Post: #226

Amber Heard in this NSFW in few pictures looks like she has boy breasts:



And in other pictures she looks just fine, but still crazy

Post: #227

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/cel...d4af9a64dc

Quote:AMBER Heard has retracted her request for spousal support from her estranged husband Johnny Depp saying her motives have been misinterpreted.
In court documents obtained by E! News, Heard says she wanted to make clear that her divorce was not about money.
She claims her initial request for $50,000 per month is being “used against me to distract and divert the public away from the very serious real issue of domestic violence.
“In light of the co-ordinated false and negative media campaign falsely depicting my attempts to attain a CLETS Domestic Violence Restraining Order as being financially motivated, I am hereby with drawing the request ... for spousal support.”
Heard said she initially asked for a monetary figure because she thought it was standard procedure in a divorce case.
The document does however stipulate that she can request financial support in the future.

Translation: having taken PR damage by the leaking of court documents indicating her expenses are Marie Antoinette in scale, she's now pivoting to make it all about domestic violence instead.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #228

She claims her initial request for $50,000 per month is being “used against me to distract and divert the public away from the very serious real issue of domestic violence.

Jesus christ. That's about what I made after getting a STEM degree and graduating at the top of the class in college. Except I was getting it in a year.

I have zero sympathy for these ridiculous spousal assaultrimony claims.

Post: #229

(06-15-2016 12:34 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  AMBER Heard has retracted her request for spousal support from her estranged husband Johnny Depp saying her motives have been misinterpreted.
In court documents obtained by E! News, Heard says she wanted to make clear that her divorce was not about money.
She claims her initial request for $50,000 per month is being “used against me to distract and divert the public away from the very serious real issue of domestic violence.
“In light of the co-ordinated false and negative media campaign falsely depicting my attempts to attain a CLETS Domestic Violence Restraining Order as being financially motivated, I am hereby with drawing the request ... for spousal support.”
Heard said she initially asked for a monetary figure because she thought it was standard procedure in a divorce case.
The document does however stipulate that she can request financial support in the future.

I am confused about this part. How is it that she can ask for alimony in the future?

Like can she as for alimony 2-5 years after this divorce ?

Post: #230

I think she means when the MSM give her another five minutes. You know, after Orlando the the gays and stuff.

Post: #231

(06-15-2016 01:26 AM)Lucario Wrote:  

(06-15-2016 12:34 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  AMBER Heard has retracted her request for spousal support from her estranged husband Johnny Depp saying her motives have been misinterpreted.
In court documents obtained by E! News, Heard says she wanted to make clear that her divorce was not about money.
She claims her initial request for $50,000 per month is being “used against me to distract and divert the public away from the very serious real issue of domestic violence.
“In light of the co-ordinated false and negative media campaign falsely depicting my attempts to attain a CLETS Domestic Violence Restraining Order as being financially motivated, I am hereby with drawing the request ... for spousal support.”
Heard said she initially asked for a monetary figure because she thought it was standard procedure in a divorce case.
The document does however stipulate that she can request financial support in the future.

I am confused about this part. How is it that she can ask for alimony in the future?

Like can she as for alimony 2-5 years after this divorce ?

There are stories of men, who after divorce and some time has passed, were taken to the court for money and the ex-wife won. Plenty of stories out there, some real, some bullshit. But it has happened and the lawyer who was hired by Amber will know this.

Whatever this cunt comes up with next is what the lawyer wants.

Post: #232

LOL, Amber Heard's ex -- the domestic violence case -- either has Stockholm Syndrome or understands the position of every man falsely accused of rape:

http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/cel...1ed8e5ff3a

Quote:AMBER Heard’s ex-girlfriend says the actor never should have been charged with domestic violence.
In a statement released to Page Six, Tasya van Ree said that the 2009 incident was actually a misunderstanding by two other individuals in a “power position” who she felt demonstrated misogynistic and homophobic leanings, reports the New York Post.
“In 2009, Amber was wrongfully accused for an incident that was misinterpreted and over-sensationalised by two individuals in a power position. I recount hints of misogynistic attitudes toward us which later appeared to be homophobic when they found out we were domestic partners and not just ‘friends.’

Note the standard accusation of homophobia against the cops. Too bad the stupid shit didn't realise the cop who made the arrest was a lesbian herself.

Quote:Charges were quickly dropped and she was released moments later. It’s disheartening that Amber’s integrity and story are being questioned yet again. Amber is a brilliant, honest and beautiful woman and I have the utmost respect for her. We shared five wonderful years together and remain close to this day.”
On Tuesday, TMZ reported that Heard, who has accused estranged husband Johnny Depp of spousal abuse, was charged with misdemeanour domestic violence after an alleged fight with van Ree at the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
According to law enforcement sources and documents, Heard allegedly grabbed and struck Ree on the arm, which triggered the arrest.
Heard’s mugshot was taken and she appeared in court the next day, but prosecutors declined to move forward with the case as both women were residents of California, not Seattle, according to TMZ.
Last month Heard filed for divorce from Depp and obtained a restraining order against him amid allegations of abuse during their 15-month marriage.

The real question being: if we judge domestic violence accounts based on the veracity of ex-partners, why do Heard's exes count and Johnny's don't?

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #233

Rhetorical in nature, I take it, Para?

Post: #234

(06-15-2016 10:07 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Rhetorical in nature, I take it, Para?

Maybe, maybe not. Heard's ex by saying it was just a heated discussion actually supports the idea the relationship was a bit fractured and that Heard dishes out as hard as she gets (something that's been observed in large categories of "abusive" relationships back to Erin Pizzey).

Here's another rhetorical question: what kind of person has so little control over themselves that they're prepared to have an argument with their partner in public so heated that it attracts the attention of police officers?

This spat seems to have happened at an international airport - pretty much the definition of a public place, literally hundreds of people in close proximity. Police officers are not exactly untrained in assessing conflict levels; cops don't go stomping in when two friends are looking annoyed with one another, and airports are not uncommonly places where stress levels can rise.

The cops would not have known on first look or first approach that these two were carpetlickers. Indeed they might not have realised that the Johnny Depp impersonator was a girl at all. But the cops would have been trained to notice body language and indications of real and escalating confrontation, in an environment where they're constantly on alert for Ahmeds wearing bulky jackets. I think they would've only been drawn to this situation when the confrontation had reached the point of Heard screaming at Taser and scaring the straights around them. That is the only scenario I can conceive of outside of one of the said straights actually whistling for the cops because these two clamsuckers were causing a racket.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #235

(06-15-2016 12:34 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  http://www.news.com.au/entertainment/cel...d4af9a64dc

Quote:AMBER Heard has retracted her request for spousal support from her estranged husband Johnny Depp saying her motives have been misinterpreted.
In court documents obtained by E! News, Heard says she wanted to make clear that her divorce was not about money.
She claims her initial request for $50,000 per month is being “used against me to distract and divert the public away from the very serious real issue of domestic violence.
“In light of the co-ordinated false and negative media campaign falsely depicting my attempts to attain a CLETS Domestic Violence Restraining Order as being financially motivated, I am hereby with drawing the request ... for spousal support.”
Heard said she initially asked for a monetary figure because she thought it was standard procedure in a divorce case.
The document does however stipulate that she can request financial support in the future.

Translation: having taken PR damage by the leaking of court documents indicating her expenses are Marie Antoinette in scale, she's now pivoting to make it all about domestic violence instead.

Welcome to the information age Amber!
If you live your life in the public eye, expect people to know a hell of a lot.

Post: #236

A public spat at an airport? Borderlines love this kind of thing. No qualms whatever.

She strikes me as a Queen/Witch type.

Post: #237

this chick has a great body, decent titties for small ones, she contains enough initial crazy to attract a guy without having to get into the full reveal which comes later of just how BSC she really is when she has attached herself like a barnacle to you can and you can't peel her from the hull. I'm voting Borderline as well, my ex wife was a borderline, good luck to JD if she is. Once you have one in your life your radar for spotting BSC borderlines becomes very well honed. I read the statement from the ex girlfriend as a "thank god she has found someone else to focus on, I'll put out a nice statement so that she doesn't look back my way and can keep her crazy ass focused on him"

Post: #238

the fatal mistake that Johnny did, was like few other rich men, to get married. Now he stands to lose 60% of his hard earned wealth

Post: #239

Johnny was playing checkers with chess playing hoes.

Post: #240

I don't think he'll really be hurting after losing 60% of his "hard earned" wealth. He'll just get married again, then divorced, and still won't feel it.
I'm not saying that divorce rape is fine, it's just that it doesn't matter for those that can afford it many times. He'll probably do another tim burton movie, and be fine.

Post: #241

^^^^losing 60 percent of his networth to some worthless cunt. That would bother me. Also, I guess this will be his last marriage. Johnny should put some stuff in his siblings names or parents.

Post: #242

Of course that would bother you, it would bother me, and I'm sure it would bother 99% of men. Those that aren't bothered, are those that can afford it. One day I will not be bothered by it.

Post: #243

(06-17-2016 10:45 AM)spokepoker Wrote:  I don't think he'll really be hurting after losing 60% of his "hard earned" wealth. He'll just get married again, then divorced, and still won't feel it.
I'm not saying that divorce rape is fine, it's just that it doesn't matter for those that can afford it many times. He'll probably do another tim burton movie, and be fine.

I used to think this way too, until:

1). It started to come out that these types of arrangements were so burdensome that rich men couldn't really afford them. Stars such as Ricky Nelson (a '50s singer) and John Cleese had alimony declared on projected income. These men were hit so hard financially they needed to keep working just to make the payments. In Nelson's case, it literally caused his death. His incessant touring to make alimony payments was the reason he was on the plane that crashed in 1985.

2). These rulings then affect regular men. It might not seem a big deal that Depp has to pay $50K a month. But that comes out to a percentage. And when that same percentage is required by law for the Average Joe, he winds up living in poverty while his wages go to his ex. A lot of alimony is geared toward the woman getting remarried. So a lot of these women wind up living with men and not marrying them so they can keep the checks rolling in.

***

Before this forum existed and before the Manosphere, there was a loose-knit group of "proto-Mansophere" men whose primary focus online centered on unfair divorce and child support arrangements. They helped build the manosphere, but I'm worrying their original message is being forgotten.

One of the best of these guys was activist-lawyer Glenn Sacks, a father's rights advocate. Here is the link to his old columns. Anyone planning on getting married should read them, esp. the ones before 2010.

From today's vantage point, this guy might not fit the current manosphere mold (especially his recent columns on Bernie Sanders). But in his day (2001-07), the guy was a true innovator and a major thorn in the media's side. He said things no one else was saying and he somehow got his writing in mainstream publications (probably because they were bigger then, and therefore had room for more points of view).

Glenn's mere name was so incendiary, in fact, that when I quoted one sentence from him in a mainstream media article once, I was immediately pounced upon by a social justice type, who was indignant that (get this) I placed his name alongside that of some women I'd also quoted.

Anyway, Glenn Sacks' columns in that link above contain a lot of food for thought about unfair divorce laws, child support arrangements, and child custody. Definitely worth reading.

Post: #244

Quote:Stars such as Ricky Nelson (a '50s singer) and John Cleese had alimony declared on projected income. These men were hit so hard financially they needed to keep working just to make the payments.

The divorce rape case that always comes to mind for me is Dave Foley. In his interview with Rogan, he just seems so...broken.

Quote:One of the best of these guys was activist-lawyer Glenn Sacks, a father's rights advocate.

When I was getting custody-raped in the mid-90s, I remember finding Glenn Sacks's web site. That site saved my sanity because I was choking hard on the family court red pill at the time. Dude's a hero in my book.

Post: #245

(06-17-2016 10:56 AM)fugly1000 Wrote:  ^^^^losing 60 percent of his networth to some worthless cunt. That would bother me. Also, I guess this will be his last marriage. Johnny should put some stuff in his siblings names or parents.

Also paying her some inflated crazy monthly alimony for who knows how many years, your money that she will be spending on purses, shoes and travels...

And still, this is the reality for over 50% of men who , not knowing any better, made the fatal mistake of getting married

Post: #246

An Idiot he may be, a super cunt she definitely is, but there is no way in hell she is worth even 10% of his networth. She did nothing to boost his star in Hollywood or amongst the people who watch his movies, me included.

Just who the fuck is this woman? Someone tell me how evidence can be manufactured to give women like her millions upon millions of another persons wealth because she opened her legs for a while. They have no children, married for a short time AND she wasn't accustomed to living at his level.

Johnny must have pissed someone off to get bent over like this, surely. An ass kicking doesn't just fall from the sky.

Post: #247

(06-17-2016 12:22 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  Just who the fuck is this woman? Someone tell me how evidence can be manufactured to give women like her millions upon millions of another persons wealth because she opened her legs for a while.

As we all saw, it always goes the same way:
she also manufactured a "domestic abuse" sobbing story,
just the next day after Johnny Depp's mum passed away

Post: #248

(06-15-2016 01:26 AM)Lucario Wrote:  

(06-15-2016 12:34 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  AMBER Heard has retracted her request for spousal support from her estranged husband Johnny Depp saying her motives have been misinterpreted.
In court documents obtained by E! News, Heard says she wanted to make clear that her divorce was not about money.
She claims her initial request for $50,000 per month is being “used against me to distract and divert the public away from the very serious real issue of domestic violence.
“In light of the co-ordinated false and negative media campaign falsely depicting my attempts to attain a CLETS Domestic Violence Restraining Order as being financially motivated, I am hereby with drawing the request ... for spousal support.”
Heard said she initially asked for a monetary figure because she thought it was standard procedure in a divorce case.
The document does however stipulate that she can request financial support in the future.

I am confused about this part. How is it that she can ask for alimony in the future?

Like can she as for alimony 2-5 years after this divorce ?

She won't have to wait that long. She WILL be awarded alimony as part of the divorce settlement. That could be years in the future, when the heat dies down.

Post: #249

They were only married for one year, I thought to get half she would have to be married to him for 10 years. Or is that why she is doing the domestic violence complaints, to get more money?

Post: #250

(06-17-2016 10:24 AM)seniol Wrote:  the fatal mistake that Johnny did, was like few other rich men, to get married. Now he stands to lose 60% of his hard earned wealth

How does he stand to lose 60% of his worth? How are you determining that?

She's dropped her demands already (shown prior in the thread) and they were only married a short time, it's highly unlikely she'll get anywhere near that amount.