Post: #26

(06-26-2015 03:20 AM)mastauser Wrote:  The dramatic drop in crime in NYC during the 90's is directly related to abortus. Many criminals have never been born. Why? Boys who were destined to grow up like shit have never been born.

Not saying I totally agree with your hypothesis, as it seems more middle class women have abortions than low class.

If I am wrong, feel free to correct me as I have thought this for years. However, in my experience middle class and up women are far more likely to abort a fetus than low class are.

While everyone thinks they, upper classes, are less likely to get pregnant that is simply not true in my experience.

*I've had more than one tell me, after the fact, they aborted my kid. Initially, the caveman response if you will, I was pissed as we are supposed to procreate. After thinking about it I was happy.

Post: #27

(06-26-2015 03:23 AM)Galahad Wrote:  

(06-26-2015 03:20 AM)mastauser Wrote:  The dramatic drop in crime in NYC during the 90's is directly related to abortus. Many criminals have never been born. Why? Boys who were destined to grow up like shit have never been born.

Read that too. Thats why I'm not against abortion. Most women don't do it as kind of sex protection. They do it because they know they are not able to rise a kid good enough to give it a decent future.
An unwanted kid is a bad thing.

But by the same reasoning you could agree with neonaticide. Welfare is the ultimate cause of the problem. Unwed mothers to multiple children by different fathers can only exist because of welfare. In a zero welfare country, the woman would become highly constrained after the first child, and would spend all her time trying to feed it. Her paltry and struggling life would serve as a warning to her peers. Under the welfare system, what her peers actually see is her being able to house and feed her bastard children easily.

Post: #28

I read about the abortion and drop of crime in the book freakonomics from Stephen J. Dubner and Steven Levitt

Welfare is an other point yes. Not sure but Bill Clinton reduce the welfare money and after some time the people that relay on it and become criminal also drop. Its never one single factor when it comes to people and society issues.

Post: #29

(06-26-2015 03:36 AM)Galahad Wrote:  I read about the abortion and drop of crime in the book freakonomics from Stephen J. Dubner and Steven Levitt

Welfare is an other point yes. Not sure but Bill Clinton reduce the welfare money and after some time the people that relay on it and become criminal also drop. Its never one single factor when it comes to people and society issues.

I think that the rise in abortions among the lower tiers of women was certainly the main factor in it.

However there would be a better option - pay welfare only to legally married and living together couples - couples who have their biological children living at home. Make it mandatory for the father to be at home.

But alas the top-down goals are depopulation, dumbing down of the population, destabilization of the family, destruction of the family and devaluation of the males in a society. So of course the current programs of abortions & support of mainly single mothers is an essential step to destroy it all.

While I don't like abortions, I do not consider it murder. If soul enters a body, then it is much later in the development. In fact there are studies out there which have cut the early fetus in half and they produced identical twins that way. Now of course the new bioethics/neo-eugenics has taken a completely perverse stance and run with it by claiming that even 3 year old children should be legally put down, because they are not complete people yet - post-birth abortion. http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2012/03...00411.full

Whenever you give those suckers a finger, they want to amputate half your body. You concede that homosexuals should live in peace without punishment and next thing you know they build on that until 5 year old boys are getting their little dicks chopped off because their lesbian mothers decided they should rather be girls.

Every reasonable point is twisted and pulled to fit their agendas.

Post: #30

(06-25-2015 10:01 AM)rpg Wrote:  What do feminazis have against condoms? Wouldnt it make more sense to wrap it up than abort first trimester? Is there some kind of post abortion sisterhood feminazi girl gang facebook group?

They would rather forego the use of a condom just so that they can get pregnant and they can get an abortion. It's like vitamins to feminists.

Post: #31

(06-26-2015 06:00 AM)CactusCat589 Wrote:  

(06-25-2015 10:01 AM)rpg Wrote:  What do feminazis have against condoms? Wouldnt it make more sense to wrap it up than abort first trimester? Is there some kind of post abortion sisterhood feminazi girl gang facebook group?

They would rather forego the use of a condom just so that they can get pregnant and they can get an abortion. It's like vitamins to feminists.