That tweet contains a link to a news story that a truck bearing the American flag and a Make America Great Again sticker was fired upon by two men (one Black, one Latino).

Trump just told the Cubans to GTFO. No further investment until there are no political prisoners, free elections, and all that jazz. Wow! That schmuck Obama must be FUMING

#MUHLEGACY

(06-16-2017 01:53 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Trump just told the Cubans to GTFO. No further investment until there are no political prisoners, free elections, and all that jazz. Wow! That schmuck Obama must be FUMING

#MUHLEGACY

It's a meissing. This is just a sign of how disoriented and lost the Trump Admin is now. Yes, I know Trump was very vocal about Cuba in the campaign. Yes, I know the GOP has a large clientele in Florida, and so, has to save face before it. Yes, I know Trump has to keep a bravado image to push other issues. And, what is he getting in exchange? Does he really think this is going to bring 'democracy' to Cuba? Does he know that American companies have been waiting for the green light to take over the Cuban economy for years before the Chinese do? Does he really care about Cuba or Cubans aside from someday opening a Trump golf course in Varadero or Havana?
You can bring 'democracy' or 'American values' to Cuba easier by creating a tsunami of American tourists and investments to the island over night. And American men would appreciate in they can go to Cuba without restrictions to pick up some Cuban pussy before it's too late.
Anyway, I guess President Trump right now is more concerned about selling weapons to Qatar... Wait! Isn't that a country accused by Trump himself of financing terrorism?

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

I don't know about you, but the conclusion I'm getting from this chart is that there's a staggering number of retards of every race.

(06-16-2017 08:34 AM)Turnus Wrote:  

There's an alternative deeper interpretation to president Trump's tweet here.

Robert Mueller is supposedly trying to trigger impeachment hearings, because the Trump-Russia investigation has borne no fruit. If Trump fires Mueller, that triggers (or strongly motivates) impeachment hearings.

So President Trump's tweet is letting Mueller know, that he knows what the game is - and that he's not going to play along.

This forces the democrats and congress to continue to strong play the Trump-Russia connection, which has borne no fruit.

(06-16-2017 02:40 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

I don't know about you, but the conclusion I'm getting from this chart is that there's a staggering number of retards of every race.

MPAI (Most People Are Idiots)

(06-16-2017 01:53 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Trump just told the Cubans to GTFO. No further investment until there are no political prisoners, free elections, and all that jazz. Wow! That schmuck Obama must be FUMING

#MUHLEGACY

Some of you really have no clue how Cuba works.

Fast Eddie Wrote:Trump is all tweet no action.

And you are Ann Coulter.

Scott Adams points out that this election was so emotionally energizing that many citizens are deeply engaged in government for the first time in decades. This means that many people have ignorant expectations of what President Trump (or, literally, President Anyone) can do.

For example, Ann Coulter tweeted out something like, "Days Spent Constructing The Wall = zero!" The Wall is a public works project, using public land. Therefore, the funding for it must be appropriated by Congress. But Congress can't vote on The Wall on its own; they can only vote on public works projects as part of the yearly budget appropriations meetings in September. Does Ann Coulter know this? Maybe, because she's stopped tweeting about it - but she sure as shit didn't know about this when she tweeted it!

Fast Eddie, your home country is Columbia. Whether that means you were born in America but fled to Colombia, or that you've never been to America, you're not as invested in America's future as those still living in America. And your knowledge base is just as impaired as that of any Columbian.

You've also already lived your own advice to, "Regardless of whether Trump continues cucking or rediscovers his ballsack the demographics are already baked in. Stack your cash and prepare to abandon ship." But continually commenting on Trump's Presidency isn't exactly bravely abandoning ship, is it?

   

(06-16-2017 01:33 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:08 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  What do Mexicans think will happen when USA becomes latino-majority like all the regions they're fleeing from? You know, the shitty primitive places they're eager to leave.

Does it really not cross their minds ? goddamn

Damn interesting how the Asian distribution is a lot more platykurtic but at the same remains comparatively populated far into the 130+ range. Very impressive. Seeing this I actually hope that the Chinese succeed in taking over Africa.

I'm not deep like you guys. Could someone please explain this graph? How do you determine a Chinese invasion of Africa from it?

Is this just a joke?

Aloha!

Leaving DACA in place is infuriating. Does anyone here think this is acceptable?

(06-16-2017 04:52 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 01:33 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:08 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  What do Mexicans think will happen when USA becomes latino-majority like all the regions they're fleeing from? You know, the shitty primitive places they're eager to leave.

Does it really not cross their minds ? goddamn

Damn interesting how the Asian distribution is a lot more platykurtic but at the same remains comparatively populated far into the 130+ range. Very impressive. Seeing this I actually hope that the Chinese succeed in taking over Africa.

I'm not deep like you guys. Could someone please explain this graph? How do you determine a Chinese invasion of Africa from it?

Is this just a joke?

Aloha!

The Chinese invasion of Africa is discussed on right wing political boards. Like the pollution of China and India regarding the cancelation of the Paris Climate Accord, liberals remain completely ignorant of China's plan to settle 100 million Chinese people into Africa. Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

(06-16-2017 04:54 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  Leaving DACA in place is infuriating. Does anyone here think this is acceptable?

As I've pointed out to Fast Eddie, President Trump can't repeal DACA because the 9th Circuit Court will declare that illegal. Yes, the Supreme Court could then rule on it, but the Court is only 5-4 in our favor. Why not wait until Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies to create a 6-3 majority, instead of repealing DACA now?

(06-16-2017 05:13 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  The Chinese invasion of Africa is discussed on right wing political boards. Like the pollution of China and India regarding the cancelation of the Paris Climate Accord, liberals remain completely ignorant of China's plan to settle 100 million Chinese people into Africa. Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

OK. So how does this graph relate? I'm very confused.

Aloha!

(06-16-2017 05:13 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

That probably won't happen. Genocide is not a Chinese thing. Assimilation is more to it. The Chinese will sinicize the Africans like they're doing to the Tibetans and that's it. The Chinese are happy to intermarry with suitable individuals from any race, from French to Mozambican. Chinese in general are not concerned with genetic purity like the Jews and White Supremacists are.

Robots are going to replace low-skilled workers, and those unable to find work in the new automated economy will be sent to Africa to grow food, build their clans and sinicize the natives. That's how the Chinese government approaches this problem.

(06-16-2017 07:10 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 05:13 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  The Chinese invasion of Africa is discussed on right wing political boards. Like the pollution of China and India regarding the cancelation of the Paris Climate Accord, liberals remain completely ignorant of China's plan to settle 100 million Chinese people into Africa. Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

OK. So how does this graph relate? I'm very confused.

Aloha!

It doesn't, in my opinion, because Blacks are listed with an, average IQ of 85, but African blacks have an average IQ of 70. The Chinese average IQ, listed under "Asian" is comparable to average Chinese IQ.

105 minus 70 is 35 IQ points. Holy shit, is that a lot. In America, if you have an IQ of 100, you're smarter than half the population. But if you go back to an IQ of 80, you're only smarter than 5% of the population. If you can envision a line with 144.2 million people on it, that's how many people represent the difference between a 100 IQ and an 80 IQ.

There's no fucking way that the African people can meaningfully learn to co-exist with the Chinese. Not in an economic sense, when the Chinese are the only people qualified for Chinese-created jobs.

Long story short, phase one of the Chinese plan is to send managers to run a bunch of factories. After that, wave after wave of Chinese citizens will flood Africa and displace those Africans from those factory jobs.

In 1960, before a bunch of technology artificially increased the African population, there were only 267 million people living there. So 100 million Chinese represents about 40% of the natural carrying capacity of Africa.

It would be shitty for the Europeans if the Chinese merely displaced the Africans, because then those Africans would move to Europe and America. And it would be arguably shittier from a humanistic perspective, if the Chinese "merely" executed these Africans on site.

But there is no way President Trump, nor President Anyone, could prevent China from moving that many people into Africa. (Though it would be amusing for liberals to say that America is a nation of immigrants enriched by the presence of so much hard-working Mexicans, but Africa *WOULD NOT* be enriched by the presence of so many hard-working Chinese. We could troll leftists further by saying that the Chinese only seek to perform jobs that the Africans literally cannot.)

Without the moral authority, nor military presence to prevent mass Chinese immigration into Africa, Africa is totally fucked. Totally and utterly.

The Chinese are just taking full advantage of their massive population and doing what they have done best throughout history: assimilating and sinicizing everyone, turning every place they touch into a part of the Sinophere.

Pakistan is feeling more and more like a Chinatown

Analysis: Russia's Far East Turning Chinese

It was created via executive action how can the 9th circuit even review the reversal of it? That would imply a president cannot reverse executive actions of a previous president.

(06-16-2017 05:15 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 04:54 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  Leaving DACA in place is infuriating. Does anyone here think this is acceptable?

As I've pointed out to Fast Eddie, President Trump can't repeal DACA because the 9th Circuit Court will declare that illegal. Yes, the Supreme Court could then rule on it, but the Court is only 5-4 in our favor. Why not wait until Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies to create a 6-3 majority, instead of repealing DACA now?

Thomas Jackson where have you been brother? It does not matter how a policy came into existence, someone can and will sue in the 9th circuit and they will rule on it, putting a block in place that stands until it goes to Supreme Court.

What you are - correctly - saying can't or shouldn't happen has already been happening, and it will continue to.

(06-16-2017 07:59 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  It was created via executive action how can the 9th circuit even review the reversal of it? That would imply a president cannot reverse executive actions of a previous president.

I don't want to be rude, but I wish you had asked (about six months ago), "How could the 9th Circuit Court, or any court for that matter, use the campaign statements of a presidential candidate, or his campaign team (!), to magically imply the intent of a law?"

Because if you had, you would know "how" the 9th Circuit Court would declare illegal President Trump's removal of DACA.

Yea i see your point. Just wanted to see if there was a specific legal principal or something anyone had read to this effect. I know the 9th circuit makes it up as they go.

(06-16-2017 08:10 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 07:59 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  It was created via executive action how can the 9th circuit even review the reversal of it? That would imply a president cannot reverse executive actions of a previous president.

I don't want to be rude, but I wish you had asked (about six months ago), "How could the 9th Circuit Court, or any court for that matter, use the campaign statements of a presidential candidate, or his campaign team (!), to magically imply the intent of a law?"

Because if you had, you would know "how" the 9th Circuit Court would declare illegal President Trump's removal of DACA.

(06-16-2017 07:33 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 07:10 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 05:13 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  The Chinese invasion of Africa is discussed on right wing political boards. Like the pollution of China and India regarding the cancelation of the Paris Climate Accord, liberals remain completely ignorant of China's plan to settle 100 million Chinese people into Africa. Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

OK. So how does this graph relate? I'm very confused.

Aloha!

It doesn't, in my opinion, because Blacks are listed with an, average IQ of 85, but African blacks have an average IQ of 70. The Chinese average IQ, listed under "Asian" is comparable to average Chinese IQ.

105 minus 70 is 35 IQ points. Holy shit, is that a lot. In America, if you have an IQ of 100, you're smarter than half the population. But if you go back to an IQ of 80, you're only smarter than 5% of the population. If you can envision a line with 144.2 million people on it, that's how many people represent the difference between a 100 IQ and an 80 IQ.

There's no fucking way that the African people can meaningfully learn to co-exist with the Chinese. Not in an economic sense, when the Chinese are the only people qualified for Chinese-created jobs.

Long story short, phase one of the Chinese plan is to send managers to run a bunch of factories. After that, wave after wave of Chinese citizens will flood Africa and displace those Africans from those factory jobs.

In 1960, before a bunch of technology artificially increased the African population, there were only 267 million people living there. So 100 million Chinese represents about 40% of the natural carrying capacity of Africa.

It would be shitty for the Europeans if the Chinese merely displaced the Africans, because then those Africans would move to Europe and America. And it would be arguably shittier from a humanistic perspective, if the Chinese "merely" executed these Africans on site.

But there is no way President Trump, nor President Anyone, could prevent China from moving that many people into Africa. (Though it would be amusing for liberals to say that America is a nation of immigrants enriched by the presence of so much hard-working Mexicans, but Africa *WOULD NOT* be enriched by the presence of so many hard-working Chinese. We could troll leftists further by saying that the Chinese only seek to perform jobs that the Africans literally cannot.)

Without the moral authority, nor military presence to prevent mass Chinese immigration into Africa, Africa is totally fucked. Totally and utterly.

China seeks control of Africa's resources, its people moving there is towards this goal, not as a demographic outlet. Too many chinese men wouhld be counterproductive, for one thing, the locals would resent it. They only tolerate them now because they see them as a counterweight to western influence, and because they have delivered, the Chinese development model being superior to the previous western one.

The old model was to loan funds intended for major projects to corrupt African governments who would siphon off those funds and repress their people in order to maintain their corrupt cabal. The Chinese model is instead to build and run those infrastructure projects themselves in exchange for natural resources. Their countries have benefited economically as a result of all those new roads, dams, railways, plants and other works.

The second phase is Chinese merchants and businessmen who will settle there in business centers, along the lines of other Chinese communities all over Asia.

The demographic pressure on China is actually declining, its population is set to diminish by about a third to a half by the end of this century.

I got totally juked!