Post: #1

I figure this deserves its own thread.
Similar to the other media threads, but specific to the LGBT agenda that is shoved down your throat on a daily basis.

Post: #2

You spelled 'heterosexual' incorrectly, which may explain why you only got ~1/100th of the results you should have gotten.

In other news, this just pointed me to a case-in-point example for this thread. Whenever you search for something LGBT related in Google it shows a rainbow heart and a line of rainbow people standing hand-to-hand in the dashboard.

Post: #3

(06-23-2015 03:21 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  You spelled 'heterosexual' incorrectly, which may explain why you only got ~1/100th of the results you should have gotten.

Corrected, thanks.

This past Father's Day...

JC Penny




Manhattan Mini Storage


Zipcar

Post: #4

Such bs. A family is a mother and a father; children don't happen unless a penis and vagina combine, stuff shoots out, more stuff combines, and a zygote is formed. Its nature. They can be gay all they want, but they act like the 2% of the population is worth 150% of our energy. I can't see why this slender 2% (if that) gets to have so much political clout. Its worse than Vietnam or anti-Iraq protesters.

Post: #5

Cool, but how can this thread help me have sex with hot women?

Post: #6

(06-23-2015 03:49 PM)travolta Wrote:  Cool, but how can this thread help me have sex with hot women?

Perhaps get a sex change and stay attracted to women?
Hot post-op lesbian sex awaits...!!!

Post: #7

That google screencap is one of the weakest proofs of an "LGBT conspiracy I've seen. There's a very simple reason there's more search results for gender word-salad than for heterosexuality: nobody needs a god damn encyclopaedia to know it's normal for men to fuck women, or to go on tumblr to discuss it in great detail. Hell, the only lengthy treatises on heterosexuality appear on sites either specifically or tacitly dedicated to the discussion of abnormal sexualities.

I'd hazard to guess there are more forums out there dedicated to dwarfs than there are to people of exactly average height, as well...

A better example of agenda-pushing would be Obama praising Bruce Jenner's "transition", perhaps, or the fact that many schools are now trying to teach children that there are in fact 16 different genders before they can even read and write.

Post: #8

The more I think about it, the more I think that all this LBGT-other-letters stuff is just a way to deal with overpopulation.

Gay men, transsexuals, lesbians, etc. don't tend to reproduce. If you normalize it, then you prevent 5%-7% of the population from reproducing.

Post: #9

(06-23-2015 04:25 PM)Truth Teller Wrote:  The more I think about it, the more I think that all this LBGT-other-letters stuff is just a way to deal with overpopulation.

Gay men, transsexuals, lesbians, etc. don't tend to reproduce. If you normalize it, then you prevent 5%-7% of the population from reproducing.

It isn't about that for me.

Having to see it, hear about it and then witness yet more entitlement syndrome come about because of who or what they fuck is extremely irritating.

Oh wow fan-dabi-dozee you have a dick but identify as a woman, I don't care but don't tell me you're not mentally ill. We used to lock them up or a war would rid society of them but we all know whats happening with those two things today.

Post: #10

Understanding and Responding to the Transgender Movement (saw on heartiste twitter)

Pretty good overview for people who aren't familiar with the academic buzzwords and other concepts. One of the counters to the "oh ho you think there's only two genders? Science says no" crowd.

Quote:Sidebar: Intersex Conditions

A misleading distraction frequently is raised in the context of this issue. A tiny percentage of people suffer from disorders of sexual development (DSD), sometimes referred to as an intersex condition (or as hermaphroditism). True hermaphrodites -- those in whom sexual anatomy is ambiguous or clearly conflicts with their chromosomal make-up -- are rare, estimated by one expert as "occurring in fewer than 2 out of every 10,000 live births." The vast majority of "transgender" individuals are not "intersexed."

Post: #11

I've been wondering about where this movement will go. After they get gay marriage which is inevitable then what will gay's chamipon as the injustice against them. Thoughts I've seen on this forum make me think it will go towards normalizing homosexual pedophilia.

Post: #12

Actually it's now LGBTQI* you fucking shitlords

Post: #13

(06-23-2015 05:52 PM)EuphoricWizard Wrote:  I've been wondering about where this movement will go. After they get gay marriage which is inevitable then what will gay's chamipon as the injustice against them. Thoughts I've seen on this forum make me think it will go towards normalizing homosexual pedophilia.

When thousands of gay people find out marriage sucks and is insane if you dont want kids, Im going to laugh my ass off. Just wait until gays are suing each other for alimony. Its coming.

Post: #14

Please tell me the "I" isn't for interspecies.

Post: #15

(06-23-2015 06:01 PM)h3ltrsk3ltr Wrote:  Please tell me the "I" isn't for interspecies.

It's intersex, which denotes people who have both male and female chromosomes, genitals, or secondary sex characteristics. What we used to call hermaphroditism.

Post: #16

The language of the LGTBQ movement is so easy to mock because each constituent group has developed further distinctions in order to have its aggrieved status recognized (which is their worth within the SJW-sphere). And these distinctions, of course, require a new vocabulary. The degeneracy of the human species supplies the only limit on how the terms proliferate.

Here's a fine send-up of the meaningless symbols and phrases that the neon blob of tumblr has invented in the past few years.

Post: #17

What the fuck is Neptune?

Post: #18

Ok, I decided I identify as a crossgender Attack Helicopter/DemiGod

Post: #19

That's funny. I identify now as a Male Trans-am Hell boy Assassin

Post: #20

I still wanna be an A-10 Thunderbolt...with a hint of agender gendervoid.

Post: #21

Here's a VERY important link for anyone who follows the issue.

It's not a coincidence that these people have suddenly become very prominent. They've gotten Billions of money funneled into their cause from some very rich people:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor...-marriage/

Post: #22

(06-24-2015 03:38 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  What the fuck is Neptune?

Neptune is the God of the sea in Roman Mythology. That's his symbol. This chart is a satirical jab at all the different gender-identification terms the LGBT community has recently created.

But yeah, this shit is getting out of hand. I believe, however, that this is just a fad as it is now "cool" to be pro-LGBT. Businesses are catching on to this and are, very smartly, cashing in on it $$$$ and this is why we see this shit plastered everywhere.

Hopefully this fad dies down. I have nothing against gays, but I adamantly hate feminists and I can't help but feel these two groups feed off each other.

Post: #23

delete. double post

Post: #24

delete

Post: #25

(06-24-2015 10:01 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Here's a VERY important link for anyone who follows the issue.

It's not a coincidence that these people have suddenly become very prominent. They've gotten Billions of money funneled into their cause from some very rich people:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor...-marriage/

Damn, I am amazed at how much money these groups can raise:

Quote:Schultz might be taking a risk going all in on a divisive matter at a precarious time, just as the Supreme Court decides the future of same-sex marriage. Luckily, he’s in good company.

Many of his fellow members of the Forbes 400 rich list have not just spoken out in support of same-sex marriage, but opened their considerable wallets at the state level, helping with November’s equal rights victories. Others went a step further, founding their own super PACs (political action committees) during the last election cycle, providing infrastructure for their donations and fundraising.


The Seattle-based Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos and his wife MacKenzie cut a check for $2.5 million to Washington United for Marriage, a group funding Referendum 74, the same cause Schultz’s Starbucks backed. His donation helped secure a victory: same-sex marriage was legalized in November by a margin of 7.4%.


Fellow Seattle-area billionaires and Microsoft co-founders Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer also pitched in: $100,000 each.

As the New York Times first reported, it was an email from a former Amazon employee from the company’s early days that prompted Bezos and his wife to publicly back equal rights. Jennifer Cast, a lesbian mother of four, sent Bezos a note last Sunday asking for $100,000 towards Referendum 74. She received a reply two days later confirming his support and $2.5 million donation.

As my colleague Ryan Mac has reported, Silicon Valley’s tech billionaires have been vocal equal rights supporters as far back as 2008 and California’s Proposition 8.

That year, Google cofounders Larry Page and Sergey Brin publicly opposed Prop 8, the California voter initiative banning same-sex marriage. The two Google leaders contributed a combined $140,000 to the “No On 8″ campaign, which failed that November.

Billionaire tech titans who joined Page and Brin backing the No On 8 movement included Yahoo cofounder Jerry Yang, then-Google CEO Eric Schmidt, eBay founder Pierre Omidyar, former eBay president Jeffrey Skoll, former Cisco CEO John Morgridge and venture capitalist Michael Moritz.

Billionaire media mogul David Geffen, who is openly gay, also backed the movement against Proposition 8 in 2008, giving $100,000 to the No On 8 campaign.

Other openly gay billionaires who’ve long backed the legalization of same-sex marriage include Jon Stryker, heir to the Stryker Corp. medical supply fortune. Stryker gave $602,000 in 2010 to the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund.


Peter Thiel, the PayPal and Facebook billionaire, is also gay and has helped fund right-leaning LGBT group GOProud. In 2010, he hosted a GOProud event at his New York home that caused some consternation on the gay blogosphere for its host, Ann Coulter, who isn’t exactly known for her liberal views on marriage rights.

Some Forbes 400 rich list members have, as Sen. Rob Portman did earlier this month, become backers of equal rights as a show of solidarity to their gay sons and daughters.

Perhaps the most prolific donor to the cause is not particularly well-known outside New York finance circles: hedge fund billionaire Paul Singer, who has given more than $10 million and counting.

Singer avoids the limelight more so than Bezos, but agreed to talk to the NYT’s Frank Bruni last year when he launched a pro-gay rights super PAC. The Republican billionaire pledged $1 million to start the group, and told Bruni his commitment stems from a cause close to home. He has a gay son, who married his partner in Massachusetts in 2o04.

Another billionaire backer of equal rights: Peter Lewis of insurance giant Progressive. Lewis himself is progressive in nature as well as name as the country’s highest-profile billionaire supporter of marijuana legalization. In an interview with Forbes in 2011, he revealed his main focus is drug reform, but the lifelong Democrat has donated to LGBT groups in the past. His son Jonathan is gay and a major Democratic fundraiser who gave $250,000 to the Gay & Lesbian Victory Fund in 2008.

Real estate developer and conservative political donor Steven Roth is another billionaire with a personal stake in the issue: like Lewis and Singer, he has a gay son. He and wife Daryl both gave $16,800 to support the campaigns of Republican New York state senators who backed same-sex marriage.

Fellow Republican donor and billionaire Steven Cohen also backed New York’s gay marriage initiative, as did Singer. Another notable super-rich supporter of the successful New York equal rights bid: the city’s billionaire Mayor Mike Bloomberg, a vocal LGBT advocate for years.

Lately, Mayor Mike has been channeling his wealth and efforts towards combating gun crime, earmarking $12 million for an ad buy to help push gun control through Congress. He did, however, funnel $250,000 towards equal rights in Maryland, his home away from home (he attended Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and is the college’s biggest donor by far).

The next generation of Forbes 400 members is getting in on the act too. Laura Ricketts, daughter of conservative Chicago Cubs billionaire Joe, co-founded LPAC, a super PAC focused on lesbian rights. Ricketts — the first openly lesbian owner of a major sports franchise — helped LPAC raise and spend well over $500,000 on key races in the 2012 cycle. Their largest donation went to Wisconsin’s Tammy Baldwin, who became the first openly gay U.S. Senator in history.

These aren't just wealthy people, these are really smart people too. So, why are they backing this?

Is it just going with the flow? A tax right off? I guess if you are a billionaire then dropping a couple hundred thousand or even a few million isn't that big of a deal, especially if you get political brownie points or greater connections or to attention whore or all of the above.

I do really wonder if these wealthy guys don't have some ulterior motive though.