Post: #376

she would have been better off not mentioning Trump at all.

Post: #377

(01-08-2016 02:27 PM)Libertas Wrote:  This is why Scott Adams has predicted a Trump landslide.

She is such a terrible marketer/persuader it boggles the mind. She and her team came up with a catchy wordplay but most people think this kind of "cleverness" is enough. Read Copyblogger. It's not. Your headlines and catchphrases need to be an emotional anchor that connects with people, and this just doesn't. It doesn't even come close. In fact it even backfires because it uses SJW buzzwords that people are getting tired of anyway and reconnects them back to the fact that Trump is shattering this PC machine one hammer-blow at a time. So now, Trump is in your mind, not Hillary.

The more I learn about marketing/power/PR/persuasion/game (much of which has come through studying Trump's campaign), the more I see the validity of Scott Adams' viewpoint. He has been proven correct on everything he says while the media talking heads have been proven incorrect.

Bernie Sanders is better at it than Hillary is, but he falls hugely short of most of the guys on this forum, let alone Trump.

Basically, a day 1 blue pill guy just learning about game probably has better game/persuasion skill than Hillary does.

Her campaign seems to be run mostly by broads.

Nuff said.

Post: #378

Even the guys she pays for advertising hate her.

Post: #379

(01-08-2016 03:08 PM)Libertas Wrote:  I actually got a reply from Scott Adams.

False alarm guys. It's not real, photoshop: https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/statu...1739151361

It's still terrible marketing though, for all the reasons I mentioned.

This works

Post: #380

(01-08-2016 03:09 PM)frenchcorporation Wrote:  she would have been better off not mentioning Trump at all.

This. And if she did mention him, she perhaps shouldn't have made his name roughly ten times larger than hers on the form. She just keeps drawing more attention to Trump, which is the last thing she should be doing.

Post: #381

(01-08-2016 03:10 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  Her campaign seems to be run mostly by broads.

Nuff said.

Yep. She will lose.

Post: #382

Planned Parenthood has Endorsed Clinton...and they have never endorsed a candidate in their 100 year history. http://www.christianpost.com/news/planne...nt-154462/

Post: #383

(01-08-2016 11:54 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  Planned Parenthood has Endorsed Clinton...and they have never endorsed a candidate in their 100 year history. http://www.christianpost.com/news/planne...nt-154462/

She's good for the baby killing business.

Baby murderers get to vote too.

Post: #384

(01-08-2016 11:54 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  Planned Parenthood has Endorsed Clinton...and they have never endorsed a candidate in their 100 year history. http://www.christianpost.com/news/planne...nt-154462/

Why not? Bill has raw dogged so many sluts over the years he forms a big part of their yearly turnover.

Post: #385

(01-09-2016 12:35 AM)RioNomad Wrote:  

(01-08-2016 11:54 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  Planned Parenthood has Endorsed Clinton...and they have never endorsed a candidate in their 100 year history. http://www.christianpost.com/news/planne...nt-154462/

She's good for the baby killing business.

Baby murderers get to vote too.

I just figured that she drinks a blender full of baby parts every morning to keep her corpse alive...she's like like the under the table Tommy Lasorda spokesperson.

Post: #386

Post: #387

(01-10-2016 04:49 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

I can't tell if that tweet is subtle trolling or if they are really that ignorant of their own words.

"Every child deserves the opportunity to live up to their God given potential"

says the organization that has performed 7 million abortions since 1970

I mean that is like Hitler tweeting "every jew deserves to live a life free from persecution #yamakalivesmatter"

I keep looking around to see if that is a fake twitter account, or if they were hacked and someone posted that.

Post: #388

(01-10-2016 07:10 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(01-10-2016 04:49 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

I can't tell if that tweet is subtle trolling or if they are really that ignorant of their own words.

"Every child deserves the opportunity to live up to their God given potential"

says the organization that has performed 7 million abortions since 1970

I mean that is like Hitler tweeting "every jew deserves to live a life free from persecution #yamakalivesmatter"

I keep looking around to see if that is a fake twitter account, or if they were hacked and someone posted that.

They were respecftul enough to capitalize God, so I'm guessing fake.

Post: #389

(01-10-2016 07:43 PM)kleyau Wrote:  

(01-10-2016 07:10 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(01-10-2016 04:49 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

I can't tell if that tweet is subtle trolling or if they are really that ignorant of their own words.

"Every child deserves the opportunity to live up to their God given potential"

says the organization that has performed 7 million abortions since 1970

I mean that is like Hitler tweeting "every jew deserves to live a life free from persecution #yamakalivesmatter"

I keep looking around to see if that is a fake twitter account, or if they were hacked and someone posted that.

They were respecftul enough to capitalize God, so I'm guessing fake.

I find them promoting the #blacklivesmatter hashtag about as repugnant

Post: #390

(01-10-2016 07:10 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(01-10-2016 04:49 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

I can't tell if that tweet is subtle trolling or if they are really that ignorant of their own words.

"Every child deserves the opportunity to live up to their God given potential"

says the organization that has performed 7 million abortions since 1970

I mean that is like Hitler tweeting "every jew deserves to live a life free from persecution #yamakalivesmatter"

I keep looking around to see if that is a fake twitter account, or if they were hacked and someone posted that.

Post: #391

Shrillery has decided to begin slinging mud at Sanders. Her lead in Iowa has shrunk to 3 percentage points. Sanders is already leading in New Hampshire. I know a lot of people here don't care for Sanders, but even if you don't like the guy, you have to respect him for slinging mud right back. Instead he pointed out the obvious. He mentioned that a few months ago when she had a sizable lead, she thought he was an upstanding guy, but now that victory isn't as cut and dried as it had been, she doesn't think he's so great anymore. He also said "“It could be that the inevitable candidate for the Democratic nomination may not be so inevitable today." This was followed by: “Secretary Clinton and her campaign now know that she is in serious trouble,” Mr. Sanders said. “And, I think a candidate who was originally thought to be the anointed candidate, to be the inevitable candidate, is now locked in a very difficult race here in Iowa and in New Hampshire. Obviously, in that scenario, what people do is start attacking.”

On the surface, that remark doesn't seem like much. But when you stop and think about it, it's a rather biting thing to say, as it goes after the very insecurity that's prompted her poisonous shit.

One thing to keep in mind with these campaigns is that people who rapidly ascend to the top, tend to falter as fast or even faster. Carson is an example of this. He was a nobody, and then for a week or two, they were saying he'll be the nominee, and in another debate or two, he'll be sent off to the kids table. Also, when a candidate starts losing ground in the polls, eventually they enter into a downward spin from which recovery is next to impossible. Jeb is a prime example. A year ago it was presumed that he would be the republican nominee. Look at him now. One step from the kid's table.

Ever since the 90s, people have been saying Shrillery should be the first female president (even though they don't realize that Barack Obama became the first woman prez in '08.) So her run has been expected for decades. She's been flying high ever since she announced her intention to run. And now she's losing ground. Sanders is chipping away at her lead 1-2 points/week for several weeks now. Ironically enough, she said today in her latest attack on Sanders, “I think it’s time for us to have the kind of spirited debate that you deserve for us to have.” The irony here is that a few weeks ago I told you all about how the DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has done everything she can to limit debates, and to keep Clinton away from her opponents, the press, and people in general.

For Clinton, the primaries can't come soon enough. She needs a primary win right now to try to stop her decline. If Sanders wins Iowa and New Hampshire, that's like a 1-2 blow in boxing. There's a good chance it'll send her to the floor. In a way I hope it doesn't happen and hope that she can stay in the game. I want to see Trump attack her and Bill. I want to see Trump point out that Bill was going to the Caribbean to bang Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex slaves. I want to see her humiliated into obscurity.

Post: #392

(01-10-2016 04:49 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

Every child deserves the opportunity to live up to their God given potential, but unfortunately, God wants you to die before you are born. What's more, God loves a strong capitalist society so we'll sell your body parts for some quick cash.

#blacklivesmatter so much that abortions disproportionately remove black bodies from the gene pool, with 50 abortions per 1000 black women and 11 abortions per 1000 white women (source).

"Abortion is pro-women!" Except for the fact that as much or even more women oppose its legality compared to men. And except for the fact that worldwide millions and millions more baby girls than baby boys have been aborted. Oops. I meant to say: Go @HillaryClinton!

Post: #393

(01-12-2016 04:15 AM)porscheguy Wrote:  Shrillery has decided to begin slinging mud at Sanders. Her lead in Iowa has shrunk to 3 percentage points. Sanders is already leading in New Hampshire. I know a lot of people here don't care for Sanders, but even if you don't like the guy, you have to respect him for slinging mud right back. Instead he pointed out the obvious. He mentioned that a few months ago when she had a sizable lead, she thought he was an upstanding guy, but now that victory isn't as cut and dried as it had been, she doesn't think he's so great anymore. He also said "“It could be that the inevitable candidate for the Democratic nomination may not be so inevitable today." This was followed by: “Secretary Clinton and her campaign now know that she is in serious trouble,” Mr. Sanders said. “And, I think a candidate who was originally thought to be the anointed candidate, to be the inevitable candidate, is now locked in a very difficult race here in Iowa and in New Hampshire. Obviously, in that scenario, what people do is start attacking.”

On the surface, that remark doesn't seem like much. But when you stop and think about it, it's a rather biting thing to say, as it goes after the very insecurity that's prompted her poisonous shit.

One thing to keep in mind with these campaigns is that people who rapidly ascend to the top, tend to falter as fast or even faster. Carson is an example of this. He was a nobody, and then for a week or two, they were saying he'll be the nominee, and in another debate or two, he'll be sent off to the kids table. Also, when a candidate starts losing ground in the polls, eventually they enter into a downward spin from which recovery is next to impossible. Jeb is a prime example. A year ago it was presumed that he would be the republican nominee. Look at him now. One step from the kid's table.

Ever since the 90s, people have been saying Shrillery should be the first female president (even though they don't realize that Barack Obama became the first woman prez in '08.) So her run has been expected for decades. She's been flying high ever since she announced her intention to run. And now she's losing ground. Sanders is chipping away at her lead 1-2 points/week for several weeks now. Ironically enough, she said today in her latest attack on Sanders, “I think it’s time for us to have the kind of spirited debate that you deserve for us to have.” The irony here is that a few weeks ago I told you all about how the DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz has done everything she can to limit debates, and to keep Clinton away from her opponents, the press, and people in general.

For Clinton, the primaries can't come soon enough. She needs a primary win right now to try to stop her decline. If Sanders wins Iowa and New Hampshire, that's like a 1-2 blow in boxing. There's a good chance it'll send her to the floor. In a way I hope it doesn't happen and hope that she can stay in the game. I want to see Trump attack her and Bill. I want to see Trump point out that Bill was going to the Caribbean to bang Jeffrey Epstein's underage sex slaves. I want to see her humiliated into obscurity.

So much this.

Hillary is a fuckin joke yet for some reason is consider an elite player in politics. During her 2008 run, libtards as well as herself were mentioning her time as First Lady of the US as relevant experience to run the country. A position she wasn't elected to, has no official power, and has no accountability. The one major thing that Bill passed to her to take point on (healthcare reform), she fucked up in such epic fashion that she was essentially forbidden to ever lead on anything of importance ever again in the Clinton administration.

Her Senate election was a gimme and not remotely earned in any fashion. She accomplished nothing of significance during her tenure. But she did vote for the Iraq War; which was stupid but she just gets a pass on that now. She could have shown some independent judgement at that moment but did not despite being in an ultra safe Senate seat.

Then she walks into the 2008 election, runs a really sloppy campaign (no one EVER forgets about legitimately dodging sniper fire; especially some ivy league upper class twat who has been a state governors and US President's wife who probably hasn't seen any real violence in her entire life), and ultimately loses to the black guy.

But because she was the original democrat heir apparent and probably threaten Obama during the primary process with a possible brokered convention, Obama GIVES HER the SoS job under likely duress as part of a deal to get a smooth nomination/election process. She sure as hell didn't EARN the position for a lifetime of successful diplomatic accomplishments.

As SoS, there were no real accomplishments but there sure as shit was some dubious shit happening; the e-mail server deal being a legitimate breach of Federal law. Then there is the possible Clinton Foundation/SoS collusion and corruption stuff.

Then the 2016 election democrat field starts up with only 5 players (a lot of democrats don't want to run against Hillary). 8 fuckin years of Obama where the democrats have almost a decade to groom potential presidential candidates and they can only come up with fuckin 5?! 3 are non-entities, and 1 is a proud socialist. And right before the first primaries, it looks like she might lose the primary process yet again because she sucks so bad as a candidate (proving she learned nothing from 2008) and her time as SoS might actually lead to Federal charges. This nomination was and continues to be rigged as much in favor as possible for her to win the democrat nod and she is looking like she is again going to blow it.

Yet as of today despite all the aforementioned, she is still consider a top contender among a lot liberals/democrats for some reason. It's straight up insanity. But I think the walls are closing in on Hillary finally with Sanders in the picture as a viable alternative and Trump using the media to destroy Clinton.

It's sort of amazing how far Hillary has been able to make it despite being an overall shitty person, shitty politician, and shitty manager/leader. She would be a complete nobody without her husband and his clout and connections. That said, it would bring me enormous pleasure to see Trump take Hillary down once and for all and force the media to really examine her as a candidate and as a person for once; as well as take down Bill's image by proxy in the process. It's already starting with Bill's conduct towards women getting some traction in the media after Trump brought it up.

Trump is going to break Hillary in half in front of the entire world if she gets the nomination. He is already doing damage and the first primary hasn't even occurred yet.

But I don't think Hillary is getting the Democrat nod; a lifetime of bullshit, lies, and corruption are finally starting to catch up with her now. It's been a long time coming.

Post: #394

The Democratic base wants anybody but Hillary. Why do you think Sanders is doing so well?

They realize she can't win. She's had one competitive election in her entire life. She lost.

Post: #395

Scott Adams wrote something interesting today: Has anyone heard a man say he would vote for Hillary?

I have many liberal friends and not a single man whether public or in private has given full support to Hillary. It's always either Sanders or something like "Well I'm not sure. I wish Biden (or someone else) would run" and then some halfhearted words for Hillary. Men don't like her. She won't win.

Post: #396

Post: #397

(01-12-2016 09:44 PM)Lucky Wrote:  Scott Adams wrote something interesting today: Has anyone heard a man say he would vote for Hillary?

I have many liberal friends and not a single man whether public or in private has given full support to Hillary. It's always either Sanders or something like "Well I'm not sure. I wish Biden (or someone else) would run" and then some halfhearted words for Hillary. Men don't like her. She won't win.

If you live in DC, you run into many men who would vote for HRC. They also happen to work in Dem politics directly or indirectly, so it is a clear-eyed transactional type of support whereby if she gets into office, there's more professional opportunities for these men on the blue side of the aisle.

Post: #398

Post: #399

You can put lipstick on a pig. It's still a pig eight years later.

Post: #400

This could well be the year that both the Republican and Democratic parties begin to collapse completely. At the moment, it appears that the likely Republican candidate will be Donald Trump, and if his poll numbers keep rising Bernie Sanders will be the supposed candidate for the Democrats. However, the powers that be have decided that Hilary WILL be the Democratic candidate, will of the people be damned. Similarly, though it is not nearly as straightforward as the Dems, the powers that be have also decided that an establishment Republican (at the moment it looks like Rubio) should be the Republican nominee. If the heads of both parties go against the will of the people and elect their mainstream candidates despite the will of the people (which is not out of the realm of possibility) I can't see either party surviving after that, unless the majority of people in this country are far, FAR more idiotic than we think.

Either way, it's shaping up to be one hell of a race.

Trump 2016