Post: #401

(06-06-2016 12:12 AM)Lucario Wrote:  

(06-05-2016 06:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Yeah, banging pre-pubscient boys is highly unusual for women. Looks like female pedos flock to public education. Luckily for the boys, it probably won't mess them up too much as it would with girls.

I wonder if there is a way to work their hamster to game theses pedos teachers for easy pussy, even if you are a fully grown adult male.

If you look online dating sites nurses and teachers are like 80% of the female users, a job that require you to deal with people constantly and a very tight schedule (especially nurses) will make you go for sex and relationship with the people you most encounter on your job, women tend to develop feeling for people they see as needing help. Students needs constant help from teachers and are in need of education the teacher has while nurses has the haling ability the patient is sick. There is even a term for this "Florence Nightingale effect" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_N...ale_effect Harley Quinn and Joker relationship is based on this.

Post: #402

(06-30-2016 07:31 PM)kinjutsu Wrote:  I think his reaction similar to what a 10yr old say/do if an adult gave him a cheque for 1 million dollars. Sure he might understand but he wouldn't grasp the importance of this piece of paper in his hands represents.

I think the average 10yo would understand the importance of a $1 million check and what he could buy with it. By that age, they've learnt enough arithmetic to know how many weeks' allowance that equals.

Another possibility is that maybe the kid suspected the situation to be some kind of setup for him to be ridiculed or punished if he acted curious about her offer for sex. I.e. he might have thought she was trolling or entrapping him.

When I was that age, sometimes there would be a movie on with a sex scene (or, more likely, kissing scene) and my mother would look at me to observe my reaction. Aware that I was being closely watched, I would feign disinterest or disgust, to avoid seeming like I was interested in sex. Adults typically punish kids for talking about sex or for trying to view porn, so kids learn that they're supposed to act indifferent to or repulsed by anything sexual.

Also, sometimes older kids will show a younger kid a sexual photo, or initiate a conversation about sex, so that they can laugh at his reaction. So, kids learn that when the topic of sex comes up, it often leads to their being ridiculed. A response like "OK IDC" then becomes pretty understandable.

Post: #403

(09-12-2016 01:29 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

(09-12-2016 05:36 AM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  This one, a 24 year old teacher from Iowa, claims a 17 year old seduced her. Oh my...

The thing is, much of what he did sounds like uber-beta bullshit that ordinarily wouldn't get a guy anywhere:

Quote:“He would come into my classroom, grab a Post-It, write something and stick it to my desk on his way out,” Haglin told Inside Edition. One of those sticky notes — which Haglin still has — read: “I love you so much, my empress.”

Just looking for any excuse to bang one of her students, apparently. Spin, hamster, spin!

You left out the best party, her slutty dress up, attention whoring, non-apology breathy apology to Inside Edition. Listen closely, the only thing she apologizes for is how far it got, that's it. This is her triumphant walk of shame-no-shame. She even lists her favorite parts of the affair. She even takes to camera to the park where they bonked!

If there is a shame fetish that involves recounting all the naughty things you have done, she definitely has it, you can see the arousal in her eyes.

WB

Look at his text game:



Look at her with the teen, her body language says all:



And the best for last..


‘I love you so much, my empress'



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...IPPER.html

Post: #404

(09-17-2016 02:50 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(06-06-2016 12:12 AM)Lucario Wrote:  I wonder if there is a way to work their hamster to game theses pedos teachers for easy pussy, even if you are a fully grown adult male.

If you look online dating sites nurses and teachers are like 80% of the female users, a job that require you to deal with people constantly and a very tight schedule (especially nurses) will make you go for sex and relationship with the people you most encounter on your job, women tend to develop feeling for people they see as needing help. Students needs constant help from teachers and are in need of education the teacher has while nurses has the haling ability the patient is sick. There is even a term for this "Florence Nightingale effect" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florence_N...ale_effect Harley Quinn and Joker relationship is based on this.

Probably a good third of the girls I got with via online dating in the past year worked in either education or healthcare. Gosh, how much easier do y'all want it to be?

They were also all into kinky sex, to a one.

Post: #405

There goes a new one

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...udent.html

Quote: Olivia Sondheim, 25, was charged with first-degree sexual assault misconduct with a minor
The Washington state choir teacher is accused of having a sexual relationship with a male student at Lynnwood High School last year
Sondheim, who has been married since May 2014, was in her second year of teaching

http://madworldnews.com/husband-uncovers-wife-secret/

Quote: Excited to start the new year with her high school students, Olivia’s message on the school site to the teens was that she was “excited to get to know each and every one of you,” which also proved to be her famous last words.
...
According to KGMI, the “perfect” 25-year-old teacher had been having a sexual relationship with one of her 16-year-old male students, when the alleged misconduct was found out by administrators at Olivia’s school who brought it to the attention of local police.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/cops-m...-sex-romp/


That is what happens hen you try to turn a hoe into a housewife.
Do they wait to get married or something to do this kind of shit or what?
Oh, by the way, WB-WMHS (would bang while make her sing)

(edit: grammar)

Post: #406

WB, WBOHH
(Would bang, with bag over her head) that face isn't the one of a "perfect" woman, as the story described.

Hell, ever see any guy accused of something like this get such deferential to the point of flattering reviews? Bet the ho gets probation.

Post: #407

I feel sad for the men in these stories married to these hoodrats.

Men need to learn how to screen females, I swear, that shit will save your life.

Post: #408

Isn't it fuckin ironic that the Western Millenial females who are entering the teaching profession to spread misandric views are the ones most likely to permit an underaged male student to fuck her in the ass or pussy?

Ok, picture this:

2012: 20-year-old Teacher college student Ms. Deborah-Letourneau accuses every man on campus of rape. She is part of a feminist collective. Several men were falsely accused of rape by her after a drunken night of sex.

2014: 22-year-old Teacher graduate Ms. Deborah-Letourneau becomes a Sexual Education teacher, forms a feminist collective at the school she teaches to teach students about "consent".

2016: 24-year-old Teacher graduate Ms. Deborah-Letourneau is alleged to have fucked an entire classroom of 12-year-old boys to the extent that 50% of the school is infected with an antibotic resistant STD virus because she permitted 12-year-old boys to fuck her hard in her pooper, which is high risk for STD.

2017: 25-year-old Ms. Deborah-Letourneau tells Dr. Phil how she was "waped" by permitting 12-year-old boys to fuck her in the ass because she did not "consent" to permitting her male students to tear her anal walls while fucking her.

2018: Parents who have common sense riot, with some exercising their 2nd Amendment right against a government teacher like Ms. Deborah-Letourneau after the school board re-instates Ms. Deborah-Letourneau to teach students again.

What a messed up world we live in right now in the West.

Post: #409

Here's a guy who (according to the video in the linked article) got with several students over the years, married and divorced a couple of them, then got nailed when he went for the daughter of his live in girlfriend (who still stands by him): He stood to go to jail for 66+ years; at 56 years old it was essentially a life sentence. He slit his throat in court and was taken to the hospital.

Has any one EVER found a story where a similarly accused or convicted woman has attempted to take her own life, even following a guilty verdict, much less an exclusive and favorable television interview?

Quote:SANTA ANA (CBSLA.com) — Moments after he was convicted of sexually assaulting a teenage relative of his live-in girlfriend, an English teacher slashed his throat Wednesday with a razor in a Santa Ana courtroom.

Jeffrey Scott Jones of Huntington Beach, who was out of custody on bail during his trial, was rushed to a hospital.

“Right after the judge asked if we wanted jurors polled, both attorneys said no, and then he took a razor out of his left pocket and slashed his throat,” Senior Deputy District Attorney Heather Brown said. “His head hit the table and I thought he fainted, but then I saw the blood and the razor on the table.”

Orange County Superior Court Steven Bromberg had advised the 56-year-old defendant on Tuesday that if he was found guilty, he would be taken into custody immediately.

“I didn’t see it even though I was sitting next to him,” defense attorney Ed Welbourn said, adding that his client apparently cut the artery in his neck.

“At that point, he passed out or something happened and he hit the table, which is when I noticed something was happening,” Welbourn said. “It’s very unfortunate, the whole thing,” he said. “We respect the jury’s decision, but we thought there was reasonable doubt as to what occurred… It’s just terrible. The good news is it looks like he will recover.”

Orange County Sheriff’s Lt. Mark Stichter said there will be an investigation into how Jones “was able to have (a razor blade) in court and provide answers to that.”

Jurors deliberated about two hours before convicting Jones of two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of continuous sexual abuse. He faces up to 66 years to life in prison.

Jones was a teacher of Advanced Placement English classes at the Libra Academy in Huntington Park at the time the felony charges were filed.

According to prosecutors, he had sex with the girl in May 2013 and molested her at various times from Sept. 2012 through April 2013.

Brown told jurors that the defendant’s girlfriend accused the teen of “framing Mr. Jones” and had her placed in a youth shelter. The girl was subsequently placed in a county facility, and also in several foster homes, Brown said.

Brown presented evidence during the trial that Jones had sexual relationships with two underage students who were 16 at the time and later married them.

Welbourn argued that clothes and sheets collected by investigators at Jones’ home show no physical evidence backing up the girl’s claims. He also brushed off DNA evidence linking the defendant to the sexual assault.

“The District Attorney wants you to believe the DNA of Mr. Jones is somehow their smoking gun,” Welbourn said, telling jurors that members of the household used the same shower, bathroom, towels and other items in explaining
how the defendant’s DNA could end up on the girl.

“Nobody saw anything inappropriate” between the girl and Jones, Welbourn said.

Welbourn accused the girl of “concocting a story” because she was smoking marijuana and trying to hide it.

KCAL9’s Stacey Butler spoke to some of Jones’ neighbors Wednesday evening.

They told her they were less concerned about Jones hurting himself than they were about him being unable to hurt another child.

“I can go to bed tonight and know that my daughter’s gonna be safe,” said neighbor Ken Deleske.

Michele Deleske concurred.

“I have a young teenage daughter in this house. I would worry about her every time we left because I wasn’t sure what he was capable of doing.”

Ken said he took all precautions.

“I taught my daughter how to use my shotgun and told her if he ever comes into the house, shoot him.”

Post: #410

(10-19-2016 06:19 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  Look at his text game:



Look at her with the teen, her body language says all:



And the best for last..


‘I love you so much, my empress'

This girl is the gift that keeps on giving. She is on a tear.

You're leaving out the best part of that article, how after her tearful apology/not apology on Inside Edition, she is now on Dr. Phil trying to pretend that she is the victim!






After all of her tearful cries that she never wants to see him again, what does she do, and when I say what does she do, I mean what would she do that would be most entertaining and salacious to us, she does the only thing she can do.

She becomes a stripper, and instead of meeting her rape victim at Beaver Park (Bever Park, really) in a car, she now meets him at work. Oh yeah, and don't forget the liaisons in the corn maze.

Quote:Crime Watch Daily found her working as an exotic dancer at Woody's, a strip joint along a lonely highway just a few miles from the school where she used to teach.

Crime Watch Daily shot video just a few days after she told us she never wanted to see her forbidden lover again.

Haglin is under a court order not to have any contact with the student, or she goes back to jail. But Crime Watch Daily witnessed that student go into Woody's.

Under fluorescent lights in the darkened club, MaryBeth Haglin and her former student were locked in a deep conversation that lasted for about 30 minutes. Then the newly legal 18-year-old abruptly leaves.

http://crimewatchdaily.com/2016/09/14/io...h-student/

What other choice does she have?

The tv show Crimewatch actually caught her onstage at the strip club, called Woody's of course, and meeting her boyfriend there, and she was dumb enough to wave off the bouncers and let them interview her in the parking lot. Good part starts at 3:25:






Of all these women, she is moving to the front of the line for entertainment value.

Post: #411

Classic thread. Anyone remembers Mary Kay Letourneau? she had had a kid with a 12 year old. Well her daughters 18. WB her eldest daughter, she has the signs of a early stage slut hood.

Post: #412

(06-05-2016 12:24 PM)deus_ex Wrote:  Roosh had predicted that the next big thing the left would do would be to push the normalization and acceptance of pedophilia, and here we are, it's happening right under our noses.

A 15- or 16-year-old boy having sex with a teacher is not "pedophilia." When Roosh and other talk about the left wanting to normalize pedophilia, they mean real pedophilia, not this shit.

To compare these female teachers to real pedophiles is demeaning to actual child victims of sexual abuse. Don't get me wrong, these teachers are as degenerate as they come. I just think that to compare a 15-year-old boy "victim" to a real child victim is kind of fucked up.

Post: #413

(10-20-2016 05:49 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  

(06-05-2016 12:24 PM)deus_ex Wrote:  Roosh had predicted that the next big thing the left would do would be to push the normalization and acceptance of pedophilia, and here we are, it's happening right under our noses.

A 15- or 16-year-old boy having sex with a teacher is not "pedophilia." When Roosh and other talk about the left wanting to normalize pedophilia, they mean real pedophilia, not this shit.

To compare these female teachers to real pedophiles is demeaning to actual child victims of sexual abuse. Don't get me wrong, these teachers are as degenerate as they come. I just think that to compare a 15-year-old boy "victim" to a real child victim is kind of fucked up.

Equal justice under the law is supposed to mean just that. Think a similarly situated guy would be given any slack whatsoever if the girl he banged was one day shy of the age of consent? The age limits do not specify exceptions based on gender combinations, so if guilty, the punishment should fit the crime - not what we think the crime should have been. Usually the punishment equals zero jail time for the female offender - it remains to be seen if the one referenced above is punished for violating the court order against contacting the minor, even though he's now 18. Judges generally don't like to be blown off like that.

I also wouldn't think that just because a male child may enjoy the experience of banging his teacher that it is harmless for him. Think about LeTourneau and how she started stalking her prey as a second grader, eventually seducing him when he was 12 The boy knew nothing else other than her demented sense of caring, then winds up marrying and fathering kids with her. One day he'll wake up and realize he married his nutty grandmother and it'll cost him dearly for a divorce.

There's also been more than a few cases where the boy is later in life forced into paying for child support for the predator's kid - even though by legal definition he could not consent to the act! Excusing grown women from preying on young boys incapable of understanding what they get into for some easy pussy flies in the face of the purpose behind these laws.

Post: #414

Here's one that will make you all shudder

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/magazi...field.html

Quote:When she arrived at the house on Memorial Day in 2011, Anna didn’t know what D.J. planned to do. His brother, Wesley, was working in the garden, so she went straight inside to speak with D.J. and his mother, P. They chatted for a while at the dining table about D.J.’s plans for school and for getting his own apartment. Then there was a lull in the conversation after Wesley came back in, and Anna took hold of D.J.’s hand. ‘‘We have something to tell you,’’ they announced at last. ‘‘We’re in love.’’

‘‘What do you mean, in love?’’ P. asked, the color draining from her face.

To Wesley, she looked pale and weak, like ‘‘Caesar when he found out that Brutus betrayed him.’’ He felt sick to his stomach. What made them so uncomfortable was not that Anna was 41 and D.J. was 30, or that Anna is white and D.J. is black, or even that Anna was married with two children while D.J. had never dated anyone. What made them so upset — what led to all the arguing that followed, and the criminal trial and million-­dollar civil suit — was the fact that Anna can speak and D.J. can’t; that she was a tenured professor of ethics at Rutgers University in Newark and D.J. has been declared by the state to have the mental capacity of a toddler.

Quote: She acknowledges that it’s hard for him to stay in one position, that muscle contractions sometimes twist his spine and clench his fingers in a useless ball. It’s clear to her, as it is to everyone, that he has trouble making eye contact and keeping objects fixed in view. She knows that he wears diapers and cannot dress himself; that he can walk only if someone steadies him; and that otherwise he gets around by scooting on the floor. She knows that D.J. screams when he’s unhappy and chirps when he’s excited, but that he can’t control his vocal cords.

How romantic.

Not exactly your "hot young teacher bangs teenager" scenario. This freak was an ardent feminist professor (she'll be in prison for the next 12 years) and was the man's "facilitated communicator" whereby she holds the fellow's hand over a keyboard and types whatever she wants him to say tricking people into believing that it's him saying it. A very easy way to get consent I guess.

Women can justify just about anything, even having sex with a disabled man who has the mental capacity of a toddler. I bet this woman's kids are proud of her.

Post: #415

(10-20-2016 04:05 PM)fugly1000 Wrote:  Classic thread. Anyone remembers Mary Kay Letourneau? she had had a kid with a 12 year old. Well her daughters 18. WB her eldest daughter, she has the signs of a early stage slut hood.

Every picture you see of her she is smiling like a teen girl, he looks like the adult.

Post: #416

(10-20-2016 06:41 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

(10-20-2016 05:49 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  

(06-05-2016 12:24 PM)deus_ex Wrote:  Roosh had predicted that the next big thing the left would do would be to push the normalization and acceptance of pedophilia, and here we are, it's happening right under our noses.

A 15- or 16-year-old boy having sex with a teacher is not "pedophilia." When Roosh and other talk about the left wanting to normalize pedophilia, they mean real pedophilia, not this shit.

To compare these female teachers to real pedophiles is demeaning to actual child victims of sexual abuse. Don't get me wrong, these teachers are as degenerate as they come. I just think that to compare a 15-year-old boy "victim" to a real child victim is kind of fucked up.

Equal justice under the law is supposed to mean just that. Think a similarly situated guy would be given any slack whatsoever if the girl he banged was one day shy of the age of consent? The age limits do not specify exceptions based on gender combinations, so if guilty, the punishment should fit the crime - not what we think the crime should have been. Usually the punishment equals zero jail time for the female offender - it remains to be seen if the one referenced above is punished for violating the court order against contacting the minor, even though he's now 18. Judges generally don't like to be blown off like that.

I also wouldn't think that just because a male child may enjoy the experience of banging his teacher that it is harmless for him. Think about LeTourneau and how she started stalking her prey as a second grader, eventually seducing him when he was 12 The boy knew nothing else other than her demented sense of caring, then winds up marrying and fathering kids with her. One day he'll wake up and realize he married his nutty grandmother and it'll cost him dearly for a divorce.

There's also been more than a few cases where the boy is later in life forced into paying for child support for the predator's kid - even though by legal definition he could not consent to the act! Excusing grown women from preying on young boys incapable of understanding what they get into for some easy pussy flies in the face of the purpose behind these laws.

So I take it that you believe in equality between men and women?

I don't. I believe men and women are different and should be treated differently.

I do believe in equality under the law. If a woman kills someone or robs someone, she should be prosecuted just like a man would. However, when it comes to sex crimes, it is different. Allowing yourself to be penetrated by a 15-year-old boy is NOT the same thing as penetrating a 15-year-old girl. In fact, allowing yourself to be penetrated by someone is not the same as penetrating that person, regardless of age. So when you talk about "equal punishment for an equal crime," it is NOT an equal crime.

I personally don't think it should be considered rape to have consensual sex with anyone who is post-pubescent. I think it is a parent's responsibility to keep their young daughter away from men who may want to fuck them. I understand people who think having casual sex with a 13-year-old girl is fucked up, but having casual sex with an 18-year-old girl is just as harmful to the girl. I think that to consider the former as "rape" is demeaning to actual violent rape victims.

That being said, I do think that a man having casual sex with a 13-year-old girl is WAY MORE fucked up than a woman having casual sex with a 13-year-old boy. As a matter of fact, I am inclined to think of the man having sex with a girl as a predator and to be angry at him, while I am inclined to think of the woman having sex with a young boy as a degenerate slut and to feel pity for her.

You can certainly argue that in some cases, if a boy has sex with an older woman, it can fuck him up emotionally. But there is absolutely no comparison with how much it fucks up a young girl's emotions to have sex with an older man (or a boy her own age, for that matter). There's just no comparison at all.

I understand that feminists claim to want true equality when they really seem to want female superiority. I understand this is frustrating, and their hypocrisy pisses me off. However, that does not mean that "true equality" is a good thing. There are some feminists, especially the early feminists, who really wanted true equality. I still think they were a cancer on society just as bad as, if not worse than, modern feminists. True equality would lead to women getting drafted for war, the total acceptance of sluttiness, and ultimately the destruction of the family. "True equality" between the sexes is not the answer.

Post: #417

(10-21-2016 06:31 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  So I take it that you believe in equality between men and women?

I don't. I believe men and women are different and should be treated differently.

Though that might sound right, the red pills aren't in this bottle; you might have picked up the blue ones.

Quote:I do believe in equality under the law. If a woman kills someone or robs someone, she should be prosecuted just like a man would. However, when it comes to sex crimes, it is different. Allowing yourself to be penetrated by a 15-year-old boy is NOT the same thing as penetrating a 15-year-old girl. In fact, allowing yourself to be penetrated by someone is not the same as penetrating that person, regardless of age. So when you talk about "equal punishment for an equal crime," it is NOT an equal crime.

Until such time as there are exceptions or variations written into the law for the things you describe (and in some limited cases, there are, with respect to age differences), there is no excuse for the disparity in sentencing and conviction rates. It's simply the pussy pass in action.

if the punishment for X sex crime is X number of years, it should apply regardless of the genders of the perpetrators. Does a similarly accused male even get to argue mitigating circumstances without being universally pilloried? That white knight style of different treatment is all you're going to get.

Moreover, some laws are written to make age of consent offenses even more strict when the perpetrator is a person in a position of authority (police, clergy, camp counselor and - wait for it - teacher). This thread contains almost exclusively examples of female teachers committing sex crimes while abusing their positions of authority. I have yet to see any of them receive added punishment for abusing their position of power over adolescent and younger males. If you want different treatment for men and women, well, you already have it.

Post: #418

(10-21-2016 06:31 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  I understand that feminists claim to want true equality when they really seem to want female superiority. I understand this is frustrating, and their hypocrisy pisses me off. However, that does not mean that "true equality" is a good thing. There are some feminists, especially the early feminists, who really wanted true equality. I still think they were a cancer on society just as bad as, if not worse than, modern feminists. True equality would lead to women getting drafted for war, the total acceptance of sluttiness, and ultimately the destruction of the family. "True equality" between the sexes is not the answer.

Objective readers could consider you part of this group based on your writing. A classic feminist/female/beta trope is that women should not be held to the same level of accountability for her misdeeds as a man.

I'm curious, do you consider any crime to be less severe if a man commits it versus a woman?

Post: #419

(10-22-2016 12:12 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

(10-21-2016 06:31 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  So I take it that you believe in equality between men and women?

I don't. I believe men and women are different and should be treated differently.

Though that might sound right, the red pills aren't in this bottle; you might have picked up the blue ones.

I'm not sure I understand. How is it blue-pill to believe men and women are different and should be treated differently?

I never said women should be treated better, just differently.

(10-22-2016 12:12 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

Quote:I do believe in equality under the law. If a woman kills someone or robs someone, she should be prosecuted just like a man would. However, when it comes to sex crimes, it is different. Allowing yourself to be penetrated by a 15-year-old boy is NOT the same thing as penetrating a 15-year-old girl. In fact, allowing yourself to be penetrated by someone is not the same as penetrating that person, regardless of age. So when you talk about "equal punishment for an equal crime," it is NOT an equal crime.

Until such time as there are exceptions or variations written into the law for the things you describe (and in some limited cases, there are, with respect to age differences), there is no excuse for the disparity in sentencing and conviction rates. It's simply the pussy pass in action.

if the punishment for X sex crime is X number of years, it should apply regardless of the genders of the perpetrators. Does a similarly accused male even get to argue mitigating circumstances without being universally pilloried? That white knight style of different treatment is all you're going to get.

Moreover, some laws are written to make age of consent offenses even more strict when the perpetrator is a person in a position of authority (police, clergy, camp counselor and - wait for it - teacher). This thread contains almost exclusively examples of female teachers committing sex crimes while abusing their positions of authority. I have yet to see any of them receive added punishment for abusing their position of power over adolescent and younger males. If you want different treatment for men and women, well, you already have it.

First of all, I am in favor of equal punishment for equal crimes, regardless of the perpetrator's gender. It's just that I don't consider penetrating someone to be the same thing as allowing yourself to be penetrated. Sex is an asymmetrical act. Therefore, a male teacher fucking his student and a female teacher getting fucked by her student are not committing equal crimes.

For the record, I believe that if a female teacher were to penetrate a student (with a dildo), it would be just as fucked up as if a male teacher did it.

You mention all these laws that are used to fuck over men who violate age-of-consent laws. I think most of these laws are fucked up. If a male teacher has sex with a female student, I don't think that should be considered rape.

I think it is retarded to have teenage girls in a room with an adult male and no other supervision, and I also think it is retarded to have teenage boys in the same room as a young attractive female teacher, but the two are fucked up for entirely different reasons.

Post: #420

Rob Banks,

Is what you think the cause is for probably a fair number of school shootings Elliott Rogers style during the past decade?

Is the same female teachers you are defending who spread rape hysteria & anti-male hysteria against the male students, while encouraging the female students to hate the boys in their school, while the LGBTPEDOPHILE crew in Education work on implementing new recruits for lesbians & faggots.

You appear to have a problem with a peer-&-peer sexual experimentation amongst high schoolaz, & you appear to want to attack a young man for being seduced by a 17-year-old jailbait, but you support female teachers who are using my tax dollars to get fucked by 12-year-old boys in her pooper.

I don't give a damn if a male or female in their 20s get it on with an adolescent from 14-17 years of age, but female teachers are paid very well as compared to private sector workers & it is a huge fucking insult to every American and anyone abroad, that many people have to struggle to find minimum wage work, while a female teacher in the Western world gets her pooper fucked by a group of 13-year-old male students, & still get paid above middle class wages, and becomes wealthier through fame from Dr. Phil the female-pedophile apologist.

Elliot Rogers & Adam Lanza also appeared to have committed mass shootings because they complained about mistreatment under a feminist high school environment, in addition to not getting laid because they didn't learn game in school. It is already mentioned before how it is female educators who are responsible for teaching anti-male values in school. Therefore, the female teachers who take underage cock up their ass while spreading hysteria make it harder for beta men to get laid in high school, beause they lack game.

If teenage males aren't getting laid in high school (because the female students are taught to hate men by their female teachers) while a female teacher fucks the select number of Chad jailbait cocks because she wouldn't be punished, then don't be surprised if another potential Elliot Rogers or Adam Lanza comes out of the woodwork complaining on PUAHate that they aren't getting laid at their high school or college.

Even Dimitri the Lover created a post which stated that Adam Lanza did Sandy Hook because he wanted to get back at the teachers who were anti-male against him.

There is much more behind the scenes with these female teachers fucking underage students that it isn't the story of some teenage chick seducing a male teacher like in the old days. It is more sinister & agenda setting.

Is it a co-incidence that while college campuses are infected with anti-male & anti-sex hysteria, there are more female teachers getting their holes fucked by underage students than ever before?

That's the thing. Female teachers fucking minor students is a very deep issue.

Post: #421

Rob Banks, in many laws, they consider statutory rape as "sexual contact with a minor" regardless of who is penetrating or not.

It is just like when a 20-year-old male is dating a 16-year-old chick in a legal state, but if he gets her drunk, or admits her into a bar where the drinking age is over 16, he can be charged for "corruption of a minor".

The point is that when a female teacher bends over to instruct a 12-year-old male student to fuck her hard in the ass without a condom, it is my tax dollars who will be paying for that teacher's salary, lawyer fees if she is even caught, STD treatment for her students & other costs to society.

Likewise, if it was a 19-year-old chick fucking a 12-year-old boy, I wouldn't even give a damn, though feminist pedophile hysteria would cause a man of that age to be in jail for even having sex with a 15-year-old chick who initiated the sexual contact.

Furthermore, the factual point that a minor male student is FORCE to pay child support if he "accidentally" impregnates his female teacher, concludes that female teachers who fuck students are a far worse case than some dumb male teacher who thought with his dick while being seduced by the hottest chick in the Grade 9 class of that high school.

Post: #422

I'm not even touching rob's argument with a 10-foot pole. That's feminist firewood right there.

Post: #423

When feminists & man-haters are marching up & down to point more anti-male laws, even when the Age of Consent in Canada was 14, the female teachers still fuck the under-14 students:

http://www.oct.ca/ShowDocument.sample?do...167&lang=E

Quote:THE ALLEGATIONS
The allegations against Jennifer Lynn Dorland in the Notice of Hearing, (Exhibit 1) dated
December 12, 2006, are as follows:

IT IS ALLEGED that Jennifer Lynn Dorland is guilty of professional misconduct as
defined in sections 30(2) and/or is incompetent as defined in sections 30(2) and 40(1.1) of the Ontario College of Teachers Act, 1996 (the “Act”),
in that:

(a)she failed to maintain the standards of the profession, contrary to Ontario Regulation 437/97, subsection 1(5);
(b)she abused a student or students physically, sexually, verbally, psychologically or emotionally, contrary to Ontario Regulation 437/97,
subsection 1(7);
©she failed to comply with the Act and the Education Act, Revised Statutes of Ontario 1990, chapter E.2, and specifically section 264(1)© thereof or the Regulations made under those Acts, contrary to Ontario Regulation 437/97, subsections 1(14) and (15);

(d)she contravened a law, the contravention of which is relevant to the
Member’s suitability to hold a Certificate of Qualification and
Registration, contrary to Ontario Regulation 437/97, subsection 1(16);

(e)she contravened a law, the contravention of which has caused students
under the Member’s professional supervision to be put at or to remain at risk, contrary to Ontario Regulation 437/97, subsection 1(17);
2
2
(f)she committed acts that having regard to all the circumstances would
reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or
unprofessional, contrary to Ontario Regulation 437/97, subsection 1(18);

(g)she engaged in conduct unbecoming a member, contrary to Ontario Regulation 437/97, subsection 1(19); and
(h)she engaged in sexual abuse of a student or students of a nature defined in sections 1 and 40(1.1) of the Act.

Counsel for the College advised the Committee that an agreement had been and
introduced an Agreed Statement of Facts, Plea of No Contest and Joint Submission on
Penalty (ASF – Exhibit 2), which provides as follows:

AGREED STATEMENT OF FACTS
1.
Jennifer Lynn Dorland, now known as Jennifer Lynn Toews (the “Member”) is a
member of the Ontario College of Teachers. Attached hereto and marked as Exhibit “A”
is a copy of the Ontario College of Teacher
s Registered Member Information respecting
the Member.
2.
At all material times the Member was employed as a teacher by the Upper Canada
District School Board (the “Board”) and was assigned to teach [**] at [a school] (the
“School”).
3.
During the 2004-2005 Academic year, the Student was a [...] male [**] at the
School. Further, during the summer of 2004, the Student assisted the Member [...].
4.
Prior to the commencement of the 2004-2005 academic year, arrangements were made for the Member [**] [...] two to three times a week [**], and the [**] commenced
in September 2004.
5.
In or around the month of September 2004, the Member engaged in acts of unprofessional and inappropriate conduct towards the Student, which included:
(a)
sexual assault;
(b)
invitation to sexual touching; and
3
3
©
sexual interference.
6.
On or about September 11, 2004, the Membersent two inappropriate e-mails to
the Student.
7.
On or about December 20, 2007, the Member was found guilty in the Ontario
Superior Court of Justice in Cornwall of the following charges:
(a)
that she committed a sexual assault of the Student;
(b)
that she did for a sexual purpose touch the Student, a person under the age of fourteen years directly with a part of her body, to wit her hand contrary to s.151 of the Criminal Code (Canada); and
©
that she did for a sexual purpose invite the Student, a person under the age of fourteen years, to touch directly a part of her body, to wit her vagina, contrary to s.152 the
Criminal Code (Canada).
8.
The trial judge, Madam Justice Parfett,found that on [a day in] September 2004, by prior arrangement, both the Member and the Student called in sick to the School and
that the Member went to pick up the Student as soon as both his parents had left for work.
The Member then drove the Student to her home. While there, the Member kissed the
Student and they proceeded to fondle one another both over and under their clothing,
without engaging in sexual intercourse.
9.
The judge also found that the e-mails which were sent by the Member to the
Student were compelling evidence that the Student had a sexual relationship with the
Member and further corroborated the fact that there was a sexual relationship between the
Student and the Member. The judge noted that the Member had acknowledged that she
knew that her behaviour in sending the e-mails to the Student was inappropriate

Female teachers getting their 90k Canadian dollars a year teaching jobs to fuck under-14 students, even when the Age of Consent in Canada was 14 ten years ago.

Now, the feminists want to raise the Age of consent to a million years if they try, yet Rob Banks appear to want to excuse female teachers when they get their pooper fucked by a 12-year-old boy, wah boombaclat is dis?

Post: #424

When feministes want to increase the age of consent to a billion years worldwide, even creating laws that if a 120-year-old woman takes only one shot of vodka, that she is unable to "consent" as if she was a newborn baby,

This pedophile teacher Letourneau wants to be removed from the Sex Offenders' List, so she would probably re-enter the teaching profession to fuck more 12-year-old Villi Faaulau's

[Youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoXh9GfMMw8[/Youtube]

Where are the manginas & feministes condemning this woman for grooming her Grade One student so that she could fuck him at age 12, & then become pregnant with him so that he is trapped with her?

Female teachers are dangerous fucks I tell ya because they can get pregnant & claim child support from her underaged students who fucked her in the pussy!

Post: #425

^Mentioned before. Watch for female teachers that deliberately get pregnant to wealthy trust fund students at (first erection +1 second). Not that you'll hear of it. They will end up with epic bank and it will all be settled underneath he table. It's probably happening as I type this.