(11-03-2016 03:34 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 03:05 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  I occasionally Skype chat with an Australian girl who is reasonably attractive, smart at psychology, and not crazy. (Rare combo.)

So I'm explaining shitposting and how difficult it is, because you have to know how to hurt people, and learn how not to care when you're hurting people. Empathy without empathy.

She says, "Psychologically speaking, that's psychopathy!"

And I'm thinking to myself, "Yeah it is." while imagining my favorite Trump smiley face.

Where does skyping a hot chick land you on Vox Day's hierarchy?

Hopefully borntomack busts out some pen and paper or some other solution.

Not to rain on your parade, but here's an example of a high energy <250 post count user. Via PM to me:

Volbeck Wrote:I saw your post in the Trump thread. I'm glad that my donation encouraged you to donate more! Please, go ahead and identify me<SNIP>

NOTE: Volbeck donated ~$950 which was my motivation to raise my level of matching donations.

Here's the rest of his PM:

Volbeck Wrote:Trump himself is putting everything on the line: his safety, his wealth, and his reputation. The least I could do was <SNIP>[donate $950].

I'm in Michigan and can make some reports that might be of interest to those who read the Trump thread. Would you be willing to post them for me if I PM'd them to you? After I attended the Grand Rapids rally on Monday, I went to Fricano's Pizza (mentioned in the Trump thread), whose owner Doug Fricano had taken a risk by writing a bold, unapologetic Facebook post about his support for Trump and why he was going to keep his Trump yard signs in front of his business. I ate there and had an encouraging conversation with him. Moreover, on Wednesday I attended Donald Trump Jr.'s rally in East Lansing, on the campus of Michigan State University. If you want, you can ask people in the thread if they want to hear about this stuff (feel free to copy and paste this message). If they do, all I need is someone who's willing to pass along my PMs. Thanks.

I'm willing to pass along his reports if users are interested, just let me know on the thread or via PM.

Separately, I also received another <250 post count PM from a member who can't donate through normal funding means, so if someone in the US wants to help them out let me know and I can get you linked up.

(11-03-2016 03:25 PM)MiscBrah Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 03:05 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  So I'm explaining shitposting and how difficult it is, because you have to know how to hurt people, and learn how not to care when you're hurting people. Empathy without empathy.

What the fuck. Shitposting isn't about "hurting people." Its hilarious trolling that draws attention to what you want.

Trolling is about pushing buttons while remaining disengaged emotionally, so not wrong. And certainly hope the trolling hurts people, I am still keeping fingers crossed for SJWs lighting themselves on fire next week. Very serious. Hope we get to play with rope too, but less likely

(11-03-2016 03:25 PM)MiscBrah Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 03:05 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  So I'm explaining shitposting and how difficult it is, because you have to know how to hurt people, and learn how not to care when you're hurting people. Empathy without empathy.

What the fuck. Shitposting isn't about "hurting people." Its hilarious trolling that draws attention to what you want.

It's either.

Demoralize the unreasonable and the uncivil, especially if they're members of the media. The unreasonable and the uncivil need to feel that it's hopeless, because Trump's supporters are so rabid, and so racist, that it's not worth fighting us.

Converse rationally with the civil and the reasonable.

Interesting how the older membership on the forum (and not just you MMX2010) has a vastly different idea of trolling and shitposting, as compared to the younger membership ...and the functions it serves.

MiscBrah put it perfectly.

Trump with a massive crowd in North Cackalacky!




C'mon Tar Heels, Vote Trump!

(11-03-2016 03:36 PM)ManAbout Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 03:10 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  ^ guys - what did you expect? The globalists have been building their nest egg for centuries now.

Trump is a globalist. His past words and actions are ample evidence.

If you are expecting things to change with a Trump presidency, I wouldn't hold your breathe. The president is only one man, the vast power structure that surrounds US politics and the global economy will remain intertwined.. forever.

Everyone should vote for Trump.

We will soon find out whether he can have any effect at all. At least he will be somewhat harder to control for the globalists. Especially his words will be impossible to censor.

I don't expect much in terms of actions of Trump, but hey - a tiny chance of positive change is better than none.

Besides - it's better to have an Alpha as a PR head than a gay, a cunt, or a gay pseudo-Christian like Bush. That is why guys still preferred Clinton despite him being married to TheCunt for show.

Trump as president is likely one of the cleanest, most masculine and smartest ones.

Even if he cannot do much, because he knows that that the real power-structure would crush him or his family, even then is he a far better choice than the Cunt.

(11-03-2016 03:45 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  Hopefully borntomack busts out some pen and paper or some other solution.

Not to rain on your parade, but here's an example of a high energy <250 post count user. Via PM to me:

Volbeck Wrote:I saw your post in the Trump thread. I'm glad that my donation encouraged you to donate more! Please, go ahead and identify me<SNIP>

NOTE: Volbeck donated ~$950 which was my motivation to raise my level of matching donations.

Here's the rest of his PM:

Volbeck Wrote:Trump himself is putting everything on the line: his safety, his wealth, and his reputation. The least I could do was <SNIP>[donate $950].

I'm in Michigan and can make some reports that might be of interest to those who read the Trump thread. Would you be willing to post them for me if I PM'd them to you? After I attended the Grand Rapids rally on Monday, I went to Fricano's Pizza (mentioned in the Trump thread), whose owner Doug Fricano had taken a risk by writing a bold, unapologetic Facebook post about his support for Trump and why he was going to keep his Trump yard signs in front of his business. I ate there and had an encouraging conversation with him. Moreover, on Wednesday I attended Donald Trump Jr.'s rally in East Lansing, on the campus of Michigan State University. If you want, you can ask people in the thread if they want to hear about this stuff (feel free to copy and paste this message). If they do, all I need is someone who's willing to pass along my PMs. Thanks.

I'm willing to pass along his reports if users are interested, just let me know on the thread or via PM.

Separately, I also received another <250 post count PM from a member who can't donate through normal funding means, so if someone in the US wants to help them out let me know and I can get you linked up.

We have the best <250 post members don't we folks?

(11-03-2016 03:57 PM)Wahawahwah Wrote:  Interesting how the older membership on the forum (and not just you MMX2010) has a vastly different idea of trolling and shitposting, as compared to the younger membership ...and the functions it serves.

Especially this part - "Converse rationally with the civil and the reasonable?" WutFace cmonBruh Kappa FailFish NotLikeThis

MiscBrah put it perfectly.

It's also interesting how that group has the, "Only my position is correct!" conclusion. And only that group will follow me around from thread to thread, calling me "Gamma".

While my position is that, " It's nuanced, with two competing but equally valid perspectives: Speak reasonably and civilly with the reasonable and the civil OR speak completely unreasonably and uncivilly to the unreasonable and uncivil to demoralize them."

If you have enough background in religious studies, you can compare religions which lack nuance and assume that their perspectives are applicable in all societies and situations with religions that profess nuance and blends of opposing perspectives. Which type religion is less tolerant and more violent?

(11-03-2016 04:14 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  It's also interesting how that group has the, "Only my position is correct!" conclusion.

Like you're one to talk.

(11-03-2016 09:45 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 09:35 AM)Libertas Wrote:  That was the second of three hoaxes yesterday. None seem to be sticking.

If we make it through today and tomorrow without anything earth shattering, we're in a good position.

They need something that directly hits Trump. Not some hoax allegation. They need him in his own words, or at least the words of people very close to him.

That we aren't seeing that tells me they're out of bullets. If they have one left, now's the time to shoot, or at the very latest tomorrow.

I'm just concerned that the attacks may still continue after the election is over.
We have to remember that while the election is on 8th of November 2016, the inauguration and actual transfer of power is not until the 20th of January 2017.

So even after Trump wins we have to wait more than 2 and half months after the election for him to take office.
Does anyone know the legal status of a "president elect" in those 2 and half transitory months ?
Can they still try to attack and remove him in a obviously evil and biased, but semi legal way ?

Oh, they will try to remove him, but probably not legal or semi legally. They had better have him making all of his public appearances wearing kevlar and some sort of bullet proof helmet.

But let's win the election first. We all know the Clintons will attempt some major election fraud on election day

(11-03-2016 03:39 PM)kaotic Wrote:  Okay I've got to ask

I'm pretty sure I made eye contact and gave a nod with a possible RVF forum member last night.

It was at a chain restaurant in Southern California.

Dude was dressed to the 9's with a custom fitted light blue suit, I think with pocket square.


I was in the bathroom taking a piss and I heard him in a stall, he was on the phone, talking about Trump and something about "they have a list of all of us" maybe implying Hillary's team. Also talked about WikiLeaks and the Veritas videos.

The way he was talking sounded definitely like our discussions on here.

I'm hoping it was an RVF'er if not, it's fucking awesome people are aware and talking about this stuff.

You might have just met Gmanifesto.

Lets be real, you just me the man Gmanifesto...aspires to be.

(11-03-2016 04:14 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 03:57 PM)Wahawahwah Wrote:  Interesting how the older membership on the forum (and not just you MMX2010) has a vastly different idea of trolling and shitposting, as compared to the younger membership ...and the functions it serves.

Especially this part - "Converse rationally with the civil and the reasonable?" WutFace cmonBruh Kappa FailFish NotLikeThis

MiscBrah put it perfectly.

It's also interesting how that group has the, "Only my position is correct!" conclusion. And only that group will follow me around from thread to thread, calling me "Gamma".

While my position is that, " It's nuanced, with two competing but equally valid perspectives: Speak reasonably and civilly with the reasonable and the civil OR speak completely unreasonably and uncivilly to the unreasonable and uncivil to demoralize them."

If you have enough background in religious studies, you can compare religions which lack nuance and assume that their perspectives are applicable in all societies and situations with religions that profess nuance and blends of opposing perspectives. Which type religion is less tolerant and more violent?

1. MMX I dont think you're a gamma or autistic or whatever.
2. I was just making a note of how the meaning was different in different groups.
3. My *fedora-tip* to MiscBrah was just an indication of what my opinions of the terms were.
4. Clearly other people's shitposts are triggering you. No need to be combative in every thread.

That being said, if you're gonna call the color orange "a nuanced collection of various reds and yellows", people are gonna call you out on that shit. Technically you're not wrong, but you're kinda KappaPride.



Anyway, I don't wanna talk about this much more since its a thread diversion, always open to PMs or posting in Everything Else.

I can get down with this

(11-03-2016 04:18 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:14 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  It's also interesting how that group has the, "Only my position is correct!" conclusion.

Like you're one to talk.

I am one to talk, because the most important part of what I said is that one group is following me around, waiting to insult me. Which is what your group is doing.

And which is also not what I'm doing to you.

Did you read the last of Anonymous Bosch's posts which detailed how Gammas never forget any slights, and lie in wait until they perceive the perfect moment to get back at the one who slighted them?

Jesus christ dudes, let's keep this high energy man !

(11-03-2016 02:08 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 01:35 PM)redpillage Wrote:  I don't even know why I bother to cast my vote at this point. I hope you guys can appreciate the implications here.

It' very possible that Trump will just be "more of the same". He is most likely buddy-buddy with many honchos on Wall St. and won't do much to piss them off. I'm voting for him solely because he represents a symbolic fuck-you to the liberal/SJW establishment. That and also the fact that his election would be a slight dent in the femcentric nature of our society. Other than that, I'm not holding my breath.

Agreed - I did vote for him for the same reasons. I even pointed out ahead of time that I believe Trump would be remembered as a mediocre president at best. But an irreverent personality like Trump as POTUS is what the country needs most right now.

It seems any hopes or reigning in the six headed 'vampire squid' is a battle reserved for another day. Still pisses me off though. Based on the lack of response here I have a feeling that the significance of this escapes many RVF members here.

I hate to rain on everyone's parade and frankly it irks me having to bring this up only days ahead of the election. But Goldman Sachs represents globalism at its core. This is what we are fighting, isn't it?

For the record, I did vote for Trump and I would have done it even knowing that he's in bed with GS (in a way I did actually suspect it). The alternative would just be too unbearable to even imagine.

(11-03-2016 02:27 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  

Okay, I can get around that perspective. Maybe there is hope after all ;-)

I also want to add that I think Trump is funny as hell. After 8 years of the dreadfully boring and inauthentic Obama, I think many people underestimate that Trump is also a form of comedic relief for the country that we desperately need.

I lol'd at this pretty hard, despite the fact that it was a bit fucked up on Trump's part.

(11-03-2016 04:40 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:18 PM)Comte De St. Germain Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:14 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  It's also interesting how that group has the, "Only my position is correct!" conclusion.

Like you're one to talk.

I am one to talk, because the most important part of what I said is that one group is following me around, waiting to insult me. Which is what your group is doing.

And which is also not what I'm doing to you.

Did you read the last of Anonymous Bosch's posts which detailed how Gammas never forget any slights, and lie in wait until they perceive the perfect moment to get back at the one who slighted them?

I don't wait for the perfect moment. I just don't want a supposedly well vetted member mouthing off about skyping with chicks in different countries with no perceived returns like it's the coolest thing. That's not a good example to follow.

Anyways I'm out good luck with your International Aussie chick. Maybe she'll bang you when you fly in.

And as for your sanctimonious attitude Mr. I'm One to Talk, I'll just wait for your thread where you claim to have fought off got curbstomped by 30 "white knights".

Vote cast for Trump this afternoon fellas.

(11-03-2016 04:52 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  I lol'd at this pretty hard, despite the fact that it was a bit fucked up on Trump's part.

Trump does the same mocking flailing arm gesture and stuttering voice that I use to make fun of anyone I think is stupid or ridiculous. I think Trump just got really unlucky that he did it to make fun of a reporter that also just happened to be disabled, and the media pounced on it to claim Trump was specifically making fun of the guy's disability.

(11-03-2016 05:13 PM)Shrodax Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 04:52 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  I lol'd at this pretty hard, despite the fact that it was a bit fucked up on Trump's part.

Trump does the same mocking flailing arm gesture and stuttering voice that I use to make fun of anyone I think is stupid or ridiculous. I think Trump just got really unlucky that he did it to make fun of a reporter that also just happened to be disabled, and the media pounced on it to claim Trump was specifically making fun of the guy's disability.

(11-03-2016 03:54 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 03:25 PM)MiscBrah Wrote:  

(11-03-2016 03:05 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  So I'm explaining shitposting and how difficult it is, because you have to know how to hurt people, and learn how not to care when you're hurting people. Empathy without empathy.

What the fuck. Shitposting isn't about "hurting people." Its hilarious trolling that draws attention to what you want.

It's either.

Demoralize the unreasonable and the uncivil, especially if they're members of the media. The unreasonable and the uncivil need to feel that it's hopeless, because Trump's supporters are so rabid, and so racist, that it's not worth fighting us.

Converse rationally with the civil and the reasonable.

Where are these rational people you speak of? (This isn't directed at you MMX, its directed at anyone who ignores the fundamental paradigm shift we're dealing with going forward. The left threw facts out the window, we have to beat them at their own game.)

For years the "rational" brand of politics was afraid of being called racists so they where the left's whipping boy. And the left got so uppity that they created so much resentment that we embraced a billionaire, former democrat who had hundreds of politicians in his pocket, the media's darling, and friends in all the right places. We embraced him quicker than little dark could empty a M1 magazine.

His decision to run isn't rational. The left was never rational. Republicans were afraid of the media calling them names.

The only thing that counts is will and self belief. That persuades rational people to do irrational things. Isn't this a game website?

The people in power know that rationality isn't powerful. You have to fight emotion with emotion. When their shitty foot soldiers try to shame you, you logic bomb them so while you're discussing "facts" you're really nuking their "superiority" and thus sending them into an ego spiral because around here, we wear snarkproof vests. Kevlar.