(04-10-2016 08:54 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(04-10-2016 08:19 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  See, that's the thing. Dudes just like using the word -- it satisfies some centipede taste bud, I guess.

But the centipede needs to remember that it's a nimble navigator. TWO HOLLOW FANGS.

"Cuck" plays in chanworld. Real live SJWs don't care.

Try "traitor". It will trigger and hurt them. Nothing infuriates them more than this word, because they know they totally deserve it.

Traitor to what? well, they (the SJWs) know in their heart what: to their nation, ethnic group, national history, family values, ancestors, even to God's or nature's will... have your pick. They know they are traitors to many things.

Try it, you'll see them turn white with the sting and impact of this word!

^On that note, Ive been thinking we need to form a complete and comprehensive list of traitors that have come out as a result of this election. Every GOP leader who flipped to endorse Cruz when it became a two man race. Every "Never Trump" campaigner. Every media figure that pushed ridiculously stupid anti-trump narrative. Every official who has frauded or cheated the trump campaign in each state.

It should have their name, who they are, and their act of betrayal. The list should enable the momentum from the Trump movement to carry through to our future elections at the local state and federal level, so our efforts now do not go to waste.

Anabasis, your characterization of these states is extremely accurate.

South Dakota and Nebraska are locks for Cruz. Montana is a more interesting state and while Cruz will probably win it, it could be a surprising pickup opportunity for Trump. If I were on Trump's campaign I would be looking hard at MT and at doing rallies there. It's a state that Cruz basically cannot afford to lose.

Make sure you guys catch Trump's latest Rochester speech, IMO it's his best and most high energy performance yet. He's improved so much as a speaker and as a politico; it's now virtually impossible for his opponents to slander him with claims of not having enough substance.

Notice how the same progressives who've started the "Donald Drumpf" meme are the same people who'll demand that you call Bruce Jenner "Caitlyn" just because he (oh sorry, she) "wants" to be called that?

EDantes it's just another example of left-wing hypocrisy. They epitomize the "do as I say not as I do" attitude.

(04-10-2016 08:29 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I don't think anyone actually believes that superPACs don't coordinate their activities with candidates and their campaigns. That's just a flimsy veneer to make the matter seem slightly less shady, but everyone knows the truth.

Just take a look at the http://www.keepthepromise.com/]Keep the Promise super PAC - does it really seem "independent" to you?



Not to mention that Cruz's own campaign has $8 million of unused money at the moment, so even if it is spending more than it is taking it can still last a very long time.

PACs aren't really independent, but it's still a major logistical issue, like a deadbolt lock doesn't keep your house secure. I'm not looking to Talmud this.

Basically, Cruz needs to win roughly 7 million more votes or he'll get brokered out same as Trump. Cruz's cheapest votes were on Super Tuesday at $3.95 a vote with Texas being the the big, cheap win.

Seven million votes at $3.95 a vote means under the most optimistic scenario, Ted still needs almost $28 million for his campaign, not his PACs. He has $8 million. So he needs at minimum, $20 million more, but more likely $34 million more due to his difficulties with voters in the remaining states, and this has to be from small donations limited to $2700.

And he'll have to raise this after he is most likely mathematically eliminated after New York and the April 26th Trumplosion.

Trump making anime real. Be sure to read the scrolling text at the bottom.

(04-10-2016 08:19 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  "Cuck" plays in chanworld. Real live SJWs don't care.

I think we've both made our positions clear by this point, but I'm surprised by this opinion.

SJWs are not known for their thick skin. Behind the politics lies twitchy, personal weakness, a desire to put as many degrees of separation between them and danger as possible.

They're not a coward if they condemn violence, not a sexual failure if they denounce rape, not self-loathing if they denounce pride.

My last word on the subject:

"Cuck" brings the fight back to their doorstep.

(04-10-2016 10:18 PM)Wutang Wrote:  Trump making anime real. Be sure to read the scrolling text at the bottom.

Fucking Japan. High school girls with IQ's over 100 and minds forever in a different dimension.

I don't think cuck works on the normies enough. I test out my insults all the time in real life. While sjw sticks, people just look at my funny when I use cuck. Even after I explain it. They think it's weird and brush it aside.

I think traitor will work better. I've used a variation of traitor by asking people why they want to sell out their country so bad and that always gets a reaction.

Just curious, does not Cruz's wife works at Goldman Sachs? I bet Cruz has somehow got his hands on Hillary's transcript speeches, I do not doubt Trump would find a way to get that too.

Trump 2016!

^ Highest energy first post in RVF History.

I really like "traitor".

If you point out they are going against Americans with their various positions and then call them a traitor I bet some might get triggered.

Others probably don't care.

I've honestly never heard the word cuck outside of the internet, except for this one time a girl had "Don't be a cuck" in her tinder bio.



I agree with LOZ though, cuck has been used way too liberally to the point to describe everyone we don't like and it's lost its meaning. Kind of like how the word rape has lost its effect.

What's worrisome is if the 51%+1 delegates vote to change the rules prior to the convention, that's why the establishment has been picking #NeverTrump delegates even in states where Trump won like Florida. They can try to change the rules to make it a lot harder for Trump during the convention. Not sure if possible but could try to make everyone unbind first ballot

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." - John F. Kennedy

(04-10-2016 11:33 PM)pot of smoke Wrote:  Trump 2016!

(04-10-2016 11:04 PM)cibo Wrote:  I don't think cuck works on the normies enough. I test out my insults all the time in real life. While sjw sticks, people just look at my funny when I use cuck. Even after I explain it. They think it's weird and brush it aside.

I think traitor will work better. I've used a variation of traitor by asking people why they want to sell out their country so bad and that always gets a reaction.

I feel like the actual word "cuckold" has a lot more snap to it. Quit shortening it.

(04-10-2016 09:11 PM)mickeyd Wrote:  

(04-10-2016 08:54 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(04-10-2016 08:19 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  See, that's the thing. Dudes just like using the word -- it satisfies some centipede taste bud, I guess.

But the centipede needs to remember that it's a nimble navigator. TWO HOLLOW FANGS.

"Cuck" plays in chanworld. Real live SJWs don't care.

Try "traitor". It will trigger and hurt them. Nothing infuriates them more than this word, because they know they totally deserve it.

Traitor to what? well, they (the SJWs) know in their heart what: to their nation, ethnic group, national history, family values, ancestors, even to God's or nature's will... have your pick. They know they are traitors to many things.

Try it, you'll see them turn white with the sting and impact of this word!

^On that note, Ive been thinking we need to form a complete and comprehensive list of traitors that have come out as a result of this election. Every GOP leader who flipped to endorse Cruz when it became a two man race. Every "Never Trump" campaigner. Every media figure that pushed ridiculously stupid anti-trump narrative. Every official who has frauded or cheated the trump campaign in each state.

It should have their name, who they are, and their act of betrayal. The list should enable the momentum from the Trump movement to carry through to our future elections at the local state and federal level, so our efforts now do not go to waste.

My my my, would you look at this web-wiki that has recently launched and is getting entries now?

http://judas.watch

(04-10-2016 05:15 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  I don't think this video has been posted before. It is truly excellent:

I don't usually watch Ramzpaul although I see him linked around a lot. He seems like a smart guy and I agree with him on most points. Yet the basic premise of his video - that Trump is doing badly with women and especially that he is doing badly because of the recent mistakes - is a fantasy based on indulging in too much leftist propaganda.

Have a look at the Wisconsin exit polls which show Trump being equally supported by men and women:

   
http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/wi/Rep

But maybe his female support has been higher before? That is not true either: Michigan exit poll shows that his support among women is actually climbing over time.

   
http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/mi/Rep

The same can be found for Florida, South Carolina and many of his other victories: all won with less female support than in Wisconsin.
http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/fl/Rep
http://edition.cnn.com/election/primaries/polls/sc/Rep

Thus I propose that Trump is not doing badly among women and that he definitely didn't lose Wisconsin because of women. His support among women actually seems to be improving.

On the other hand, it's entirely possible that Trump's harshness does not appeal to the cuck mindset ™ (Yes that word again! Sue me ) - many men get turned off by his attacks on women and their instinct to protect their precious little snowflakes becomes activated. Given what we know about the sexual proclivities and game levels of American men, this would not be surprising at all.

(04-12-2016 12:40 AM)MiscBrah Wrote:  This is getting too complicated for me. I'll just stick with faggot

(04-11-2016 09:02 PM)Emancipator Wrote:  Trump is gearing up for the anti-establishment Bernouts's desertion after Hillary wallops him, pointing out how messed up the primary process is on both sides.

I don't think any Berniepeople watch Trump's speeches or read any news portals that might truthfully report on his comments. Declaring that at a rally is like shouting into a tornado.

He should put anything he really wants to be heard on his website and Facebook and mention it several times in an an interview with a leftist media house like CNN.

Interesting article on Trump:

Quote: The Donald seemed hurt to discover the dirtiness of politics.

“It’s a crazy business,” said the man who helped invent the lunatic asylum called reality TV.

Could he build coalitions with people who had wronged him? Could he, for example, see appointing Sen. Marco Rubio to a position in his administration?

“Yes. I like Marco Rubio. Yeah. I could,” he answered. As for a potential Rubio vice president: “There are people I have in mind in terms of vice president. I just haven’t told anybody names. ... I do like Marco. I do like (John) Kasich. … I like (Scott) Walker actually in a lot of ways. I hit him very hard. ... But I’ve always liked him. There are people I like, but I don’t think they like me because I have hit them hard.”

He seems to have forgiven Rubio for his cringe-inducing attempt at stand-up comedy at Trump’s expense. “He made a mistake,” Trump said. “He became Don Rickles for about four days, and then I became worse than Don Rickles.”

[...]

When asked about the possibility of a contested convention, Trump mused darkly, “I wouldn’t be happy about it.” He added, “The nicest thing that will happen — the minimal — is that if I leave, all those people are gone, and the Republicans will go down to one of the great defeats in history.

[...]

He then recounted a call he received from a liberal journalist: “How does it feel to have done what you have done? I said what have I done. He said nobody ever in the history of this country has done what you have done. And I said, well, if I lose, then no big deal. And he said no, no, if you lose, it doesn’t matter because this will be talked about forever.

"And I said it will be talked about more if I win.”

That last part is interesting. If Trump (and Bernie) lose, it will appear to people on both sides of the political spectrum that the Establishment doesn't give a shit about them. The Establishment only chooses candidates they like, and if the voters don't stick to the plan then the Establishment will dismiss the voters. Could lead to some interesting results.

Trump seems poised to make a move toward being slightly less bombastic, but think he will continue to hit Cruz and Hillary hard.

Why bother trying to pick an existing or creative word? Just call them all leftists. That's their label. That allows the battle lines to be drawn. That allows us a point of focus, a lynch pin to vilify and associate with sabotage and social destruction.

Especially those claiming to be conservatives -- they're the easiest target. Defend gay marriage? Leftist. Defend illegal immigration? Leftist. Doesn't matter what they claim they are. A cuckservative is simply a leftist in conversative's clothing.