Post: #26

(05-09-2015 01:57 AM)Bear Hands Wrote:  Why did I click this? I expected a human cabbage patch kid and got Jeremy Clarkson.

At least you had an some clue as to what to expect, I had no idea who Amy Schumer was. All I know is I usually usually enjoy seeing women in bikinis. This thread did NOT go in the direction I was hoping.

Post: #27

(05-08-2015 10:21 PM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  Her body is clearly not ready for the beach.

Bullshit. Every body is beach body ready. How dare you deny Amy the right to flaunt her beautiful, curvaceous body anywhere she chooses - just because it doesn't conform to your outmoded Patriarchal beauty norms.

Post: #28

(05-09-2015 03:44 AM)davyjose Wrote:  

(05-08-2015 10:21 PM)iamdegaussed Wrote:  Her body is clearly not ready for the beach.

Bullshit. Every body is beach body ready. How dare you deny Amy the right to flaunt her beautiful, curvaceous body anywhere she chooses - just because it doesn't conform to your outmoded Patriarchal beauty norms.

I'm sorry, thank you for educating the shitlord right out of me. Amy's body is ready for anywhere she wants to go. The place her body is most ready for is the gym.

Post: #29

God have mercy.

Post: #30

She looks like a tranny Will Ferrell in that picture.

Post: #31

She is 33 years old? She has the body of a granny 20-30 years older.

Post: #32

(05-09-2015 12:57 AM)Pestilence Wrote:  This fat acceptance shit has got out of hand.

All this combined with Roosh's appearance on oz calls for either for a fatshamingweek or taking it to the next level - fatshamingmonth

A month is too long. You'll get to the point of diminishing returns that way.

Another fat shaming week though is definitely appropriate. It should absolutely be an annual event. And now is one of the best times too, since it's time to start getting "beach body ready."

What say you, Roosh? Fat Shaming Week on ROK every May?

Post: #33

(05-09-2015 10:36 AM)Libertas Wrote:  

(05-09-2015 12:57 AM)Pestilence Wrote:  This fat acceptance shit has got out of hand.

All this combined with Roosh's appearance on oz calls for either for a fatshamingweek or taking it to the next level - fatshamingmonth

A month is too long. You'll get to the point of diminishing returns that way.

Another fat shaming week though is definitely appropriate. It should absolutely be an annual event. And now is one of the best times too, since it's time to start getting "beach body ready."

What say you, Roosh? Fat Shaming Week on ROK every May?

I agree. I am looking forward to seeing this happen. I also remember seeing a call for a single mother shaming week. Single motherhood acceptance is as much a threat to our civilisation as fat acceptance.

Post: #34

The saddest part that just occurred to me...
This was a very supportive article, so those were the handpicked BEST pictures of her they could find.

What the fuck did the rejected pictures look like?

Post: #35

----------------------------------------

Post: #36

^ Girl is still gorgeous. Find me a girl that looks that good in last pic with no makeup on whatsoever.

Post: #37

Would bang Scarlett without makeup she's a pretty decent plain jane without make up. No college girl but bang worthy. So eh why not especially with what some guys in the Would You Hit it Thread have found bangable.

Post: #38

(05-09-2015 12:16 PM)tallandblonde Wrote:  ^ Girl is still gorgeous. Find me a girl that looks that good in last pic with no makeup on whatsoever.

I'll take it you're joking. Have you been to New York or any decent sized city in Europe. There are crawling of women twice as good looking w/o makeup.

Post: #39

i think Scarlett is still attractive, but she does not have a symmetrical face. Notice how her two front teeth don't meet right under the center of her nose, they meet under her right nostril - WNB (kidding).

Post: #40

(05-09-2015 12:41 PM)Goldfinger Wrote:  

(05-09-2015 12:16 PM)tallandblonde Wrote:  ^ Girl is still gorgeous. Find me a girl that looks that good in last pic with no makeup on whatsoever.

I'll take it you're joking. Have you been to New York or any decent sized city in Europe. There are crawling of women twice as good looking w/o makeup.

Post: #41

(05-09-2015 12:41 PM)Goldfinger Wrote:  

(05-09-2015 12:16 PM)tallandblonde Wrote:  ^ Girl is still gorgeous. Find me a girl that looks that good in last pic with no makeup on whatsoever.

I'll take it you're joking. Have you been to New York or any decent sized city in Europe. There are crawling of women twice as good looking w/o makeup.

I think that it's so rare to see a woman without make up on that a lot of men have no idea what it looks like.

And yeah I live in NYC. Many girls would make you want to bleach your eyes out if they didn't have concealer or any type of product on their face. Any good looking girl doesn't leave the house without putting makeup on, it makes a 6 look like an 8.

Post: #42

(05-09-2015 12:49 PM)Dusty Wrote:  i think Scarlett is still attractive, but she does not have a symmetrical face. Notice how her two front teeth don't meet right under the center of her nose, they meet under her right nostril - WNB (kidding).

It does seem that she had a nose job but I think the focal length of the lens is making her look worse here. With a wider angle lens the nose is exaggerated. In comparison, the portrait for the magazine would be taken with a longer lens. (Something like 85mm for a 35mm full-frame image sensor.)

Post: #43

Post: #44

(05-09-2015 11:51 AM)Dan Woolf Wrote:  

imokaywiththis.jpg

On topic, why did I click this thread? What is it in the human psyche that compels us to watch car crashes/train wrecks/Schumer in a bikini etc when we know it will repulse us?

Post: #45

(05-09-2015 01:31 PM)kmhour Wrote:  

"Size 6", uh, what?
What brand makes size 6 pants that fat?

Also, she's wrong, she'll change... into a size 7, then 8, then 9.

Post: #46

(05-09-2015 01:31 PM)kmhour Wrote:  

size 6?
maybe in dog years


edit, and for the guys saying 'scarlette johansen is 2/10 WNB", i'd like to see what you are banging.

Post: #47

Post: #48

----------------------------------------

Post: #49

(05-09-2015 01:31 PM)kmhour Wrote:  

Guess I'm staying on, because there's no way that shit's getting me off.

Post: #50

Schumer is a perfect 5. That picture should be the center post of the numbers system. Banging that would be like "ugh, I guess so, my pants are already off" No one would be happy or proud of it, but no one would march themselves down to the std clinic right after either. Banging her would be so neutral...an exact 5.