Roardog
Alpha Male
   
Posts: 1,124
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 10
|
RE: Chris Rock getting divorced
(02-20-2018 05:47 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote: Chris Rock's special was funny as hell, the last 45 minutes were hilarious. It is comedy fellas, do not take it personally. I listen to Owen Benjamin and laugh my ass off , I do not take it personally. If you don't think his jokes about divorce, Tinder, and Crips are funny then I wonder about your sense of humor. Listen to the whole thing, then judge.
Agreed. I thought his latest special was funny as hell. I was pissing myself the whole way through.
I thought it was much better than Bill Burr's latest special.
He definitely looks a lot older but then he is 53, he's not a young guy any more and I'm sure the divorce and things have taken their toll on him.
"Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provides something." - Chris Rock
|
|
| 02-20-2018 10:24 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Roardog's post:1 user Likes Roardog's post
Atlanta Man
|
AneroidOcean
International Playboy
     
Posts: 3,282
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 79
|
RE: Chris Rock getting divorced
(02-20-2018 09:22 PM)Repo Wrote: Therefore it actually shows that black people are getting shot by the police at a higher rate than white people. I am not sure how the highlighted statement is backed up based on this.
Did you read the study or dig into it to see why they stated that, or did you just call it wrong based on looking at one graph added to that headline as an image?
It's likely you did the latter. That article is about a small sample study that involves putting mostly white officers in a simulator. If you want to read more about it, here's an additional breakdown as well as the actual text of the study. Here's a large sample study by a Harvard professor that's far more interesting/relevant (as it analyzes actual incidents) and the news article listing some of it's findings below:
Quote:A study by a Harvard professor released this month found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings even though officers were more likely to interact physically with non-whites than whites.
The paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, which examined thousands of incidents at 10 large police departments in California, Florida and Texas, concluded that police were no more likely to shoot non-whites than whites after factoring in extenuating circumstances.
“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,” said Harvard economics professor Roland G. Fryer Jr. in the abstract of the July 2016 paper.
Mr. Fryer, who is black, told The New York Times that the finding of no racial discrimination in police shootings was “the most surprising result of my career.”
At the same time, the study found blacks and Hispanics were more than 50 percent more likely to experience physical interactions with police, including touching, pushing, handcuffing, drawing a weapon, and using a baton or pepper spray.
The 63-page study, “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force,” appears to support research conducted at Washington State University showing that officers in simulation tests were actually less likely to shoot at blacks than whites.
The paper also challenges the contention by the new wave of civil-rights groups such as Black Lives Matter that racist police are singling out blacks for shootings.
The findings are nothing if not timely, coming after protests spurred by two deadly incidents earlier this month involving black men shot and killed by police in Louisiana and Minnesota.
Their deaths, which are under review, spurred a sniper attack on police Thursday in Dallas during a Black Lives Matter march that left five officers dead and seven injured.
The 25-year-old gunman, Micah Xavier Johnson, told negotiators he wanted to take out white people, especially officers. He was killed after Dallas police detonated a remote-control robot in his vicinity after he refused for hours to exit a college building.
Mr. Fryer’s study found that police are 50 percent more likely to engage in physical interactions with blacks and Hispanics, including touching, pushing and drawing weapons.
“Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities,” the paper said.
The study examined data collected in six Texas cities, three Florida counties and Los Angeles County, as well as New York City’s Stop, Question and Frisk program.
Mr. Fryer said that the “importance of our results for racial inequality is unclear.”
“It is plausible that racial differences in lower level uses of force are simply a distraction and movements such as Black Lives Matter should seek solutions within their own communities rather than changing the behaviors of police and other external forces,” he said in the study’s conclusion.
“Much more troubling, due to their frequency and potential impact on minority belief formation, is the possibility that racial differences in police use of nonlethal force have spillovers on myriad dimensions of racial inequality,” Mr. Fryer said.
Read My Old Blog - Subscribe To My Old Blog
Top Posts - Fake Rape? - Sex With A Tranny? - Rich MILF - What is a 9?
"Failure is just practice for success"
|
|
| 02-21-2018 03:13 PM |
|
|
Repo
International Playboy
     
Posts: 3,154
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 17
|
RE: Chris Rock getting divorced
(02-21-2018 03:13 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote: (02-20-2018 09:22 PM)Repo Wrote: Therefore it actually shows that black people are getting shot by the police at a higher rate than white people. I am not sure how the highlighted statement is backed up based on this.
Did you read the study or dig into it to see why they stated that, or did you just call it wrong based on looking at one graph added to that headline as an image?
It's likely you did the latter. That article is about a small sample study that involves putting mostly white officers in a simulator. If you want to read more about it, here's an additional breakdown as well as the actual text of the study. Here's a large sample study by a Harvard professor that's far more interesting/relevant (as it analyzes actual incidents) and the news article listing some of it's findings below:
Quote:A study by a Harvard professor released this month found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings even though officers were more likely to interact physically with non-whites than whites.
The paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research, which examined thousands of incidents at 10 large police departments in California, Florida and Texas, concluded that police were no more likely to shoot non-whites than whites after factoring in extenuating circumstances.
“On the most extreme use of force — officer-involved shootings — we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account,” said Harvard economics professor Roland G. Fryer Jr. in the abstract of the July 2016 paper.
Mr. Fryer, who is black, told The New York Times that the finding of no racial discrimination in police shootings was “the most surprising result of my career.”
At the same time, the study found blacks and Hispanics were more than 50 percent more likely to experience physical interactions with police, including touching, pushing, handcuffing, drawing a weapon, and using a baton or pepper spray.
The 63-page study, “An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force,” appears to support research conducted at Washington State University showing that officers in simulation tests were actually less likely to shoot at blacks than whites.
The paper also challenges the contention by the new wave of civil-rights groups such as Black Lives Matter that racist police are singling out blacks for shootings.
The findings are nothing if not timely, coming after protests spurred by two deadly incidents earlier this month involving black men shot and killed by police in Louisiana and Minnesota.
Their deaths, which are under review, spurred a sniper attack on police Thursday in Dallas during a Black Lives Matter march that left five officers dead and seven injured.
The 25-year-old gunman, Micah Xavier Johnson, told negotiators he wanted to take out white people, especially officers. He was killed after Dallas police detonated a remote-control robot in his vicinity after he refused for hours to exit a college building.
Mr. Fryer’s study found that police are 50 percent more likely to engage in physical interactions with blacks and Hispanics, including touching, pushing and drawing weapons.
“Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities,” the paper said.
The study examined data collected in six Texas cities, three Florida counties and Los Angeles County, as well as New York City’s Stop, Question and Frisk program.
Mr. Fryer said that the “importance of our results for racial inequality is unclear.”
“It is plausible that racial differences in lower level uses of force are simply a distraction and movements such as Black Lives Matter should seek solutions within their own communities rather than changing the behaviors of police and other external forces,” he said in the study’s conclusion.
“Much more troubling, due to their frequency and potential impact on minority belief formation, is the possibility that racial differences in police use of nonlethal force have spillovers on myriad dimensions of racial inequality,” Mr. Fryer said.
Yes I read the image because that was what was posted. I have not yet read the second study you posted, but the qualifications and limiting factors identified in the first study explain why the highlighted statement is clickbait at best. But that is to be expected with modern "journalism".
(This post was last modified: 02-21-2018 03:58 PM by Repo.)
|
|
| 02-21-2018 03:56 PM |
|
|
Thot Leader
Wingman
  
Posts: 775
Joined: Feb 2018
Reputation: 11
|
RE: The Chris Rock thread
Rock was my alltime favorite comedian, and I guess he still is, but I couldn't make it through his latest special. Uninspired, phoned-in, pandering to black and SJW audiences. He wasn't always like that. He used to deal with race and politics in an even-handed way, pointing out historical and structural racism while also calling out black people for their own poor decisions. Now it's just "white people are terrible, Trump is terrible, America sucks, it's basically impossible to get ahead if you're black", repackaged over and over into predictable jokes. I guess the divorce was hard on him and he needs to get paid. Pity.
|
|
| 03-14-2018 08:17 PM |
|
The following 3 users Like Thot Leader's post:3 users Like Thot Leader's post
Captainstabbin, Brebelle3, Buck Wild
|