Post: #19751

I've been pretty hard on Trump since the beginning but his integrity and character is pretty solid in my opinion. Here are the things i've noticed about him in the media and his past:

He keeps good friends even if he's completely politically split from them and socially outclasses them. Howard Stern comes to mind. He defends his friend and even name drops him occasionally. There's actually negative benefit for him to be attached to Howard Stern at this point.

He's absolutely willing to deal with a lot of different people and anywhere. He has a luxury development right in the heart of the Philippines. I'm sure though he's gaining some benefits from that.

He's hard on employees but he keeps people who are reliable and have good work ethic. This is 100% what I do as a businessman too. There's quite a few accounts of Trump riding employees but keeping the ones who show they are capable pretty much forever.

His children are solid. No crackheads, sex videos, tattoos, or other shit unlike the Bush's or Kennedy's. You don't raise children this solid without good parenting and solid character. The way Eric talks about his dad i'm certain is for real.. there's real admiration there from son to father. The children and even women in his life have total respect for him as the patriarch.

He's consistent with his political views even when you go way back. I don't see any major divergences there. He's always said a lot of the same things he's saying now.

Post: #19752

Trump's campaign manager was apparently rough with a Breitbart reporter of all places last night.

I've been noticing that the media is really getting scared about Trump's disdain of them and his rhetoric about "opening up the libel laws." Of course, this is never going to happen, but they're getting frightened anyway.

They seem to blame everyone but themselves, of course.

Post: #19753

I plan on writing up a history of Judaism and Christianity in the deep forum someday, which is where that discussion belongs. There is a lot to cover. But the short of it is that Jews split between Christianity and Talmudism around 200-400 AD. Christian Jews did not believe in racial supremacy, believed in converting others, and went on to build Western Civ as we know it. The Talmuds were insular, did not believe in mixed marriages, fought to preserve their racial heritage, and have only sought to gain strength relative to others. The results speak for themselves.

Post: #19754

Charles Evers, the brother of civil rights icon Medgar Evers, endorses Trump and makes some good points.

Post: #19755

(03-09-2016 12:17 AM)BIG BOSS Wrote:  Glad to be pleasantly surprised. I suppose the everlasting exposure to the lame stream media got to me. Celebrated with a Trump Steak tonight and don't call me low energy kaotic. That's for the cuckservatives. Not those who've helped The Donalds campaign.

(03-09-2016 12:08 PM)BIG BOSS Wrote:  In the news, Trump is dropping innuendo that he'll choose Queerio for VP as long as Queerio drops out. No good. Tomorrow night's debate will be a Rubio/Cruz slugfest for the shenanigans in Hawaii.

(03-09-2016 12:39 PM)BIG BOSS Wrote:  I'll start sharing more content on the computer, there's only so much one can do on the phone. The Donald Trump Thread, for all intents and purposes, has become The Politics Thread.

The truth is, all of his republican opponents are viable choices for VP cause the situation is so dire. Although, Fagio is definitely the worst choice because cozying up to the globalist slime would be out of character for The Donald.

I'd like to hear people's predictions on this forum for who the VP would be backed by logical reasoning.

I seriously still think you're concern trolling.

First you said it's not looking good for Trump last night.

Then you say he's going to choose Rubio as VP.

Then you say all of his opponents are viable for VP.

Do you even google the forum ? There's a whole thread dedicated to who his VP might be, which I extremely doubt will be Rubio, or any of his opponents.

You're acting like every low post members, going into a frenzy freaking out that he's going to lose a caucus and time and time again get proven wrong.

Then saying he needs to choose a shitty VP to get more votes.

Post: #19756

Good longer speech by Trump after the recent wins.

Post: #19757

(03-09-2016 01:26 PM)Austrian Wrote:  Charles Evers, the brother of civil rights icon Medgar Evers, endorses Trump and makes some good points.

Same stupid bait question three times in a row.

That's the level of integrity I've come to expect from these snakes.

Post: #19758

http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-p...1?lo=ap_b2

Quote:Donald Trump has a commanding lead over Marco Rubio and John Kasich in their home states.

A CNN/ORC poll out Wednesday has Trump holding the lead in Florida with almost double the share of voters than Rubio (40 percent to 24 percent). Cruz follows with 19 percent and Kasich has just 5 percent.

The poll of Ohio Republicans has Trump ahead of the Ohio governor 41 percent to 35 percent. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz has 15 percent and Rubio is a distant fourth with 7 percent.

Post: #19759

I forgot to add..just look at the last 15 presidents of the U.S. and ask yourself how many of them have had real jobs?

There's a lot of silver spoon kids, career politicians, and lawyers but few real men who have worked actual jobs. I wish we had guys like Eisenhower still around because these were the real old guard. George Bush Sr was maligned but he was definitely for real. This is the sort of leadership and men that the U.S. has in short supply. It's all lawyers and community organizers ie. professional bullshitters now and has been for some time.

Trump is a technocrat. A person who has a real track record of cutting deals and building shit even overseas. I can fly to a major city in asia and see a project he has a direct hand in building. It's pretty wild when I think about it because i've walked past this building a lot. This is someone who actually builds and does things for a living and has experience with that. There's a lot to be said about a person who has this business acumen in positions of the highest executive power. Trump is right when he says China's leaders are too smart. It's mainly because they promote technocrats to those highest positions. You can't outmaneuver guys who live and breathe business. America has been putting people into office who are humanities majors.

Post: #19760

(03-09-2016 01:42 PM)iop890 Wrote:  [quote='Austrian' pid='1244150' dateline='1457548016']
Charles Evers, the brother of civil rights icon Medgar Evers, endorses Trump and makes some good points.

-video snip-

Same stupid bait question three times in a row.

That's the level of integrity I've come to expect from these snakes.

It's perfect, because he's just the old man who'll swat the BS away and keep things real.

Notice how he had his arms crossed and head low, he doesn't give a fuck, he knows what CNN is about, and what shit they're trying to pull.

Post: #19761

It will go down in history that one of Trumps greatest defensive ramparts was his long running TV show. It bonded with the American voter. It insulated him from the media storms and opponent attacks. Utter genius strategy of long game.

Post: #19762

(03-09-2016 01:49 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Trump is a technocrat. A person who has a real track record of cutting deals and building shit even overseas. I can fly to a major city in asia and see a project he has a direct hand in building. It's pretty wild when I think about it because i've walked past this building a lot. This is someone who actually builds and does things for a living and has experience with that. There's a lot to be said about a person who has this business acumen in positions of the highest executive power. Trump is right when he says China's leaders are too smart. It's mainly because they promote technocrats to those highest positions.

While this is correct, I hate the term "technocrat" because it's been extremely maligned by the European financial crisis and EU's idiotic, totalitarian handling of the same. ECB, Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Slovenia and now Croatia all have or have had "technocrat" rulers (as chairmen, prime ministers and financial ministers) and have all been ruined by them.

These people have all universally been shown to possess A) zero business knowledge and B) zero positive intentions. Thus, the word "technocrat" has become extremely hated and is nowadays merely a polite expression for an "obedient EU shill" or "commissar".

China can rely on placing the most qualified technocrats in leadership positions because it is a sane country (oh the irony) and will really select the most qualified person. Europe and to a lesser extent USA - probably not. Our technocrats are simply different, so I would rather call Trump "skilled" than a "technocrat".

Post: #19763

For those suggesting a Trump/Lubio ticket, that's like "how to get JFK'd 101".

Post: #19764

(03-09-2016 01:30 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 12:39 PM)BIG BOSS Wrote:  I'll start sharing more content on the computer, there's only so much one can do on the phone. The Donald Trump Thread, for all intents and purposes, has become The Politics Thread.

The truth is, all of his republican opponents are viable choices for VP cause the situation is so dire. Although, Fagio is definitely the worst choice because cozying up to the globalist slime would be out of character for The Donald.

I'd like to hear people's predictions on this forum for who the VP would be backed by logical reasoning.

I seriously still think you're concern trolling.

I was just about to post the same, but in reading the last few posts saw your breakdown. BIG BOSS, you need to do your research before posting in any thread on this forum. I too think you're a troll, but for the benefit of the forum, here's a link to the VP thread. I noticed that it's located in the Everything Else main forum. I've requested that it be moved to the Politics & War subsection.

Post: #19765

(03-09-2016 02:17 PM)iop890 Wrote:  For those suggesting a Trump/Lubio ticket, that's like 'how to get JFK'd 101'.

By suggesting Lubio as VP he is effectively take a high value hostage. Fuck with me a foam party boi gets it.

Post: #19766

(03-09-2016 02:13 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 01:49 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  Trump is a technocrat. A person who has a real track record of cutting deals and building shit even overseas. I can fly to a major city in asia and see a project he has a direct hand in building. It's pretty wild when I think about it because i've walked past this building a lot. This is someone who actually builds and does things for a living and has experience with that. There's a lot to be said about a person who has this business acumen in positions of the highest executive power. Trump is right when he says China's leaders are too smart. It's mainly because they promote technocrats to those highest positions.

While this is correct, I hate the term "technocrat" because it's been extremely maligned by the European financial crisis and EU's idiotic, totalitarian handling of the same. ECB, Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Ireland, Slovenia and now Croatia all have or have had "technocrat" rulers (as chairmen, prime ministers and financial ministers) and have all been ruined by them.

These people have all universally been shown to possess A) zero business knowledge and B) zero positive intentions. Thus, the word "technocrat" has become extremely hated and is nowadays merely a polite expression for an "obedient EU shill" or "commissar".

China can rely on placing the most qualified technocrats in leadership positions because it is a sane country (oh the irony) and will really select the most qualified person. Europe and to a lesser extent USA - probably not. Our technocrats are simply different, so I would rather call Trump "skilled" than a "technocrat".

The term has been corrupted within the E.U. with political correctness and there's a lot of false prophets.

A technocrat is merely someone who is highly knowledgeable in a particular technical (usually STEM) or a proven business field who is in power and wields it accordingly..

It's interesting how a term related to promoting people who have expert knowledge in productive fields beneficial to society and the economy of their nation has become so maligned.

That says more about the individuals, the social environment, and the complicity of the media and the elite who are the gatekeepers and kingmakers when it comes to putting people in charge.

Post: #19767

(03-09-2016 02:20 PM)rpg Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 02:17 PM)iop890 Wrote:  For those suggesting a Trump/Lubio ticket, that's like 'how to get JFK'd 101'.

By suggesting Lubio as VP he is effectively take a high value hostage. Fuck with me a foam party boi gets it.

In what way though? They'd only be a bullet away from getting their favorite puppet into the oval office.

Post: #19768

(03-09-2016 11:09 AM)Emancipator Wrote:  



Trump Native Hawaiian campaign manager tearing up

MAhalo !

You guys must be thinking the same thing I do when I see white people on the news whose cars get stuck in floodwater.

"Why do we call em rece they humans"

Aloha!

Post: #19769

(03-09-2016 02:24 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 02:20 PM)rpg Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 02:17 PM)iop890 Wrote:  For those suggesting a Trump/Lubio ticket, that's like 'how to get JFK'd 101'.

By suggesting Lubio as VP he is effectively take a high value hostage. Fuck with me a foam party boi gets it.

In what way though? They'd only be a bullet away from getting their favorite puppet into the oval office.

It is putting alot of chips on the hope that nobody really wants to kill anybody to get what they want.

Post: #19770

(03-09-2016 01:49 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  I can fly to a major city in asia and see a project he has a direct hand in building. It's pretty wild when I think about it because i've walked past this building a lot. This is someone who actually builds and does things for a living and has experience with that.

Not only that, but if you walk down from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. (White House address for those that don't know) to 1100 Pennsylvania Ave. you will see the new Trump International Hotel under construction in the former Post Office Building. How about that shit? I can only imagine the scene there if Trump becomes president. All the SJW's will avoid it, and only the hot girls will come. It will be a poosy paradise in DC and Roosh will come back and settle down and live happily ever after where it all began.

Post: #19771

So Jeb is meeting with Rubio, Cruz and Kasich tomorrow.

More panic. That those three are giving a clown like Jeb even a little of their time says a lot.

Post: #19772

(03-09-2016 01:49 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  I forgot to add..just look at the last 15 presidents of the U.S. and ask yourself how many of them have had real jobs?

Warren Harding had been a businessman prior to going into politics and was one of the worst presidents in American history. He was dishonest at best and corrupt at worst.

Calvin Coolidge had been the governor of Massachusetts.

Herbert Hoover was a mining engineer who became a millionaire before he turned 30. He was also Secretary of Commerce under Harding/Coolidge.

FDR was the governor of New York.

Harry Truman did almost everything before he went into politics. He was a business owner, farmer, artillery officer, etc.

Eisenhower was a career military officer and the former president of Columbia.

JFK was a trust fund kid and a mediocre president.

Lyndon Johnson was a career politician.

Richard Nixon was a career politician.

Gerald Ford was a career politician.

Jimmy Carter was a naval officer and farmer.

Ronald Reagan was an actor, radio announcer, and about 12 other things before he became president.

George H.W. Bush was a career politician.

Bill Clinton was a career politician.

George W. Bush had several different business ventures, most of which were not successful, before he got into politics.

Barack Obama is a career politician.

I don't think presidential success is necessarily linked to "having a real job." Hoover and Harding were poor presidents who had real jobs, whereas Truman was very good.

Post: #19773

(03-09-2016 02:01 AM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 12:15 AM)Last Parade Wrote:  Trump's Megyn Kelly shoutout (and her genuine reaction - she didn't know the camera was going to cut to her)





She wants The D(onald)

You know when a girl is mad at you but she still wants you, then you use game to say something and she giggles? Kelly just did that, she is like a girlfriend mad at you that still is crazy for you, that smile was real and genuine, look even she looks better smiling.

Megyn Kelly: Trump’s Unscripted Campaign Is a ‘Breath of Fresh Air’

Post: #19774

I seriously still think you're concern trolling.

Just because I don't take Trumps nomination for a given doesn't mean I don't support him. Ive been wanting him to run since 2011, long before you said "fuck him and 2 party joke of a system."

First you said it's not looking good for Trump last night.

Never said that. Just said I'm annoyed with Ted Cruz.

Then you say he's going to choose Rubio as VP.

Never said that either. Just said he said its a possibility.

Then you say all of his opponents are viable for VP.

True. Ted is a good choice. Kasich is a good choice. If you look close enough, you can even see that I said Rubio would be the worst choice but viable nonetheless.

Do you even google the forum ? There's a whole thread dedicated to who his VP might be, which I extremely doubt will be Rubio, or any of his opponents.

My mistake.

You're acting like every low post members, going into a frenzy freaking out that he's going to lose a caucus and time and time again get proven wrong.

Not so. I had a lot of money on him winning Michigan and Mississippi and received a nice payout. Had doubts about Hawaii but quickly rectified that.

Then saying he needs to choose a shitty VP to get more votes.
[/quote]

Who? Ted Cruz? I stand by those words that he is the best bet. Flawed candidate but there isn't any other kind. Now go get your fuckin shine box.

Post: #19775

(03-09-2016 02:18 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 01:30 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(03-09-2016 12:39 PM)BIG BOSS Wrote:  I'll start sharing more content on the computer, there's only so much one can do on the phone. The Donald Trump Thread, for all intents and purposes, has become The Politics Thread.

The truth is, all of his republican opponents are viable choices for VP cause the situation is so dire. Although, Fagio is definitely the worst choice because cozying up to the globalist slime would be out of character for The Donald.

I'd like to hear people's predictions on this forum for who the VP would be backed by logical reasoning.

I seriously still think you're concern trolling.

I was just about to post the same, but in reading the last few posts saw your breakdown. BIG BOSS, you need to do your research before posting in any thread on this forum. I too think you're a troll, but for the benefit of the forum, here's a link to the VP thread. I noticed that it's located in the Everything Else main forum. I've requested that it be moved to the Politics & War subsection.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/pres...-i-talk-vp

Do your research. Amazing how a little skepticism in Trumps chances makes me a troll. Thanks for the link nonetheless. I apologize for not using the search function. Long time lurker, new member.