Post: #26

Fundamentally, all of this "blame the Whitey game" comes from other Whites. Most non-Whites don't give two shits, except when some White like Rachel Dolezal comes along and starts teaching them how to hate Whites. This is really just a case of Whites trying to use non-Whites to gain status over their fellow Whites. It's really just a form of betrayal. As the unabomber notes above, it's probably due to a deep-seated inferiority complex inside of the treasonous Whites.

Most of these "blame Whitey" Whites are bluepill beta males, or ugly White women. Notice how that works? In order to get revenge against their fellow Whites they feel inferior towards, these losers of White society will conspire with elements from outside of their society in order to gain advantages.





What makes these SJW's so dangerous is the amount of hatred and jealousy inside of their hearts. They truly want to see others suffer for no reason other than the color of their skin. This gives them some sort of sadistic satisfaction.

Post: #27

(07-09-2015 11:48 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Fundamentally, all of this "blame the Whitey game" comes from other Whites. Most non-Whites don't give two shits, except when some White like Rachel Dolezal comes along and starts teaching them how to hate Whites. This is really just a case of Whites trying to use non-Whites to gain status over their fellow Whites. It's really just a form of betrayal. As the unabomber notes above, it's probably due to a deep-seated inferiority complex inside of the treasonous Whites.

Most of these "blame Whitey" Whites are bluepill beta males, or ugly White women. Notice how that works? In order to get revenge against their fellow Whites they feel inferior towards, these losers of White society will conspire with elements from outside of their society in order to gain advantages.





What makes these SJW's so dangerous is the amount of hatred and jealousy inside of their hearts. They truly want to see others suffer for no reason other than the color of their skin. This gives them some sort of sadistic satisfaction.

Thank you.

Post: #28

^ No problem. It should also be noted that these SJW's do not care in the slightest about the non-Whites they claim to be championing. For example, do you think Rachel Dolezal cared that she was denying employment to a potential Black woman for an organization that was supposed to help Blacks?

SJW's do not give a fuck about anyone except themselves (they are jealous narcissists) and if they couldn't use non-Whites to get back at their fellow Whites whom they loathe and status-whore themselves with, they would probably never interact with non-Whites either.

Post: #29

(07-02-2015 03:30 PM)LINUX Wrote:  Never argue with the person who assigns your grade.

If you would have approached her during her office hours and told her you disagree with her and this is why, she would have respected you.

Doing it in front of the class is different. The end purpose of the class is to get an A. You'll need that A when it comes to Grad or medical school.

I leaned this the hard way when I got a C in a multicultural education class. I should have bit my pride.

I disagree.

I had an American history course my 2nd year of uni. The bitch professor used it as a platform to rant about slavery and other injustices caused by "the white man". Naturally, she was black.

I called her out on it in the class...respectfully...but with conviction.

Proudest C- I've ever gotten.

I opted out of the grad school route (which is lame anyhow). But the man who bends the knee for a good grade is a slave to the whims of others. And that ain't how I role.

Post: #30

I was going to post a long response, but it's easier just to call them stupid.

Post: #31

Because of this man's influence:




Also relevant:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School

Post: #32

Here's a video with a real live SJW in action:





It's the rally Trump held at Arizona, recently. Here's a picture of him:

   

A seemingly innocuous looking man. However, notice he doesn't quite fit in? He's really scrawny, with a pencil neck. Also, effeminate. He's not there with any family or friends. He's also looking right at the camera and not at the speaker.

Fast forward a bit and the SJW reveals his traitorous nature:

   

He's modified the "TRUMP" poster to read "RUMP." It's obvious now: he's actually a faggot, and wants to make Trump look bad while promoting the gay agenda. He continuously holds up the "RUMP" sign without being noticed by anyone but makes sure he's on the camera. You can see his smirk as he thinks he's so clever, brave, and intelligent for actually being a spineless, piece-of-shit traitor worm.

However, notice, no one next to him even realizes what he is doing. This is how SJW's work: behind the scenes, carefully plotting to undermine their own society just so they can score brownie points and look cool with their fellow SJW's. They are far too cowardly to ever confront those they disagree with so they resort to backstabbing. They are a community of traitors.

Also, notice that this guy would NEVER fit in with any culture besides White culture. Blacks or Latinos would want nothing to do with this faggot if they could help it. It's obvious well over 80% of his friends are White and are social rejects just like he is.

Because, fundamentally, SJW's are social rejects just like that 300 video posted above. As outcasts from White culture, they seek revenge against it and want to work with alien cultures they can in order to bring "Social Justice" against those they feel have wronged them. They believe that if White Culture was taken down, they would be the heroes in the New World Order. Of course, if such a day ever comes, they'll just be eliminated as the useful idiots they are, Kevin Sutherland style, and that will be the last the world ever hears of them.

But, until they are done away with by the people who have no more use for them, they represent extremely dangerous forces not just against White culture, but America as a whole. They seek to bring lawlessness, crime, promotion of the weak, feminism, faggotry, transgenderism, and all the other ills associated with SJW's into mainstream culture. They will make life hell for any straight man regardless of his political affiliation.

Historically, traitors have been considered the lowest of the low. In the American Constitution, traitors are to be given the death penalty. In the Bible, Judas is one of the few examples of people sent to hell. In Dante's Inferno, traitors are in the Ninth Circle of Hell next to Satan. Genghis Khan would sometimes conquer cities by bribing traitors within to open the city gates, and then after the city was conquered he would execute every traitor who helped him for being untrustworthy. Cicero famously wrote:

Quote:A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.

SJW's must be recognized as the same. Watch out for the social rejects in the corner pretending to fit in; they secretly harbor evil thoughts and plot ways to ruin and kill you. Both the survival of White Culture and America writ large depend on normals ostracizing this diseased element of society.

Post: #33

Confession time:

I once had a class in college that was about nationalism and human security. A newly minted phd hippy lady was teaching the class and put some kind of spin on the course theme making it about 'patriarchal power structures' and issues involving the nuclear 'male-centered' family.

This was before my rvf baptism but even then I already knew something was up with all this anti-male/leftist shit going on. Of course I had to use the books in class on my papers, written mainly by feminist professors. In the end I think I worded my paper so as to argue that masculine perspectives in international relations result in more aggressive war-mongering foreign polices where as feminist perspectives did not. It was hardly making any sense but the professor got to read what she wanted to see and I got my A.

Post: #34

(07-14-2015 05:16 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Here's a video with a real live SJW in action:





It's the rally Trump held at Arizona, recently. Here's a picture of him:



A seemingly innocuous looking man. However, notice he doesn't quite fit in? He's really scrawny, with a pencil neck. Also, effeminate. He's not there with any family or friends. He's also looking right at the camera and not at the speaker.

Fast forward a bit and the SJW reveals his traitorous nature:



He's modified the "TRUMP" poster to read "RUMP." It's obvious now: he's actually a faggot, and wants to make Trump look bad while promoting the gay agenda. He continuously holds up the "RUMP" sign without being noticed by anyone but makes sure he's on the camera. You can see his smirk as he thinks he's so clever, brave, and intelligent for actually being a spineless, piece-of-shit traitor worm.

However, notice, no one next to him even realizes what he is doing. This is how SJW's work: behind the scenes, carefully plotting to undermine their own society just so they can score brownie points and look cool with their fellow SJW's. They are far too cowardly to ever confront those they disagree with so they resort to backstabbing. They are a community of traitors.

Also, notice that this guy would NEVER fit in with any culture besides White culture. Blacks or Latinos would want nothing to do with this faggot if they could help it. It's obvious well over 80% of his friends are White and are social rejects just like he is.

Because, fundamentally, SJW's are social rejects just like that 300 video posted above. As outcasts from White culture, they seek revenge against it and want to work with alien cultures they can in order to bring "Social Justice" against those they feel have wronged them. They believe that if White Culture was taken down, they would be the heroes in the New World Order. Of course, if such a day ever comes, they'll just be eliminated as the useful idiots they are, Kevin Sutherland style, and that will be the last the world ever hears of them.

But, until they are done away with by the people who have no more use for them, they represent extremely dangerous forces not just against White culture, but America as a whole. They seek to bring lawlessness, crime, promotion of the weak, feminism, faggotry, transgenderism, and all the other ills associated with SJW's into mainstream culture. They will make life hell for any straight man regardless of his political affiliation.

Historically, traitors have been considered the lowest of the low. In the American Constitution, traitors are to be given the death penalty. In the Bible, Judas is one of the few examples of people sent to hell. In Dante's Inferno, traitors are in the Ninth Circle of Hell next to Satan. Genghis Khan would sometimes conquer cities by bribing traitors within to open the city gates, and then after the city was conquered he would execute every traitor who helped him for being untrustworthy. Cicero famously wrote:

Quote:A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.

SJW's must be recognized as the same. Watch out for the social rejects in the corner pretending to fit in; they secretly harbor evil thoughts and plot ways to ruin and kill you. Both the survival of White Culture and America writ large depend on normals ostracizing this diseased element of society.

The SJW in the audience you point out also has shifty, quick body language. He whips his head around quickly often throughout the speech. Looking around at his surroundings almost nervously. Fast change of expression on his face, suddenly grinning and fidgeting. Beta body language big time. Like you said Samseau, nothing but a little worm. Definitely out of place in this crowd.

Post: #35

(07-09-2015 11:48 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Fundamentally, all of this "blame the Whitey game" comes from other Whites

You're wrong. The school textbooks of ex-colonized countries blame most things at the door of colonial powers and rightly so.

.

(07-09-2015 11:48 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Most non-Whites don't give two shits,

Wrong again mate, Get traveling brah and I mean really traveling. In fact, if you ever come on down to my neck of the woods I'll host you for a couple of nights.

Cheers!

Post: #36

(07-17-2015 02:35 PM)fifty Wrote:  You're wrong. The school textbooks of ex-colonized countries blame most things at the door of colonial powers and rightly so.

Wrongly so, given much of those countries have through incompetence or corruption squandered what was left to them by colonialism.

Beyond that, successful ex-colonial countries often have quite good relations with their former colonial powers (most of the Commonwealth, for instance). The delusional guilt complex that's being discussed is primarily cultivated in the halls of western academia, not in the streets of their former colonial possessions.

Post: #37

(07-17-2015 05:49 PM)Saga Wrote:  Beyond that, successful ex-colonial countries often have quite good relations with their former colonial powers (most of the Commonwealth, for instance). The delusional guilt complex that's being discussed is primarily cultivated in the halls of western academia, not in the streets of their former colonial possessions.

The only successful ex-colonial countries are those where the invaders exterminated the local population and settled there and thus had vested interests to build a civilization. There are of course exceptions like Singapore etc but they are irrelevant as they have a lesser population than my current neighborhood.

Any region that already had a significant local population was exploited and wealth was drained systematically back to the host nation and the support structures of the colonized nation were destroyed with few benefits like railways etc which were in effect built for easier governance by the Euro nations.

I have traveled to Kinshasa and interacted with people I highly respect and they say that there are still regions where White skin will be met with immediate hostility. Of course Kinshasa is an extreme example with a complete breakdown in law and order since the CIA assassinated the democratically elected leader Patrice Lumumba.

However, in other nations like that were colonized like the sub-continental nations, Nigeria, Kenya, Indonesia etc they are chilled out people who will not hold you responsible for what happened previously but along with the factors mentioned like corruption they are also quick to mention that a lot of problems are due to the ex-euro nations that ruled. In fact if you pay attention to political diplomacy people have been laughing about the fact that Cameron is trying his level best to leverage access of to emerging markets in an effort to paper over the wounds that are now showing as a result of Thatcher's policies whereas while Modi has traveled the entire world from USA-Germany-Mongolia-Korea he has left out 10 downing street.

Denying this is a futile exercise and rather we should look, introspect, move forward and more importantly not repeat the mistakes of the past. The attitude with which you are approaching this is what has led to academics coining the term Western hypocrisy and it is a concept gaining traction very fast with the BBC being accused of this by various nations.

No offense intended mate and cheers. I'll probably be too busy to reply going forward but if you're ever in these parts of the world don't hesitate to buy me a drink .

Post: #38

What you have to understand about about modern political ideologies is that virtually everything is leftist, because it is all about the state having power, being the most important entity in society, beyond this it is believed by Leftists that the state not only has agency, but a "moral imperative" to shape society. Virtually all political systems are leftists/socialist/fascist too a degree because of this.

The real divider then becomes not the left/right spectrum, but the individual/state spectrum, how much liberty is given to the individual and how much responsibility is he entrusted with. For a better understanding I suggest the book Liberal Fascism, even if you don't agree with it, it is quite well researched, informative and fact driven.

To answer your question as to why liberals blame everything on white men? The answer is simple. Liberals hate white men because the ultimate goal of liberals is for the state to achieve total power, not by force and coercion, but by dependency. It ultimately comes down to practicality.

Liberals want everyone to be dependent on the state for everything, because white men are the demographic that is currently least dependent on the state, the most resistant to becoming dependent on the state, and the most willing and able to become self-sufficient, this is why they hate them so much. Because we are the ones most willing to refuse the gilded cage that is the nanny state.

Post: #39

I think it is pretty simple: investing in the votes of non-white/non-male votes pays off more. And, white men have done bad things and also have a coherent historical record which is well known. So the propaganda makes itself.