(10-26-2016 03:37 PM)Latinopan Wrote: Democrats Busted On Camera Stuffing Ballot Boxes
This is how dead people vote
Notice how they are always women.
Who ever is putting out these fake/doctored videos is not doing the Trump campaign any favours. It reeks of desperation.
Moreover, it muddies the waters to the point where voters won't pay attention to them even if real voter fraud is uncovered, assuming that it is fake or staged.
This story can only be told 4chan greentext style.
>My hometown newspaper in North Texas just endorsed Ill Hill.
>Drive down there to cancel my subscription in person.
>There's a fucking line of people canceling, just the ones mad enough to do it in person.
>WEW lads!
>Get to the front and cancel it, tell the nasty woman at the desk that I hope their shitty propaganda rag has to shut down after this.
>Go pick up my 83 year old grandmother and take her to cancel in person as well.
>She's been subscribed for over 50 God damn years!
>Publisher comes out.
>"He looks like a nervous wreck, he's going down folks!"
>Asks us if there's anything he can-
>"No, you made your choice."
>My entire extended family cancels their subscriptions.
My northern Texas mega-church is doing its part to fight off the cuckservative votes. They were giving these out to everyone exiting the building last Sunday: http://voteundergod.com/files/2016%20POT...0Guide.pdf
I think it gets the point across while still allowing them to keep their tax exempt status. Average attendance is probably around 15,000 each weekend. Glad to see the church take a roll in this. Texas is dangerously close to becoming a swing state because of idiot Christians who think they can just "vote their conscience" and be morally vindicated.
Mike Cernovich has a great tag going right now called Hillary's bullies. Scott Adams did a clever reframe of the Clinton side as bullies, which we all know subconsciously but it brought it out into the open. Get to posting in there with all the shit Hillary and her side in general have done. All the snark. All the violence. All the intimidation.
(10-26-2016 05:25 PM)iop890 Wrote: This story can only be told 4chan greentext style.
>My hometown newspaper in North Texas just endorsed Ill Hill.
>Drive down there to cancel my subscription in person.
>There's a fucking line of people canceling, just the ones mad enough to do it in person.
>WEW lads!
>Get to the front and cancel it, tell the nasty woman at the desk that I hope their shitty propaganda rag has to shut down after this.
>Go pick up my 83 year old grandmother and take her to cancel in person as well.
>She's been subscribed for over 50 God damn years!
>Publisher comes out.
>"He looks like a nervous wreck, he's going down folks!"
>Asks us if there's anything he can-
>"No, you made your choice."
>My entire extended family cancels their subscriptions.
Barack Obama's grandmother mysteriously died the day before his election in 2008.
It's possible that he staged this in order to win sympathy votes and to make sure his grandmother didn't reveal the truth about his lies about himself and his upbringing.
Is it possible that Hillary will follow in Barack's footsteps (the way she followed in Honest Abe Lincoln's)? Is Bill going to have to hire his own security?
(10-26-2016 07:13 PM)Lucky Wrote: Barack Obama's grandmother mysteriously died the day before his election in 2008.
It's possible that he staged this in order to win sympathy votes and to make sure his grandmother didn't reveal the truth about his lies about himself and his upbringing.
Is it possible that Hillary will follow in Barack's footsteps (the way she followed in Honest Abe Lincoln's)? Is Bill going to have to hire his own security?
Like that Netflix show 'House of Cards' where they used her moms death as a way to get sympathy votes.
The Clintons really do reality better than fiction.
The death / murder of British MP Joe Cox didn't prevent Brexit going through.
Plus, whether it was Cernovich or more likely Scott Adams, one quite rightly stated that sympathy or pity don't generate enthusiasm to actively vote for XYZ.
We are in a "fuck you, pay me" election cycle. Typical sensibilities are gone. The story about your dad being a small business owner? That dreamer Raquel Gonzales who dreams of attending Harvard and becoming the first illegal alien female president? The war on women?
People have had enough of your pretty little stories.
Fuck you, pay me.
Chelsea and Bill could die on Nov 7th and its not going to change people's attitudes at all.
PS. Even the look at all these leather bound buildings I own/built wore out its welcome.
(10-26-2016 01:44 PM)Bushido Wrote: "WikiLeaks Just Released THE TRUTH About Hillary Clinton鈥檚 Health"
Email evidence of one of The Hag's staffers sending her information on drugs to combat...you guessed it. So it looks like she really does have Parkinson's.
Modafinil use isn't proof of Parkinson's or ill health, that article is off base.
I just posted in the Modafinil thread and several other forum users have experimented with it. All this shows is that she's using a compound to stay awake for long periods of time, probably prescribed to her for jet lag.
From the video's I've seen, she definitely seems to have some type of neurological disorder, but this email is not the 'smoking gun.'
more polling whitepilling - a false sense of hope or polls correcting in the lead-up to the election day?
Fox News released a poll today showing Clinton +3. It was +6 last week. For someone whose campaign is collapsing and making one misstep after another, while fending off one accuser after another, he's sure showing some life!
Poll still only shows Trump up 44-39 with men (gotta be a higher real number in the end) and up bigly with independents, 41-28.
Of course the skew is there, D+7 44-37 and Independent less than 20; note that's a much smaller number than the broader population, and again, Trump massively dominates that demo.
Lesser Dem count, higher Independent count - Trump is winning.
Already mentioned earlier, Reuters/Ipsos D+4 with D+8 sample.
Fun b.s. polls:
-Associated Press-GfK poll has Clinton +14; poll is D+12 with other demographic issues
-USA Today/Suffolk has Clinton +9: no methodology on the site but they have their electoral college breakdown as 263-180 for Trump, all the toss-ups lean to Trump except Wisconsin (others: Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina). Hey, assholes: a +9 popular vote difference equates to a shitton more electoral college votes than your model is showing
That Fox News poll, the cut in the deficit while the barrage and taking-offense is non-stop. Even more satisfying than the Reuters/Ipsos one, or the ABC News poll dropping 3 points in mere days.
(10-26-2016 08:45 PM)Last Parade Wrote: more polling whitepilling - a false sense of hope or polls correcting in the lead-up to the election day?
Fox News released a poll today showing Clinton +3. It was +6 last week. For someone whose campaign is collapsing and making one misstep after another, while fending off one accuser after another, he's sure showing some life!
Poll still only shows Trump up 44-39 with men (gotta be a higher real number in the end) and up bigly with independents, 41-28.
Of course the skew is there, D+7 44-37 and Independent less than 20; note that's a much smaller number than the broader population, and again, Trump massively dominates that demo.
Lesser Dem count, higher Independent count - Trump is winning.
Already mentioned earlier, Reuters/Ipsos D+4 with D+8 sample.
Fun b.s. polls:
-Associated Press-GfK poll has Clinton +14; poll is D+12 with other demographic issues
-USA Today/Suffolk has Clinton +9: no methodology on the site but they have their electoral college breakdown as 263-180 for Trump, all the toss-ups lean to Trump except Wisconsin (others: Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina). Hey, assholes: a +9 popular vote difference equates to a shitton more electoral college votes than your model is showing
That Fox News poll, the cut in the deficit while the barrage and taking-offense is non-stop. Even more satisfying than the Reuters/Ipsos one, or the ABC News poll dropping 3 points in mere days.
The reality is that Trump has likely always been winning, it's just the polls that give a fictional sense of the race 'swinging' all over the place.
Unless there is some major rigging event that is unaccounted for, most of them should swing to Trump +3 by early November.
(10-26-2016 08:50 PM)Rush87 Wrote: The reality is that Trump has likely always been winning, it's just the polls that give a fictional sense of the race 'swinging' all over the place.
Unless there is some major rigging event that is unaccounted for, most of them should swing to Trump +3 by early November.
I know. It'll be fascinating to see next week, these double digit polls have to drop to like, +6 next week, to be at +2 or +3 Clinton to give a slight veneer of respectability if/when they're wrong on election day.
Got a political "survey" call tonight that quickly turned into a man trying to strong arm me into giving my support to Hillary. After a few questions they asked, "Many people say they can't vote for Trump because he's a racist and terribly sexist. Would agree with that or disagree?" Notice how disagreeing is the same as saying you're a racist and sexist too.
Then, "Many people can't vote for Trump because his economic plan will destroy the economy and put millions out of work."
A few more like that before moving on to Hillary. "Many people are voting for Hillary Clinton because of her wealth of experience and strong plan for the economy - creating 10 million jobs in her first term alone."
Then, "Many people are voting for Hillary Clinton because she stands up to both Republicans and Democrats and does what's right."
This went on for several more questions and I gave the "wrong" answer every time. Then I spent a few minutes refuting the claims being made before he gave up and said, "Well sir, the survey is over, I have to go."
One more, because there's dozens of these now but I knew you guys would appreciate the dark humor. These types of memes absolutely obliterate the left's arguments for a variety of issues. Brilliant.
Tweeting that last one, Gmac. Hilarious. Autocomplete for #DraftOurDaughters, however, was #DraftOurDaughers, without the t.
So, if these are real hashtags is Twitter fucking with things again? Cernovich caught them subtly altering hashtags several weeks ago IIRC to hide tweets from searches and kill trending hashtags.
Edit - by "real" I mean hashtags people are actually using... and there's stuff showing up under both spellings, but the correct spelling is not showing up in autocomplete. Fuck you, Twitter.