Post: #26

So private actors use their contracts to restrict activity on their private network.

I'm sure their politics are okay with this, Roissy at least.

WIA

Post: #27

Delete.

Post: #28

Why is this now a race thread?

Post: #29

...i'm not taking the mickey to dads...however, as a black man living in africa, i find heartiste's brand of reasoning to be brutaly honest if not outright intriguing...you see, down here we are close to 100% black and we still fight over tribalism and it won't end...we even have xenophobia in some quaters....we even have tribe based soccer teams....how is that one's passionate appreciation for his heritage and identity and its perks be considered as an issue in the manosphere and for its constituents...we have a saying, " having eaten the whole cow, why leave out the tail"...are we also keen on uniformity of thought?

Post: #30

There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.

Post: #31

If this how Twitter wants to roll, we all know it's just a matter of time before they overreach and cause a fallout a la Reddit style. Watch them try and ban someone like Trump for being "offensive," or something like that.

Post: #32

Chuck C Johnson is still banned

Post: #33

(07-14-2015 08:13 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 08:06 AM)Blick Mang Wrote:  

Quote:I don't see any reason why he should have been suspended.

I'm of the Heartistian school of red pill thought, but even here many don't like him. It's a shame really, he's one of the only few willing to bridge game realtalk and political realtalk.

It's because most men are far more sensitive with their feelings than they realize.

Trust me it was not a man. I do not like Heartiste, so I do not go to his site. That is how men deal with sites they object to. Women see something they do not like and want it banned, the guy fired and everybody to pat them on the back for dealing with a "problematic" person.

I think Heartiste is a troll and he went from a good game site to a Stormfront light, race baiting site for his white nationalist base of daily visitors-But I do not want him banned, I don't care if he advocates for a return to slavery, I do not want him banned. I personally disagree with him but I would rather refute his ideas, not ban him from a platform to speak. Once people start banning people for saying things they do not like then you end up going down a slippery slope, I do not like Heartiste's views on race,but most women would not like my views on gender- So if they can ban Heartiste, what is to stop them from banning my account for my views on"rape culture",false rape accusations and Bill Cosby's innocence. Not popular views, like Heartiste's, but they are legitimate thought out opinions.

Remember, the people that banned Heartiste are the same people demanding for no more net anonymity and having to use your real name for everything you do online. Imagine if SJWs could find my real name, your real name or Heartiste's-do you think they would hesitate to inform our employers and pull a Dax on us and get us fired? Make us unemployable for years and destroy our Google search results, and not not bat an eye? You bet your ass they would...

Post: #34

(07-14-2015 11:34 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.

You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

Same goes for mainstream entertainment. John Stewart has been calling Trump "Fuckface" on his show and Twitter and Kimmel had that midget on his show calling him a bastard in Spanish - in both cases it's met with thunderous applause.

Post: #35

(07-14-2015 11:50 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:34 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.

You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

Same goes for mainstream entertainment. John Stewart has been calling Trump "Fuckface" on his show and Twitter and Kimmel had that midget on his show calling him a bastard in Spanish - in both cases it's met with thunderous applause.

You're probably right. Also, I laughed at that gif.

The fact that they're resorting to such retarded insults against Trump means they're scared and he's doing something right. Shit isn't even remotely humorous or sophisticated compared to the way they mock mainstream cuckservative Republican politicians they know their guys will beat.

But this thread has already been derailed enough. The Donald has his own thread!

Post: #36

Bannings on Twitter -> race issues -> Donald Trump

Guys maybe the next topic of discussion in this thread can be about how God isn't real or how both political parties in the USA are the same.

Post: #37

Twitter is now in bed with two forces that will make it increasingly hostile for us: money and SJW's. The former will probably do us in faster since corporations don't want to advertise where there is "misogynist" speech present. Give it 5 years, but Twitter will eventually have the moderation ethic of Reddit.

Facebook is already long gone. It's getting impossible to share a link that is critical of women or makes fun of them without getting a one-month ban. I've been suspended 6 or so times because of it.

While Facebook/Twitter serves some benefit to promote links/books, it wouldn't be wise to be dependent on them.

Post: #38

(07-14-2015 11:50 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:34 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.

You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

The SJW takeover of silicon valley and digital media has to be one of the defining characteristics of the last decade. All of these platforms started off as very free speech, were infiltrated, and have been slowly choking out any dissenting viewpoints for being "offensive".

I'm sure there's some sort of metaphor there for the West in general. If our side ever wins, historians and sociologists should have a field day trying to piece it together. There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.

Post: #39

(07-14-2015 12:10 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Twitter is now in bed with two forces that will make it increasingly hostile for us: money and SJW's. The former will probably do us in faster since corporations don't want to advertise where there is "misogynist" speech present. Give it 5 years, but Twitter will eventually have the moderation ethic of Reddit.

Facebook is already long gone. It's getting impossible to share a link that is critical of women or makes fun of them without getting a one-month ban. I've been suspended 6 or so times because of it.

While Facebook/Twitter serves some benefit to promote links/books, it wouldn't be wise to be dependent on them.

What about Google Plus and YouTube?

Problem with Google Plus is that nobody seems to use it...

Post: #40

(07-14-2015 12:13 PM)dog Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:50 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:34 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.

You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

The SJW takeover of silicon valley and digital media has to be one of the defining characteristics of the last decade. All of these platforms started off as very free speech, were infiltrated, and have been slowly choking out any dissenting viewpoints for being "offensive".

I'm sure there's some sort of metaphor there for the West in general. If our side ever wins, historians and sociologists should have a field day trying to piece it together. There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.

Unfortunately, our side only wins when the illusion of safety is taken away. Remember the thread about women being more feminine when they're scared? The world will never work in our favor when women and weak men are free to act like idiots, make any wild unsubstantiated claims and even start physical attacks with no ramifications other than praise for their "bravery".

That means that the world will have to be a scarier place before these weak SJWs, fearing for their lives, come back to real men begging for protection. In exchange, they will become the submissive, feminine and even physically fit women they used to be - and be happier for it!

Quote:There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.

Those lessons are quickly forgotten when the danger passes.

Post: #41

(07-14-2015 12:13 PM)dog Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:50 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:34 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.

You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

The SJW takeover of silicon valley and digital media has to be one of the defining characteristics of the last decade. All of these platforms started off as very free speech, were infiltrated, and have been slowly choking out any dissenting viewpoints for being "offensive".

I'm sure there's some sort of metaphor there for the West in general. If our side ever wins, historians and sociologists should have a field day trying to piece it together. There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.

Post: #42

(07-14-2015 12:21 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 12:10 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Twitter is now in bed with two forces that will make it increasingly hostile for us: money and SJW's. The former will probably do us in faster since corporations don't want to advertise where there is "misogynist" speech present. Give it 5 years, but Twitter will eventually have the moderation ethic of Reddit.

Facebook is already long gone. It's getting impossible to share a link that is critical of women or makes fun of them without getting a one-month ban. I've been suspended 6 or so times because of it.

While Facebook/Twitter serves some benefit to promote links/books, it wouldn't be wise to be dependent on them.

What about Google Plus and YouTube?

Problem with Google Plus is that nobody seems to use it...

The only discussion that goes on in Google Plus is by the beta Silicon Valley nerds that inhabit places like Hacker News. It's a long-form social networking circlejerk of intellectual posturing and industry minutiae. It has zero pull on the zeitgeist at large.

YouTube is somewhat different, it's a lot scrappier (particularly the comments) because it reflects the population at large as opposed to a narrow interests. But it's still very easy for SJWs to exert influence by mass-reporting videos they don't like, either through adult content gating, DMCA takedown requests, or just calling it offensive. It was also pushing the "real name" thing for a while in an effort to de-anonymize their users. They aren't exactly friendly to free speech.

Post: #43

(07-14-2015 12:24 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

I can only imagine what that toast was!

Post: #44

It's Randi Harper

She has a thread on reddit gamerghazi where she openly made and talks about him getting suspended. Milo needs to get part 3 out soon. Manosphere needs to put some effort in getting her suspended and her Patreon taken down. We have tons of evidence of her breaking all the rules but she's allowed to go free.

Post: #45

(07-14-2015 12:24 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 12:13 PM)dog Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:50 AM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(07-14-2015 11:34 AM)TheWastelander Wrote:  There are enough topics about race. I want to know how we can get back at the motherfuckers who did this to them but I don't really use social media.

You can't. Twitter is completely in bed with the SJWs - a few reports will get a conservative or red pill account deleted while a million reports won't do anything to SJWs accounts.

The only thing to do is not use Twitter.

The SJW takeover of silicon valley and digital media has to be one of the defining characteristics of the last decade. All of these platforms started off as very free speech, were infiltrated, and have been slowly choking out any dissenting viewpoints for being "offensive".

I'm sure there's some sort of metaphor there for the West in general. If our side ever wins, historians and sociologists should have a field day trying to piece it together. There are certainly some lessons to gleaned from the mess.

No lie that picture is a little scary. I have applied to work at Genentech prior to Medical School, they are a Biotech giant. Amgen and Genentech are like the Microsoft and Apple of biotech. Remember the Politically Incorrect episode where Carlin said "there is no need for a formal conspiracy, these people went to the same schools, know each other and their interests all align regardless of their political party affiliation" that picture is proof positive of that statement.

Post: #46

Other than wealth and political influence, I will give a rep point to whoever identifies the most common denominator among the people in that photo.

You don't have to look very far.

Post: #47

(07-14-2015 01:39 PM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Other than wealth and political influence, I will give a rep point to whoever identifies the most common denominator among the people in that photo.

Post: #48

(07-14-2015 01:39 PM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Other than wealth and political influence, I will give a rep point to whoever identifies the most common denominator among the people in that photo.

Satanists? CFR? Trilateral? Bohemian Grove?

Post: #49

(07-14-2015 01:39 PM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Other than wealth and political influence, I will give a rep point to whoever identifies the most common denominator among the people in that photo.

You don't have to look very far.

They are all liberals/socialists.

Post: #50

Bilderburg? Ivy league graduates? Skull and bones?

Fuck the rep point I just want to know now.