Post: #201

(11-01-2014 09:03 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  If you can't approach and talk to women how will that change the game? Women will only select and approach attractive men? Like they don't do that already?

in nature only the top specimens of the pack get to mate with females because females spontaneuosly go to them. that's probably what feminists more or less unconsciously want: going back to a primitive state of mating where they can gravitate around alphas in harem like institutions rather than shacking up in a monogamous relationship with a random guy just because society tell them so.
promoting a gender apartheid where you can't talk to stranger women is a first step to realize that scenario.

Post: #202

(10-31-2014 02:25 PM)J DOE Wrote:  


A good looking dude decided to do the reverse, I expect this to go viral soon.

Also, check out the guy at the end who turns his girl away

It's very instructive that he gets looks, I think, not only because of how he's built or how handsome he may be, but the way he carries himself. He's not rushed, he's not desperate, he's slow and deliberate, shoulders back, head held high, and couldn't give a fuck about what's going on around him. It's very alpha and very effective. Good field lesson, thanks.

Caveat: one has to wonder what the setup with the cameraman was - if it's a guy walking backwards and he's filming the model, that's going to draw unusual attention to the subject of the film. But it looks like nobody noticed the camera and it was concealed in a backpack or something similar.

It would be interesting to watch this play out in DC, but I'm afraid the homosexual male observers would probably outnumber the females, certainly the attractive ones.

Post: #203

(10-31-2014 12:19 PM)kbell Wrote:  Almost all of the attractive Jewish women from my Shul that I grew up going to, have dated and or engaged to nonjews. They all know about the statistics that withing one or two generations their family will be non jewish from mixed marriages. Yet they still marry out. They also tend to all be super obnoxious and demand the world, yet don't offer much. The only Jews that will be left are the orthodox which I guess are purple pill. Strange group, but they do keep the women in line a lot more than the rest of Judaism.

Never mind the Jewish guys who live overseas, particularly in Asia. They completely lose interest once they find out what's out there beyond the Shul. If they never have to come back, it's easy to leave the flock. Can't say as I blame them.

Post: #204

(10-31-2014 09:32 PM)dholland662 Wrote:  

(10-31-2014 09:15 PM)Dusty Wrote:  These people are fucking liars and exaggerators.

oh everything they say is a lie. A guy I am subbed to on youtube called RockingMrE pointed out how they are shaming male on female interaction while promoting every other perversity.

Especially since there are rumblings in Europe about allowing incest apparently.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnew...-says.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/29...00672.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...53506.html

Well, this is disturbing, but I suppose inevitable - you can't be logically consistent by simultaneously allowing gay marriage but denying, for example, two gay cousins wanting to do the same. And for heterosexual siblings, the supposed concern over birth defects isn't enough to illegalize over 40 women from having kids much more likely to be born with Down syndrome. It gets tough to draw the lines (or maintain old ones) when so many others have been obliterated by moral relativism.

One of those articles say incest has been legal in France since Napoleon I; it'ts only a matter of time before the rest of Europe - and eventually America - finds a way to scrap what's left of outlawed taboos.

Post: #205

(11-01-2014 09:23 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Three years ago if this video was put up, it wouldn't have received a scrap of negative response. But now it is.

Do you guys realize what is happening?

Post: #206

(11-01-2014 09:23 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Three years ago if this video was put up, it wouldn't have received a scrap of negative response. But now it is.

Do you guys realize what is happening?

Yep, and you can take a lot of credit for it, along with their own bullshit excesses.

Post: #207

^^^So true.

Even a year ago, before I came here, I would see a video like that and not think to say a thing.

Like with everything, they focus on trivial issues and trivialize actual problems through their narcissism and unquenched thirst for attention.

(11-01-2014 09:58 AM)catoblepa Wrote:  

(11-01-2014 09:03 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  If you can't approach and talk to women how will that change the game? Women will only select and approach attractive men? Like they don't do that already?

in nature only the top specimens of the pack get to mate with females because females spontaneuosly go to them. that's probably what feminists more or less unconsciously want: going back to a primitive state of mating where they can gravitate around alphas in harem like institutions rather than shacking up in a monogamous relationship with a random guy just because society tell them so.
promoting a gender apartheid where you can't talk to stranger women is a first step to realize that scenario.

That is the end game of feminism.

Notice how obsessed they are with putting down "nice guys". The contempt they show for minorities who make comments as their dumpy asses walk through low income neighborhoods. Their overall attention whoring. Their subtle and not-so-subtle shaming of fit women through that song "All About That Bass", phrases such as "Real women have curves", their attacks on the "Fit Mom", etcetera.

And of course, their obsession with fit, desirable men. Far more so than actual desirable, feminine women do. In their world men aren't allowed to "fat shame" or "slut shame", but they'll feel free to judge all men as they see fit.

By using the above tactics, they want to force society to put them at the top of the sexual food chain. Ain't gonna happen.

(11-01-2014 10:22 AM)Jack198 Wrote:  

(10-31-2014 12:19 PM)kbell Wrote:  Almost all of the attractive Jewish women from my Shul that I grew up going to, have dated and or engaged to nonjews. They all know about the statistics that withing one or two generations their family will be non jewish from mixed marriages. Yet they still marry out. They also tend to all be super obnoxious and demand the world, yet don't offer much. The only Jews that will be left are the orthodox which I guess are purple pill. Strange group, but they do keep the women in line a lot more than the rest of Judaism.

Never mind the Jewish guys who live overseas, particularly in Asia. They completely lose interest once they find out what's out there beyond the Shul. If they never have to come back, it's easy to leave the flock. Can't say as I blame them.

Yup, and to add to my earlier post, the hottest Jewish girls (who are also the nicest) are almost always from eastern Europe/Russia, so it pretty much works in reverse. The ones from overseas give a reason to stay with the flock.

Post: #208

(11-01-2014 12:39 PM)CRR Wrote:  Like with everything, they focus on trivial issues and trivialize actual problems through their narcissism and unquenched thirst for attention.

Correct. I was actually talking to a girl last night who told me that she has on numerous occasions been touched inappropriately, as have her friends, which suggests a problem that merits further investigation. But imbeciles like this blow problems out of proportion and distract attention from the real issues at hand, preventing a socially constructive dialogue as to how they can be solved.

Mentioned that towards the end of the video I made about it (like I said I would a few days ago). Tell me what you guys think (as an aside, we could use more of the manosphere in the video-making realm):

Post: #209

NY Times (yup, they want to criminalize day game):

Quote:Street Harassment Law Would Restrict Intimidating Behavior

Laura Beth Nielsen

Laura Beth Nielsen is an associate professor of sociology and the director of the Center for Legal Studies at Northwestern University. She is the author of "License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy and Offensive Public Speech."

OCTOBER 31, 2014

The police may largely ignore harassment on the street because men often do not understand how pervasive it can be, but most importantly because there are no laws being violated in such encounters. About two thirds of women report that they hear such comments every day, but men’s estimates of the frequency of such remarks is significantly lower. All of the women I interviewed for my research reported changing their routes, behavior, transportation or dress to avoid street harassment.

A law that would prohibit street harassment would also be consistent with our First Amendment jurisprudence about other kinds of hate speech.
I'd propose a law that would prohibit street harassment and would also be consistent with our First Amendment jurisprudence about other kinds of hate speech (cross-burning in Virginia vs. Black) that intimidates, harasses and perpetuates inequality. It would allow states and cities to recognize street harassment for what it is: physical and psychological acts that intimidate, exclude, subordinate and reinforce male dominance over women.

The law would prohibit “uninvited harassing speech or actions targeted toward individuals in public spaces on the basis of sex or sexual orientation when done with the intent to intimidate.” Violation of the law could be a tort, meaning a woman could sue her harasser; an infraction, like a ticket with a fine; or even a misdemeanor. Even if rarely enforced, the symbolism of a law weighing in on the side of equality would have powerful effects.

Although not fully realized, the movement to combat domestic violence demands women’s equality (or at least freedom from assault) in our homes. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stands for the idea that with courage, we can demand equality and freedom from sexual harassment at work. Campus advocacy groups like Know Your IX and End Rape on Campus are demanding freedom from assault and harassment in our institutions of higher learning.

If the law has an appropriate role prohibiting sexual harassment, violence and rape in our homes, workplace and universities, why not the street? Shouldn’t gender equality exist everywhere?

Post: #210

^^^^
Laura Beth Nielsen:

Post: #211

(11-01-2014 02:50 PM)Dusty Wrote:  NY Times (yup, they want to criminalize day game):

Yes. And that is the true context of pieces like the Lindy West one that I posted about, and the reason they are no laughing matter.

Quote:Laura Beth Nielsen is an associate professor of sociology and the director of the Center for Legal Studies at Northwestern University. She is the author of "License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy and Offensive Public Speech."

Realize what that means. The academic hags and faggots set the agenda in books such as the one written by Laura Beth Nielsen; newspapers like the NYT and the Guardian and online media like Hollaback provide the platform to popularize the agenda; and eventually the deranged laws dreamed up by these academics make their way into state legislatures. That is how it goes.

Post: #212

(11-01-2014 03:00 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(11-01-2014 02:50 PM)Dusty Wrote:  NY Times (yup, they want to criminalize day game):

Yes. And that is the true context of pieces like the Lindy West one that I posted about, and the reason they are no laughing matter.

Quote:Laura Beth Nielsen is an associate professor of sociology and the director of the Center for Legal Studies at Northwestern University. She is the author of "License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy and Offensive Public Speech."

Realize what that means. The academic hags and faggots set the agenda in books such as the one written by Laura Beth Nielsen; newspapers like the NYT and the Guardian and online media like Hollaback provide the platform to popularize the agenda; and eventually the deranged laws dreamed up by these academics make their way into state legislatures. That is how it goes.

I'm starting to realize that this was probably an orchestrated campaign behind the scenes. The Lindy West article, the Hollaback video, and now this op-ed which was probably sitting on the shelf ready to go when the time is right.

By the way, Laura Beth Nielsen is a mattress carrier.

Post: #213

(11-01-2014 02:50 PM)Dusty Wrote:  A law that would prohibit street harassment would also be consistent with our First Amendment jurisprudence about other kinds of hate speech.

Lol, generally first amendment protections against "hate speech" are extremely broad.

What is this bitch talking about?

Virginia's statute against cross burning was found unconstitutional in that case.

Post: #214

(11-01-2014 03:36 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

(11-01-2014 02:50 PM)Dusty Wrote:  A law that would prohibit street harassment would also be consistent with our First Amendment jurisprudence about other kinds of hate speech.

Lol, generally first amendment protections against "hate speech" are extremely broad.

What is this bitch talking about?

Virginia's statute against cross burning was found unconstitutional in that case.

For an example of how "harassment" turns into a "threat," see this case:

http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/433/433mass229.html

Quote:The defendant, Peace Chou, was convicted of accosting or annoying a person of the opposite sex with offensive and disorderly acts or language. G. L. c. 272, s. 53 . On appeal he claims that the judge improperly denied his motion for a required finding of not guilty, arguing that (1) his language and conduct were not "disorderly"; (2) as applied, the annoying or accosting provision of s. 53 criminalizes his speech in violation of his rights under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. 16 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights, as amended by art. 77 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution; and (3) as applied, the provision violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and art. 1 of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights because it punishes only those who accost or annoy persons of the opposite sex. We transferred the case to this court on our own motion and affirm the judgment of conviction.

1. Facts. In October, 1998, the defendant, then eighteen years old, produced a number of "missing person" flyers identifying and describing a young woman he had dated for approximately three weeks. The young woman, a high school student, "had broken up" with the defendant some weeks before. Determined to "get back" at her, the defendant sneaked into her school one night and hung several flyers at various locations.

The word "MISSING" is printed in large type across the top of the flyer beneath which is the young woman's name; a large photograph of her fills the right-hand corner of the flyer. Her "Race" is listed as "White Slut." The description of the victim includes the following statements: "Will respond to: 'Cum to daddy, Urin;' Favorite Song: 'Put it in the mouth'; Favorite drink: protein rich semen; . . . Most recent employer: BJs Wholesale Club; . . . Other distinguishing characteristics: Has a nipple ring; Extremely loose; Has trouble sitting down because of numerous penetrations; Ass itches & bleeds violently; . . . Gets passed around (sometimes for free) like you wouldn't believe." The victim's guidance counsellor was so concerned that the police were contacted when the flyer was brought to her attention.

The defendant did not contest the Commonwealth's evidence that he made or hung the flyers. The victim testified that she was very upset by the language on the flyer, and felt violated by its display at her school. She was also afraid, as the defendant had threatened to hit her at least once during their brief relationship and he had telephoned her in anger about the breakup a few weeks before he posted the flyers. After the incident the victim suffered from nightmares in which the defendant chased her with a gun.

Post: #215

Will the law also cover gay men "harassing" straight men? Also, I don't want fat or unattractive women trying to talk to me. Can all that be illegal?

Again, in that video, the only instances of harassment were those guys who followed her. That is harassment. Otherwise, it falls under the category of inappropriate comments. Either way, it's exploitative crap.

Society could just focus on actual problems. I heard on the news that a girl in Alabama is missing, and was part of a child sex ring run by family members. Something like that is definitely worthy of attention from the criminal justice system. But since it is something they can't pretend to relate to, and won't forward their agenda, and involves a poor "redneck" family in Alabama, feminists won't give a shit.

Post: #216

(11-01-2014 10:22 AM)Jack198 Wrote:  Never mind the Jewish guys who live overseas, particularly in Asia. They completely lose interest once they find out what's out there beyond the Shul. If they never have to come back, it's easy to leave the flock. Can't say as I blame them.

There's some kind of irony that secular, unothodox Jews who are very left wing are falling prey to feminism (articles I've read cite how Jewish women spend too much time in school) and miscegenation.

I'm no "Jewish conspiracy" guy but it is fitting.


On the actual subject of this thread. Napoleon once said that it is best to "not interfere when the enemy is making a mistake." Focusing on trivial, cherrypicked bullshit is not flying anymore.
The Manosphere in general can take a lot of credit for that, but a backlash (even if trite and meaningless in the long run) was inevitable.
So you guys have a lot to be proud of.

Post: #217

(11-01-2014 02:21 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

(11-01-2014 12:39 PM)CRR Wrote:  Like with everything, they focus on trivial issues and trivialize actual problems through their narcissism and unquenched thirst for attention.

Correct. I was actually talking to a girl last night who told me that she has on numerous occasions been touched inappropriately, as have her friends, which suggests a problem that merits further investigation. But imbeciles like this blow problems out of proportion and distract attention from the real issues at hand, preventing a socially constructive dialogue as to how they can be solved.

Mentioned that towards the end of the video I made about it (like I said I would a few days ago). Tell me what you guys think (as an aside, we could use more of the manosphere in the video-making realm):0

Dude sounds like Roosh.

WIA

Post: #218

(11-01-2014 02:50 PM)Dusty Wrote:  NY Times (yup, they want to criminalize day game):

Quote:Street Harassment Law Would Restrict Intimidating Behavior

Laura Beth Nielsen

Laura Beth Nielsen is an associate professor of sociology and the director of the Center for Legal Studies at Northwestern University. She is the author of "License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy and Offensive Public Speech."

OCTOBER 31, 2014

The police may largely ignore harassment on the street because men often do not understand how pervasive it can be, but most importantly because there are no laws being violated in such encounters. About two thirds of women report that they hear such comments every day, but men’s estimates of the frequency of such remarks is significantly lower. All of the women I interviewed for my research reported changing their routes, behavior, transportation or dress to avoid street harassment.

A law that would prohibit street harassment would also be consistent with our First Amendment jurisprudence about other kinds of hate speech.
I'd propose a law that would prohibit street harassment and would also be consistent with our First Amendment jurisprudence about other kinds of hate speech (cross-burning in Virginia vs. Black) that intimidates, harasses and perpetuates inequality. It would allow states and cities to recognize street harassment for what it is: physical and psychological acts that intimidate, exclude, subordinate and reinforce male dominance over women.

The law would prohibit “uninvited harassing speech or actions targeted toward individuals in public spaces on the basis of sex or sexual orientation when done with the intent to intimidate.” Violation of the law could be a tort, meaning a woman could sue her harasser; an infraction, like a ticket with a fine; or even a misdemeanor. Even if rarely enforced, the symbolism of a law weighing in on the side of equality would have powerful effects.

Although not fully realized, the movement to combat domestic violence demands women’s equality (or at least freedom from assault) in our homes. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stands for the idea that with courage, we can demand equality and freedom from sexual harassment at work. Campus advocacy groups like Know Your IX and End Rape on Campus are demanding freedom from assault and harassment in our institutions of higher learning.

If the law has an appropriate role prohibiting sexual harassment, violence and rape in our homes, workplace and universities, why not the street? Shouldn’t gender equality exist everywhere?

Nice try, but how are you going to convince a judge it's "hate speech" when a man says "Good morning!" or "Smile!" or "You look nice" to a woman?

If the woman claims she's intimidated, the focus will turn to who is intimidating her, and the spotlight be then be on black American men (as it is in this video).

So these "progressive" laws are going to send us back to the days of Emmett Till, the black kid from the '50s who got murdered when he whistled at a white woman. Only now it'll be the government stepping in, not rednecks.

When we allow the government to control discourse of a minute nature on our streets, we have ceased to be a free country. How do progressives not see this?

Post: #219

I am thinking about walking around New York City for ten hours carrying a mattress. How do you all think that will go over?

Post: #220

(11-01-2014 02:21 PM)Libertas Wrote:  

(11-01-2014 12:39 PM)CRR Wrote:  Like with everything, they focus on trivial issues and trivialize actual problems through their narcissism and unquenched thirst for attention.

Correct. I was actually talking to a girl last night who told me that she has on numerous occasions been touched inappropriately, as have her friends, which suggests a problem that merits further investigation. But imbeciles like this blow problems out of proportion and distract attention from the real issues at hand, preventing a socially constructive dialogue as to how they can be solved.

Mentioned that towards the end of the video I made about it (like I said I would a few days ago). Tell me what you guys think (as an aside, we could use more of the manosphere in the video-making realm):

This is a good video for it highlights a few things that I would like to bring to light.

1.) The reason why there were so many threads about "Best place/countries for Black Men" is because of one clear statement he said in this video "She didn't like black guys hitting on her." "Black guys were the problem"

2.) Most black guys I know DONT have approach anxiety. This is how it translates in the inner city. An attractive black girl will get approached 10+ times a day in her urban, "black" environment. An attractive white girl will get approached maybe 3 times a week in her "white" environment. The disparity is that great. So when guys talk about "approach more" they are speaking from a position that the girls are usually shocked (in a good way) that some guy (white guy to white girl) has actually came up to them to talk to them. But the opposite is true for us. There are sooooo many guys approaching girls in our community all the time they not only expect it but have built entire defense systems against it way beyond your normal shit test (and if you try indirect you will get ANNIHILATED by black girls). So when someone says "well stop talking to black girls and talk to white girls" We get put on a video called "10 hours of street harassment"

3.) You said "Bad Game" but I dispute that some of it was bad game. I think some guys are blown out of the water before they even have a chance to perform "Bad Game" The Guy who followed her had clothing problems, and some game problems but really how much different is his INITIAL approach different from the tons of Day Game videos we see. We see guys run across the street and ask a girl to stop and/or wait to talk to them all the time. The INITIAL approach is the same "Hey...How are you doing...excuse me...." etc...just that part alone is considered Harassment by attractive (6 or better) White women. Just the process of looking at her and opening your mouth to speak is considered harassment. Which is why people are always SHOCKED when they see Justin Wayne PUA videos because they know the odds of a black guy doing well in NYC day gaming white women are so low it almost seems fake when you are watching it.

4.) Black men have created the environment that allow "Thicker" women to prosper in todays urban enviroment and have been effectively shut out from them. Kim Kardashian, Iggy Azeala, J. Lo and even Jen Selter are popular "Ass" women because Black men (and Spanish) have been the biggest proponents of Thick women (Big asses) in our media for as long as i can remember. Think about it. Sir Mix A lot song came out in 1992, and before that we had songs like She's a Brick House in 1977. Its no secret Black (and Spanish) men LOVE thick women. Just like the word "My Bad" has permeated white culture so has the increased love for thick women. Women of the 70s, 80s, and 90s did not have access upper echelon white men if they were built like Shoshana or thicker. They were considered "fat", where as there were plenty of upper echelon black/spanish men who not only considered them not fat but perfect for what they were looking for. These women were open to talking to black/spanish men if not just because of their own interest but because they at least knew they would be far well of than their "White" options. In todays environment I am shocked to see women who are as thick or thicker than Shoshana, have the same attitudes towards urban men as thin Valley girl types. its insane. But when you look at it, its because White men are now seeing these women as desirable because "thick" or "curvy" has now permeated their culture to be included in their tiers of attractivity. Thats why you see so many thicker women wearing Tights/Yoga Pants, Hip accentuating jeans, or curve hugging dresses. Urban men have help created a culture where these women are considered desirable and these women have used it to prosper in it and then effectively shit on us.

5.)The Black Guy Dilemma: If you talk to white girls who show obvious interest in black guys they are usually low class. If you try to talk to white girls that are universally attractive you can almost guarantee that mountain is steep and almost unclimbable (In America), and even if you try to filter through and say ..."I'm only going to talk to Thick white women, who live in the inner city" thinking that her body shape (should be unattractive to her male peers) and her living in the inner city (maybe she's open minded enough to find attraction in black guys) would be enough to increase your chances and yet you still will be looked upon as a sub-tier human (in terms of desirability). So you either have to stick with the highly competitive atmosphere of your own culture, accept the garbage from other cultures....or start a thread on RooshV and hope someone can shed light on another place in this world where the cards are nearly stacked as high against you.

Post: #221

^ Interesting comments, but come on, that is bad game from the majority of those guys in the video. I wouldn't even consider it game for the most part, just random flirting. The article actually made its way to the most progressive newspaper in my Northern Euro feminist country and they had a professor in some 'related' field comment and say that it wasn't harassment and that it was just an example of a culture where people speak more on the street than in NE and that these girls just want to be part of a group. Also asked a couple of girls who said it wasn't harassment and that it was cool to get complimented. You can find this kind of street life in many cultures also such as SEA where girls will usually not be shy to catcall themselves if in a group.

As you can see, this video is a non issue, don't even engage in the premise. It is not harassment. It's a ploy to create more strife between men and women, whites and blacks. Don't fall for it.

It's still not good game. If black guys think this is a good approach for white girls, then I can better understand claims that white girls are closed off. Then again, I don't even consider that approaches, do you?

I'm also suspicious as to if all black girls will really shoot you down on indirect. I only have experience with black girls from Africa, and I agree they usually expect direct and assertive approaches in nigthtime, but in day time are pretty much like any other girl.

Post: #222

(11-02-2014 03:28 AM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  Dude sounds like Roosh.

WIA

Heh. Thanks.

(11-02-2014 08:26 AM)PhilE Wrote:  2.) Most black guys I know DONT have approach anxiety.

I wouldn't exactly call what we saw in the video a lack of approach anxiety. One reason why women hate catcalling is because it's unassertive and beta. If you want to talk to a girl you need to go up to her and risk rejection.

Interesting comments though. I wonder as to the nature of what you exactly mean as to how black women get approached so often.

That video seems to me that these guys are running game that might work for ghetto black girls but no one else.

(11-02-2014 08:46 AM)berserk Wrote:  ^ Interesting comments, but come on, that is bad game from the majority of those guys in the video. I wouldn't even consider it game for the most part, just random flirting.

It's bad game in a number of ways. Catcalling never works. Then you had those guys that were following her side by side, not giving her any space, etc.

I mean seriously this is basic stuff that goes all the way back to The Game and earlier.

Post: #223

i think the girl in that video might be on OKcupid.

check it.
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/PleuRoses...r_indirect

Post: #224

If you check out her facebook page she belongs to a lot of Jewish groups and is definitely a Jew. She claims she is a middle eastern and Indian here with no mention of Judaism. What happened to the beta looking boyfriend? Also the combined level of Indian princess and Jewish princess takes her into orbit in terms of ego.

Post: #225

(11-02-2014 12:43 PM)kbell Wrote:  If you check out her facebook page she belongs to a lot of Jewish groups and is definitely a Jew. She claims she is a middle eastern and Indian here with no mention of Judaism. What happened to the beta looking boyfriend? Also the combined level of Indian princess and Jewish princess takes her into orbit in terms of ego.

Middle Eastern and Indian has more cachet with leftists and SJW types than Jewish.

Jewish says 'establishment' and other connotations that leftists avoid because like many middle-class types, will do anything to not appear middle-class.