Post: #76

(05-26-2016 12:29 PM)LeeEnfield303 Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 10:32 AM)Jvramerys Wrote:  So stating that intelligence is not the most important attribute a woman must have is woman hating?
Throughout mankind history women had no kind of formal education, and they were excelent wife material. A simple woman can be a pleasure in man's life.

If she doesn't have formal instruction/education(college degree, etc...) doesn't mean she must be retarded/dumb.

If the "grammar" on that sign she's holding is any indication, Johnny was in no danger of being overwhelmed by her intellect.

She reads Ayn Rand so your strawman argument is mute.

Post: #77

Reminds me of the proverb, a wise man is a fool in the affairs of women.

Post: #78

(05-26-2016 11:39 AM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  Ahem:

(12-23-2014 12:26 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  The only part where he went wrong was getting married.

Post: #79

Annnnnnd this, ladies and gentleman, is a strong and independant woman divorce-raping a man.

Post: #80

I'll concede while the wall was near she was still attractive. Regardless ignored many classic red flags and payed for it.

Post: #81

(05-26-2016 12:28 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 12:13 PM)birthday cat Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 10:32 AM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 09:38 AM)Gmac Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 08:56 AM)Lucario Wrote:  Brains on a woman are like nipples on a man...useless. woman who are smarter are far more manipulative and hence more of a threat for dating/marriage...Hope Johnny is well covered, would hate to see him go down.

You guys often lose me with the women hating.

Dumb women are a pain in the ass to keep around. They're always breaking shit, can't do anything by themselves, and can't hold a conversation about anything relevant. Usually at least, intelligent women have their own hobbies... so they aren't wanting to spend every waking goddamn minute with me. I would know.

Whew, that felt better.

On topic:

Depp made a big mistake not getting a pre-nup, no doubt about it... but you can't blame a man (even a celebrity) for wanting to get married in his 50s. It's not fun trying to sustain a harem forever. I mean, look at what happened to Hugh Heffner. Having a woman around for the long haul is nice. Doesn't mean you can't get some strange now and then on the side.

So stating that intelligence is not the most important attribute a woman must have is woman hating?
Throughout mankind history women had no kind of formal education, and they were excelent wife material. A simple woman can be a pleasure in man's life.

If she doesn't have formal instruction/education(college degree, etc...) doesn't mean she must be retarded/dumb.

Multiple straw man arguments. You didn't address anything Gmac said. This is a great example of how a feminist frames an argument.

And if you think women were sugar and spice and everything nice "throughout mankind history" before they had formal education then you need to check your history sources.

1. Yes it was adressed(I could've wrote two thousand words, but I wrote two lines instead does that bothers you?) . No, using shame language is how feminist frames an argument.

2. They are way better now, since now they have more education I guess...

I assume you aren't fluent in English so you didn't understand.

Nothing in your original comment refuted or countered anything that Gmac said.

You insinuate that Gmac said a lot of things that he didn't say and then you argued against those points. Those are straw man arguments. You can call it shaming language if you want but that is precisely how feminists argue and you need to better than that in a discussion with logical thinking men.

Post: #82

The marriage was a front to begin with, she was a lesbian at the time.

Depp seems a bit off as well, he had a full make out session with some talk show host.

Post: #83

(05-26-2016 01:04 PM)birthday cat Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 12:28 PM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 12:13 PM)birthday cat Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 10:32 AM)Jvramerys Wrote:  

(05-26-2016 09:38 AM)Gmac Wrote:  You guys often lose me with the women hating.

Dumb women are a pain in the ass to keep around. They're always breaking shit, can't do anything by themselves, and can't hold a conversation about anything relevant. Usually at least, intelligent women have their own hobbies... so they aren't wanting to spend every waking goddamn minute with me. I would know.

Whew, that felt better.

On topic:

Depp made a big mistake not getting a pre-nup, no doubt about it... but you can't blame a man (even a celebrity) for wanting to get married in his 50s. It's not fun trying to sustain a harem forever. I mean, look at what happened to Hugh Heffner. Having a woman around for the long haul is nice. Doesn't mean you can't get some strange now and then on the side.

So stating that intelligence is not the most important attribute a woman must have is woman hating?
Throughout mankind history women had no kind of formal education, and they were excelent wife material. A simple woman can be a pleasure in man's life.

If she doesn't have formal instruction/education(college degree, etc...) doesn't mean she must be retarded/dumb.

Multiple straw man arguments. You didn't address anything Gmac said. This is a great example of how a feminist frames an argument.

And if you think women were sugar and spice and everything nice "throughout mankind history" before they had formal education then you need to check your history sources.

1. Yes it was adressed(I could've wrote two thousand words, but I wrote two lines instead does that bothers you?) . No, using shame language is how feminist frames an argument.

2. They are way better now, since now they have more education I guess...

I assume you aren't fluent in English so you didn't understand.

Nothing in your original comment refuted or countered anything that Gmac said.

You insinuate that Gmac said a lot of things that he didn't say and then you argued against those points. Those are straw man arguments. You can call it shaming language if you want but that is precisely how feminists argue and you need to better than that in a discussion with logical thinking men.

You can circle around it anyway you want, he said that women that aren't smart they break things, can't do anything by themselves, and can't hold a conversation about anything relevant.

I just said that throughout human history women were basically illiterates(coudn't do a lot of things by themselves, and couldn't hold a conversation about anything relevant, in other words not smart by today standards) they were useless with anything besides taking care of the house, her family and her man. My point is women can be "dumbs" and still be great women, wives, without being a pain in the ass to keep around.

Post: #84

(05-26-2016 09:38 AM)Gmac Wrote:  Dumb women are a pain in the ass to keep around. They're always breaking shit, can't do anything by themselves, and can't hold a conversation about anything relevant. Usually at least, intelligent women have their own hobbies... so they aren't wanting to spend every waking goddamn minute with me. I would know.

Whew, that felt better.

I'm with Gmac on this.

I really can't stand being around dumb women for the reasons mentioned. Dealing with dumb women often is less about guidance and leading and more about babysitting and tedious hand holding. The dividing line can be a bit blurry sometimes but having dealt with my share of dumb sluts, it can get really tiresome to deal with someone who has a overly dependent and dumb personality.

I should further clarify though that dumb/smart isn't strictly about formal education in my mind but more about general competency with every day matters and having some broad (beyond superficial) understanding about a variety of topics. The aforementioned combined with a submissive,feminine, friendly personality is really the ideal for me.

The problem is that many American born and raised chicks (especially white chicks) with university educations (potential "smart" people) is that they think they are "smart" because they have a degree in something and a professional job. Combined with liberal/feminist university propaganda and you get a ton of arrogant unfeminine dumb women who think they are smart. Shitty combo.

In the US for me at least, the women I seem to gel best with and who have the most LTR potential are:

1) Foreign born and raised women (until their teens/early 20s) with university educations and

2) 2nd generation US born women with immigrant parents.

Both groups have a tendency from my experience to produce women who have a nice mix of feminine/friendly/submissive behavior while also possessing solid intellect/competency skills; the latter case making it so where talking to them isn't a chore and I don't have to babysit them with regards to every little thing.

Post: #85

^ Like attracts like

Post: #86

There's something off about Depp himself..I can't quite put my finger on what it is.

Bi? He just doesn't strike me as the type that can actually fuck a woman properly.

(or I'm just hatin')

Post: #87

(05-26-2016 02:05 PM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  There's something off about Depp himself..I can't quite put my finger on what it is.

Pretty boy in way over his head?

Post: #88

Thus is the fate of those who would marry a girl as she approaches the Wall - despite fame, money, or looks.

Post: #89

http://www.tmz.com/2016/05/27/amber-hear...qus_thread

She claims Depp smashed his iPhone on her face....

...We're told cops told Amber they would find Johnny and arrest him if she gave a statement about the alleged violence, but she refused. Officers told her if she changed her mind she could call them....

...Cops gave Amber this business card and told her to call if she wants to press charges. As far as we know, she has not gone back to the cops....

Post: #90

^ a razor sharp bruise line.. strange

Post: #91

I don't know about this one.
I think they're both mendacious and duplicitous.

Depp's a wino and while he was cool in the 90s and early 2000s he's a weird alcoholic mofo now.

Heard is hot as hell but with this attention grabbing victim shit, she's lost some major points.

Post: #92

Depp hit a woman with an Iphone? The same woman who just announced she wants money out of him and intends to divorce his ass in court?

That woman?

How nice of the white knight brigade to say they'll arrest him without any evidence. He would sue them to high hell.

Post: #93

   
   
   
   

If it happened then fine but those marks in the last two photos don't even match.

edit - I'm not the only one who seems to have noticed:

   

Post: #94

(05-27-2016 05:18 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  If it happened then fine but those marks in the last two photos don't even match.

edit - I'm not the only one who seems to have noticed:

I'm pretty sure that the picture where the bruise moved lower on her cheek is from the moment she hit the wall.

Bitch is fucking plane now.

Post: #95

(05-27-2016 06:46 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(05-27-2016 05:18 PM)Nineteen84 Wrote:  If it happened then fine but those marks in the last two photos don't even match.

edit - I'm not the only one who seems to have noticed:

I'm pretty sure that the picture where the bruise moved lower on her cheek is from the moment she hit the wall.

Bitch is fucking plane now.

Could be, got it from the daily mail site. Quote below it:

Quote:The actress submitted a photo of a large bruise around her eye as evidence (above) in her claim that was reportedly taken on Saturday after Depp hit her

Post: #96

Let's step back a second. The recent turn of events (i.e. Depp getting accused of assaulting his wife) should make us assess Depp's character.

And that character is someone who took the time to create a video mocking Donald Trump and his "Eastern European bride" back in February as part of an UN-Funny Or Die video called "Trump's The Art of the Deal: The Trailer." For this effort, Depp was praised by his Hollywood cronies for donning makeup to look like Trump and acting the fool.

As it stands today, it doesn't matter whether Depp beat up Heard. If he did, he's a lowlife. If he didn't he's a dumbass for not vetting his women better and allowing a hysteric who makes false accusations into his inner circle.

In the weird world of Hollywood and newspapers, this is someone who holds moral authority over Donald Trump -- they said as much by praising the above video. It's important to remember that. The New York Times recently tried to smear Trump with a large-scale article titled "Trump's Women." Their attempt fizzled. Their reporting was deemed to be false by two of the eight women they interviewed and the general thesis of the story was said to be: "He dated a lot. SINNER!"*

So, I'm wondering when the New York Times will do a "Depp's Women" article. After all, he's being accused of leaving one bloody. Since Depp has stepped into the political arena as a self-proclaimed Voice of Authority, doesn't he warrant an investigation as well? I won't hold my breath.

* Here is a hilarious takedown of that story by Camille Paglia in Salon. Much better than the article itself. It's worth giving them the click so they'll run more of her.

Post: #97

^I totally forgot:







Now, I remember the collective reddit circlejerk over that.

Post: #98

Spent 14 years in his previous arrangement before this.

Felt the call of middle age.

Shafted the mother of his kids for young strange.

Didn't marry his previous girl after 14 years and two kids, but did marry this one after 3 years.

Now has allegations of physical abuse, a restraining order and an application for financial support, requesting "$US50,000 a month for spousal support based on their lifestyle."

After a decade and a half in a relationship, whatever game and awareness the man had had atrophied

He thought his status and resources absolved him of the tribulations of the common man.

He was lazy, ignorant and arrogant, and is now going to be taken for a several million dollar ride.

Outplayed and outgunned.

Post: #99

Ambivalent towards Depp, yet I can imagine the thought process of Heard.

"Oh shit, everyone thinks I'm a cunt for divorcing a man three days after his mothers death!
Better claim domestic violence!"

Post: #100

Oops... :

Report: Cops Say No Evidence of Injuries to Amber Heard on Night Actress Says Johnny Depp Assaulted Her

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2...hnny-depp/

Police arriving at Amber Heard and Johnny Depp’s apartment Saturday night found no evidence of injuries consistent with the domestic violence the actress has accused her husband of, according to a report.

The 30-year-old Rum Diary actress was in court Friday morning to file for a restraining order against Depp, 52, and reportedly brought along pictures of her bruised face as evidence in the case.

The judge ultimately granted Heard a temporary restraining order against Depp. Heard filed for divorce from the Pirates of the Caribbean star on Monday, after just 15 months of marriage.

Now, TMZ reports that LAPD sources said they did not see the bruises on Heard’s face when they arrived to take a statement from the actress last Saturday night. Heard alleged in court Friday that Depp threw a cellphone at her face, which caused the bruising, and smashed various objects around their apartment, eventually fleeing before the cops arrived.