Post: #51

(07-09-2015 05:31 PM)RockHard Wrote:  

(07-09-2015 03:25 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  Plus there are other indicators that show that we humans seem to be better suited to vegan diets:

On the other hand, look at the eyes: "eyes in front, ready to hunt, eyes to the side, run and hide". Almost universally, predators eyes face forward and they have depth perception, herbivores eyes face to the side and they have incredibly wide field of view, but little or no depth perception.

Evolutionary arguments are very limited. Frugivore apes have eyes in the front too just like us.

And claiming that we have just de-evolved our fangs because we humans were always fighting with our fists is just one of those arguments that Roosh has written against in his evolution article. Pretty much anything can be claimed to be a "evolved".

The fact is that we simply cannot stomach meat raw and all meat others can. Yeah - the Game of Thrones dragons need their meat cooked, but they spew fire because of it - heh.

We humans can eat a lot of things, we can literally eat shit and we have adapted, but what constitutes the best diet is another matter. And someone please finally leave the bloody bonobos alone, because their faulty studies on captivity are trumped out by every god-damned feminist as proof for matriarchy, homosexuality and hyperpromiscuity. We have often repeated here that the studies are comparable to an Alien race studying male prisons and then assuming that all are psychopathic, violent closet homosexuals.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v48...11128.html

Even in nature they cite the captivity studies. There was a scientist who studied them in the open they are aggressive, patriarchal and territorial just like most other apes. The bonobos when kept in captivity together with females just spend their days fucking and letting the women run the show, since food is plenty and there is no competition.

Ah - science - whatever fits their shitty viewpoint is going to be financed.

As far as meat eating goes - I have stated my case. All meat eaters or omnivores can digest meat without cooking. Personally I enjoy my steak, but I am not letting that cloud my judgement.

Post: #52

Post: #53

Post: #54

It's important to note that our brain is by and large are most important evolved asset. All the other predators and non-predators you compare to humans are stronger and faster than us. We don't have huge sharp canines and claws because we have never needed them - we do not attack with our teeth and claws. We do not use brute strength and superior physical prowess to prosper. We use our intellect.

The argument can be made that our digestive systems are sensitive to raw foods and rind because it takes a considerable amount of energy to process these foods. Our brains and our lifestyles are vastly different from other creatures in the animal kingdom, therefore perhaps preparing our food allows us to use less energy to digest so we have more for our brains. Food for thought.

Post: #55

(07-10-2015 07:55 AM)Eirykr Wrote:  

Hat tip, Maddox.

Post: #56

Just my 2 cents..I've been eating nothing but grass fed meats and free range chicken..I can taste the difference now...even my bacon is free range.My kids had a problem with milk..My ex thought it was lactos intolerance..I just switched them to organic milk and they have no issues with it now...

Post: #57

(07-11-2015 11:00 AM)Green-On-GO Wrote:  Just my 2 cents..I've been eating nothing but grass fed meats and free range chicken..I can taste the difference now...even my bacon is free range.My kids had a problem with milk..My ex thought it was lactos intolerance..I just switched them to organic milk and they have no issues with it now...

It's probably because of the rBGH - bovine growth hormone which is particularly toxic to the human body in the form of milk consumed. It's forbidden in the EU despite some tries.

Besides - pasteurization changes the characteristics of milk and it's not much use to the body. Raw milk is the best form, but hard to come by in our times. In Switzerland and some EU countries you have raw milk vending machines where you buy 1l of raw milk for about 1$ and it's still a good deal for local farmers. They want to ban that now too of course. Irradiated and x-times pasteurized food is fine, but healthy raw milk is not:



That's how a win-win for farmers and consumers looks like vs. the exploitation of big corporations which only profit the 0,001%.

Post: #58

(07-11-2015 11:08 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(07-11-2015 11:00 AM)Green-On-GO Wrote:  Just my 2 cents..I've been eating nothing but grass fed meats and free range chicken..I can taste the difference now...even my bacon is free range.My kids had a problem with milk..My ex thought it was lactos intolerance..I just switched them to organic milk and they have no issues with it now...

It's probably because of the rBGH - bovine growth hormone which is particularly toxic to the human body in the form of milk consumed. It's forbidden in the EU despite some tries.

Besides - pasteurization changes the characteristics of milk and it's not much use to the body. Raw milk is the best form, but hard to come by in our times. In Switzerland and some EU countries you have raw milk vending machines where you buy 1l of raw milk for about 1$ and it's still a good deal for local farmers. They want to ban that now too of course. Irradiated and x-times pasteurized food is fine, but healthy raw milk is not:



That's how a win-win for farmers and consumers looks like vs. the exploitation of big corporations which only profit the 0,001%.

Raw milk is banned here in Australia

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-02-06/ra...ia/6076596

Post: #59

(07-11-2015 11:08 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(07-11-2015 11:00 AM)Green-On-GO Wrote:  Just my 2 cents..I've been eating nothing but grass fed meats and free range chicken..I can taste the difference now...even my bacon is free range.My kids had a problem with milk..My ex thought it was lactos intolerance..I just switched them to organic milk and they have no issues with it now...

It's probably because of the rBGH - bovine growth hormone which is particularly toxic to the human body in the form of milk consumed. It's forbidden in the EU despite some tries.

Besides - pasteurization changes the characteristics of milk and it's not much use to the body. Raw milk is the best form, but hard to come by in our times. In Switzerland and some EU countries you have raw milk vending machines where you buy 1l of raw milk for about 1$ and it's still a good deal for local farmers. They want to ban that now too of course. Irradiated and x-times pasteurized food is fine, but healthy raw milk is not:

That's how a win-win for farmers and consumers looks like vs. the exploitation of big corporations which only profit the 0,001%.

Ugh pass. I managed to score some raw milk a while ago and drank it for a few months. I ended up getting a nasty stomach bug twice in the course of 4 months of drinking it. I hadn't had stomach problems like that in years.

No more, we pasteurize milk for a reason.

Post: #60

(07-09-2015 09:32 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  There is an ethical reason not to eat meat.to sit down when you urinate. Especially mass produced stuff.when it makes womyn feel oppressed and uncomfortable. You can function fully without meat.testicles or that pesky hormone called testosterone. You just need to do a bit more work and research.check your white, cisgender, male privilege.

It took some work, but it's fixed now.

Post: #61

I swing back and forth wildly about whether I'm happy being a meat eater or not.

Some days I think it's the most natural thing in the World and on others I am disgusted at myself for an unnecessary death of a living creature.

It doesn't help that most of the beef in the UK these days is fucking Halal. That just offends me.