VincentVinturi
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,132
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 115
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
I'm off rice completely.
It's all about potatoes and sweet potatoes.
From AnabolicMen.com:
Quote:I’ve seen many lists around the internet about increasing testosterone levels, and quite many of them cite rice as a beneficial carbohydrate source…
…However I’d like to disagree with that.
Rice bran won’t directly lower your testosterone levels, and it’s not estrogenic, but the researchers in this study found out that it is an extremely potent 5-a reductase enzyme blocker. Meaning that it blocks the conversion from testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT).
Rice was actually more effective at blocking DHT than most drugs for such purposes on the market are.
DHT beign the king of androgens, and having roughly 10 times the potency of testosterone, is one of the reasons why high testosterone levels are so beneficial for men, as your body naturally converts some of that testosterone to DHT.
Blocking this conversion by eating rice, you’d also block testosterone from excerting its full effects in the body.
So the bottom line is that rice won’t directly decrease testosterone, but it blocks it from converting into a more potent derivate.
My Latest Book On How To Make Money Online By Offering A Service Check It Out Here
|
|
| 02-24-2015 04:01 AM |
|
The following 5 users Like VincentVinturi's post:5 users Like VincentVinturi's post
The Reactionary Tree, Enigma, Kamikaze, Giovonny, JoyStick
|
tattiemasher
Recovering Beta

Posts: 167
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 1
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
(02-22-2015 11:30 AM)Rutting Elephant Wrote: Does "red rice" (nasi merah in Malay/Indonesian) ring a bell with anyone? I'd never heard of it until a year or two ago when a girl told me it was a substitute for white rice for weight loss.
I don't share the cultural maxim that "without rice, you won't feel full" so it doesn't figure in my diet, but it seems a lot harder to cook properly.
(I am aware that merah Malay/Indonesian used to cover the colors red and brown, but this stuff is actually red. Brown rice seems to be largely unknown.)
I bought red rice back home in the UK, but I could only get it from Asian supermarkets. It's from Thailand or Bhutan or somewhere if I remember right? I had heard that it was healthier than brown or white rice, and on a par with black rice, however I found black rice didn't taste great and apparently it's more used for dessert dishes than just as part of a main meal.
It takes about 20 minutes to prepare, and it had a slightly nutty taste for me. I usually cooked it in chicken stock or I added in freshly squeezed lime, spices etc to give the flavour a kick. It's definitely worth trying if you're looking to get as much nutrition out of your rice as possible, but since it's a low-yield crop it's more expensive.
|
|
| 02-24-2015 07:32 AM |
|
The following 2 users Like tattiemasher's post:2 users Like tattiemasher's post
Rutting Elephant, Giovonny
|
Suits
Innovative Casanova
      
Posts: 9,726
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 239
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
(02-24-2015 04:01 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote: I'm off rice completely.
It's all about potatoes and sweet potatoes.
From AnabolicMen.com:
Quote:I’ve seen many lists around the internet about increasing testosterone levels, and quite many of them cite rice as a beneficial carbohydrate source…
…However I’d like to disagree with that.
Rice bran won’t directly lower your testosterone levels, and it’s not estrogenic, but the researchers in this study found out that it is an extremely potent 5-a reductase enzyme blocker. Meaning that it blocks the conversion from testosterone into dihydrotestosterone (DHT).
Rice was actually more effective at blocking DHT than most drugs for such purposes on the market are.
DHT beign the king of androgens, and having roughly 10 times the potency of testosterone, is one of the reasons why high testosterone levels are so beneficial for men, as your body naturally converts some of that testosterone to DHT.
Blocking this conversion by eating rice, you’d also block testosterone from excerting its full effects in the body.
So the bottom line is that rice won’t directly decrease testosterone, but it blocks it from converting into a more potent derivate.
Suddenly, I understand Asian cultures.
I'm the King of Beijing!
|
|
| 02-24-2015 04:46 PM |
|
|
Enigma
International Playboy
     
Posts: 3,504
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 87
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
(02-22-2015 06:50 AM)kosko Wrote: There is a reason millions chose to polish it and eat. If brown was superior the rice consuming nations would favor it. Why for close to 10,000+ years would Asian go through the extra effort of milling rice, some times via grueling hand methods if the brown rice was really that more healthy? Wouldn't they just save the effort and just eat the brown rice as it is?
No group of people are going to put forward that much more effort if it wasn't worth it. Brown Rice is modern hippe food. It tastes like shit and it is marginally healthier then white rice. Plus most brown rice you buy in the store is bunk and near rancid. Brown rice has a lot more fat content and it oxidizes on the shelf.
Rice is a staple and like all staples is simply a form of dense easy absorbed energy to help power you through the day.
You just answered your own question. White rice stores better. That has been a huge aspect of preparing food until very recently in human history. And, as mentioned throughout the thread, it cooks faster too.
The bran and chaff removed from the rice during processing is also used for other things, particularly by Asian cultures.
Hey, maybe white rice is equal -- or even better. But I need to see an argument a lot more complete than, "hey, they did it 10,000 years ago, guys" to convince me. Especially when the group of people doing it are the smallest of the human race.
Personally, I think brown rice tastes great. It's the same thing as eating wheat bread.
|
|
| 02-24-2015 05:40 PM |
|
The following 2 users Like Enigma's post:2 users Like Enigma's post
Simeon_Strangelight, DJ-Matt
|
The_CEO
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,471
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 7
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
Reason to favor Brown:
Basmati rice, particularly wholegrain Basmati rice can and should be a regular addition to the diets of people who suffer from diabetes. Basmati rice is a naturally low energy food but as with all carbohydrate foods, it’s the portion size that is important: an average serving of boiled rice is 150-180g providing 207-248 calories; a small serving (100g) provides approximately 138 calories. By contrast a typical takeaway portion of fried rice is 300g providing 558 calories, so it’s important not to assume all rice types are the same.
Wholegrain Basmati rice has the lowest GI (glycaemic index) of all rice types, which means once digested it releases its energy slowly keeping blood sugar levels more stable, which is a crucial part of diabetes management. On the other hand, sticky and risotto type rices have much higher GIs, so less suitable in a diabetic diet. The varying GIs of rice depends on the type of carbohydrate present in the grains. Basmati rice has the greatest amount of a type known as amylose which does not gelatinize during cooking and results in fluffy, separate grains. Whereas grains with more amylopectin burst on cooking resulting in sticky rice that can be eaten with chopsticks. The more intact the structure of a grain of rice the lower the GI because once consumed the particle size maintains intact for longer, slowing the digestive process. The higher quality brands of rice like Tilda have the technology to reject broken grains from their products, further guaranteeing the low GI of the rice. Steaming rice helps to better maintain the structure of the grain compared with boiled rice so generally steamed rice has a lower GI than boiled.
Wholegrain Basmati rice is also a good source of fibre which is important for gut health and improves bowel function. High fibre intakes have also been associated with a lower risk of bowel cancer, reduced risk of type 2 diabetes complications, increased satiety and weight management. A high intake of wholegrain foods has been associated with lower risk of heart disease and stroke.
Both wholegrain and white Basmati rice contains a type of fibre known as resistant starch. This has a prebiotic effect in the bowel, which means it can help to increase the number of ‘friendly’ bacteria. This in turn, protects the bowel and keeps it healthy and boosts the body’s immunity. Resistant starch also increases satiety, helping to keep you feeling fuller for longer, so including Basmati rice in a meal can help regulate appetite and prevent cravings for sugary drinks and snacks between meals.
Finally, both wholegrain and white Basmati rice has a superior nutrient content compared with other rice types. They contain higher amounts of B vitamins and minerals such as copper and magnesium. The higher magnesium content found in Basmati can help with blood sugar control. These properties combined together with the antioxidant and anti-carcinogenic properties of numerous compounds found in rice, especially those found in the bran and germ (minerals, trace elements, vitamins, polyphenols), means rice can make a valuable contribution to the diets of people with diabetes.
|
|
| 02-28-2015 07:59 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes The_CEO's post:1 user Likes The_CEO's post
eradicator
|
The_CEO
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,471
Joined: Dec 2008
Reputation: 7
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
Reason to minimize white:
Eating white rice on a regular basis may increase the risk for type 2 diabetes, according to new Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) research.
HSPH researchers from the Department of Nutrition—led by Emily Hu, research assistant, and Qi Sun, research associate—reviewed four earlier studies involving more than 352,000 people from China, Japan, the United States, and Australia who were tracked between four and 22 years. The researchers found that people who ate the most rice—three to four servings a day—were 1.5 times more likely to have diabetes than people who ate the least amount of rice. In addition, for every additional large bowl of white rice a person ate each day, the risk rose 10 percent. The link was stronger for people in Asian countries, who eat an average of three to four servings of white rice per day. People in Western countries eat, on average, one to two servings a week.
The study was published in the British Medical Journal March 15, 2012.
White rice has a high glycemic index, meaning that it can cause spikes in blood sugar. Previous research has linked high glycemic index foods with increased type 2 diabetes risk.
|
|
| 02-28-2015 08:00 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes The_CEO's post:1 user Likes The_CEO's post
The Reactionary Tree
|
Teutatis
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,363
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 17
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
(02-27-2015 12:09 PM)The Beast1 Wrote: Neither I hate brown and white rice.
Basmati Rice FTW!
That's the rice I eat as well, it's delicious, but I thought Basmati was a variety type of rice and that it could come as white or brown. I only eat white by the way, the nutritional diffrences between white and brown are so minute that it doesn't make a difference to us, and white is much tastier and faster to prepare, and doesn't have phytates, if you're worried about that.
(03-01-2015 10:26 AM)Basil Ransom Wrote: Lol attacking a food based on its glycemic index alone is garbage. Pairing fat and protein with "high glycemic" foods significantly reduces their effect glycemic index. Unless you're extremely poor, you are not eating rice alone.
And unless you are a competitive bodybuilder, calorie density is irrelevant. Much of modern nutrition is based on the idiotic idea that calorie density is bad - when less calorie dense foods like breads can actually satisfy you less, leaving you eating more calories. Fat is more satisfying per calorie than white carbohydrates, but "fat is bad because it has twice as many calories per gram."
Can't paste for some reason, but google 'fat protein glycemic index.'
White is right. With
Indeed, the whole glycemic index thing is a bit silly, just add basically anything (meat, fish, olive oil, eggs, peanut butter, whatever really) to whatever high index glycemic food you're eating and the whole thing becomes meaningless.
(This post was last modified: 03-08-2015 09:12 PM by Teutatis.)
|
|
| 03-08-2015 09:11 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Teutatis's post:1 user Likes Teutatis's post
Giovonny
|
Enigma
International Playboy
     
Posts: 3,504
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 87
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
(03-09-2015 04:30 AM)HughMyron Wrote: tl;dr there isn't even any reason for any debate, really. Rice is a bland carbohydrate staples, just right there with potatoes, lentils and beans. One would hope that you don't just eat 1 certain type of rice every single day of your life, so why the debate? They're just easy carb and calorie source, so pick your staple of choice for that day, cook it and be done with it. In the grand scheme of things, natural unprocessed carbs are just unprocessed carbs. You should be nitpicking more which fat and protein sources you're ingesting
Except 6 of the guys posting in this thread live in Asia, where rice is an integral part of the local cuisine. That's not even including TravelerKai, who has a Chinese wife.
But sure, I'll just tell all the restaurants in town to start serving potatoes and beans instead.
(This post was last modified: 03-09-2015 07:02 AM by Enigma.)
|
|
| 03-09-2015 07:01 AM |
|
|
HughMyron
Banned
Posts: 30
Joined: Feb 2015
|
RE: The Great Rice Debate: brown vs white
(03-09-2015 07:01 AM)Enigma Wrote: (03-09-2015 04:30 AM)HughMyron Wrote: tl;dr there isn't even any reason for any debate, really. Rice is a bland carbohydrate staples, just right there with potatoes, lentils and beans. One would hope that you don't just eat 1 certain type of rice every single day of your life, so why the debate? They're just easy carb and calorie source, so pick your staple of choice for that day, cook it and be done with it. In the grand scheme of things, natural unprocessed carbs are just unprocessed carbs. You should be nitpicking more which fat and protein sources you're ingesting
Except 6 of the guys posting in this thread live in Asia, where rice is an integral part of the local cuisine. That's not even including TravelerKai, who has a Chinese wife.
But sure, I'll just tell all the restaurants in town to start serving potatoes and beans instead.
You also won't be asking restaurants to serve you brown rice instead of white one if they only have white rice so that was a pretty pointless and irrelevant comment. The point being that there are some small differences in nutrition and taste, but all in all it's just a carb source. No one is gonna get healthy if he eats the same damn thing every day, so vary it up for a balanced diet and all is well
|
|
| 03-09-2015 10:07 AM |
|
|