Post: #51

(07-06-2015 10:06 AM)Cr33pin Wrote:  I value athletic females.... If I see a girl thats hot and looks like she works out I will approach her and say "So are you into fitness?" When she says she is I say ... "Well how bout fitness dick in your mouth" 40% of the time it works 100% of the time

I value them too. But they look a whole lot better in still photos than running around like a bunch of hyped-up teenage boys on a field. The one you posted above is a perfect example.

If you look at historical photos of art and sculpture, what you see is men in action and women lazing about. The male body looks better in motion. The female body looks better in still images. That's not going to change.

Also, anyone who has an online dating profile should keep this in mind. Women prefer action shots. Women who project their desires onto men often post their own action shots. Let's admit that these photos of them running in marathons and the like are usually either unintentionally ridiculous or a turn-off. They are for me, anyway.

Post: #52

(07-06-2015 12:00 PM)realologist Wrote:  

'shopped

Post: #53

^^^ does appear to be so. Either that or gravitational lensing.

Post: #54

   
This is Cross Country Michelle Scott. Track is phenomenal. Short quick intro with lots of jiggle, quick as hell, that slow down, and more jiggle but with hugs. All done in 10-12 minutes. On phone, but look up Me'lisa Barber sexy track and field on youtube. Highly value to me.