Post: #51

The food people eat has a big role to play in this, believe it or not. Some foods are high in estrogen and can cause you to turn gay slowly over time. Also, plastic has estrogen in it. For example, baby pacifiers are laced with estrogen to turn kids gay from a very young age.

Ever heard of that Bed intruder guy Antoine Dodson? Apparently he was gay but then woke up one day and realized he was actually straight, he now has a girlfriend and kids. He thought he was gay because he was raped as a youth. Crazy world.

Post: #52

(06-07-2015 09:17 PM)TheYoungVeteran Wrote:  Some foods are high in estrogen and can cause you to turn gay slowly over time.

I don't think I've ever read anything on this forum so blatantly absurd.

Post: #53

(06-07-2015 09:17 PM)TheYoungVeteran Wrote:  The food people eat has a big role to play in this, believe it or not. Some foods are high in estrogen and can cause you to turn gay slowly over time. Also, plastic has estrogen in it. For example, baby pacifiers are laced with estrogen to turn kids gay from a very young age.

Ever heard of that Bed intruder guy Antoine Dodson? Apparently he was gay but then woke up one day and realized he was actually straight, he now has a girlfriend and kids. He thought he was gay because he was raped as a youth. Crazy world.

Post: #54

Gays becoming so popular is just another piece of evidence of The Cathedral at work.

Quote:In a two-party democratic system, with Whigs and Tories, Democrats and Republicans, etc, the intelligentsia is always Whig. Their party is simply the party of those who want to get ahead. It is the party of celebrities, the ultra-rich, the great and good, the flexible of conscience. Tories are always misfits, losers, or just plain stupid - sometimes all three.

And the left is the party of the educational organs, at whose head is the press and universities. This is our 20th-century version of the established church. Here at UR, we sometimes call it the Cathedral - although it is essential to note that, unlike an ordinary organization, it has no central administrator. No, this will not make it easier to deal with.

This strange chiral asymmetry implies some fundamental difference between right and left. What is that difference? What does it even mean to be left rather than right? How can an entire system of independent thinkers and institutions, without any central coordinating agency, recognize that everyone should go left rather than right?

http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot...ified.html

Post: #55

Kerouac wrote:-

"I've been noticing a trend amongst the "sexual deviants," whether they're prostitutes, porn stars, and/or homosexuals: they all have difficult relationships (or abusive relationships) with their fathers (or whoever was in the fatherly role).

In any case, their story, as well as every other disenfranchised group's story, deserves a bit of empathy, but unfortunately, empathy means votes, which parts of the homosexual community use to further their own fringe causes (Gays raising children)."

But was the difficult paternal relationship the cause of their sexual disorder. Or was it gay/ queer deviant behaviour from a young age that caused the paternal rift due to the father being unable to steer the child away from being queer??

Nature or nurture cause or effect?? I'm willing to bet that even in today's brainwashed PC liberal left culture that 99% of fathers would be very dissapointed, if not devastated if their son turned out to be gay.

Post: #56

(06-08-2015 08:31 AM)Guitarman Wrote:  I'm willing to bet that even in today's brainwashed PC liberal left culture that 99% of fathers would be very dissapointed, if not devastated if their son turned out to be gay.

I have heard many straight women express the idea that they would prefer a gay son, that they would not know how to relate to a straight son, and they would try their best to make him turn out gay or trans. They say they would be so elated to have a coming out party for their son, but would hate it if he wanted to just play football and stuff.

Perhaps this is a lie and deep down they don't believe this, but I have no tangible reason to believe this.

Post: #57

It seems the publicised, long-running story about homosexuals (recognition; acceptance; protection; advancement; marriage; adoption etc.) is a merely a convenient vehicle for an agenda. Of course the obvious targets are easy to list - the traditional male-led nuclear family and traditional values and beliefs and religion. One of the goals is to weaken communities in relation to the power held by government, corporations, mass media and the rulers who created the agenda because how will whites, non-whites, gays, lesbians, trans-gender people, immigrants all of whom by the way are all 'equal' ever pull together in the face of the malevolent power of authority, when in reality they each have disparate interests.

One of the early ways homosexuality was promoted was through TV. From the 1990s depiction of the usual nuclear family (married man and woman with children) suddenly became a rarity. Clearly this was no coincidence. Instead the unwed mom and the childless working woman, for example, was now to be seen. Often, bizarrely, in many TV shows, if the main character was an adult, one or both of his or her parents were either deceased or estranged from that character.
In the beginning, gays in TV series were obscure or peripheral players whose role was usually to provide the humour. That soon changed and later reality TV was an accelerator.
But everything the mass media shows the public about gays is so sanitised. We are supposed to believe they are just loveable victims of a patriarchal society. On the other the truth about gays (high incidence of relationship violence; rampant promiscuity; multiple diseases) is hidden away. However every chance to promote the gay lifestyle is taken. For example in sports, there's always extensive coverage whenever an athlete (even one out of a thousand players with a contract in a league, even if he's otherwise relatively unknown) reveals that he is homosexual.

Once the gay issue has become well-worn and stale, there will be something else to replace it. These things have been planned in advance to be foisted on the public at a whim.

Post: #58

(06-07-2015 06:34 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Usually the only people who support gays are people who have no experience with them.

This is surprising to hear.

Living in NYC, the "professional class" has tons of gays in it, and so any young working professional here has tons of experience with gay people, at least in the workplace, but very often socially. Nearly all of the straight people I've ever met here are very pro-gay, like absolutely love gay shit and think gay people are the best. It seems like every girl has their "gay best friend" and really gay people are just everywhere, it's nigh-on impossible to not have experience with them.

There are some, typically finance Republican types, who are just resigned to gays and maybe will roll their eyes at some gay shit, maybe let the word "fag" slip, but never actually speak out against homosexuals or homosexuality in any way.

For instance I don't think I've ever heard a "professional" person speak out against gay marriage in NYC. Working class people yes, but it seems to have little to do with what you said, those who know gays no longer supporting them. Tons of people here mix with gays all the time, go celebrate "pride day" like it's the 4th of July, etc.

Post: #59

Interesting to see DJ 'Ten Walls' making some uncomplimentary comments about gays in recent days.
Cue the usual circle jerk of condemnation from social media, etc.
Dude might well have nuked his career from orbit, at least in Anglo countries and Western Europe.
Seems like he voiced his dislike of how the LGBT narrative is relentlessly pushed on the masses, with a couple of choice metaphors/examples.
What no publication will admit however is that there's more than a grain of truth in his words, it's a fact that there are significantly higher percentages of men with paedo tendencies in the gay community than in normal hetero men.
The pink pound however is more important than truth.
As expected, most reports on this are completely biased, here's one which at least quotes a couple of pertinent lines:
http://www.mixmag.net/read/ten-walls-has...burst-news

Post: #60

(06-08-2015 06:17 PM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

(06-07-2015 06:34 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Usually the only people who support gays are people who have no experience with them.

This is surprising to hear.

Living in NYC, the "professional class" has tons of gays in it, and so any young working professional here has tons of experience with gay people, at least in the workplace, but very often socially. Nearly all of the straight people I've ever met here are very pro-gay, like absolutely love gay shit and think gay people are the best. It seems like every girl has their "gay best friend" and really gay people are just everywhere, it's nigh-on impossible to not have experience with them.

There are some, typically finance Republican types, who are just resigned to gays and maybe will roll their eyes at some gay shit, maybe let the word "fag" slip, but never actually speak out against homosexuals or homosexuality in any way.

For instance I don't think I've ever heard a "professional" person speak out against gay marriage in NYC. Working class people yes, but it seems to have little to do with what you said, those who know gays no longer supporting them. Tons of people here mix with gays all the time, go celebrate "pride day" like it's the 4th of July, etc.

Right, all of the people you've described have no experience with them. They just see them in superficial social situations. Try living with some and get back to me.

Also every fag hag is fucked in the head

Post: #61

I've just started reading this book and will report back once I'm finished. It seems to directly answer the OP's question.



In the meantime, what strikes me as most bizarre is how rabid the pro-gay supporters are. I'm talking about straight people who go out of their way to white knight for gays. They're often incredibly passionate about the gay cause and do not take kindly to ANY criticism of it.

I personally wouldn't mind if someone voiced a position calmly, saying for instance, "Hey, you know, I don't find anything wrong with gay marriage and that's why I support it". I would then present my opinion/counterargument and we could part ways.

But that's never how it's presented, is it? No, it's always, "Hey FUCKTARD, what the FUCK is wrong with you? What, do you live in the medieval age or something? It's 2015, get the fuck out with your bigotry/homophobia/hatred/ignorance!!!"

Sigh.....

Post: #62

A bit of a tangent here:

I just came from a church meeting and the one very liberal guy who identifies as a feminist and has been pro-gay rights in the past is lamenting the fact that his pre-teen daughter is identifying as a lesbian now. I suggested that she'll grow out of it if she's ever allowed to be around boys who act like boys so she can realize how much she likes the attention of boys once the hormones really kick in. I think it's dawning on him how much all this female supremacy stuff is affecting his children now.

Post: #63

(06-09-2015 06:45 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  I've just started reading this book and will report back once I'm finished. It seems to directly answer the OP's question.



In the meantime, what strikes me as most bizarre is how rabid the pro-gay supporters are. I'm talking about straight people who go out of their way to white knight for gays. They're often incredibly passionate about the gay cause and do not take kindly to ANY criticism of it.

I personally wouldn't mind if someone voiced a position calmly, saying for instance, "Hey, you know, I don't find anything wrong with gay marriage and that's why I support it". I would then present my opinion/counterargument and we could part ways.

But that's never how it's presented, is it? No, it's always, "Hey FUCKTARD, what the FUCK is wrong with you? What, do you live in the medieval age or something? It's 2015, get the fuck out with your bigotry/homophobia/hatred/ignorance!!!"

Sigh.....

I would love to a full review of this - maybe an article for RoK?

I have the same attitude towards you. I tend to be very live and let live with lifestyle choices at least when it comes to dealing with people personally but the insistence that you must sing the praises of gays and if you aren't 100% behind the LGBT cause then you get the usual buzzwords of "ignorant" and "bigot" thrown at you. The whole discussion no longer is about ideas but rather an interrogation of the other guy and his mental state and personality.

Post: #64

Call me crazy but my theory is, that the rise in gays and asexuals is natures way of decreasing the human population since our birthrate has increased so significant in the past 200 years or so, which of course has to do with our oil fuiled economy!

Post: #65

(06-10-2015 01:27 PM)Novus Wrote:  Call me crazy but my theory is, that the rise in gays and asexuals is natures way of decreasing the human population since our birthrate has increased so significant in the past 200 years or so, which of course has to do with our oil fuiled economy!

So why aren't there more gays in parts of the world where birthrates are 2-3x higher than they are here?

Post: #66

Good point, my answer would be, because we have the privilege of living in the west and know from a very young age that there are people suffering around the world, because of our ways of living. So I would think that this is altering the views of young people, making them feel guilty and deciding that this is wrong and has to stop, by not getting children for themselves they are helping the environment. while people from 3rd world countries have no education nor the time to think about population or the environment. those are just my thoughts on the subject, but I think there is some truth to that.

Post: #67

People were suffering horribly under the Aztecs before Cortez came. Everything isn't whitey's fault.

Post: #68

They didn't destroy and exploit the planet, and also they weren't 7+ trillion people living on earth back then. I'm not blaming a race, I'm blaming greed. We will see how things are once we run out of our black gold.

Post: #69

(06-09-2015 06:45 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  I've just started reading this book and will report back once I'm finished. It seems to directly answer the OP's question.



In the meantime, what strikes me as most bizarre is how rabid the pro-gay supporters are. I'm talking about straight people who go out of their way to white knight for gays. They're often incredibly passionate about the gay cause and do not take kindly to ANY criticism of it.

I personally wouldn't mind if someone voiced a position calmly, saying for instance, "Hey, you know, I don't find anything wrong with gay marriage and that's why I support it". I would then present my opinion/counterargument and we could part ways.

But that's never how it's presented, is it? No, it's always, "Hey FUCKTARD, what the FUCK is wrong with you? What, do you live in the medieval age or something? It's 2015, get the fuck out with your bigotry/homophobia/hatred/ignorance!!!"

Sigh.....

I think the yuppy liberal masses white knight so much for the gays because it allows them to experience some sort of peripheral victim hood which is sought after as a source of authenticity in the cultural marxist west. Yuppy liberals are a privileged class of people lacking in real victim hood so they desperately seek authenticity by piggy backing on the victim hood of others. They are so rabid in their defense of victim groups because their whole entire identity depends on it. The irony is that they are unknowingly aiding in the destruction of the very society which affords them their comfortable yuppy lifestyles.

Post: #70

(05-30-2015 12:13 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-29-2015 09:20 PM)Truth Teller Wrote:  

(05-29-2015 08:26 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Gays spread gayness when they molest little boys and make them permanently gay. As gays get more power and access to children then of course we're going to see faggotry rise in the next generation.

Usually the problem corrects itself after a good war.

I think it's a little deeper than early molestation (there's likely a biological factor as well as an environmental one), but I do think that homosexuality is going to increase in terms of "outed" gays.

Most people don't believe this, but the amount of gays who claim they've been molested or raped as children by older men is shockingly high, around 15-25% by my estimates of total gays.

No one wants to do actual research on this, because it's such a damning indictment.

It's much higher.

Here is an abstract of a clinical study dated 2001.

Quote:Abstract
In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300

Post: #71

Back in college I worked in the anthropology dept, a gut-wrenching experience even without the gays that worked there. Sadly, they made it all the worse. Before I transferred I must have seen a dozen strangers get felt up by them right in the light of day... I'd notice they'd get excessively "feely" with new students in particular, like hands on and silently dare them to say anything about it. I came close to knocking one faggot's teeth out once.

I got to talking about this with a friend of mine who was a police officer for twenty years. He said homos have more pedophiles in their deviant group than ANY other social group he'd ever encountered. Although they only represent 1-2% of the general population, they account for more than half of all the pedophile cases he'd seen. This would make homosexuals more than 30-50 times more likely to be pedophiles.

That "hands on" way they have with strangers extends to all age groups, not just adults.

Post: #72

(06-10-2015 02:30 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(06-10-2015 01:27 PM)Novus Wrote:  Call me crazy but my theory is, that the rise in gays and asexuals is natures way of decreasing the human population since our birthrate has increased so significant in the past 200 years or so, which of course has to do with our oil fuiled economy!

So why aren't there more gays in parts of the world where birthrates are 2-3x higher than they are here?

In Africa there may well be the same proportion of gay people as there are here, or more.

It has often been posited as one of the reasons for AIDS' quick spread there.

I doubt there are reliable stats on % gay by continent though. And many people of course fuck men but don't call themselves "gay". Our CDC has invented the category MSM, "Men who have Sex with Men", to cut through the bullshit of people who fuck men in the ass but want to say "Oh I'm bi, I'm queer, I'm pansexual".

Post: #73

(06-12-2015 10:47 AM)Gimlet Wrote:  

(05-30-2015 12:13 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(05-29-2015 09:20 PM)Truth Teller Wrote:  

(05-29-2015 08:26 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Gays spread gayness when they molest little boys and make them permanently gay. As gays get more power and access to children then of course we're going to see faggotry rise in the next generation.

Usually the problem corrects itself after a good war.

I think it's a little deeper than early molestation (there's likely a biological factor as well as an environmental one), but I do think that homosexuality is going to increase in terms of "outed" gays.

Most people don't believe this, but the amount of gays who claim they've been molested or raped as children by older men is shockingly high, around 15-25% by my estimates of total gays.

No one wants to do actual research on this, because it's such a damning indictment.

It's much higher.

Here is an abstract of a clinical study dated 2001.

Quote:Abstract
In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. This research is apparently the first survey that has reported substantial homosexual molestation of girls. Suggestions for future research were offered.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11501300

Christ almighty.

Post: #74

(06-10-2015 03:53 PM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  People were suffering horribly under the Aztecs before Cortez came.

LOL, first time I've heard someone speak of Cortez as a saviour. I'm not sure if I was an Aztec dude, I'd swap 'we have ritual sacrifice', for 'we are being wiped out by slaughter, being deliberately worked to death, and all our women being taken by the invaders as concubines'.

Post: #75

I usually love reading this forum, but I am surprised by the anti-gay sentiment here. People are born gay; it's not a choice.