Post: #44076

(10-19-2016 12:03 AM)Fisto Wrote:  

(10-18-2016 11:50 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Should Mr. Trump bring Jill Stein to the debate?

I bet Jill Stein was hot in her prime years.

Did you bang her younger version in your dreams as well?

Post: #44077

(10-19-2016 05:16 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  Classical Liberalism has much more in common with and is more similar to modern Republican & Libertarian ideas than those of the current Democratic/Progressive party, so it makes sense to describe himself as such.

Classical liberalism was all about free markets, limited and small government, private property rights, individual freedoms, free speech, press etc. From around the 1930's forward Liberalism has been flipped on its head to stand for the opposite of just about every one of those ideals.

(10-19-2016 06:04 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Well, in Europe and the rest of the world, a liberal/classical liberal is still someone that defends free markets, small government and all those other things. The script has been flipped but mostly only in the US I believe. The word "Liberal" here has a positive connotation if you're on the Right.

As someone who has extensively read up on liberalism (in the European sense) and the Austrian school, I'm well aware of all that, but it just seems that my brain short-circuited at the sight of this cuck.
My bad, point taken.

Anyway, something tells me I would still disagree with his interpretation of classical liberal ideas. It's an ideology like any other, many of its followers tend to forget that words and ideas should never overrule or ignore the reality of life and basic human behavior.

Post: #44078

Liberalism has a differant connotation outside of America, but these Non-US Liberal parties are slowly veering left as well. Globally, many Liberal parties are also linked with a national party.

It's coming time that the national component splits with the Liberal component and runs on it's own... Liberal politics and leftist politics are forming into one of the same.

Post: #44079

Before the debate tonight, lets all remind ourselves with some Trump shit posting.

Trump 101

Post: #44080

(10-19-2016 12:45 AM)Adonis Wrote:  

A bit of a digression, but what is AJ Delgado doing in this picture? I know she's on the right side, but she does not get a pass for her behaviour simply for that.

Harvard law grad, Trump insider, 36 years old and she still has to pose like your typical western slut for a photo.

Even the girls on the right side are mostly degenerates. Depressing.

Post: #44081

Quick anecdote on phone polling: One of my relatives, a Trump voter, received a call from the polls this morning. They were asked:

- Do Donald Trump's sexist remarks about women bother you? Answer: Sure.
- Do Donald Trump's remarks about immigrants negatively influence your vote? Answer: Um. Sure.
- Who are you voting for in this election? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein. Answer: Um. Hillary Clinton.

My relative is a woman in her early 30s. She mentioned that the questions were structured in such a way whereby she felt they would judge her as a racist or bigot if she said Trump. Coupled with the fact that she wasn't sure whether they had her details, she made a snap judgement on the spot to tell them she was voting Clinton.

One question people may ask? Well wouldn't this relate to Romney polls or Bush polls? No. This election has been framed around racism, sexism and xenophobia. People are losing jobs and getting threatened over Trump affiliation. This election is completely unique, and a true representation of the nation won't be felt until election day.

Post: #44082

Pol uncovers plot to frame Assange as a pedo, catches everyone

HERE IS FROM 4CHAN http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614

Post: #44083

(10-19-2016 06:52 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:  More peace loving tolerant Democrats who are totally opposed to intimidation

Yet another example of "tolerant" leftists only adhering to their own rules if you align with their distorted and myopic worldview. These people are the biggest hypocrites on the face of this planet.

Post: #44084

(10-19-2016 10:31 AM)Rush87 Wrote:  Quick anecdote on phone polling: One of my relatives, a Trump voter, received a call from the polls this morning. They were asked:

- Do Donald Trump's sexist remarks about women bother you? Answer: Sure.
- Do Donald Trump's remarks about immigrants negatively influence your vote? Answer: Um. Sure.
- Who are you voting for in this election? Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein. Answer: Um. Hillary Clinton.

this is an unethical practice called push polling. socioligists like Robert Cialdini in his new book (recommended) Pre-suasion calls it single-chute questioning.

its far more powerful than just giving a lopsided poll result. this is because after they get you to say you favor Hillary, then you are much more likely to act consistent with your own statement. Yes, your statement was contrived but you will act consistent with it.

p.s. it probably wasn't a real poll at all.

Post: #44085

(10-19-2016 10:57 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Pol uncovers plot to frame Assange as a pedo, catches everyone

HERE IS FROM 4CHAN http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614

This is by far the most damaging leak so far. If this can be boiled down in simple terms [Into a basic statement] for everyday American's, this will cause epic problems for Clinton.

Post: #44086

(10-19-2016 11:10 AM)Rush87 Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:57 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Pol uncovers plot to frame Assange as a pedo, catches everyone

HERE IS FROM 4CHAN http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614

This is by far the most damaging leak so far. If this can be boiled down in simple terms [Into a basic statement] for everyday American's, this will cause epic problems for Clinton.

   

He got that right.

Post: #44087

(10-19-2016 10:57 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Pol uncovers plot to frame Assange as a pedo, catches everyone

HERE IS FROM 4CHAN http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614

How is there even an election at this point?

The bible is going to need a new chapter for all this.

Post: #44088

(10-19-2016 11:10 AM)Rush87 Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:57 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Pol uncovers plot to frame Assange as a pedo, catches everyone

HERE IS FROM 4CHAN http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614

This is by far the most damaging leak so far. If this can be boiled down in simple terms [Into a basic statement] for everyday American's, this will cause epic problems for Clinton.

Clinton associates try to frame Assange as pedo in order to discredit his leaks exposing Clinton as an election-rigging pay-for-play witch.

Post: #44089

(10-19-2016 11:19 AM)Valentine Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 11:10 AM)Rush87 Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 10:57 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Pol uncovers plot to frame Assange as a pedo, catches everyone

HERE IS FROM 4CHAN http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614

This is by far the most damaging leak so far. If this can be boiled down in simple terms [Into a basic statement] for everyday American's, this will cause epic problems for Clinton.

Clinton associates try to frame Assange as pedo in order to discredit his leaks exposing Clinton as an election-rigging pay-for-play witch.

Emperor Trump must pound on this issue today.

Post: #44090

That David Soloff guy took a swipe at Reddit. Now all his tweets are hidden.

In that same thread they seem to think the girl from that Todd and Claire video is the same woman that accused Trump of rape recently.

The whole thing smells to high heaven. My "CIA shell op fake ass company" radar is going off the charts. The UN delisted them a few days ago from their company support list as well.

Post: #44091

(10-19-2016 10:57 AM)Fisto Wrote:  Pol uncovers plot to frame Assange as a pedo, catches everyone

HERE IS FROM 4CHAN http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/93582614

I tried to archive the link but was told it's already been done and was linked to the page http://archive.is/o42XX

Also, Fisto, is there any chance of you doing a Trump Hotel datasheet? I expect many of us would like to hear about it.

Post: #44092

Can someone screenshot that 4Chan thread for me? I can't open 4Chan at work.

EDIT: Thanks Lizard King

Post: #44093

There is supposed to be a "surprise" tonight right?

Do we know what that is?

I hope he does a Facebook Live before the debates and reads all her emails or does something about the O'Keefe videos, with the Benghazi soldier's mom and Malik Obama sitting next to him...

Post: #44094

First it was false sex assault allegations then it's being a pedo.

Time to turn on the fucking heat.

Post: #44095

Here's the forum's current near unanimous WB political commentator, Lauren Southern, on concerns the US election could be rigged.





It's certainly been a concern of mine from many of my prior posts.

Consider, Hillary is not the most honest and non-criminal person on Earth and she has clearly wanted to be POTUS at least as much as her husband did - probably more. Would it really shock even her supporters if she cheated? I really don't think I'm wearing the tinfoil hat here.

Consider also some of the recent skewed polling. The most recent poll from AZ show Clinton with a 4 point lead over Trump, but was a +34 Dem sample (not a misprint). Similar situation in GA although not nearly as bad. These are two traditionally red states showing blue right now on Nate Silver's map.

The only reasonable explanation I can muster for this is that the public is being groomed for massive electoral fraud. If Hillary wins these states, she'll have the plausible deniability that she was "polling way ahead" in them. If this is the case, things are going to be over very, very quickly on election night, likely to the tune of over 100 plus electoral votes for Hillary (I do NOT expect Trump to go quietly like a cuckservative who knows he's been cheated though - lawsuits galore).

One great thing about the Project Veritas vids is that they destroy the establishment narrative that "there is no voter/electoral fraud in the US". BullSHIT. There clearly is. There's evidence. The question of course is how bad it is? Did it have an affect on either this election or previous ones? Are the GOP doing it too in some places (probably)?

The need for reform is obvious. Voter ID is the simplest initial safeguard to enact and makes complete sense. We had it here in Canada since before I first voted and our democracy has not collapsed. There are likely other safeguards.

One thing is clear, the US citizenry will only tolerate the potential sham called "elections" if they think they actually control the outcome. An electoral system that completely lacks credibility will not function and the state it purports to support will likely topple as a result.

Post: #44096

It's fake, or sent by some Nigerian scammers. These are not the words of a native English speaker.

Quote:Todd and Clare offers remote phone and text chats to gentleman using our site to contact women singles. We are
not an adult site. We would want you to explain in the Ad that even you can use ToddandClare.com's mobile
dating services, for chats with women, from behind your embassy walls.

https://wikileaks.org/IMG/pdf/toddandcla...p-2016.pdf

Who talks like that? Not that 4Chan has ever been wrong before.

Post: #44097

Most stuff I read from Clinton people is absolutely retarded, in phrasing and language and in content. Would not be surprised if it is from them.

Post: #44098

(10-19-2016 10:23 AM)DannyAlberta Wrote:  

(10-19-2016 12:45 AM)Adonis Wrote:  

A bit of a digression, but what is AJ Delgado doing in this picture? I know she's on the right side, but she does not get a pass for her behaviour simply for that.

Kind of looks to me like she was saying something. Hard to say without seeing other photos of this moment.

Post: #44099

Latest poll from Arizona, which has Clinton up by 5. Media is furiously wanking over this.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/poli.../92390100/

Sample Breakdown: 58% D, 23 % R, 19 % I

The gaslighting is reaching all time highs.

Post: #44100

58%? What the hell?

By comparision...

California Party Affiliation from Google...:

" The share of registered voters who are Democrats (44.8%) is up from 2012 (43.7%), while the share of Republicans (27.3%) is down (from 29.4%). The share of voters who say they are independent (also known as "decline to state” or "no party preference”) has been increasing: it is now 23.3%, up from 20.9% in 2012.""

So they expect us to believe that Arizona is now more democratic than California?