Post: #51

Do you guys think that SJWs like this woman truly believe what they're saying? Or is it just that they've adopted being a SJW as their identity so they can't deviate from the script?

Post: #52

(05-26-2015 09:27 PM)Only One Man Wrote:  Do you guys think that SJWs like this woman truly believe what they're saying? Or is it just that they've adopted being a SJW as their identity so they can't deviate from the script?

I felt pity for her since she was at a loss for words, but considering she's your average SJW, and he's your average guy, this is how it should be done.

This is how it should be, not a staged, prepped, and rigged debate. 2 people shooting the shit, that's it.

If we bring in the best femenazi, and she were to 'face-off' with Gavin, would it be fair? A person who lives, eats, and dreams vapid nonsense, compared to your sheeple SJW?

Would it even be fair to the average population to bring in the best Femenazi, and the best Neomale? Would they even be able to relate to them?

2 normal people duking it out is how it should be, and from there we gauged that she had no idea what she was talking about, as do most women when it comes to this crap.

I'm sure if we had the crown f eme n it would have made for a more 'sensational' debate, but she doesn't represent the majority of women, properly, or at all.

I know some people were expecting more lights and fireworks, but you won't get much out of nonsense at its core, and this is what femenazism is in the end: easily dismantled with a little bit of knowledge.

Makes all their gender 'studies' useless, don't it?

What I was able to gather from the debate...

The sole reason for the existence of Femenazism is basically to oppress men.

And the conclusion that I was able to draw is good. If we can fold more SJW like this, many people will realize that they are the oppressors, the censors of our society, the people who bring about negative changes, and have no idea what their cause is about, or what they are talking about.

Post: #53

(05-26-2015 03:44 AM)RedPillUK Wrote:  

(05-25-2015 09:43 PM)Broady Wrote:  It was an entertaining interview but I wouldn't call her moronic.

Sure, she couldn't argue her case but she did maintain a degree of composure when she was clearly being baited.

Some of the feral feminists we get here would have just resorted to swearing.

She was an easy target.

Sometimes there is more respect to be gained by not taking the easy shots.

skepticalroosh.gif

I agree, she wasn't some crazy feral feminist, but he did give her the opening 10-20 minutes to explain her position, without really saying much at all before he got stuck into debating. She just couldn't do it, didn't have the ability to discuss her 'ideas' at all. That's not his fault. I don't see how she's being baited? It's an interview she agreed to do.

Don't get me wrong. I hate those feminist bitches as much as the next guy.

However, Gavin did start baiting her towards the end when he said stuff like "women have every STD under the sun", "women like being dominated in bed...choking them, slapping them, calling them whores", email received - "thanks for raping me".

She stayed calm and even made some valid comments about safe sex and education.

She's a feminist bitch, but she was smart enough not to take the bait.

Post: #54

It wasn't a fair fight. Heather Marie Scholl is a no-name. She sounds like an NPR broadcaster on sedatives. Gavin McInnes stirs up shit as a profession. He knew he was going to steamroll this bitch for the entire segment.

She let him make his points virtually unopposed. It was a sparring match for him. If she had any fans who stayed to watch from the bleachers, they were wearing bags to cover their faces.

Bring on Gavin McInnes vs. Lindy West. That's the matchup I want. The Shitlord vs. the Toilet Clogger.

Post: #55

(05-26-2015 07:31 PM)Jeans Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 04:48 PM)Nightwing Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 04:34 PM)Jeans Wrote:  

(05-26-2015 12:56 PM)hwuzhere Wrote:  

(05-25-2015 07:11 PM)Suits Wrote:  You're looking for a busy guy with a low post count who has had an account here for a few years.

He posts only occasionally, but it's gold every time.

He's never met another forum member, but he has a extensive knowledge of the entertainment industry and has added up a good number of rep points for a fellow who has never had the time to post up a datasheet.

Holy shit man. If it is who I think it is......

Mcinnes has been lurking/posting in alt-far right corners of the internet for some years ... I believe he has posts on Vdare dating back to the '05 or so. I feel confident speculating that he has some knowledge of the forum, and certainly ROK, but there's no reason to believe he's ever posted. Having been a big fan of his work since he was essentially the sole contributor behind Vice, I can say that it would seem he arrived at the large majority of his views quite independently of the last few years of activity on the manosphere.

Fun fact about this guy that many may not know and be surprised to hear -- dude was a WOMEN'S STUDIES major in college. True fuckin story.

He majored in English, and probably took a few gender related courses to get some action from weak femenazis. Who isn't guilty of that? Also, he went to Taiwan to teach English too.

Well, in some interviews he has claimed women's studies anyhow. He cited that the reason was because that's where the most lively debates went down, and he was mainly attracted to the anarchy of it. But also at the time he was pretty heavy into hardcore punk, and all of the SJW politics that go with it. This is like, 20+ years ago, and there's nothing wrong at all with having silly beliefs as a teenager. I just think it's a wild fact to point out -- rarely do those who start down that road end up rejecting it at all, least of all in public and with such invective.

But that's why he's able to destroy SJWs so well, because he actually really knows how they think. I've always been brought conservative - blue pill yes, but then took Math in university. I can't remember half the talking points in a debate in person. I smile and nod and move on.

Post: #56

Gavin's a dude who's fighting the good fight and not afraid to say what needs to be said. He's been in the hot seat a few times in interviews with feminists who are no strangers to professional l live debates - but he generally can hold his own.

I agree that this debate wasn't exactly a "fair fight" as Gavin is a seasoned entertainment personality who is no stranger to tense debate and live interviews where this woman is just some Feminist robot off the street chanting the party line she has heard and read everywhere since she was a adolescent. Nonetheless, I think Gavin maybe was able to show her how her held views are a little bit silly and nonsensical. Doubtful - as he even pointed out that many people who are ignorant/close-minded/unintelligent/immature will often, out of spite and insecurity, double-down on their ideologies when presented with sound opposition.

I would love to see him or Roosh have a serious debate with a well-seasoned SJW/feminist with prepared research and statistical data with sources to help prove their points.

Post: #57

I thought this vid would be relevant for this thread.

Here is everyone's favorite red head femcunt. This is what a feminist / sjw / progressive looks like when they are trying to use reason and miserably failing. I don't necessarily agree with the preacher but at least he was trying to debate in a calm and logical way. He does make some valid 'non religious' points.

She even has her own mock wikipedia page https://encyclopediadramatica.se/Big_Red

Post: #58

Seemed more like a slaughter. Entertaining, but not really what I was expecting. I'd like to see This guy vs. a more practiced feminist. My reasoning is as following: we pride ourselves on higher debate skills and more balanced arguments, so we should bring opponents of similar level together. Sort of like a boxing match between two pros as opposed to a pro and a newb. That is entertaining, but sort of not indicative of the pro's true skill.

Maybe roosh vs West? Paglia. But I sort of like Paglia. She seems lucid enough to have a real debate with as opposed to just a screaming match.

Post: #59

She literally got destroyed, I'll give her points on sitting through the whole thing and coming up from the street to do this.

Post: #60

Original Youtube video was deleted:

Post: #61

Ten minutes in, and it's like the German football team playing against Tonga. No f'n contest.