Quote:With countless hours of media, and Clinton campaign, speculation and accusations that the source of hacked Wikileaks Democratic emails including the Podesta files, is none other than Russian president Vladimir Putin, either directly or indirectly, Julian Assange has decided to close the book on that particular loose end, and as RT reports, in a John Pilger Special, to be broadcast by RT on Saturday courtesy of Dartmouth Films, Assange categorically denied that the troves of US Democratic Party and Clinton work and staff emails released this year have come from the Russian government.
“The Clinton camp has been able to project a neo-McCarthyist hysteria that Russia is responsible for everything. Hillary Clinton has stated multiple times, falsely, that 17 US intelligence agencies had assessed that Russia was the source of our publications. That’s false – we can say that the Russian government is not the source,” Assange told the veteran Australian broadcaster as part of a 25-minute interview.
Assange spoke with Pilger at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where he has been for four years, and accused the US presidential candidate of being a pawn of behind-the-scenes interests, and voiced doubts about her physical fitness to take charge of the White House.
“Hillary Clinton is just one person. I actually feel quite sorry for Hillary Clinton as a person, because I see someone who is eaten alive by their ambitions, tormented literally to the point where they become sick – for example faint – as a result of going on, and going with their ambitions. But she represents a whole network of people, and a whole network of relationships with particular states.”
Over the past nine months, WikiLeaks uploaded over 30,000 emails from Hillary Clinton’s private email server, while she was Secretary of State. This was followed by nearly 20,000 emails sent to and by members of the US Democratic National Committee, exposing the party leadership’s dismissive attitude to Bernie Sanders, and his outsider primaries campaign.
Finally, last month, WikiLeaks posted over 50,000 emails connected to John Podesta, Bill Clinton’s chief of staff, and a close associate of the current presidential frontrunner.
A preview of the upcoming interview below. The Homeland Security Department and Office of the Director of National Intelligence posted a joint statement in October, claiming they were “confident” that the Russian government “directed” this year’s leaks. Moscow has rejected the accusation, with presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov calling the claims “nonsense,” while Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said the “public bickering with Russia” before the US election is probably a “smokescreen” to draw the voters’ attention away from serious domestic issues.
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2016 01:29 PM by redpillage.)
If the demographics in this country are so fucked that Hillary wins in spite of all her baggage--without massive voter fraud--that means the left will win forever. Which means it's time for the country to break up, or have a fun little civil war, because there's no way half the country will tolerate being perpetually disenfranchised at the federal level.
(11-03-2016 02:55 PM)britchard Wrote: We'll see who's right I do wish from the very bottom of my heart for Trump to win, I'm just being a realist.
Well, even the polls are swinging in Trump's favor. What do you base this on?
In keeping with high energy, here's my post from the Trump thread about my Hillary shirt this morning:
Quote:Last night had a great conversation about Hillary's massive corruption with friends and their family members all around in a circle. I had no idea she had this much hate amongst people I assumed were voting for her. They pointed out the anti-hillary sign in their neighborhood and how it had been joined by a Trump sign. I heard the words "Trump is bad, but Hillary is WAY WORSE" come out of a teacher's mouth.
I woke up this morning much earlier than usual with a freedom boner. Rolled over and started playing with my girl. Told her to get up and ride it. She complied and loved it, as did I.
Took a hot shower while looking forward to the day. Walked out to my car, pulled my shirt off, unfurled a maximum triggering shirt I got in the mail recently and donned it slowly. Drove over to a local breakfast/lunch spot that is SJW central and enjoyed the furtive glances I was getting while making a to go order.
Sat down at a table while waiting for my order and as I took my seat this middle aged lady in glasses with a pudgy looking husband looked up and her eyes LIT UP when she saw "Hillary" on my shirt and then she visibly soured as she read the rest:
She asked something related to politics and we entered into a jilted conversation where she didn't really have a lot to say other than to ask questions. I explained that I was somewhat skeptical of the corruption claims against Hillary until the last couple weeks and the mountains of evidence that keep piling up of her corruption from the Podesta E-mails, the rest of the Wikileaks releases, Project Veritas, the FBI releases, etc... and now I know she and the Clintons are horrible.
Then I went on to ask her if she knew that it's PROVEN in the releases that she colluded with the DNC to steal the Democrat nomination in the primaries from Bernie? That the only other anti-establishment candidate got blatantly cheated? This may have been the one point where the husband asked "do you think the Bernie supporters are going to vote for Hillary?" and I told them both that no, I think that the Bernie supporters are mostly going to vote for Trump, Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, or a good bit of them are instead going to just stay home.
She asked me if I was a Bernie supporter and I told her at that time I was undecided (HA). They didn't know what to think at all. She kind of just started eating and then they meekly said bye when I stood up after getting my order called and said, "It's going to be really interesting, you guys have a great day" with a big smile on my face. On my way out the register girl was coming back in and opened the door for me so I thanked her and wished her a great day as well as she smiled super wide nervous either because she was scared of Trump supporters or because she was impressed by my shirt and attitude.
(11-03-2016 03:04 PM)weambulance Wrote: If the demographics in this country are so fucked that Hillary wins in spite of all her baggage--without massive voter fraud--that means the left will win forever. Which means it's time for the country to break up, or have a fun little civil war, because there's no way half the country will tolerate being perpetually disenfranchised at the federal level.
I don't think we're there quite yet, though.
Which is precisely my point. You know that the white proportion of the vote is decreasing by 2% each election? Since ethnic minority groups vote overwhelmingly to the left and for bigger government, America is only going in one direction (leftwards) if their share of the vote increases.
The only events that stop these sorts of changes are war or total catastrophes (such as we are seeing in Venezuela).
Just my observation, based on fact.
(11-03-2016 03:24 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:
(11-03-2016 02:55 PM)britchard Wrote: We'll see who's right I do wish from the very bottom of my heart for Trump to win, I'm just being a realist.
Well, even the polls are swinging in Trump's favor. What do you base this on?
In keeping with high energy, here's my post from the Trump thread about my Hillary shirt this morning:
As I've already said, the demographics factor. And the fact Crooked is leading in early voting.
Polls systematically ignore voters who aren't 'connected', as in those who aren't very active online, who don't really stay up to date with the news, who aren't watching the TV debates or talk about politics.
In the UK this is the reason why Vote Leave won the EU referendum when it wasn't projected to, and why the Conservatives won with a majority in the 2015 GE when they weren't projected to. The polls done by polling companies or news outlets systematically ignores these unconnected people, who in the UK are mainly made up of people aged 65 or over.
However in the US the unconnected people are likely to be either old or from a ethnic minority background, which evens it out. You think the Mexican guy working in Cali for 16 hours a day who's planning to vote for Clinton has the time/energy to be answering polls? Or the black guy living in the ghetto? These don't factor in much in the UK (it might as our demographics become less white), but it does in the US.
Hebrews 11:1
11-03-2016 03:51 PM
rpg
True Player
Posts: 1,506
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 11
Hillary is doomed. So many people are writing in Bernie it is amazing. It is as if the write slot was created just for him! Election day will be a clusterfuck.
Chance favors the prepared mind.
My strength lies solely in my tenacity.
Pasteur
(11-03-2016 02:55 PM)britchard Wrote: We'll see who's right I do wish from the very bottom of my heart for Trump to win, I'm just being a realist.
Well, even the polls are swinging in Trump's favor. What do you base this on?
In keeping with high energy, here's my post from the Trump thread about my Hillary shirt this morning:
As I've already said, the demographics factor. And the fact Crooked is leading in early voting.
[/quote]
I haven't found a definitive explanation, but isn't early voting only loosely correlated with election results, and worse, isn't early voting only reported by party and not by actual vote result?
So for example if I'm registered independent or democrat and I vote for a republican it's listed as just my party when counting/reporting early voting?
Correct me if I'm wrong on either point, I haven't been able to find clarity on this.
(11-03-2016 05:15 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote: I haven't found a definitive explanation, but isn't early voting only loosely correlated with election results, and worse, isn't early voting only reported by party and not by actual vote result?
So for example if I'm registered independent or democrat and I vote for a republican it's listed as just my party when counting/reporting early voting?
Correct me if I'm wrong on either point, I haven't been able to find clarity on this.
As far as I know you're right on both points. Early voting discussions are basically just something to keep political junkies occupied.
11-03-2016 06:08 PM
redpillage
Alpha Male
Posts: 1,394
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 37
(11-03-2016 03:24 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote: She asked me if I was a Bernie supporter and I told her at that time I was undecided (HA). They didn't know what to think at all. She kind of just started eating and then they meekly said bye when I stood up after getting my order called and said, "It's going to be really interesting, you guys have a great day" with a big smile on my face. On my way out the register girl was coming back in and opened the door for me so I thanked her and wished her a great day as well as she smiled super wide nervous either because she was scared of Trump supporters or because she was impressed by my shirt and attitude.
Make Breakfast Great Again!
[/quote]
Having class, manners, and intelligence has the capacity to move mountains. Well done, brother. The husband may actually wind up secretly voting Trump ;-)
The powers that be are hoping for a Hillary win where-after they give her 6 months and then let her drop dead. That gives them 3.5 years of Tim "yes, sir, whatever you say, sir" Kaine.
11-03-2016 06:55 PM
Bushido
True Player
Posts: 1,890
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 86
Home
RooshV.com
Search (Via Forum)
Member List
![[-]](images/collapse.gif)
The following 8 users Like Libertas's post:
![[Image: CwWSQ0jWEAAdEVM?format=jpg&name=small]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwWSQ0jWEAAdEVM?format=jpg&name=small)
![[Image: b54b01e1d1ba8912fa61ecd2db38a159.jpg]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/b5/4b/01/b54b01e1d1ba8912fa61ecd2db38a159.jpg)
![[Image: gde9ZCl.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/gde9ZCl.jpg)
I do wish from the very bottom of my heart for Trump to win, I'm just being a realist.
