RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
The formula is now apparent - to use the cultural Marxists' weapons of smearing and shaming against them, and separate them from their commercial masters. They're uniquely vulnerable because they have always dripped with foul-mouthed contempt for their opponents, and so often make use of lies, bullying and death threats.
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
It's amazing to see everything that Roosh and Mike have done against Gawker. The next few weeks should be interesting. They will scream, holler and complain. But it won't matter. These people have pulled so many horrific stunts, ruined so many people's lives and done it in public. Exposing them and putting pressure on their sponsors will knock them down a peg or two. It is nice to see that using Saul Alinsky's tactics against his followers is an effective tool.
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
I've been warning about this for years, but I'll remind everyone again:
They will try and shut this place down. Feminists never rest as long as there exists some group of males for them to target. I remember it well back in my fraternity, basically all fraternities were systematically targeted and slowly exterminated via extra-legal means. There were 12 fraternities when I was in college; now I hear there's less than 5.
I am waiting in anticipation of how they'll try to bring this place down. Hate speech won't be enough, they'll need something else. I'm almost giddy for the upcoming fight.
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
It's funny to see them get a taste of their own PC medicine. I think this is the new reality we all live in, sadly. In order for us to say what we want, we have to strategically become as self sufficient as possible. If you take a guy like Donald Trump, he just says whatever the hell he wants all the time without giving a crap...and he has so much money nobody can really do much to him. The SJWs have a lot of power. They can get someone fired from their job, get their website shutdown, get their advertising partner accounts closed, persuade people to disassociate themselves from someone etc.
I think it's an important time to mention that financial independence and finding as many ways as possible to make it so they can only minimally disrupt our lives is probably something we should strive for. Create a force field for yourself against the PC police. Roosh seems to have a lot of different revenue streams and a lot of different avenues of voicing his opinion, not to mention he moves around a lot. That makes him a difficult target for them, because he's not a one-trick pony youtube celebrity or someone they can just bombard or "flag" to make him disappear easily.
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
(10-22-2014 09:27 PM)Roosh Wrote: Alright guys, the SJW/feminists/establishment/cathedral has not been under this much pressure for as long as I remember. Gamergate and other independent guerrillas are currently causing them great anguish and, in the case of Gawker, serious financial harm. There are people who work for these companies and have been making money for the longest time by pushing their bullshit agenda that we have been exposing here for years. They will not go down with a fight, and surely won't let a bunch of gamers or guys like us finish them off easily. Remember that they have far more people than us, and not to let a handful of small victories get to our head. This isn't the time to be cocky. Even if you hurt a dying animal, that animal will show a great furious strength to protect itself from inevitable death. Don't underestimate them, as low as their intelligence seems to be on the surface.
The next couple days, I believe, could get pretty bad, especially since I know that there will be an escalation coming from our side shortly. The enemy entered the desperation stage where they are now trying everything to preserve themselves. SJW journalists who don't work at Gawker are flipping out that their company could be next. If I speak to you as if we are in a war, well, it's because we are. Not one of weapons, but of ideology. We're outnumbered but thankfully we are on the side of truth.
So here's the plan:
-Keep digging up the dirt and hypocrisy of our enemies. It's damaging them greatly because they don't have any legs to stand on, especially when they've done action they try to blame us for. My next target is Wil Wheaton. Check this thread to see if you can help.
-Consider writing an ROK article about one of our active enemies if you have enough dirt on them to show they've been lying or hypocritical. What you write can be used to taint their image online. 800 words is a good target. A good format is to review their current stance on Gamergate followed by bullying/sexism/shadiness they've done in the past. If you have an idea for a post, drop me a PM or email [email protected]
-The best dirt on the big names should flow upwards to guys with the biggest bullhorns. Right now that's Mike and myself. Other guys who have big bullhorns can volunteer. I'm monitoring the threads and if I see something good I'll go on Twitter and run with it.
If this event continues to grow in size, I may create a new temporary subforum for it.
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
Lock yourselves down gents. Twitter. Images. Passwords.
Sign in through VPNs.
Even if you don't think you are guilty or would be a target, you should act as if you are guilty and are a target due to your mere association on this forum.
This is a company who openly and proudly threw a former sponsor, Intel a $100BB company, under the bus.
Real people are losing real money and influence because of this.
A rabid person will act irrationally, without warning and without provocation.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2014 05:45 AM by MaleDefined.)
On the one hand, she is pretty, slutty, and vile enough that I would hatefuck her with the fury of Andromeda annihilating the Milky Way.
On the other hand, she gets paid a New York salary to write articles that could be copy/pasted from any Super Informified College Girl's Tumblr site or OK Cupid "About Me" with absolutely no discernible difference in style or content, which pisses me off. There are millions of actually talented writers in the U.S., many of whom have at least a shred of loyalty to the rapidly vanishing journalistic ethos, whose style has more to contribute to the world than Internet Feminist Mad Libs, yet who remain unemployed or underemployed for their abilities while this Bloggerina with more baggage than four seasons of Sex and the City gets to whore her pen to Nick Denton without a penny for regret or self-awareness.
This almost makes me want to go ape shit, until I remember that I live in Eastern Europe, where the women are thinner, prettier, more pleasant and feminine than the future cat ladies of America like Erin Gloria Ryan could ever hope to be, and I don't have to date or even think about unfortunate cases like her anymore except in places of abstract amusement, such as this forum.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2014 05:52 AM by Buddydowrongright.)
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
Everything Roosh mentioned in this video back in December 2013 is starting to make sense now:
“There’s a big individual component in how you pursue your goals, but if you ignore your opponents, if you ignore your enemies, within a time period of 1 year or 5 years (...) you will give them the green light to change laws and change the cultural collective mentality.”
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
If you guys need to stay anonymous, make sure your shit is locked down. First the SJWs dox you, then they attempt to ruin your reputation, get you fired, or destroy your business.
For example, just assume rooshvforum will be hacked, they'll get your registration info and e-mail, then use that address to cyberstalk and possibly uncover your identity. It could have serious repercussions so plan accordingly.
Not all of us are immune to these malicious tactics like Roosh.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2014 08:51 AM by rawhide.)
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
Quote:I am waiting in anticipation of how they'll try to bring this place down. Hate speech won't be enough, they'll need something else. I'm almost giddy for the upcoming fight.
I'll fight with everything I have to keep this running. I'll host this in Russia if I have to under the domain rooshvforum.ru.
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
Quote:Maybe kinja/gawker bloggers can pull together an activist program to get advertisers to pull ads from http://www.rooshvforum.com?
The editor of Gawker is complaining about a concerted effort to get ads off Gawker, and then someone helpfully suggests to do the same behavior, on a site that doesn't have ads. Amazing, really.
This is a company that I, as a consumer, find reprehensible. Firstly, I thought you might like to know how Sam Read, Gawker's Editor-in-Chief, really feels about advertisers that have ceased their campaigns with Gawker. His own words may be found here:
Notice how he begins by associating an internet campaign with fascism first, but the key language may be found in the third paragraph. Quoting him:
"Intel is run by craven idiots.It employs pusillanimous morons. It lacks integrity."
If this is how he feels about a sponsor that decided to part ways, it makes me wonder how he truly feels about all his other sponsors. As you will see in the article (and may find upon further digging), other notable companies such as Adobe, BMW, Mercedes, Nissan, and Olympus have since suspended or distanced themselves from their relationships with Gawker.
Gawker also apparently regards their readers as products and not consumers, which many found deeply insulting. You can see the archive of that article in the link below (14th paragraph):
Additionally, Gawker employees Sam Biddle and the previously mentioned Editor-in-Chief Sam Read have been outed as having written some questionable things supporting bullying against various groups. You may see some select scree shots below:
Sam Read's insensitive words on those with autism:
To further evidence the somewhat nebulous stance this company has with bullying, they yesterday released an article that insensitively shamed older virgins, who generally tend to be people that have issues regarding depression and/or social awkwardness. Articles such as this only serve to lessen their already low self-esteem:
And last, but not least, Gawker Media is currently in court over its treatment of workers, not paying them when they may in fact have been required to be legally compensated. The following article includes sworn affidavits:
In short, Gawker Media is a company with a long history of practices that are less than fully ethical, and it employs people that seem to behave in the same way. I find this reprehensible and am disappointed that Discover, which I have until now held in high regard, does business with them.
I ask that you look into your current relationship with Gawker and reassess it. Otherwise, I may need to reconsider the use of your services.
I purposely tried to be as comprehensive as I could regarding all their skeletons. That's how I operate.
Any of you can use this as a blueprint if you want to write a sponsor. Mostly all of their shenanigans should be in there.
RE: RVF is being blamed for Gawker losing advertisers
As I've read on here many times that once you take away the corporate support/funding of SJW's that they would lose their shit and they're proving it right now. On the other side we have guys like Roosh and Mike who from day one never really relied on corporations and were backed by the truth and provided life changing knowledge and now you see who's real and who's not. I'm just glad I'm on the right side of this battle.
(This post was last modified: 10-23-2014 10:33 AM by PrimeTime32.)
Home
RooshV.com
Search (Via Forum)
Member List
![[-]](images/collapse.gif)
The following 7 users Like RawGod's post:
![[Image: 3TaMg6j.png]](http://i.imgur.com/3TaMg6j.png)
