Post: #51

And naturally she thinks that feminism and older women being nasty to catcallers - that those things actually diminished catcalling:

Quote:And as women get older they’re less likely to put up with nonsense; I’ve become much more likely to scream at and shame catcallers in recent years, a much different tact than my teen years, when I would just shrink into myself.

Quote:Have I reached my “last fuckable day” already, at 36 years old?

Almost - it will be over soon, stop struggling and botoxing and you will be rid of catcalling forever.

Quote:But I can admit that - even as a seasoned feminist - sexism is a powerful enough force to still reside my head.

It's not sexism you stupid bitch - it's just human nature. Women always want to be attractive to men - even many lesbians. We are hardwired to want to be appreciated by the other sex. Without that drive we likely would have died out during the stone age. That instinct is alive and well even in countries like Saudi Arabia where women are walking around in tents and commercials are de-sexualized as much as possible. To eliminate that drive is to wipe out the human race within a few generations.

Also - oldie but goodie from the American Girls thread:



She already misses it and she is barely 36.

Post: #52

(07-21-2015 08:12 AM)CH-Toronto Wrote:  Based off of this - I can see Valenti transforming into Constanza Miriano or someone similar in 10 years from now.

http://www.christianpost.com/news/femini...pe-111120/

Not gonna lie, I clicked that link and a nice, cool breath of fresh air wafted across my face.

Post: #53

I tweeted this to our good friend Jess:



What I expected from her (as in, what ALWAYS happens when I engage feminists) was a response that initially thanked me for challenging her intellectual vigour before proceeding to defend her apparent hypocrisy and inconsistency on the matter at hand, apologising for any confusion as she rebutted my point with a staggering clarity and potency, once again thanking me for engaging her and challenging her opinions.

Only kidding!

This happened:

Post: #54

She was cute during the late Clinton-early Bush years. But with that ugliness inside her I don't know that I could have banged her - unless she was more feminine and civilized back then.

Post: #55

(07-20-2015 11:31 PM)Eskhander Wrote:  I was going to say I would be shocked if she was ever catcalled.
But she lives in Britain so she is probably an 8 over there.

Not this again!

In regards to Valenti...this is glorious. You couldn't make it up! It's so hypocritical, hamsterish and as OP said - confirms, unintentionally, lots of our opinions.

Post: #56

(07-21-2015 05:50 AM)blck Wrote:  

Quote:She went to the prom with some guido-looking dude, who probably thanks
his lucky stars he didn't knock that bitch up. I wonder if he piped it.

Dude looks like Goodfellas guy Henry Hill, around 1965.


   

Post: #57

I wonder if she will divorce rape her husband so that she can "explore"? She obviously is the man in the relationship and she resents that.

I would bang hard early Jess Valenti. It's sad to see girls waste themselves to an ideology that deep down they don't even like.

Post: #58

(07-21-2015 03:03 AM)HeyPete Wrote:  I also like honking my horn at chicks and telling them to smile. Because it makes them absolutely livid.

You're a hero, for real.

Post: #59

Now




Then:
Old, bitter and alone Jessica Valenti down the road of feminism


No man to be seen around her



Feminism is great when you are at the peak of your beauty, but then you hit the wall, the wall... Oh the wall

Post: #60

I'm bathing in feminist tears.

Post: #61

(07-20-2015 09:13 PM)Kingsley Davis Wrote:  There was the man in a business suit who told me to “take care of those titties for me”

What a great line- I may start catcalling just so I can use it.

Post: #62

Doesn't apply to this girl as she's married, but this is another analogy I like similar to the other one going from detesting attention to wanting it:

Quote:When a woman is young and reasonably attractive, men will pass through her life with the regularity of subway trains; even when the platform is empty, she'll expect another to be coming along soon. No woman in her right mind would want to commit herself to marriage so early. Time stretches luxuriously out before her. [...] When dating a man, she'll be constantly alert to the possibilities of others.

[...]
But if a woman remains single until her age creeps up past 30, she may find herself tapping at her watch and staring down the now mysteriously empty tunnel, wondering if there hasn't been a derailment or accident somewhere along the line.

Quote:The sensible, decent, not-bad-looking men a woman rejected at 24 because she wasn't ready to settle down all seem to have gotten off at other stations.

Or, as it may be, a woman might find herself caught in a relationship that doesn't seem to be going anywhere or living with a man she doesn't want to marry [or be married to?]. Whatever her circumstances, the single woman will suddenly feel trapped — trapped by her own past words and actions [doesn't seem to hinder feminist hypocrisy]— at the same moment other desires begin to thrust themselves upon her.

Saw this on this website: http://claytoncraddock.blogspot.ca/2011/...riage.html

Post: #63

Some serious redpill info here...

Danielle Crittenden

Quote:Men will outlast her. Men, particularly successful men, will be attractive and virile into their 50s. They can start families whenever they feel like it...I often think that moderately attractive bachelors in their 30s now possess the sexual power that once belonged only to models and millionaires. They have their pick of companions, and may callously disregard the increasingly desperate 30-ish single women around them, or move on when their current love becomes to cloying.

She's exaggerating about the models and millionaires there, but she hits on a fundamental truth. Attractive women peak early. They are like fireworks, they shoot up fast, explode in a blaze of beauty, and then fade away into the darkness.

We (men) have the staying power. We can play the long game, each failure builds strength and our peak is more of a steadily rising plateau over many years. Interesting that this female author points this out.

Post: #64

(07-21-2015 12:51 PM)poutsara Wrote:  Some serious redpill info here...

Danielle Crittenden

Quote:Men will outlast her. Men, particularly successful men, will be attractive and virile into their 50s. They can start families whenever they feel like it...I often think that moderately attractive bachelors in their 30s now possess the sexual power that once belonged only to models and millionaires. They have their pick of companions, and may callously disregard the increasingly desperate 30-ish single women around them, or move on when their current love becomes to cloying.

She's exaggerating about the models and millionaires there, but she hits on a fundamental truth. Attractive women peak early. They are like fireworks, they shoot up fast, explode in a blaze of beauty, and then fade away into the darkness.

We (men) have the staying power. We can play the long game, each failure builds strength and our peak is more of a steadily rising plateau over many years. Interesting that this female author points this out.

Good find. +1

Post: #65

Who knew Jessica Valenti has puffy meat flaps? The RVF is a constant source of knowledge.

Post: #66

Men can live their whole lives never seeking or acknowledging the red pill. Women WILL come face to face with it sooner or later, usually sooner.

Post: #67

Since we're turning this into the Valenti data file, I'll just put this pic here, in which I first became aware of the existence of this infamous femtard on teh Interwebz:

Quote:According to Valenti’s critics, she is pushing her breasts forward so that Bill Clinton can’t help but think, “I must have that woman. Maybe I can come up with an excuse to go into the broom closet with her.” In other words, this feminist is using her body parts to curry favour with a powerful man.

You go, girl!

Here she is with Mr. Valenti just prior to getting married and lost out on a potential revenue stream for fetal body parts having a baby.



Mr. Valenti beta-bux followed the script perfectly, and put a ring on it just minutes before impact....

Post: #68

(07-21-2015 03:02 PM)K Galt Wrote:  

"Where da hoes at?!"
-Slick Willie

Post: #69

(07-20-2015 09:30 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

They already changed the headline:



Yeah, you're seasoned all right.

Post: #70

Heh, I remember that pic. This was around the time that I first became aware of these issues in the feministsphere and manosphere.

A few things about Valenti. Her husband is several years younger than her. She wrote an article about it and in the article she mentioned dating a string of bad boys and also mentioned trying to pawn off her future husband on her younger sister because she felt weird about dating someone so much younger than herself.

Another thing that is darkly amusing. Years ago she wrote a ranting article, I think it was initially posted on her blog feministing, taking some doctor to task. Why? Because he had the gall to state medical facts and suggest that women lose their fertility and face serious risks with pregnancies the older they become, starting around 27 or so.

Well, fast forward a few years and Valenti becomes pregnant in her thirties. I think, if I remember correctly, that she smugly posted another article about how it wasn't a big deal and perfectly normal and fine.

A few months later and she almost dies giving birth to her daughter and was in the ICU for awhile due to conditions that pretty much only happen to older mothers. Lol.

Post: #71

(07-21-2015 03:02 PM)K Galt Wrote:  Since we're turning this into the Valenti data file, I'll just put this pic here, in which I first became aware of the existence of this infamous femtard on teh Interwebz:

Quote:According to Valenti’s critics, she is pushing her breasts forward so that Bill Clinton can’t help but think, “I must have that woman. Maybe I can come up with an excuse to go into the broom closet with her.” In other words, this feminist is using her body parts to curry favour with a powerful man.

You go, girl!

Here she is with Mr. Valenti just prior to getting married and lost out on a potential revenue stream for fetal body parts having a baby.



Mr. Valenti beta-bux followed the script perfectly, and put a ring on it just minutes before impact....

Look at the way she crowds him out in the picture and partially hides his face. She's clearly the dominant one. He needs to look for his testicles. I think they fell off and rolled under the couch or something.

Post: #72

"Men rarely catcall me anymore. I hate that our culture makes me miss it."

I read this line and had a mindblown moment. She blames culture, which is obviously her removing herself from accountability. Can feminists even recognize that the opposite sex are mainly self-accountable? Maybe a good counter-feminist argument is to point out how all the feminist ideals are about blaming external factors, whereas men rarely do that. How can you assume men and women are equal when they differ so much in placing blame?

Post: #73

(07-20-2015 10:04 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  New York again?

Why the fuck are these femi-cunts always from New York?

NYC is the vortex of all the feminism in the world. It sucks them all here and then spits them out.

When you encounter an FOB tourist at the Museum or Park you see the sunshine radiating from their faces. So full of life and sweetness, and then you come across a New Yorker and it's like seeing Crullea D' Vil

Post: #74

If this face doesn't fit the definition of mangina Backpfeifengesicht, I don't know what does.

Post: #75

(07-21-2015 03:13 AM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(07-21-2015 03:03 AM)HeyPete Wrote:  I kind of like "take care of them titties."

Speaking of titties. At 21: