Post: #151

They're probing Joe Rogan:

Post: #152

Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

Post: #153

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

Just been reading the comments and replies on that tweet.

Reckon Joe playing it pretty straight forward and the white Saffas coming in and serving these guys, Bargain Bin Idris Elba in particular.

What gets me most about the I.D. politics crowd is how they seem to think their skin colour makes their opinions inviolable whilst they pursue a callous anti-white agenda.

The White Farmer >"conspiracy theory"<.. WTF?

Post: #154

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

They'll ban him along with guys like Adam Carolla and David Rubin.

Alex Jones coordinated deplatforming was the Camel's Nose in the Tent for internet censorship. We can now expect mass deplatforming of alternative media, including left leaning members like Joe Rogan.

The disturbing Left Wing-Big Corp alliance would want to get him for two reasons:

1. Interviewing people like Milo Yiannopoulos, Jordan Peterson, Steven Crowder, and Owen Benjamin and giving them a mass audience. God help Joe if he ever decided to interview Richard Spencer, Vox Day, or even Steve Bannon.

2. Taking away ears and viewers from traditional corporate Media. The Big Corp's HATE this. The WSJ Nazi smear of the until then completely unpolitical PewDiePie showed this. It's worth remembering that News Corp owns the WSJ. Think what guys like Joe have done to just corporate FM/AM radio by people listening to him in their cars.

Post: #155

(09-15-2018 10:35 AM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

They'll ban him along with guys like Adam Carolla and David Rubin.

Alex Jones coordinated deplatforming was the Camel's Nose in the Tent for internet censorship. We can now expect mass deplatforming of alternative media, including left leaning members like Joe Rogan.

I don't wish for anyone else to be banned, but what you said needs to happen for the normies to wake up. Once their beloved entertainment is removed, they will raise a stink in a way that they didn't when the likes of me, Alex Jones, and Andrew Anglin were banned.

Post: #156

I said in another thread the best possible thing that could happen for free speech right now would be a Trump ban on Twitter for similar reasons, it would light a fire under not only the president's ass but many willing to waffle on free speech when it comes to unpopular opinion.

Edit: off topic but read a hundred or so pages of Game and if anything the book will not only help men but improve gender relations, being banned as some form of hate mongering is an abomination.

Post: #157

(09-15-2018 11:09 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 10:35 AM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

They'll ban him along with guys like Adam Carolla and David Rubin.

Alex Jones coordinated deplatforming was the Camel's Nose in the Tent for internet censorship. We can now expect mass deplatforming of alternative media, including left leaning members like Joe Rogan.

I don't wish for anyone else to be banned, but what you said needs to happen for the normies to wake up. Once their beloved entertainment is removed, they will raise a stink in a way that they didn't when the likes of me, Alex Jones, and Andrew Anglin were banned.

If even a couple of these guys are banned, a new network could swoop them up and instantly have 10x the viewership of shitshows like CNBC and CNN.

Post: #158

(09-15-2018 11:23 AM)Laner Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 11:09 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 10:35 AM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

They'll ban him along with guys like Adam Carolla and David Rubin.

Alex Jones coordinated deplatforming was the Camel's Nose in the Tent for internet censorship. We can now expect mass deplatforming of alternative media, including left leaning members like Joe Rogan.

I don't wish for anyone else to be banned, but what you said needs to happen for the normies to wake up. Once their beloved entertainment is removed, they will raise a stink in a way that they didn't when the likes of me, Alex Jones, and Andrew Anglin were banned.

If even a couple of these guys are banned, a new network could swoop them up and instantly have 10x the viewership of shitshows like CNBC and CNN.

They would kill it within a year with the limitations they would put on him. Can you imagine him on a sanitized network show? His Elon interview was barely tolerable even with him giving Elon a joint, imagines him doing that interview under network restrictions?

Post: #159

(09-15-2018 09:00 AM)Roosh Wrote:  They're probing Joe Rogan:

Why is Rogan bothering to respond to Bargin Bin Idris? The dude has 138 followers. My burner account that got banned in about 2 weeks had more than that; all organic too.

The left has been overusing the term "Conspiracy Theory." I don't think people are buying it anymore. The ones that still indulge in the term are people that obviously have an interest in the destruction of western civilization and want socialism. They know that white genocide in Africa is real but if they gave even one ounce of credibility to its possibility, their entire house of cards crumbles.

Post: #160

(09-15-2018 11:23 AM)Laner Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 11:09 AM)Roosh Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 10:35 AM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

They'll ban him along with guys like Adam Carolla and David Rubin.

Alex Jones coordinated deplatforming was the Camel's Nose in the Tent for internet censorship. We can now expect mass deplatforming of alternative media, including left leaning members like Joe Rogan.

I don't wish for anyone else to be banned, but what you said needs to happen for the normies to wake up. Once their beloved entertainment is removed, they will raise a stink in a way that they didn't when the likes of me, Alex Jones, and Andrew Anglin were banned.

If even a couple of these guys are banned, a new network could swoop them up and instantly have 10x the viewership of shitshows like CNBC and CNN.

I wonder who even watches TV anymore. CRTV and Compound Media have the right idea. If he ended up getting banned he could actually just start his own multi-contect site like the two I just mentioned. He has enough Clout to start his own media empire.

Post: #161

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

He also got shit for having Abby Martin on his show. She is a staunch supporter of Palestinians and anti-Israel. She is a bona-fide socialist and heavily left wing and they are friends.

I don't think him getting kicked off the air is going to happen as he has such far reach, although feminists seem to hate him for the sole fact that "dudebros" like him and that he is a major figure in the masculinity community (lifts weights, isn't a faggot).

He is too much of a likeable guy that carries weight for a lot of left-ish issues.

He also has a tendency to be wishy-washy in terms of his beliefs; not that that is a bad thing if you are trying to accommodate and amplify different diverse points of view (aka actual diversity).

He has the ability to completely bypass and render ineffective the SJW no-platforming tactic which has been their primary tool in forming the opinions and manufacturing consent of the masses. This drives shitlibs insane. They are going to obviously call for a boycott of his sponsors but I don't think that shady gambling websites and Onnit would even think to cave into them as they know that Joe Rogan has an extremely loyal fanbase. This is the beautiful thing about running your own one-man operation. Multinationals that advertise on Fox completely heel to even the slightest possibility of a boycott and Fox many times gives into SJWs. Fox and other major outlets have insanely high operating expenses and cannot afford mass exodus of advertisers. Joe don't have that problem. Neither does Cumia. \

There are a lot of people that would want him gone but for now he is more or less approved opposition.

Post: #162

He cucked out.

Post: #163

(09-15-2018 02:17 PM)Bill Brasky Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

He also got shit for having Abby Martin on his show. She is a staunch supporter of Palestinians and anti-Israel. She is a bona-fide socialist and heavily left wing and they are friends.

I don't think him getting kicked off the air is going to happen as he has such far reach, although feminists seem to hate him for the sole fact that "dudebros" like him and that he is a major figure in the masculinity community (lifts weights, isn't a faggot).

He is too much of a likeable guy that carries weight for a lot of left-ish issues.

He also has a tendency to be wishy-washy in terms of his beliefs; not that that is a bad thing if you are trying to accommodate and amplify different diverse points of view (aka actual diversity).

He has the ability to completely bypass and render ineffective the SJW no-platforming tactic which has been their primary tool in forming the opinions and manufacturing consent of the masses. This drives shitlibs insane. They are going to obviously call for a boycott of his sponsors but I don't think that shady gambling websites and Onnit would even think to cave into them as they know that Joe Rogan has an extremely loyal fanbase. This is the beautiful thing about running your own one-man operation. Multinationals that advertise on Fox completely heel to even the slightest possibility of a boycott and Fox many times gives into SJWs. Fox and other major outlets have insanely high operating expenses and cannot afford mass exodus of advertisers. Joe don't have that problem. Neither does Cumia. \

There are a lot of people that would want him gone but for now he is more or less approved opposition.

The problem is that they can go after his hosting and domain services. Maybe he has the resources to set up his own physical hosting service, but will the ISPs just drag their feet under pressure from the left and deep state (he's brought up Seth Rich & Pizzagate on more than one occasion).

Post: #164

(09-15-2018 03:37 PM)loremipsum Wrote:  He cucked out.

I enjoy his casts to an extent but like I said, he's very wishy washy. The Bargin Big Elba guy is actually correct in that he is a "fence-sitter."

I don't think that this is necessarily a problem as I think that anyone, in any way can push the needle towards our side and this is what he does.

His cucking is annoying and unbecoming but I'm a "progress not perfection" kind of guy. He does undermine the SJW left which is about as good as you're gonna get from him.

Also note that he is not a Christian and is explicitly anti-religion so he doesn't have the mental and spiritual framework to "believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything."

Post: #165

(09-15-2018 03:43 PM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 02:17 PM)Bill Brasky Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 09:09 AM)Teedub Wrote:  Rogan has an enormous passive fanbase, I doubt they'll ban him as it would cause too much of a shockwave. I know progressives who listen/watch the odd podcast.

His defensiveness on his twitter is a bad showing though. Never apologise, because the baying mob of progressives never stop, and see it as a weakness to exploit.

He also got shit for having Abby Martin on his show. She is a staunch supporter of Palestinians and anti-Israel. She is a bona-fide socialist and heavily left wing and they are friends.

I don't think him getting kicked off the air is going to happen as he has such far reach, although feminists seem to hate him for the sole fact that "dudebros" like him and that he is a major figure in the masculinity community (lifts weights, isn't a faggot).

He is too much of a likeable guy that carries weight for a lot of left-ish issues.

He also has a tendency to be wishy-washy in terms of his beliefs; not that that is a bad thing if you are trying to accommodate and amplify different diverse points of view (aka actual diversity).

He has the ability to completely bypass and render ineffective the SJW no-platforming tactic which has been their primary tool in forming the opinions and manufacturing consent of the masses. This drives shitlibs insane. They are going to obviously call for a boycott of his sponsors but I don't think that shady gambling websites and Onnit would even think to cave into them as they know that Joe Rogan has an extremely loyal fanbase. This is the beautiful thing about running your own one-man operation. Multinationals that advertise on Fox completely heel to even the slightest possibility of a boycott and Fox many times gives into SJWs. Fox and other major outlets have insanely high operating expenses and cannot afford mass exodus of advertisers. Joe don't have that problem. Neither does Cumia. \

There are a lot of people that would want him gone but for now he is more or less approved opposition.

The problem is that they can go after his hosting and domain services. Maybe he has the resources to set up his own physical hosting service, but will the ISPs just drag their feet under pressure from the left and deep state (he's brought up Seth Rich & Pizzagate on more than one occasion).

As we saw with his recent tweet, he is approved (not controlled) opposition means he is in about as much danger of having hosting removed as say Ben Shapiro. He would never allow it to get to that point.

However, if he tucks tail too much he will lose his base to more steadfast people. He knows it's a balancing game and that is what he is doing.

Post: #166

Rogan is a about another ten dry podcasts away from me unsubscribing.He needs to get the guy from Red Elephants, Mlo, Gavin McInnes, James Allsup... Somebody who is really sturring the pot.

Also, some heavy hitters in Music/Comedy would be nice. I'm thinking Dave Chappelle, Vince Staples, DJ Akademik, etc.

Post: #167

(09-15-2018 04:41 PM)Thrill Jackson Wrote:  Rogan is a about another ten dry podcasts away from me unsubscribing.He needs to get the guy from Red Elephants, Mlo, Gavin McInnes, James Allsup... Somebody who is really sturring the pot.

Also, some heavy hitters in Music/Comedy would be nice. I'm thinking Dave Chappelle, Vince Staples, DJ Akademik, etc.

I dislike the ones with comedians... Comedians are fucking low self-esteem losers, always have been, few exceptions like a number of black ones (Patrice, Richard Pryor, Chapelle despite recent cucking didn't do the loser portrayal), Andrew Dice Clay. Maybe a couple others. I don't need their opinions on anything.

Post: #168

(09-15-2018 04:49 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  I dislike the ones with comedians... Comedians are fucking low self-esteem losers, always have been, few exceptions like a number of black ones (Patrice, Richard Pryor, Chapelle despite recent cucking didn't do the loser portrayal), Andrew Dice Clay. Maybe a couple others. I don't need their opinions on anything.

I agree. The comedian podcast with Rogan have become incredibly boring and repetitive. You could switch out the comedian and the content would be 95% the same. I don't need to hear about it for the 100th time how hard it is to be a comedian, their comedian life, how much they're on the road, their next special, etc..

Post: #169

A-fucking men. It’s got to the point where I’ll read the episode description and if it says “so-and-so is a stand-up comedian” I immediately delete it without listening.

Post: #170

Man I really feel like Im alone in hating Joe Rogan, the guys an idiot, I cant say enough how much I hate a person that fancies themselves intellectual but in reality is a moron. Joe qualifies, hes an idiots interviewer, if you like him then you are a tool.

Post: #171

(09-15-2018 06:28 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:  Man I really feel like Im alone in hating Joe Rogan, the guys an idiot, I cant say enough how much I hate a person that fancies themselves intellectual but in reality is a moron. Joe qualifies, hes an idiots interviewer, if you like him then you are a tool.

He is a moron but if you like the guest he generally lets them speak. I listen to maybe 1 in 30 episodes.

Post: #172

(09-15-2018 06:30 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 06:28 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:  Man I really feel like Im alone in hating Joe Rogan, the guys an idiot, I cant say enough how much I hate a person that fancies themselves intellectual but in reality is a moron. Joe qualifies, hes an idiots interviewer, if you like him then you are a tool.

He is a moron but if you like the guest he generally lets them speak. I listen to maybe 1 in 30 episodes.

Ok theres that, but I saw a Jordan Peterson suggested clip the other day and once I saw Joe Rogan on the thumbnail I just couldnt bring myself to push play. I knew it would make me angry, few have that effect. Im surprised Peterson could put up with him.

Post: #173

(09-15-2018 06:35 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 06:30 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 06:28 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:  Man I really feel like Im alone in hating Joe Rogan, the guys an idiot, I cant say enough how much I hate a person that fancies themselves intellectual but in reality is a moron. Joe qualifies, hes an idiots interviewer, if you like him then you are a tool.

He is a moron but if you like the guest he generally lets them speak. I listen to maybe 1 in 30 episodes.

Ok theres that, but I saw a Jordan Peterson suggested clip the other day and once I saw Joe Rogan on the thumbnail I just couldnt bring myself to push play. I knew it would make me angry, few have that effect. Im surprised Peterson could put up with him.

Sounds like you have some work to do if simply looking at a random podcaster on the internet has that big of an effect on your emotional state.

Post: #174

Post: #175

"Many people isolated the statistics on farmers and it makes it seem like they're being targeted." Just racists isolating statistics. Another right wing conspiracy.

Nothing to see here, "violence is just a HUGE problem in general in South Africa".