Post: #126

I tried OregonToSoCal's line about looking forward to matching and not hearing from you, and got this. I'm pretty sure I matched with this girl a few months ago either here or Tinder when I had a more traditional bio and she didn't respond to me.

Post: #127

I haven't been able to find this

Is there any reason NOT to swipe right on Bumble apart from girl not being able to give you a boner at all?

It seems there's no consequence for the right swiping, which I find weird for a Tinder spin-off.

Also, have people noticed that it'll cycle between absolutely brutal runs of 2-4s to then 7s and up for 10 swipes at a time?

Just wondering

Post: #128

So here's the female mating strategy for Bumble:

Open every guy with a "hey" so their profile doesn't disappear after 24 hours. Collect as many orbiters as possible. May or may not pick the best one. Move a couple guys to social media, a few more to texting, now she's got a full pipeline of attention.

Post: #129

Bumble has so fake profiles its not even funny. They basically have save every hot girl who signs up and put them right in front to make it seem tons of hot bitches are using it. Don't believe it, saw someone on there whose not even alive, and another one with a boyfriend who I know she wont fuck around wit.

Post: #130

(08-14-2016 04:32 PM)godzilla Wrote:  Bumble has so fake profiles its not even funny. They basically have save every hot girl who signs up and put them right in front to make it seem tons of hot bitches are using it. Don't believe it, saw someone on there whose not even alive, and another one with a boyfriend who I know she wont fuck around wit.

You don't seem to know what the word "fake" means.

Bumble doesn't delete or deactivate inactive profiles, and yes, their algorithm sorts the most right-swiped to the top. Everyone knows this.

No reason to throw around the word fake when these people clearly signed up for the app at one time (doesn't mean they still actively use it).

Post: #131

the 10 or so girls I've banged off bumble weren't fake at all.

Shit is real, get your profile set up right.

Post: #132

Bumble is a more polarized version of Tinder. Better looking guys will do better on Bumble than they will on Tinder, worse-looking guys will do worse.

Post: #133

^Thanks for the English lesson ten post asshole. One of the definitions for the word fake is "to deceive"

You're incorrect. Theres no difference between Bumble using a girls profile whose been inactive for a year and Bumble taking random pics off the internet and creating profiles. They are both non available to be match so hence, they are fake l.

Post: #134

^

This is essentially true.

I've noticed in doing the delete profile thing every couple weeks or so, the same people are at the top and never swipe. Believe what you want about me, these are clearly never used profiles that have decent pics.

Here's the other thing that is particular to bumble but a general trend for tinder --- the 29-33 age range gets a guy like me tons of matches, but the girls are 5-6 at best on average. I almost feel bad because I'm like a girl, I talk to them just for practice or to see how stupid they are, but know precisely on the instant I see their pic if they even had a chance (which is almost never).

I've randomly hit 18-25 girls on there, but Tinder is where it happens much more. As someone else said, this is more for IG and snap followers in this crowd.

Bumble and Tinder are garbage, but I've also noted they are far worse in the summer, for some reason October it picks up big (relatively).

It seems to me that since these aren't in anyone's serious contemplation for any relationship anyway, why add to the thirst? SA at least has that particular interest that makes THEM thirsty. I sorta hate that this is true, but I've met very few girls that are cool at all, let alone wasting time on to try to bang. The average to bad looking ones were only interesting because they were sexual, but then you consider that these girls are crazy diseased, and the whole thing is even more filthy than you ever thought.

Post: #135

(08-14-2016 10:12 PM)godzilla Wrote:  ^Thanks for the English lesson ten post asshole. One of the definitions for the word fake is "to deceive"

You're incorrect. Theres no difference between Bumble using a girls profile whose been inactive for a year and Bumble taking random pics off the internet and creating profiles. They are both non available to be match so hence, they are fake l.

Yes, there is. There is no deception going on here.

1. If a girl goes into her account settings and clicks Delete Account, the account is deleted. The girls you're seeing have uninstalled the app without doing this.
2. The Bumble girl could log back in at any time and review her matches.

You are rationalizing your decision to use the word fake because you were frustrated. Stop doing that.

Post: #136

(08-14-2016 04:32 PM)godzilla Wrote:  Bumble has so fake profiles its not even funny. They basically have save every hot girl who signs up and put them right in front to make it seem tons of hot bitches are using it. Don't believe it, saw someone on there whose not even alive, and another one with a boyfriend who I know she wont fuck around wit.

Yes, these profiles are absolutely fake. Oftentimes they are stock model pictures front loaded to give the appearance that Bumble has a plethora of attractive people. The fatties and ug's will soon appear. You can especially tell the fake profiles by the vague job descriptions and university's attended.

There are some real women buried in there. I've been on a few bumble-meet-n-greets.
The fake profiles are more annoying than anything, but Bumble is a good back-up tool.

Post: #137

(08-15-2016 04:35 PM)DimeBait Wrote:  

(08-14-2016 04:32 PM)godzilla Wrote:  Bumble has so fake profiles its not even funny. They basically have save every hot girl who signs up and put them right in front to make it seem tons of hot bitches are using it. Don't believe it, saw someone on there whose not even alive, and another one with a boyfriend who I know she wont fuck around wit.

Yes, these profiles are absolutely fake. Oftentimes they are stock model pictures front loaded to give the appearance that Bumble has a plethora of attractive people. The fatties and ug's will soon appear. You can especially tell the fake profiles by the vague job descriptions and university's attended.

There are some real women buried in there. I've been on a few bumble-meet-n-greets.
The fake profiles are more annoying than anything, but Bumble is a good back-up tool.

Nope. They aren't. You can easily find these girls on social media by using Google reverse image search or Google searching their names and universities/jobs.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bumble/comments...rest_once/

Post: #138

Bumble bans mirror selfies and other dumb photos from users’ profiles

Quote:There are certain kinds of photos users of dating apps tend to loathe, and the suggestive mirror selfie tends to be at the top of that list, somewhere near photos of guys holding a fish and gym selfies. That’s why today, the dating app Bumble has taken action to ban selfies of users posing in their underwear, or while wearing swimsuits indoors. In addition, you can no longer upload photos of just your child, though Bumble hasn’t gone so far as to ban images of children altogether.

Banning pictures of kids on their own makes a lot of sense. After all, the kids didn’t agree to join a dating app – this app is for adults who are 18 or older.

It also limits children’s exposure to potential predators, and respects the children’s right to privacy. However, Bumble will still allow photos of parents and children together, and will continue to leave it up to its users as to whether or not they’ll take the step of blurring out their children’s faces.

No More Mirror Selfies. You're Welcome, Folks!

Quote:Imagine Bumble being a restaurant where you can introduce yourself to people who pique your interest. How would you dress, act, and conduct yourself? How would you want others to dress, act, and conduct themselves? Would you wear only your underwear? Probably not. And you probably wouldn’t feel comfortable walking up to someone in their underwear either.

...

We’ve created these rules for everyone, no matter your gender, sexual identity, or preferences. And yes, these rules apply to everyone, including Victoria’s Secret models and Liam Hemsworth (you know, if things ever go south with Miley…)

If this was driven by men, it would ban retarded snapchat filters and any pose designed to hide how fat you are.

"I'd hate myself if I had that kind of attitude, if I were that weak." - Arnold

Post: #139

^ Don't take away girl's mirror-selfies, damn it! A mirror selfie is one of the best indications a girl is DTF! She wants to make sure you know what you're getting. I've banged at least three mirror-selfie girls!

Girls with semi-pro beach shot or "activity" main photos like yoga poses in the fashion of the illustration above are all fucking timewasters, to a one!

Post: #140

I like when a girl just has half a dozen slutty mirror selfies in revealing clothing.

Bumble should ban pics of girls with other people. Can't tell you how many profiles I come across where its 3-5 pics of a group of people no clue who the actual girl is.

Same with pics of them paddle boarding. Standing on a summit holding a cardboard sign with the mountain's name and elevation on it. Doing lame "adventurous" shit that dude's don't care about. I think Bumble should just instruct women to upload 3-5 pics of just their body and face in different clothing. If you want to spice it up, thow in a pic of you sliding a casserole dish in the oven or folding laundry.

Post: #141

(10-12-2016 01:25 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  I like when a girl just has half a dozen slutty mirror selfies in revealing clothing.

Bumble should ban pics of girls with other people. Can't tell you how many profiles I come across where its 3-5 pics of a group of people no clue who the actual girl is.

Same with pics of them paddle boarding. Standing on a summit holding a cardboard sign with the mountain's name and elevation on it. Doing lame "adventurous" shit that dude's don't care about. I think Bumble should just instruct women to upload 3-5 pics of just their body and face in different clothing. If you want to spice it up, thow in a pic of you sliding a casserole dish in the oven or folding laundry.

Number one indicator to me of whether it's a worthwhile to even bother with is if the main photo a) has her smiling and b) isn't pro.

Women know at some level that smiles are attractive to men and an IOI. A girl who's giving you a frowny face through the screen isn't worth an online approach, any more than she would be at a bar.

Girls with obviously pro photos that have been retouched and treated with other post-effects either aren't going on any dates at all and just sucking up attention, or are going on hundreds of dates.

I can't remember a time I ever got the lay with a girl who had that dead-eyed condescending "don't even fucking talk to me you piece of shit" look in their main photo.

If she has a headshot photo of her smiling while the camera is angled from above as if it's what you'd see when banging her missionary - I know from past experience it's time to game on. A classic "submissive woman" tell

Post: #142

Going to resurrect this thread. I've actually had much better success with Bumble than Tinder lately. Maybe they're onto something. Now I'm matching with the over 35 crowd (I have my age filter down to 18 but I've only matched with a couple younger, neither messaged me but one was clearly an IG attention whore).

There's a bit of strategy here: use your profile to give some good bait to talk about. Definitely helps to project funny. In my case I have a joke about autocorrect. Several girls will say something about autocorrect, then it goes like this (I think I first learned a version of this on here, actually)

her: <something about autocorrect>
me: damn <girl's name> you got an awesome body
me: jesus autocorrect. That was supposed to say hi <girl's name> how's your day going?

wins every single time.

I have a lot of matches on tinder, but most of them aren't messaging. Probably the girls message first thing weeds out the ones who were never going to message back anyway, because those let the match expire on bumble.

Anyway, I know this app didn't sound great at first, but I think it's working better for me at this point.

Post: #143

mine is inverted.
I get no matches on bumble and 95% I find not worth gaming.

Tinder I get my share of fatties but if an attractive girl matches with me I can get some banter going before she denies or gives me her number

Post: #144

I've had way more success with bumble than I have previously using tinder. Getting lots more matches and been going on dates and making out every time so far, BUT I did begin using a way better profile photo. I think the quality of women is higher on Bumble too, but like everything that degrades with uptake.

Worst Opener used by a chick so far.
Girl: "Hey <name>, if you could describe yourself in one word, what would it be?"

lol 'not-interested' I'm not qualifying myself to her, and she was pretty average. Must have been power-swiping at the time.

Post: #145

There's one thing you guys seem to keep forgetting when you complain about Tinder or Bumble or <insert dating app here>.

You are not the customer.

Just like clubs, dating apps are for women. They know if they have the women, the men will show up and pay. Look at Tinder's marketing material - if it was for men it would all be ass and tits. Instead you see handholding, walks into the sunset, couples laughing together... all chick dream stuff.

The app is optimised to allow women to find the hottest men as easily as possible without being bothered by beta men. That is all. Tinder does not give a fuck what you're experience is like as a man using the app because you are not their customer.

Post: #146

I honestly don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. Helps give more incentive men to want to become red-pill and not exclusively use online

Post: #147

Just another data point. I've had much more success on Bumble than on Tinder. I'm in my 40's and typically match with the 35+. Tinder is nothing but bots and fakes for me.

Post: #148

Bumble is a superior dating app as far as swipers go. Better for men and women.

Post: #149

I've been killing it with Bumble! OKC has just been ok, and Tinder has been straight garbage. I'm older so I fux with older chicks and they seem a lot more amenable than young broads. POF was a gold mine for older broads as well despite its reputation for uggs and fatties.

Post: #150

Last couple of months:

Few hundred matches on Tinder (this doesn't include unmatching those not passing the boner test)

75ish on OKC

25 on Bumble (not including those I didn't want to match)

My profile is very short. Just a list of words to describe me. Maybe this is a problem on the more profile driven apps, but my conversion rate of visit to like on OKC is very high. This leads me to believe Bumble may have me put in the back of the queue. What would be nice is, similar to OKC, you can get a scoop on who is looking at your profile.

I am in the Washington DC area. 35.

So far Tinder has been the better investment, with OKC acting more passive (random swipe sessions, focus only on those who liked you).