Post: #26

And don't forget "false imprisonment" for when we were trapped in a building by a lynch mob.

Post: #27

Jessica Lelievre was awfully proud of her behavior last night, boasting about it on social media saying it was "the best moment EVER".

I wonder why within a couple of hours she attempted to completely erase her online presence. Her Facebook, Twitter, personal website, and even Linkedin accounts were all deleted or taken offline. Is it because she realized she had fucked up and there might be legal consequences? Doubtful. Most likely she was concerned about her personal information going viral and the potential safety risks that opens her up to. Kind of ironic, given that she posted the private address of Roosh on Twitter, which was then retweeted by the SJW/Feminist crowd to an angry lynch mob that had been stalking him all day long.

Post: #28

(08-09-2015 09:03 PM)Chauncey Wrote:  Jessica Lelievre was awfully proud of her behavior last night, boasting about it on social media saying it was "the best moment EVER".

I wonder why within a couple of hours she attempted to completely erase her online presence. Her Facebook, Twitter, personal website, and even Linkedin accounts were all deleted or taken offline. Is it because she realized she had fucked up and there might be legal consequences? Doubtful. Most likely she was concerned about her personal information going viral and the potential safety risks that opens her up to. Kind of ironic, given that she posted the private address of Roosh on Twitter, which was then retweeted by the SJW/Feminist crowd to an angry lynch mob that had been stalking him all day long.

I just wonder how she's going to top herself next, she's got pending charges as protestor, now police reports as a lone activist...the next rung she's got to climb on the ladder of radical feminist is false rape claim.

She'd better start hitting the gym to get in shape to carry a mattress around montreal all winter.

Post: #29

(08-09-2015 09:02 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:59 PM)Porfirio Rubirosa Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:58 PM)WanderingMan Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:20 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 08:15 PM)Carlos100 Wrote:  It would send a clear message too if you go back and hang out at the same bar again before you leave Montreal.

It would send an even bigger message if he went to that bar with a quality, well behaved, respectful Montreal girl.

By what I've seen, he'd have a better chance of going in there riding a unicorn.

Plenty of cute, feminine girls in Montreal as long as you avoid certain areas overflowing with white-knights, radical feminists and other associated groups.

It's times like these that we need G here to set the record straight. I've never been to Montreal, so I don't know.

Good to know Porfirio. For the record, I've never been there either.

Post: #30

(08-09-2015 09:11 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  I just wonder how she's going to top herself next, she's got pending charges as protestor, now police reports as a lone activist...the next rung she's got to climb on the ladder of radical feminist is false rape claim.

She'd better start hitting the gym to get in shape to carry a mattress around montreal all winter.

Post: #31

Goddamn, Roosh, good for you. Prosecute with prejudice.

Post: #32

This thread comes up as the 4th result in a Google search of her name: https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=rQvI...a+Lelievre

Post: #33

(08-09-2015 09:27 PM)civpro Wrote:  This thread comes up as the 4th result in a Google search of her name: https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=rQvI...a+Lelievre

#2 in the US

Post: #34

You guys ever use archive.is for this? In Gamergate SJWs do this sort of thing and also delete all social media believing they're free. Screenshots are tamperable and easily faked and don't hold up as well. Archive can catalog everything for you.

Post: #35

(08-09-2015 09:41 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 09:27 PM)civpro Wrote:  This thread comes up as the 4th result in a Google search of her name: https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=rQvI...a+Lelievre

#2 in the US

Post: #36

(08-09-2015 08:00 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 07:54 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

Quote:Will you appear as a government witness in court if the case gets that far?

Yes I will fly back for it.

I will chip in for the airfare.

Also, this is the #5 article on Google when you search Jess Lelievre and its only been a half hour.

Just wait until tomorrow. We'll beat that mark.

Post: #37

(08-09-2015 09:41 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 09:27 PM)civpro Wrote:  This thread comes up as the 4th result in a Google search of her name: https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=rQvI...a+Lelievre

#2 in the US

#3 in Russia

Post: #38

I think she already deleted her LinkedIn profile and her Twitter account. I'm not sure, since I never use either of those things.

Post: #39

Some information on Jessica Lelièvre follows.

An article from January 2014 : http://www.concordia.ca/cunews/main/stor...cians.html



Her LinkedIn profile has been deleted : https://ca.linkedin.com/pub/jessica-lelièvre/81/862/453

In this article from 2013, we learn that she was president of Political Sciences Student Association at Concordia at that time : http://24hmontreal.canoe.ca/24hmontreal/...04852.html

In a newspaper article from March 2015, it is mentioned she is implied in a review of Concordia's Sexual Assault Policy : http://paperzz.com/doc/3994879/in-a-few-...-home-in-a

Due to her political activism at the University, it's not surprising she poured a beer on Roosh V.

Other links :

http://www.concordia.ca/cunews/main/stor...doors.html

Post: #40

I applaud of your courage and effort to report this crime to the police.

I understand that it will take more time and will certainly have to be after the Toronto speech, but Tuthmosis on the previous page explained well how the state-run media defamed you state and nationwide with false information that could have caused serious harm to your person and/or business and was a key agitator in the "lynch mob" sort of behavior. Far better should be expected from "journalists" who were once upon a time expected to be neutral, at the very least not criminal.

I hope this is just the beginning of getting - or at least attempting as best you can - to get some justice, in order to protect other good men in the future from such threats and also to send the message that this is just not acceptable.

Another great point was made by Samseau: that, despite the higher standards of living, generally higher levels of safety and lower levels of crime, first-world countries, especially the Anglosphere, are becoming more dangerous overall if one takes into account the legal bias in favor of women and against men, to the extent that women can escape having committed serious offences with impunity, while innocent men on the other hand now do have something to fear, even if they have nothing to hide. If you're nervous already to go up to that pretty girl and say hello, now you've also got the niggling thought that if she's having a bad day, you could end up being arrested and charged for harrassment, and then some. Even if you're a guy in the anglosphere and you're lucky to avoid these pitfalls, it's just not fun to approach women under these conditions.

Post: #41

When Ms Nix read the first post in this thread, learning that Roosh had just waltzed into a police station to make this complaint without fear of arrest, it must have finally dawned on her that the Man had not taken her false rape threat claim seriously.

Anyway, I notice from the article link in the first post that Ms Lelièvre is apparently currently under investigation by Concordia's student disciplinary forum for possible expulsion due to her disruptive protests of the university back in May. I recommend that Roosh or someone on his behalf forward her tweet and the video, plus the police report # to Concordia's disciplinary committee because it might help influence their decision.

Post: #42

If that's her, she did lose some weight in the video. I didn't think it was the same person.

Post: #43

(08-09-2015 11:41 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  If that's her, she did lose some weight in the video. I didn't think it was the same person.

She admitted to it, so either she is the one in the video or she's mentally ill. Either way, she shot herself in the foot. Hija de puta, if you are reading this right now, all Roosh is advocating is guys taking steps toward self improvement in order to be more successful with women and improve themselves as human beings in general. If you think that is a bad thing, or worse yet, something which warrants some kind of protest, than my strong recommendation is that you immediately start receiving the most extensive therapy which is available to you. The therapy will also help you in mitigation when the criminal charges which Roosh filed against you go to court. At least you will be able to show that you have taken some serious steps toward treating this condition that you have. Hopefully, the attorney who you retain will advise you to do that. I know I would if I had a client in your shoes.

Post: #44

(08-09-2015 10:37 PM)slubu Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 09:41 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 09:27 PM)civpro Wrote:  This thread comes up as the 4th result in a Google search of her name: https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=rQvI...a+Lelievre

#2 in the US

#3 in Russia

ROK article will definitely rank in the top 2 or 3 positions.

Post: #45

(08-09-2015 11:53 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  She admitted to it, so either she is the one in the video or she's mentally ill. Either way, she shot herself in the foot. Hija de puta, if you are reading this right now, all Roosh is advocating is guys taking steps toward self improvement in order to be more successful with women and improve themselves as human beings in general. If you think that is a bad thing, or worse yet, something which warrants some kind of protest, than my strong recommendation is that you immediately start receiving the most extensive therapy which is available to you. The therapy will also help you in mitigation when the criminal charges which Roosh filed against you go to court. At least you will be able to show that you have taken some serious steps toward treating this condition that you have. Hopefully, the attorney who you retain will advise you to do that. I know I would if I had a client in your shoes.

Merenguero above is your true emotion pouring out as if you would try to explain to male friend in a rational way and message might get in his head but you can't do that with these Feminists.

Post: #46

(08-09-2015 10:37 PM)slubu Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 09:41 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(08-09-2015 09:27 PM)civpro Wrote:  This thread comes up as the 4th result in a Google search of her name: https://www.google.ca/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=rQvI...a+Lelievre

#2 in the US

#3 in Russia

#1 in Australia

Post: #47

Future employers would have to be crazy to hire someone unhinged like this. She has an established history now of false accusations and starting drama that ends up in a legal mess. She's an enormous liability/lawsuit waiting to happen worth potentially hundreds of thousands if not millions in damage and lost productivity to any employer.

This is the very definition of a toxic individual.

Post: #48

I don't know much about Canada but in Germany this woman would not be sentenced.

Post: #49

(08-09-2015 08:11 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I fully support your use of the legal system to protect your safety and basic rights as a legal visitor in Canada. In any developed country in the world, women and men have the right to walk and transact through a city without fear of state-media-sanctioned mob violence for political reasons. There are plenty of people whose views I haven't liked in places where I've lived. I never once felt comforted by the local media and government to attack those people with a group of my friends, with such impunity that I could then openly talk about it on the internet and, in fact, proudly upload videos of my actions on a global site. This is an embarrassment of the highest order for the City of Montreal, the Province of Quebec, and Canada at-large. Today, you're no better than Afghanistan or Bolivia. Shame on you, and your supposed institutions.

This mob is composed of bullies who--emboldened by the poor and irresponsible reporting by the local media, and the sloppy words of a cowardly mayor--have devolved into little more than a lynch mob. This is no hyperbole. They've decided to take extra-legal measures to get satisfaction for their dislike of you as a person and the failure of their half-baked "petition" to keep you out of the country illegally; when your only intention was to give little more than a 20-minute talk on relatively tame, and entirely legal, subject-matter. No matter what, they will get their way. This is not only unacceptable morally, it makes a mockery of law and order, and--left un-prosecuted--would send the message that it's perfectly acceptable behavior. It would be only a matter of time before you, or one of your supporters, were seriously injured or killed. This time it was beers in glass, but what's to stop someone from using a piece of metal pipe, a knife, or even a gun? For all the talk of violence in the United States, I don't remember you ever having to worry about being brutalized or killed in the streets of an American city by a gang of political thugs.

As the character with "unpopular" opinions--in this country that doesn't seem to have laws protecting your right to have them without fear of violent reprisal--you faced an uphill battle in proving your case. The local media has willfully failed to temper its depiction of you with the kind of nuance we used to be able to expect from an objective "fourth branch of government" and, in fact, have conspired in trying to locate your whereabouts on behalf of the mob. The videos of the news reports--available in the other threads in this very forum--openly admit to them calling around to find the second venue, after the Omni was deemed too dangerous. If the mobs are the school bully, the media and Montreal's mayoral office are the principal--not only allowing the school bully to brutalize other students, but indeed arming him with the weapons with which to do so. Thankfully, this mob is so irrational, that they--themselves--have created the evidence needed to prove your account of the events.

Make no mistake: the somewhat joking tone that some us took on this seemingly harmless semi-controversy at the outset--and I confess to foolishly having done this myself--is revealing itself to have been the product of gross underestimation of a matter of life and death. This is no joking matter. This may sound overblown, but give it some thought. If the local media has repeatedly shown its intention to look the other way on this opposition's egregiously illegal and immoral behavior (in fact, accusing you and your supporters of doing what the opposition did), and the local authorities have declared you to be sub-human, unworthy of the most basic of human rights, what's to stop a more determined mob from following you into the building and finishing the job next time? The act has been blessed.

I hope that the Montreal police is capable of accomplishing something the rest of Quebec seems woefully incapable of: caring for the safety of its visitors, enforcing the law, and sending the message to political mobs that this behavior brings shame on them all.

I've been looking at the bigger picture and have come to this conclusion. The state is constantly seeking more power through whatever means it can. When I say 'state' I mean people that have a vested interest in its constant expansion, almost like shareholders of a company.

Women, especially feminists and there 'allies', have a vested interest in the state because, in one form or another. It is their provisioner of things they both need and want (i.e. birth-control, child care, affirmative action quotas in jobs). I'd say most, if not all, hard core rad-fems are completely incapable of engaging in free commerce at a level where they can provide for themselves. The state is, for provisioning purposes their 'man'.

They vote for politicians constantly seeking state power so it seems natural that their biggest voting blocs would get free passes from state sanctioned repercussions such as arrest and prosecution. Of course women do get arrested at times for their violence. However at any meaningful level as to have any deterrent effect, they are given a free pass, if not outright encouragement by the state and the media at large. Women are essentially non-official enforcers of the state in a quid-pro-quo type of relationship because the state knows that free men of conscious and strength are its biggest enemy.

Further, they see the state enterprise will redress all grievances, resentments, and dis-contentedness that they all obviously have in their minds. Usually they feel entitled to modern day legislative spoils (affirmative action quotas, free stuff such as birth control/abortions/IVF/IUD/womyn's healthcare, legislative reign on masculinity and men's God given behaviors and instincts) because of the past wrongs incurred by generations past, both real and fancied; mostly fancied.

'Equality' is the mantra projected by the media and the government to make government encroachment more palatable to men and society at large.

I have made the decision to never play into the equality trope by trying to appeal to women's and equalist-minded men's logic or sense of justice. It doesn't exist folks and by playing into it with complaints of "I thought they wanted equality" "if they were really about equality then.....". You could go on ad-infinitum.

Don't give the false God of equalism any strength and see it for what it really is, justification for total governmental control into every facet of human existence; sex, commerce, social interactions, war, peace, religion, life, death.

Post: #50

If we truly lived in some kind of monolithic patriarchy with a supposed "rape culture" where men are beyond reproach just for being men, these women would be sitting at home cowering in a corner of the kitchen. Instead they're out in full force, brave and empowered and aggressive, BAITING men with their sexuality, being both verbally and physically abusive and engaging in criminal assault.

Yeah - a patriarchy.