He said it best. The best thing they could do for themselves is ignore Roosh. But they can't help themselves.

The Youtube title of the video is "Do you think Roosh V is crossing the line in regards to freedom of speech?" That's just it. There is no line. These people are revealing some pretty shitty things about Canada to the whole world.

Great analysis, but my favorite part was, "The best thing to do is ignore him"

Um...so you talk about him on TV?

Post: #87

Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

Post: #88

I don't apologize often, but I'm sorry,Toronto is going to BLOW THE FUCKING LID OFF THIS. Roosh, plan on a talk show tour after this, whether you want it or not.

Post: #89

(08-11-2015 08:45 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

They're running a barrage of new segments on him
multiple daily

here's another one with that breakfast fruit cake
http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/video-...ow_id=1738

At least they're posting clips from the victory speech. They're clearly very salty about this in Montreal

Post: #90

(08-11-2015 08:45 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

This psychologist is a beta moron. Basically says everything a man does, or even a boy does, that remotely resembles aggressiveness, is suddenly bad. He says because Roosh doesn't trust people, he's head fucked. Really?

Has this psychologist ever started to become famous for shit? Especially something controversial ? How the hell would he know who to trust? he wouldn't. ... Socialist MD failing miserably as to be expected.

Post: #91

[quote='Neophyte' pid='1086815' dateline='1439316607']
Toronto TV Show reads Roosh's tweets on tv:





"But free speech is so important the best thing to do is ignore people like this."

Yeah, the neon-colored hair freaks are really good at doing this...

Post: #92

(08-11-2015 08:45 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

What a silly video. Between this and the Trump campaign I'm actually regularly watching the news again for the first time in a long, long while, and I'm really noticing how stupid it it. It's like when your house has a weird smell but you don't notice it until you're gone a few days and come back.

It's bizarre, the news has always been dishonest, but the stuff I see today is just downright goofy.

"We read three handpicked quotes to a psychologist and he analyzes a man he's never met based off of them. What could it mean???"

Post: #93

(08-11-2015 08:45 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

Holy shit, Roosh. They're psycho-analyzing you now, NIGGA YOU MADE IT.

Post: #94

(08-11-2015 09:12 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

(08-11-2015 08:45 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

What a silly video. Between this and the Trump campaign I'm actually regularly watching the news again for the first time in a long, long while, and I'm really noticing how stupid it it. It's like when your house has a weird smell but you don't notice it until you're gone a few days and come back.

It's bizarre, the news has always been dishonest, but the stuff I see today is just downright goofy.

"We read three handpicked quotes to a psychologist and he analyzes a man he's never met based off of them. What could it mean???"

Any dipshit can cherry pick pieces of a long statement by someone, and turn it into something it's not... and quite often to mean the exact opposite of the underlying message.

Ever notice that same exact tactic done by women today in America? To give you an idea how feminism has affected women that don't even identify as feminists, who we still hit on and fuck time to time, they pull the SAME EXACT shit. Always taking pieces-parts conveniently out of context to start a fight. yep. Men acting like women, albeit a clearly gay co-host in this video.

Post: #95

(08-11-2015 08:45 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

What an asspull.

I saw delusion and sociopathy on display alright, but it wasn't coming from Roosh, but the SJW losers.

(eastern) Canada is proving itself more and more of a joke detached from reality by the hour now. I thought it was bad enough here.

Worthless country filled with even more worthless people.

Post: #96

That psychologist is doing nothing more than supporting the feminine imperative with some psychobabble word soup. Roosh (and many others in the Manosphere) have the courage to be honest about the opposite sex. We're violating the 11th Commandment: "Thou shalt not criticize women".

Post: #97

(08-11-2015 08:45 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Now they're getting a psychologist to analyze Roosh

http://www.citynews.ca/2015/08/11/psycho...t-roosh-v/

Oh jeez, nice attempt by citynews to add some legitimacy to the whole anti-Roosh campaign. Get a guy who has studied for many years as the "qualified expert" to subtly "diagnose" Roosh as a sociopath.

The problem here is that while the psychologist may speak as if he has objective scientific evidence backing up everything he says, the reality is that the whole psychiatry/psychology "field" is at very best a pseudoscience, at worst largely a crock of shit. A great percentage of the population is fed "theories", for example, as to how antidepressants act on the brain, but nobody really knows. The human brain is far too complex for us to say anything other than we are in the dark ages in our attempts to understand it. Another example is the "buzzwords" he comes out with e.g. "Antisocial Personality Disorder". This is actually regarded by the medical and legal establishment as a medical illness, like all the other "personality disorders" such as "Borderline Personality Disorder" "Histrionic Personality Disorder" "Avoidant Personality Disorder" "Oppositonal-Defiant Personality Disorder" and the list of nonsense just continues. None of these have been objectively been proven to exist as medical illnesses; they are just random names assigned to people who fit enough of a list of criteria written down by "experts". The DSM-V is the latest edition and it's basically a crock of shit. The NIMH in the US has withdrawn its support for this book upon the release of the latest edition, citing that people "deserve better". But I'm not sure there is much anyone can do to stop this nonsense.

The irony here is that the psychologist is a beta moron. If you want to know how that guy is really doing, check out his wife/partner/whatever to get a more accurate measure. You see within his little world of "psychology" he is under the delusion that he has competence (decades of study and qualifications, letters after your name will do that to you)... but what is one of the male endeavors that requires the most in terms of "emotional regulation" he keeps yapping on about? That's right - walking up to strange women in strange foreign lands, exposing yourself to rejection constantly. Try doing that Dr Psychologist and see how far you go. I have studied in academia and also cold approached women. The two just do not compare. Sure it's not good to have a bad score in a test, but it doesn't do anything to your emotions on the raw level that interacting with beautiful women does. Does Dr Psychologist know how many men his wife slept with before marrying him? He might be surprised at the truth.

Really, really sneaky attempt by citynews, I have to say. Get a pro in to suggest that Roosh may just be a sociopath and mentally ill, discredit his opinions based on a blog post where Roosh was quite honestly admitting his human flaws. If Roosh can be "professionally evaluated" as being a lunatic sociopath, then no one would trust what he had to say. It's a pity that too many intelligent men know Roosh speaks only the truth, truth which often appears only when you do the most difficult things. The psychologist can reel off as many pseudoscientific theories as he wishes, but by far the best teacher when it comes to your own mind as a man is trial/error/observation/correction repeated many times. Put Dr Psychologist in some Eastern European shithole, tell him to talk to a group of 6ft platinum blondes in high heels and observe how he crumbles.

There's one age-old tactic offended psychiatrists and psychologists have been using for decades. If you don't agree with the opinions of another person, you diagnose the critic. By diagnosing the critic with a "mental illness", and by seeing him as "mentally ill", this removes the requirement for genuine debate between yourself and that person. You as the professional "win the argument" automatically, because how could a delusional, sociopathic (etc. etc.) "crazy" person have any sort of concept of the truth or reality, right?

In short, don't believe the bullshit of psychiatrists/psychologists. They are I guess necessary in that someone has to process people who do need help. But as far as truth goes, they are not that much closer to it than your average man walking down the street.

The media are stepping it up. I suspect they realized all they had to work with was one satirical blog post and the shrieks of a bunch of feminist nutjobs (coincidentally the true mentally ill human beings in this war, if anyone is to be diagnosed as mentally ill, delusional and sociopathic, as mentioned above, from the most recent BoM videos it was unquestionably the rabid Montreal SJW faction).

Post: #98

Any "doctor" that diagnoses someone without ever meeting them is being foolish at best, should be thrown out of their profession at worst.

Post: #99

(08-11-2015 07:30 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Hopefully with all the news hitting us, there's at least a few guys that get convinced to join.

Welcome newbies!

Count me in! I’ve been lurking around this forum for quite some time, and have been meaning to join so that I might contribute to the incredible wealth of information here. In light of recent/current events, I could no longer sit on the sidelines while other good men joined together for such an important fight.

I’m thrilled to be able to support Roosh, and this forum, particularly during these interesting times.

Post: #100

All that's missing was a horoscope reading of Roosh.