Post: #88901

@ Travelerkai

They are aiming for children because they are 1: white 2: male 3: Catholic 4: aren't demented pedophile food that parade in front of adult men.

If they can get a free pass from facebook, twatter, the MSM and the majority of good honest folk then they can keep pushing. They need to be stomped on like a cockroach.

Post: #88902

(01-21-2019 06:06 PM)Gmac Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 05:26 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  Trump does not need to comment on every little dust up or fake news piece out there. Carson Wentz got fake news'd today. Trump isn't a parrot. In fact I wish he would comment less sometimes. Sometimes people need to see the dysfunctional shit for themselves without all the hand holding. If a white kid with a Jewish sounding last name that goes to a Catholic school gets attacked for wearing a MAGA hat, what else needs to be said that has not already been said? Mueller BTFO that trash rag Buzzfeed that nobody under 28 that is not mentally retarded, knew that they get fooled into newstories from places like 4 Chan all the time.

Let the shit marinade fellas.

Kamala Harris is a racist, openly sexist, and an idiotic god damned clown. She has zero chance of winning past the party nomination against Trump. White moderate female voters are too jealous to let even a litebright shine like Harris win before another white woman. Only way she wins is if Hispanics are somewhere around 25% of the population in two years. I do not think she can even get 90% of black male vote. She is the black Hillary Clinton. Very polarizing.

The real threat is Beto O Rourke. When that Abraham Lincoln looking wanna be, dipshit throws his hat into the ring, we are in for a serious fucking war. Obama is already working with him in private.

He likely will announce in a year or so. Probably Summer at the earliest, but I could be wrong. They likely do not want to announce too soon, but waiting too late has risks too. They know Dems and liberals, along with a sizable majority of moderates are slow as fuck to catch on to bad or negative coverage on a candidate. Low information and susceptible to fake news.

Beto has zero experience in anything and is merely a bleeding heart with no solutions for the economy, and liberals still do not care about that. He wants Canada's healthcare and that is what his base wants. We need to make him the next John Kerry, but be forewarned, Kerry actually had a very good chance of winning so it will probably look close in many polls the entire time. Get used to this now and set your expectations accordingly (ie do not freak the fuck out)

Well I disagree on a few points. The Covington story isn't going away (due to some very prominent people in media not allowing it to), and I think it's far from a minor story.

Beto on the other hand, seems like a very weak candidate to me, despite his popularity in Texas. There's no way a white man will be the Dem's candidate. Not in this political climate. They're the party of women (and hate) now. Kamala may be all of those things but she is getting all the attention on CNN, twitter, elsewhere. Once I learned how the media works I had a much greater understanding of the timing, coordination, and reasons for what they do.

Highly recommend the book "Amusing Ourselves to Death" by Neil Postman, timeless.

I have a hard time believing that any white guy is going to be the nominee for the democrats. Maybe it's me but I don't get the hype over Beto. He lost his senate race and was only close because he was running against Ted Cruz who people still haven't forgiven for his stupidity during the GOP convention and generally don't like. He's like the white maie Ocasio-Cortez who, by the way, ain't gonna sit by and be quiet while the Dems nominate another white dude. Kamala being a half black women would be more formidable but her personality will sink her just like it did for Hillary. Really not seeing some multi term back bencher congressman who lost a senate race becoming president (even Obama won his senate seat before running and was a novelty as the first black president).

Post: #88903

I don't get the Beto hype either. If he won he was going to be a real force, but... he didn't.
It would be like if Trump lost the 2016 election and then ran again in 2020. Nobody would care.


For those who are curious, Beto's google trends link is here. Interest in him is back to where it was months before the election. He's completely failed to build on the hype and momentum he had in October and November. And there's nothing happening between now and the 2020 election that'll get his name back in the news, either. He'll be going into 2020 as "That dude from a few years ago that couldn't beat Cruz", which isn't a winning message by any stretch of the imagination.

Post: #88904

Finally.

*clap*

Post: #88905

Biden/Beto could be a threat. I dont think highly of Biden but he's well liked and could play well in middle (white) America.

Post: #88906

(01-21-2019 10:31 PM)TheBMan Wrote:  Biden/Beto could be a threat. I dont think highly of Biden but he's well liked and could play well in middle (white) America.

I don't think Biden stands a chance. I am not saying he's a pedo but those videos make it look like there's a high probability. I don't think he would want this exposed to the masses.
Biden is also quite old.

I think Beto has a much better shot than Biden.

Post: #88907

Just heard Kamala's response about how she would "strive to consult all of our military experts in conjunction with our allies in making military decisions".

It was functionally an open air pledge of allegiance to the deep state and the alien lobby.

Post: #88908

(01-21-2019 12:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-20-2019 10:43 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  ...
It is better to shrug one's shoulders and say, I know a few things about the world but I don't know the future; let me delight in what there is and enjoy the spectacle for all it's worth and for as long as I'm privileged to see it. There has never been a better or more interesting time to be alive -- and for as long as one Donald J. Trump is on the scene, there has certainly never been a more entertaining time. Take it all in and, as the man himself likes to say, we'll see what happens.

How are your kids, LOZ?

Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Post: #88909

(01-20-2019 12:18 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Clap like trained seals when this turd is dumped on the table:

Anyone still applauding at this point is the butt of a dark joke.

p.s. I could breach that shitty fence with a pocketful of home made thermite and a box of matches. With a smalll backpack full I could cut a section large enough to drive a cartel F150 through. Pathetic.

It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

This is the Hungarian barrier that stopped almost all invaders.


You've shown the strongest part of the Israeli wall, but neglect to show that much of it is like this


You raised a brilliant point about border guards not wanting any wall that'd leave their jobs obscelete. But that still doesn't change that any wall is gamechangingly more effective than no wall.

(01-22-2019 01:45 AM)Wutang Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 12:23 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  How are your kids, LOZ?

Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Australia doesn't have any wall to keep the Mexicans away. WA has a fence, but that only works for emus.

Post: #88910

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be impregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

I beg to differ. Both Hungary and Israel have the strong will to keep people out. I suppose that if you had that and could rely on it, then you probably don't even need a wall but sensors and a border patrol. That was essentially the modus operandi of the United States vis-a-vis Mexico since the inception. Presently, on the other hand, we have an anti-white party that is using population replacement to import a foreign electorate and become a one party state - and a traitorous Republican party controlled by the very same elites who are anti-white and want cheap labor. We have a ridiculous legal structure where we have to release anyone and ask them to return to appear in court for a hearing if they set foot on US soil - and that is to say nothing of asylum requests or the ludicrous interpretation of the 14th amendment granting birthright citizenship to anyone who stumbles across the border and gives birth. If anything, we need an impenetrable structure more than anyone else. Not that it matters much anyway if we are unwilling to deport the tens of millions of people who are residing here illegally and out reproducing us.

Post: #88911

Australia has a wall to stop. . .rabbits!

In terms of stopping humans, you just have to delay them long enough for a response team to arrive. I'm ex-military, combat engineer in fact. Basic doctrine is that all obstructions must be observed and covered by fire. The only exception is booby traps which use a different philosophy. Otherwise, you need eyes, ears and rifles on the ground to make barriers effective.

Of course, this is not wartime and so what works is probably a little different. You don't want to kill the f***ers dead, you ultimately want to dissuade them from crossing the border at some point other than a legal crossing. A/n FAV (fast attack vehicle - think "dune buggy with machine guns") with two personnel can cover 20 kilometres in 15 minutes. A Huey takes about 5 minutes to warm up but cruises at 200 KMH: that is a 12-man team in a 100 km radius in under 40 minutes. The border is 3145 km long. Roughly 150 two-man teams and 30 12-man teams could cover it. That's 660 active people; quadruple that to 2640 for 24/7 coverage and add another few hundred to handle electronic monitoring and you are up to maybe 4000 people.

But guess what, the Border Patrol employs over 21,000 people.

Post: #88912

Our wall is an ocean and our border patrol is the Australian navy with backup from our beloved great white sharks. We don't do catch and release, at least not while the globalist lackeys in parliament at the time are the law&order types.

The pittance of people attempting to boat their way into Australian territory get shipped back to a camp on some shithole island. If it weren't for our retardedly high levels of legal immigration then we'd be in pretty good shape.

There you go. Faggot progressives don't want a wall? Build a canal a mile wide and fill it with great white sharks or whatever shrimpy American brand shark you'd prefer.

Post: #88913

Although I’d love to have a big beautiful Wall, I will accept a moat under one condition: it’s filled with sharks with lasers on their heads.

Post: #88914

(01-22-2019 01:45 AM)Wutang Wrote:  Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Why would it matter if his kids are Hispanic or not? He still wants the best life for them. We don't need to agree on what way is best way to understand why a man would want the best for his kids, right?

Post: #88915

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

Post: #88916

(01-22-2019 06:54 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 01:45 AM)Wutang Wrote:  Aren't you the guy with the Hispanic kids?

Why would it matter if his kids are Hispanic or not? He still wants the best life for them. We don't need to agree on what way is best way to understand why a man would want the best for his kids, right?

And keep in mind that Hispanic is a cultural, not a racial, label. There are white, black, Asian, and mestizo Hispanics.

IIRC he mentioned that she doesn't think very highly of most of her countrymen. She doesn't sound like the average Latin American. She be genetically 100% European for all we know.

Post: #88917

(01-21-2019 08:31 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  I have a hard time believing that any white guy is going to be the nominee for the democrats. Maybe it's me but I don't get the hype over Beto. He lost his senate race and was only close because he was running against Ted Cruz who people still haven't forgiven for his stupidity during the GOP convention and generally don't like. He's like the white maie Ocasio-Cortez who, by the way, ain't gonna sit by and be quiet while the Dems nominate another white dude. Kamala being a half black women would be more formidable but her personality will sink her just like it did for Hillary. Really not seeing some multi term back bencher congressman who lost a senate race becoming president (even Obama won his senate seat before running and was a novelty as the first black president).

The Dems seem all over the place.

The hate for heterosexual males is YUGE. I also think this is going beyond whites and starting to include black males. Dems may not have said they are against black males out loud, but they are definitely concentrating on everyone but black males.

Then you have Beto who they tried to make the next Rockstar, aka Obama. They were somewhat successful and it wouldn't surprise me if they continued that push as TK talked about. I do think it is plausible even though they sort of painted themselves into a corner as the party of women.

It sounds like Kamala has a history of putting people in jail in order to advance her career. I can't see that sitting well with the main black demographics the dems need to turnout.

Beto, on the other hand, wouldn't have any issues.

Post: #88918

(01-22-2019 06:58 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

No worries.
To remove the climbing risk, just build some windows, and inprison some lousy celebrities inside in the wall.
Batman shows the way:

Post: #88919

You got it all wrong, Beto will be VP of course. The white Chad at the groveling feet of the brown woman, it's like a dream come true for every frumpy brown girl.

Post: #88920

(01-22-2019 06:58 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

A metal buffer at the top makes scaling a proper wall dicey at best. Look at the wall prototypes. That big tube at the top is designed to stop grappling hooks as well as to make getting over the "hump" at the top really difficult. That's a long way to fall and most people can't climb ten feet vertically, much less 30 up and 30 down.

Anyway, the very idea of Border Control is absurd. It's become normalized under globalist orthodoxy that borders are a police(ish) issue but since when specifically did the job of defending a nation's borders from illegal intruders cease to be a military concern? That's supposed to be the first job on the military's list of "stuff we're supposed to be doing".

Pension off Border Control or fold them into a special branch of the military and tell them to sit in a big, beautiful air-conditioned watchtower atop a 30ft big beautiful rebar reinforced concrete wall rather than trucking around waiting to be shot by a cartel through their shitty see-through-shoot-through fence.

One useless F35 costs a mile of proper wall and the people required to man it for a lifetime.

But the guys selling the F35s run the US government, so good luck with that.

Post: #88921

(01-22-2019 07:38 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 06:58 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-22-2019 02:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  It doesn't need to be inpregnable, just more trouble than it is worth getting through before being apprehended by border security.

Is any wall really impregnable if given enough time? That is why Border Control will never be made redundant.

A concrete wall can be climbed.

A metal buffer at the top makes scaling a proper wall dicey at best. Look at the wall prototypes. That big tube at the top is designed to stop grappling hooks as well as to make getting over the "hump" at the top really difficult. That's a long way to fall and most people can't climb ten feet vertically, much less 30 up and 30 down.

Anyway, the very idea of Border Control is absurd. It's become normalized under globalist orthodoxy that borders are a police(ish) issue but since when specifically did the job of defending a nation's borders from illegal intruders cease to be a military concern? That's supposed to be the first job on the military's list of "stuff we're supposed to be doing".

Pension off Border Control or fold them into a special branch of the military and tell them to sit in a big, beautiful air-conditioned watchtower atop a 30ft big beautiful rebar reinforced concrete wall rather than trucking around waiting to be shot by a cartel through their shitty see-through-shoot-through fence.

One useless F35 costs a mile of proper wall and the people required to man it for a lifetime.

But the guys selling the F35s run the US government, so good luck with that.

Still better than your wimpy shark idea!!!

Post: #88922

-

Post: #88923

You're right. Soros would inevitably just arm the wetbacks with shark repellent bat spray.

p.s. Caduceus is just too damn quick.

Post: #88924

What the fuck are these retard-Batman gifs that don't seem either animated or live?

Post: #88925

(01-22-2019 07:07 AM)worldwidetraveler Wrote:  

(01-21-2019 08:31 PM)doc holliday Wrote:  I have a hard time believing that any white guy is going to be the nominee for the democrats. Maybe it's me but I don't get the hype over Beto. He lost his senate race and was only close because he was running against Ted Cruz who people still haven't forgiven for his stupidity during the GOP convention and generally don't like. He's like the white maie Ocasio-Cortez who, by the way, ain't gonna sit by and be quiet while the Dems nominate another white dude. Kamala being a half black women would be more formidable but her personality will sink her just like it did for Hillary. Really not seeing some multi term back bencher congressman who lost a senate race becoming president (even Obama won his senate seat before running and was a novelty as the first black president).

The Dems seem all over the place.

The hate for heterosexual males is YUGE. I also think this is going beyond whites and starting to include black males. Dems may not have said they are against black males out loud, but they are definitely concentrating on everyone but black males.

Then you have Beto who they tried to make the next Rockstar, aka Obama. They were somewhat successful and it wouldn't surprise me if they continued that push as TK talked about. I do think it is plausible even though they sort of painted themselves into a corner as the party of women.

It sounds like Kamala has a history of putting people in jail in order to advance her career. I can't see that sitting well with the main black demographics the dems need to turnout.

Beto, on the other hand, wouldn't have any issues.

You do realize that Robert Francis O'Rourke is a straight, Irish man, don't you? His nickname Beto doesn't change that. I don't think he is the kind of alternate demographic the Dems would prefer.