Post: #151

The second and fifth chick from the article are very average to slightly below average on the looks scale. Just crazy they receive all this attention.

-CD

Post: #152

(11-30-2014 11:09 PM)Jestx Wrote:  

(11-30-2014 09:08 PM)DrewP Wrote:  How could it be that relatively unknown dating apps attract a higher % of hotties than mainstream ones? Wouldn't it be the hogs who are most desperate to find something that works for them?

You might this so, but no. Hot chicks always seem to find out ways to max out their sexual value before ugly girls do.

So far I haven't seen more than 2 unattractive girls on this Happn yet.

Interesting phenomenon I've also noticed. Girls who are good at keeping themselves attractive are also good at following trends and getting ahead of them. They also get results faster on any given dating site and so probably lose interest faster. Chicks who are into casual sex are also more adventuresome and so are hot to try a new personals app.

Related: there's gotta be some kind of nuclear half-life law where girls get jaded after X months on a given dating site, where X is a function of their standard of living, age, attractiveness and sexual experience. All the guys I know have found dramatically better results with gals who are new (<36-mths) on OKC/Tinder/whatever than those who have been there a while.

Post: #153

I just started working with this app. I don't live in a big city but I have access and travel to more populated areas. The hits so far seem good... but nothing is happening quite yet. I'll give it another couple of weeks and see who crops up as I do my usual movements on the globe.

Post: #154

I tried this app too, but I don't think it's hit its first critical mass where we could start pulling good quality from there. The second critical mass would be when all the thirsty men and fatties blow it up.

Post: #155

Got a girl from this back to my place on a second date, around 6.5 at best a 7. Had drinks and she was tipsy. Couldn't progress past kissing and sucking her breasts. I thought fuck this I'm not going to waste my time. Told her she could leave and that we can be friends, she kept chasing after me. Eventually put on my shoes and got her to leave. She was smiling and kept trying to work out what's wrong with her, I said she's fine and it's me and not her. Based on a lot of experience I knew it would not progress regardless of what I did.

When you have a few plates you don't have time for timewasters.

Post: #156

Happn still isn't really happening for me. I agree it is yet to hit critical mass. Right now Bumble is still where the hottest girls are, although it has been infiltrated by the plain jane masses and the fatties. 6 months ago Bumble was nothing but fine bitches. Just like Tinder was nothing but fine bitches back in 2013. Fuck I'm tired of keeping up with all these apps.

Post: #157

^I have Tinder and Happn. Can't remember when I downloaded it, but I haven't matched with anyone since being on it. Tinder is starting to render better results though. Fatties will invade all of the popular romantic-dating/hookup-apps.

Post: #158

I tried this app and it drained my battery like crazy. Did this happen to anyone else?

Post: #159

(01-06-2016 08:42 PM)brob Wrote:  Happn still isn't really happening for me. I agree it is yet to hit critical mass. Right now Bumble is still where the hottest girls are, although it has been infiltrated by the plain jane masses and the fatties. 6 months ago Bumble was nothing but fine bitches. Just like Tinder was nothing but fine bitches back in 2013. Fuck I'm tired of keeping up with all these apps.

Never tried Bumble because it sounded like the stupidest shit ever...Tinder but the girl has to send the first message? I'd read articles about it and it was chicks bitching that too many creepy guys were messaging them on Tinder. Girl, that's what the swipe-left and unmatch buttons are for. Considering the most common complaint I read on OkCupid and Tinder profiles is "send me a message, I'm not going to make the first move," Bumble sounded like it was straight playing against the market.

Post: #160

(01-07-2016 03:39 PM)BadgerHut Wrote:  

(01-06-2016 08:42 PM)brob Wrote:  Happn still isn't really happening for me. I agree it is yet to hit critical mass. Right now Bumble is still where the hottest girls are, although it has been infiltrated by the plain jane masses and the fatties. 6 months ago Bumble was nothing but fine bitches. Just like Tinder was nothing but fine bitches back in 2013. Fuck I'm tired of keeping up with all these apps.

Never tried Bumble because it sounded like the stupidest shit ever...Tinder but the girl has to send the first message? I'd read articles about it and it was chicks bitching that too many creepy guys were messaging them on Tinder. Girl, that's what the swipe-left and unmatch buttons are for. Considering the most common complaint I read on OkCupid and Tinder profiles is "send me a message, I'm not going to make the first move," Bumble sounded like it was straight playing against the market.

The concept of Bumble is pretty dumb, but it has the hottest girls by far. It's like there was a giant memo sent to every 8/10+ girl out there to get the app.

Post: #161

Bumble is mostly for female ego validation. The whole concept violates the laws of sexual dynamics. Consider it largely a waste of time.

Look at this nonsense :

http://m.fastcompany.com/3055101/designi...wers-women

Founder, more like Mounder :

Post: #162

(01-07-2016 05:03 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Bumble is mostly for female ego validation. The whole concept violates the laws of sexual dynamics. Consider it largely a waste of time.

I wholeheartedly agree with this. When we get reports of bangs happening left, right and centre from this we can revisit, until then even just getting a date is tough as fuck since nearly all women don't want to initiate.

Post: #163

Unless you happen to be the top 1% of everything, the BBD (bigger, better deal) in terms of looks, height, wealth etc. you aren't going to get girls throwing themselves at you in person, or on some dating app. Get back to day gaming or social circle IMO. Those are where the high-quality GF chicks are at.

Post: #164

Nothing is happening on happen for me. I'm using it in Mexico City (traveling abroad right now) and matched with a bunch of women, only a few good looking ones. Got two numbers, but no meeting yet. It looks like you can use fake GPS and just hop around the city to hot spots and pick up a lot more match that way. Honestly, this shit needs to be automated. Way too lazy to put too much into this app.

Post: #165

(01-07-2016 05:03 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Bumble is mostly for female ego validation. The whole concept violates the laws of sexual dynamics. Consider it largely a waste of time.

Look at this nonsense :

http://m.fastcompany.com/3055101/designi...wers-women

Founder, more like Mounder :

The idea that a dating app needs to "empower women" is a bogus premise; women are ipso facto in the power position in the mating market.

"we need a dating app that empowers women" = "all the hot guys are players that we throw ourselves at; unattractive women don't get enough attention; we don't like getting messages from unattractive guys."

Post: #166

Women have an unlimited buffet of casual sex to chose from. They do not have an unlimited source of commitment to lock down, which is ultimately what they want. Both sexes are very unhappy with this current dating market.

Post: #167

(01-07-2016 05:03 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Bumble is mostly for female ego validation. The whole concept violates the laws of sexual dynamics. Consider it largely a waste of time.

Look at this nonsense :

http://m.fastcompany.com/3055101/designi...wers-women

Founder, more like Mounder :

I think she is catfishing abnormally attractive female profiles on Bumble. I have heard women wonder there are so many CEOs who look as if they are from GQ on it.

In deleted Bumbler for the second time because I had no matches.

Post: #168

(01-10-2016 12:45 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote:  Women have an unlimited buffet of casual sex to chose from. They do not have an unlimited source of commitment to lock down, which is ultimately what they want. Both sexes are very unhappy with this current dating market.

The bottom line is that women are the gatekeepers. If the crowd within the party is unsavoury, it is because they let them in. When PUA took off it was after many celibate men in the West who were brought up to be fathers and providers suddenly saw just how much sex women who delayed marriage were actually having.

If women abandoned tertiary education and Sex in the City and demanded commitment and families during their peak fertility years, family men would be the ones getting through the picket fence gate.

Post: #169

So far bumble has been more of the same, the same girl that I banged from Hinge found me in bumble and msged me "I found you!"

I would rate the current online dating apps in the following way, based solely on my previous bangs:

1.Tinder - still the best even after the daily cap
2. Hinge - slower than tinder and I feel its getting worse
3. Happn - place of work seems to be important here(studio/networks in LA) more attractive dates but less same day bangs.
4. CmB - slower than the above but the girls are less flakey.
4. OKC - really gone down hill.
5.bumble(About the "hottest girls", pretty sure those are fake. I admit I havn't used it enough, so far the only app with no bangs for me.)

Post: #170

I agree that Bumble should be on the very bottom. The order depends also largely on location and your style of game. I am getting about similar results on Tinder and Happn, Happn has a few things going for it such as location which increases "comfort" for women, Tinder is an anonymous sex app at least that's how I use it.

I may need to take a break from this shit at some point. I am dating a really hot 22 year old Chinese girl she is like a throwback of when women were women, feminine and sweet and no games at all. Each time she visits me she brings a gift and expects nothing back. It is a shame she's going back home in a month and I have to contend again with the ten a penny vapid disgusting girls until if I'm fortunate enough I'll meet one like that again. We are playing a true numbers game here.

Post: #171

It seems like it would be helpful if I could pay for a bot service that pretends to be me on these stupid apps and sends the leads it procures to text me off the apps. The same convos over and over or puttering out after drink suggestions of the same place on repeat seems like it can be automated. Like Vincent says, it's a big numbers game. Has this been done already?

Post: #172

(01-10-2016 04:32 PM)slothpiece Wrote:  It seems like it would be helpful if I could pay for a bot service that pretends to be me on these stupid apps and sends the leads it procures to text me off the apps. The same convos over and over or puttering out after drink suggestions of the same place on repeat seems like it can be automated. Like Vincent says, it's a big numbers game. Has this been done already?

turbo talk for tinder app has worked great for me

Post: #173

Really struggling with Happn. I've gotten over 175 "crushes" (matches) but only got 2 out on dates and not a single bang. The girls are really shit at replying, pretty much every text convo I get going happens over days and the girl just stops responding before I can get the number. I run the same text game on Tinder and have no issues.

When I first started using this app the girls were of a higher quality but now it's gotten widespread and it's no better than Tinder.

So my view hasn't changed, Tinder > Happn

Post: #174

I use https://flamite.com for a tinder bot. Just have that baby run in the background while I work. Then when I have some free time, I scan for the best looking girls and start up conversations. I aim to spend the VERY least amount of time and effort on any app.

Post: #175

How I Am Now (on this app... and apparently, some really like it... as my traffic jam of dates on Saturday may well know):





and



har har har