Post: #51

(11-30-2014 05:53 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  Men adapt to their surroundings and learn to exploit situations. No chance any of us is taking down Facebook, iPhones, and Tinder--especially overnight.

If you truly are red pill then you have to oppose and chastise.

Post: #52

OKCupid fucking blows. It seems like girls on there (especially attractive ones) are just averse to conversation. You can easily predict who will not bother replying to you. At least they're reliable in that way.

Post: #53

(11-30-2014 06:22 PM)LouEvilSlugger Wrote:  If you truly are red pill then you have to oppose and chastise.

I guess I'm not "truly red pill." I'd rather use my time improving myself and enjoying my short time on this planet than fighting uphill battles 24/7 and browbeating people I don't care about.

Post: #54

(11-30-2014 06:35 PM)UroboricForms Wrote:  OKCupid fucking blows. It seems like girls on there (especially attractive ones) are just averse to conversation. You can easily predict who will not bother replying to you. At least they're reliable in that way.

Honestly man, this reads like a chick saying "men these days are just intimidated by a strong woman." It is a transparent rationalization for your lack of success.

Very few men are successful on OKCupid because the M:F ratio is extremely unbalanced and 90% of the girls are fucking hideous, so it's nothing to be ashamed of; just call it what it is. The semi-attractive girls are not "averse to conversation," they just have a shit ton of options and you're not the one they're picking.

Post: #55

(11-30-2014 06:35 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  I guess I'm not "truly red pill." I'd rather use my time improving myself and enjoying my short time on this planet than fighting uphill battles 24/7 and browbeating people I don't care about.

I made an OK Cupid account a few weeks back, thinking it might give me some funny fuel for the Online Girls thread, so put up a few selected pics and a seven word profile all designed to get a response.

Less than five days later: I came to the conclusion the POF women are low value, basically despise or outright fear men, and that life is too bloody short to waste time engaging with the defective.

This is beyond women 'having options'. They're damaged, and young guys I know are starting to notice.

Combine Narcissistic Personality Disorder, Nietzsche's ideas of Ressentiment, and a Dismissive-Avoidant Attachment Style, and you pretty much have the majority of woman on social media under 30.

Post: #56

It's not just limited to orientation. Look at gender, which is even worse:



The problem is that you still see trannies when you search for women even with the additional options.

Post: #57

Why isn't incel an option?

Post: #58

Why is "hijra" on that list? Is it a specific gender state only attained while on a pilgrimage to Mecca?

Post: #59

Why haven't they included 'JuiceBro'?

Post: #60

Every category fits under the "Cum-Dumpster" umbrella, except most "Men".

Post: #61

If I can select multiple genders, does that mean I can be a "Cis Man Cis Woman"? Isn't that a tad contradictory?

Post: #62

(12-01-2014 01:55 AM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Why is "hijra" on that list? Is it a specific gender state only attained while on a pilgrimage to Mecca?

Hjira are Hindustani (Indian and Pakistani) trannies:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijra_%28South_Asia%29

Post: #63

(11-30-2014 08:41 PM)DrewP Wrote:  

(11-30-2014 06:35 PM)UroboricForms Wrote:  OKCupid fucking blows. It seems like girls on there (especially attractive ones) are just averse to conversation. You can easily predict who will not bother replying to you. At least they're reliable in that way.

Honestly man, this reads like a chick saying "men these days are just intimidated by a strong woman." It is a transparent rationalization for your lack of success.

Very few men are successful on OKCupid because the M:F ratio is extremely unbalanced and 90% of the girls are fucking hideous, so it's nothing to be ashamed of; just call it what it is. The semi-attractive girls are not "averse to conversation," they just have a shit ton of options and you're not the one they're picking.

On top of that, I know for a fact a lot of women are on there for validation and attention. So the "no reply" routine might be universal. They might just be into letting message pile up to inflate their ego. Remember, women don't have the sex drives men do and thus respond to stimuli differently.

I tried several experiments, including setting up profiles with model-looking/successful guys and creating a fake female profile. Some women weren't willing to talk with any guys, but were very willing to talk with the "female" in the profile.

Oh, and another thing: women being "bisexual" is also an attention-getter more than a reality a lot of the time. I spoke to several so-called bi women as a "woman" and their idea of being bi was either kissing a girl a few times or "having feelings" for a friend.

Post: #64

Brilliant trolling opportunity: select 5 mutually exclusive "orientations" like cis + trans + heterosexual + lesbian; answer 50 questions with a mix of ultra-PC and ultra-conservative views; then message the most degenerate looking people you can find and screencap the results.

Bonus points if you can convince them your orientation actually makes sense and they were being intolerant for questioning it - "Well actually, for your information shitlord, I'm a straight cis male fronting right now, but my other headmate is a lesbian trans-man."

Post: #65

(12-01-2014 09:08 AM)Ocelot Wrote:  Brilliant trolling opportunity: select 5 mutually exclusive "orientations" like cis + trans + heterosexual + lesbian; answer 50 questions with a mix of ultra-PC and ultra-conservative views; then message the most degenerate looking people you can find and screencap the results.

Bonus points if you can convince them your orientation actually makes sense and they were being intolerant for questioning it - "Well actually, for your information shitlord, I'm a straight cis male fronting right now, but my other headmate is a lesbian trans-man."

Post: #66

Can you add "Straightosexual"?

Post: #67

Tuth, that was a very funny and truthful post - it would be great as an ROK article!

(12-01-2014 04:33 AM)fokker Wrote:  

(12-01-2014 01:55 AM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Why is "hijra" on that list? Is it a specific gender state only attained while on a pilgrimage to Mecca?

Hjira are Hindustani (Indian and Pakistani) trannies:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijra_%28South_Asia%29

India recognises three genders

Quote:India's Supreme Court has recognised transgender people as a third gender, in a landmark ruling.

"It is the right of every human being to choose their gender," it said in granting rights to those who identify themselves as neither male nor female.

It ordered the government to provide transgender people with quotas in jobs and education in line with other minorities, as well as key amenities.

According to one estimate, India has about two million transgender people.

In India, a common term used to describe transgender people, transsexuals, cross-dressers, eunuchs and transvestites is hijra.

I doubt India will go for more than three genders - hijras have been part of Indian culture for thousands of years and are treated like shit. They're not fat Americans who are "trying to find themselves".