Post: #1

Two sisters were at an Atlanta Braves game and were sat behind a husband and wife. They witnessed the wife sneakily texting another man. She had the mans number saved under a woman's name. The girls wrote a note and handed it to the husband.

article

Quote:Two sisters attending an Atlanta Braves game claim they helped expose that a man's wife, who was seated in front of them, was cheating on him.

Delana and Brynn Hinson said they were at the Braves game on Wednesday against the Los Angeles Dodgers when they caught the man's spouse allegedly sexting a man saved as 'Nancy' in her phone.

They took pictures and posted photos to Twitter of the seemingly adulterous text messages they claim she sent to 'Mark Allen', as well as the note, which have since gone viral, Uproxx reported.



Delana wrote the note to the man during the game at Turner Field that read: 'Your wife is cheating on you. Look at the messages under Nancy! Its really a man named Mark Allen. There is pictures on my phone.'

She then continued saying if his wife deleted the messages he could contact her and she left her phone number. She ended the message saying: 'Sorry, just thought you should know!'

Brynn then posted the pictures on Twitter with a message that read: 'When there's a married couple in front of you but....hoes ain't loyal so me & @lanabaybee8 expose em! #Nancy #ormark.'




The sisters said they handed the man the note as he was leaving before he stopped and turned around giving them a thumbs up. About 30 minutes later, they claim he messaged Delana asking for the pictures.

Some unsure if the act was fake have criticized the sisters saying they edited the alleged cheat's text messages. However, the pair hit back by posting video of when the note was being written that evening as well as a text that was apparently sent from the man asking for the pictures.

I'm not really a fan of people getting in others business regardless of whats going on, but its nice to see women exposing one of their own for change, and its a good reminder to men about the ruthless hamster that never sleeps.

There you are at a ball game enjoying a beer on a nice afternoon and your lady next to you is telling some guy she can't wait to be with him.


Strangely enough, its not the first time this happened at a sporting event :

Quote:He was just trying to watch the game, but instead he was dragged into a random couple's relationship drama.

A man named 'Lye' has written about his experiences confronting a stranger at a Detroit Lions football game, after he claims he saw the man's very pregnant girlfriend 'romantically texting' another man throughout the game.

At the end of the game, Lye handed the man a note revealing the alleged adulterous text messages, and later posted a picture of the note and the pair he claimed to be the couple to Facebook.

Those images have since gone viral and are now sparking a heated debate online about whether it's appropriate to wade into a complete stranger's relationship.



Throughout the game, he claims he saw the woman casually texting a contact in her phone named 'Jason' apparently making comments like 'I wish I was with you all day' and 'I will see you as soon as I am done with him'.

Meanwhile,he claims the woman kept the phone screen tilted out of eyesight of the man seated next to her, and would even shut it off and put it away when he engaged her in conversation.

Feeling sympathetic for the man seated in front of him, who he believes was being cheated on, Lye got up near the end of the game to find a pen and piece of paper to write the stranger a note.

When the man got up to leave, Lye handed the piece of paper to him and said to read it when he got home.

Man (which forumer is he?) :


The pictures have since gone viral online and many have called Lye out for interjecting himself into the stranger's relationship.

Lye has since defended his actions, saying he usually likes to stay out of other people's business, but overheard a few rude comments the woman made to the man she was with that made him pity her partner.

Definitely a forumer

Quote:He says at one point in the game, another spectator commented on the size of a portion of fries saying: 'Wow! For the price they charge for fries here, that's pretty small. They barely give you anything.'

The woman in question allegedly quipped back: 'It's okay, I'm [used] to small things'.

This is the pregnant wife of man, seated next to him.

Quote:Others criticized Lye for possibly putting the pregnant woman in harms way, pointing out that her boyfriend could have been abusive.

Unfucking believable, justifying a pregnant wife cheating right next to her husband and making small dick jokes. This is the "logic" only a woman can know.

The mans response to such ridiculous suggestions:

Quote:'I doubt any woman who fears getting beat by her husband will speak that way and degrade him like she did or spend over 20 minutes texting the next man RIGHT BESIDE her "abusive" man,' Lye responded.

Despite the backlash, Lye says he would make the same decision again.
'I don’t regret a damn thing, well except the fact that I didn’t leave anything for him to be able to contact me on.'

If he isn't a forumer, lets get this man a lifetime gold membership!

Post: #2

In the news today it has been announced that sports attendance has dropped 50 percent across all major sports. Experts are attributing it to the fear of being caught setting someone other than their partner and exposed.

Just shows the thirst is strong in the chumps out there. Chasing an old post wall glasses wearing basic bitch.

Post: #3

Typical white knight 'cuckservative' hamster logic here.

Post: #4

Why would you text the man you're banging and use his full name? I've never texted "Susan Harris, wanna see Antman this weekend?"

Post: #5

(07-26-2015 03:14 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  Why would you text the man you're banging and use his full name? I've never texted "Susan Harris, wanna see Antman this weekend?"

It is odd, but in the context of what she was writing it makes more sense, kind of this faux formal declaration. I've had it said to me in a very similar way, "Global Man, I love you so much"..

Post: #6

The sisters...

Post: #7

Would bang, then high five.

Post: #8

WNB, the blonde chick looks like a gremlin.

Post: #9

Fake. It's photoshopped.

Look how clear "Nancy" is on the phone compared to "Messages" or "Details" in both photos. Bolding cannot account for that difference.

Similarly, look how blurry the text in the green text message boxes are, and how blurry the automated spelling suggestions are.

And then look how clear the delivered text messages are in the light grey boxes in the one photo ("she a bitch [sic]", "my love"), and also how clear the messages in progress are ("I will be the naked...", "Mark Allen I love...").

How convenient.



...that there's two altruistic sisters out there, looking to check their slootastic colleagues.

But nope, it's just two attention whores attention whoring.

WB sister in front.

Post: #10

I don't see any of what you're saying. There are smudges randomly all across the screen which could easily account differences in clarity in different areas

They have video of the lady texting, I'll look for it

Post: #11

(07-26-2015 04:08 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  I don't see any of what you're saying. There are smudges randomly all across the screen which could easily account differences in clarity in different areas

Agreed, I found his assertion completely ridiculous.

Some people just love doing mental gymnastics for the hell of it, like this is that serious anyway.

What do those girls gain from this?

Some temporary followers on Twitter?

There are much easier ways for women to get attention than this shit.

Post: #12

(07-26-2015 04:16 AM)jariel Wrote:  

(07-26-2015 04:08 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  I don't see any of what you're saying. There are smudges randomly all across the screen which could easily account differences in clarity in different areas

Agreed, I found his assertion completely ridiculous.

Some people just love doing mental gymnastics for the hell of it, like this is that serious anyway.

What do those girls gain from this?

Some temporary followers on Twitter?

There are much easier ways for women to get attention than this shit.

Indeed. It would be quite the convoluted scheme to use in order to get attention. There are numerous easier ways to achieve that, none of which would require Photoshop Level: Advanced.

Post: #13

The Blonde chic, but without the furrowed brow. WB all day.

Post: #14

Since when were girls expected to be rational?

I would characterize pointing out that two photos look suspicious as being an easy task, but maybe some people find such easy tasks cognitively arduous.

I'd be happy to be wrong if the girls have video clearly showing the woman typing out the text messages as shown, or less suspicious photos. After all, it's not my middle-aged wife.

Post: #15

(07-26-2015 04:36 AM)Kabal Wrote:  Since when were girls expected to be rational?

I would characterize that pointing out two photos look suspicious as being an easy task, but maybe some people find such easy tasks cognitively arduous.

Wouldn't it have been easier to just say "I'm smarter than you saps" ?

Quote:I'd be happy to be wrong if the girls have video clearly showing the woman typing out the text messages as shown, or less suspicious photos. After all, it's not my middle-aged wife.

What you are asserting may or may not be correct. I don't really care either way in the end.

However, I do find it strange with people who often claim "fake" and imply "conspiracy" that they are never concerned with motive at all, and that photos are always faked.

Post: #16

(07-26-2015 04:47 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  

(07-26-2015 04:36 AM)Kabal Wrote:  Since when were girls expected to be rational?

I would characterize that pointing out two photos look suspicious as being an easy task, but maybe some people find such easy tasks cognitively arduous.

Wouldn't it have been easier to just say "I'm smarter than you saps" ?

I was poking fun at some people making a passive aggressive remark about mental gymnastics.

(07-26-2015 04:47 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  What you are asserting may or may not be correct. I don't really care either way in the end.

However, I do find it strange with people who often claim "fake" and imply "conspiracy" that they are never concerned with motive at all, and that photos are always faked.

I too find it strange when people are overly skeptical or contrarian... but also when people are overly defensive.

Post: #17

(07-26-2015 03:55 AM)Kabal Wrote:  Fake. It's photoshopped.

Look how clear "Nancy" is on the phone compared to "Messages" or "Details" in both photos. Bolding cannot account for that difference.

Similarly, look how blurry the text in the green text message boxes are, and how blurry the automated spelling suggestions are.

And then look how clear the delivered text messages are in the light grey boxes in the one photo ("she a bitch [sic]", "my love"), and also how clear the messages in progress are ("I will be the naked...", "Mark Allen I love...").

How convenient.

Why would they have needed to Photoshop the name Nancy in? If they were already editing the messages in progress, they could've just used whatever name happened to be there already, male or female.

The black on white is more visible for the same reason that people have been using black font on white paper as the default means of communication for the past however many years. It stands out.

White on green doesn't. In fact, those are two of the worst colors you could pair for clarity's sake. That's why it becomes blurry from the combination of sun, smudges, and pixelation.

If it were fake, which it very well could be, the likelier story is that it's their mom or aunt who's in on it, rather than some stranger they picked at random to photoshop.

Post: #18

(07-26-2015 03:36 AM)jariel Wrote:  The sisters...

Were they at a Brewers game?

Look like Wisconsin girls and would bang.

Especially the brunette.

Post: #19

WB the brunette. Blonde one on the right has a SIF tell (fatty arms.)

Post: #20

(07-26-2015 03:55 AM)Kabal Wrote:  Fake. It's photoshopped.

It is not shopped, at least not at an amateur level. Look at the ELA.
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id...8&show=ela

The only thing in that image that looks shopped is the text on the bottom left (with the twitter URL)

Post: #21

(07-26-2015 04:29 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  The Blonde chic, but without the furrowed brow. WB all day.

I'd hit it but she has to be face down.

Her sister bang all day and night.

Post: #22

Here they are writing the note.

The hands holding the phone (and the shirt) are definitely from the woman in front.

Post: #23

(07-26-2015 09:42 AM)storm Wrote:  

(07-26-2015 03:55 AM)Kabal Wrote:  Fake. It's photoshopped.

It is not shopped, at least not at an amateur level. Look at the ELA.
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id...8&show=ela

The only thing in that image that looks shopped is the text on the bottom left (with the twitter URL)

Actually, the ELA suggests it is photoshopped. The twitter watermark would show up very bright on the ELA, text messages shopped or not, since it would be the last component added.

The ELA highlights discontinuities caused by color changes and different levels of quality attrition due to repeated image compression.

In the ELA for both pictures, there is a rectangle where "Nancy" is. Not only is there a rectangle instead of a very roughly "Nancy"-shaped blob (corresponding to the discontinuity cased by the text), but the edges of the rectangle are parallel to the edges of your screen--not to the edges of the iPhone--just like if someone pasted in a rectangular layer in a image editing system.

The rectangle and parallelization is very distinct on the "Nancy" on the other photo.

Not as obvious, but same idea for the sent text messages and messages in progress, with the messages in progress being multiple rectangular layers.

It could be a figment of organic image compression... but it certainly is evocative.

(07-26-2015 11:29 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  Here they are writing the note.

The hands holding the phone (and the shirt) are definitely from the woman in front.

That's also in the article, but does not show the content of the text messages as they are being typed.

Still would be happy to be wrong...

Post: #24

History repeats.

Does anyone remember a few months ago a fan named Lye at a Detroit Lions game saw a guy's pregnant girlfriend sending texts to another guy?

How did people handle it? Did they say Lyle had done a good deed? No, they said (get ready for this) that Lye "put the woman at risk for physical abuse" by outing her as a cheater.

Got that? Women should be free to cheat and no one can call them on it because it's the abusive men who are the problem!

This is the Dr. Phil mindset that America has fallen under: If he cheats he's a rat...but if she cheats, well, he's still a rat because what did he do to make her cheat?! This is why America is falling apart. The idea of men being "the problem" used to be feminist weirdness; now it's mainstream.

Here's the story link. It ran Dec. 10, 2014:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-game.html

Post: #25

Kabal Wrote:Still would be happy to be wrong...

You wouldn't be happy no matter what you're shown. You want the girl to have filmed over the ladies shoulder 3 inches from her face as she's typing.

If there was video of that I suspect you'd claim it was all a set up.

Its a common theme with conspiracy theorists. You're going to great lengths to find the smallest "abnormalities" when they are not definite abnormalities, they can be easily be artifacts. The camera is zoomed, the photo is enlarged, its been uploaded and then uploaded again.

There is no reason to change the name to "Nancy", a male name would have been better, or any other female name would be fine. Why would they do that? It doesn't add to the believability at all- in fact it only adds an unneeded complication.

Its always the most complicated theory rife with unneeded steps that the person did not need to take to accomplish the aims- but are needed for the conspiracy theory to make sense(*Crucial aspect*). Its starting from the theory and working backward to find just the slightest anomaly, which then "confirms" it.

This is always the logical flaw with conspiracy theorists.

You ignore all the common sense signs that do not point to conspiracy but dissect a photo and come up with "abnormalities" that at best only suggest a possibility, not a certainty, and are contrary to all other common sense and motive of the story.

Anyway, pointless talking to you. Good day.