Post: #51

Feminists just have to respond with the phrases "this is just taking us back to blaming the victim"..."you have really regressed all of the progress men [manboobs] have made"...."I'm sorry that you other men [manboobs] have to call this guy a fellow man"

The Jezebel bitch even said the guy was an MIT alum who "Creepily still is involved with his old frat". BITCH, he's an alumni adviser. That's a real thing that is necessary at EVERY frat. Motherfucking cunt.

Post: #52

Does anyone have a name and email address for the author of the piece?

Post: #53

(09-25-2014 01:54 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  Does anyone have a name and email address for the author of the piece?

According to his Facebook page:

Bill Frezza
[email protected]

Post: #54

(09-24-2014 12:32 PM)Sonsowey Wrote:  Filming girls without their consent is in and of itself illegal, but there have been several cases where videos of exactly that sort were permitted as evidence in court to get guys off of false rape accusations, so...

Exactly. While it may not be legal, it could save your ass to have a record of the incident. Moreover, if you found yourself in the situation of having to defend yourself from false rape accusations and you have video of the incident, immediately put that video into the public sphere (some kind of accessible online forum). In the US at least, once a communication is in the public forum there are very strong first amendment protections against taking it down. If it has never been released however, it is much more likely to be suppressed - even as evidence that could save you from a false rape charge.

Before any of this happens, I would advise all of you reading this to make a list of the three top criminal defense attorneys in your area. Find a guy who's good at going to trial and winning, not just cutting plea bargains. You want to know about them before you need them. Ditto for divorce attorneys, if you ever get married. Sad to have to think like this but such is the America we live in.

Post: #55

https://twitter.com/BillFrezza

Dude is keeping a stiff upper lip.
Hope the manosphere shows some solidarity, he's picked up on the same things we have.

https://twitter.com/BillFrezza/status/51...0746417153
https://twitter.com/BillFrezza/status/51...0647245824
https://twitter.com/BillFrezza/status/51...3582139392
https://twitter.com/BillFrezza/status/51...8238508033
https://twitter.com/BillFrezza/status/51...2588890112
https://twitter.com/BillFrezza/status/51...4830147584

Post: #56

James Taranto, George Will, and now Bill Frezza; Going forward, it will be interesting to see how many journalists will be willing to challenge the feminist narrative as to whether there's a campus "rape epidemic" after watching these three get vilified in the media for doing so.

Post: #57

He needs supporting, I've contacted Forbes about their ridiculous decision and how its hypocritical to do it at the same time as 'banned books week'

Post: #58

(09-25-2014 02:32 PM)Renzy Wrote:  James Taranto, George Will, and now Bill Frezza; Going forward, it will be interesting to see how many journalists will be willing to challenge the feminist narrative as to whether there's a campus "rape epidemic" after watching these three get vilified in the media for doing so.

More will do it, actually.

They are seeing the success (and page views, which to them means dollar dollar bills y'all) of our sites and they are copying us in a cynical ploy to get money.

Post: #59

I have started responding to some of his tweets in support [I tweet under my real name]. Immediate push-back from feminist types. As usual it is almost impossible to get any truth through their thick skulls...the best thing to do is just present it and watch their minds melt at the paradoxes in their world view.

Post: #60

(09-25-2014 02:56 PM)Slim Shady Wrote:  I have started responding to some of his tweets in support [I tweet under my real name]. Immediate push-back from feminist types. As usual it is almost impossible to get any truth through their thick skulls...the best thing to do is just present it and watch their minds melt at the paradoxes in their world view.

People don't want the truth, least of all young, single American women.

Post: #61

The old left opinion magazine The Nation just did an interesting piece on feminism and the police state.

The Nation: How feminists and liberals enabled the modern police state

Quote:“Carceral feminists,” the subject of a fair amount of recent talk and scholarship on the roots of anti-trafficking campaigns, is an unlovely phrase, but it usefully denotes a social force that elided personal power with state power, eschewed the project of liberation—the goal of a radically different set of power relations—and took as its armor the victim’s mantle.

Post: #62

Wesleyan banned all male fraternities on Monday. http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/09/...o-go-coed/

From the article:

Quote:Wesleyan follows Trinity College in Hartford, which began the transition starting in 2012, citing problems with drinking and drug use in Greek organizations. It also comes less than a month after Wesleyan closed the Beta Theta Pi fraternity house after a woman attending a party there was seriously injured after falling from a third-floor window.

So men are punished because a woman got out of control. What are the chances a sorority would be closed after a drunk man hurt himself in the house? Zero, of course.

This is part of the feminist attack on men's free association and masculinity; they want to extirpate all male spaces whether they are fraternities, men's clubs, civic organizations, military units, sports, whatever, while building and encouraging female only organizations, of course without the slightest shame at the hypocrisy.

Their end goal is simply the de-masculinization of society and as to the reason for this I agree with Heartiste:" The eradication of men-only spaces is status quo elite insurance against rebellion."

Post: #63

(09-25-2014 03:47 PM)Sp5 Wrote:  The old left opinion magazine The Nation just did an interesting piece on feminism and the police state.

The Nation: How feminists and liberals enabled the modern police state

Quote:“Carceral feminists,” the subject of a fair amount of recent talk and scholarship on the roots of anti-trafficking campaigns, is an unlovely phrase, but it usefully denotes a social force that elided personal power with state power, eschewed the project of liberation—the goal of a radically different set of power relations—and took as its armor the victim’s mantle.

Great article. Now how much you want to bet that author continues to vote for the same kinds of people who brought us those changes anyway?

Post: #64

(09-25-2014 05:01 PM)MrXY Wrote:  Wesleyan banned all male fraternities on Monday. http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/09/...o-go-coed/

From the article:

Quote:Wesleyan follows Trinity College in Hartford, which began the transition starting in 2012, citing problems with drinking and drug use in Greek organizations. It also comes less than a month after Wesleyan closed the Beta Theta Pi fraternity house after a woman attending a party there was seriously injured after falling from a third-floor window.

So men are punished because a woman got out of control. What are the chances a sorority would be closed after a drunk man hurt himself in the house? Zero, of course.

This is part of the feminist attack on men's free association and masculinity; they want to extirpate all male spaces whether they are fraternities, men's clubs, civic organizations, military units, sports, whatever, while building and encouraging female only organizations, of course without the slightest shame at the hypocrisy.

Their end goal is simply the de-masculinization of society and as to the reason for this I agree with Heartiste:" The eradication of men-only spaces is status quo elite insurance against rebellion."

They didn't ban the fraternities (yet) but are forcing the few with residential houses on campus to go co-ed. It's probably only a matter of time before they force all of them to be co-ed, residential or not.

What guy would want to join a co-ed fraternity? Isn't that kind of like paying dues for a t-shirt and living in the same dorm you were already in?

Post: #65

(09-24-2014 08:54 PM)xpatplayer Wrote:  That article was too honest. Nobody can handle the truth nowadays. I had a discussion with my chapter brothers - they said it was brilliant. We want to drink, party and bang sluts and kicking drunk whores out is the best way to ensure we don't get in deep shit.

I may do a post/ submit an article to RoK on why the attack on fraternities indicates the death of American values. Fraternities are essentially a breeding ground for future leaders and prove that synergy works wonders. The person I was as a pledge and the person I am now are completely different. Take away Greek Life and you take away many men's chance of becoming better versions of themselves.

But feminists do tend to attack men deemed attractive, because they hate masculinity with a strong vigor. Even if colleges do ban fraternities, they will continue to exist as secret organizations. No way in hell a lot of them are selling/ renting out houses to GDIs. And they will maintain chapters even when fraternities are banned, it'll just be without letters outside the house or on clothes.

I implore you to write an article on the Attack of Fraternities.

Also, while many all male dorms are now becoming co-ed don't be surprised when more than a few all female dorms are instated.

Post: #66

Delete.

Post: #67

(09-25-2014 05:01 PM)MrXY Wrote:  Wesleyan banned all male fraternities on Monday. http://connecticut.cbslocal.com/2014/09/...o-go-coed/

From the article:

Quote:Wesleyan follows Trinity College in Hartford, which began the transition starting in 2012, citing problems with drinking and drug use in Greek organizations. It also comes less than a month after Wesleyan closed the Beta Theta Pi fraternity house after a woman attending a party there was seriously injured after falling from a third-floor window.

So men are punished because a woman got out of control. What are the chances a sorority would be closed after a drunk man hurt himself in the house? Zero, of course.

Adding to your point, back when i was in college about 7 years ago, a guy fell out of the window and died partying at a frat. After a few articles in the school newspaper and a funnel, nothing else happen.

Post: #68

(09-25-2014 07:03 PM)Mentavious Wrote:  I implore you to write an article on the Attack of Fraternities.

Also, while many all male dorms are now becoming co-ed don't be surprised when more than a few all female dorms are instated.

I will soon. I just have a busy course load this semester. But you can be assured that more colleges will ban them over the next 10 years. Fraternities are the new target for SJWs. Their influence over the country and University Boards is the only thing keeping the Greek system alive. Wait till universities start replacing their board of governors with younger non-greeks.

Also, fraternity men are easy targets. They're young, immature and do stupid things like every other college student. They also inspire a lot of jealousy and maintain traditional principles. Above all, they're smarter and tend to be much more successful than average. Combine that with the fact that they have penises and you understand why frumpy unsuccessful SJWs hate them

Post: #69

Bill Frezza is a friend of a friend on facebook. I sometimes see his comments on posts. He relishes taking on liberals, so he's probably enjoying every minute of this. My guess is that he's independently wealthy and likes spending time promoting conservative causes. And he's probably getting more publicity from being fired from Forbes than he was writing for them.

About this:

Quote: In our age of sexual equality, why drunk female students are almost never characterized as irresponsible jerks is a question I leave to the feminists. But it is precisely those irresponsible women that the brothers must be trained to identify and protect against, because all it takes is one to bring an entire fraternity system down.

I think, pointing out female privilege like that is more angering to feminists than any any of the reasons that they've stated. He's pointing out that women can always fall back on their sex appeal to avoid responsibility.

Post: #70

Forbes sacks columnist over piece saying 'drunk' female students pose 'gravest' threat to frats; writer responds, 'I stand by every word'

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national...-1.1951124

Post: #71

Excellent reply. Firm and unyielding. I wish all men under attack by SJW berserkers would do the same. The moment you start apologizing or explaining how you didn't mean it that way, they will become even more crazed and destroy you completely.

Post: #72

Sounds like an RVFer

Post: #73

I've not recieved a reply from Forbes but I bet it was a mangina or a woman who pulled the article. For example the Daily Mail would have run with that article and thought $$$$$$$

Post: #74

(09-26-2014 09:39 AM)bojangles Wrote:  I've not recieved a reply from Forbes but I bet it was a mangina or a woman who pulled the article. For example the Daily Mail would have run with that article and thought $$$$$$$

Well - Dailymail strangely enough publishes plenty of Red Pill wisdom, which produces click-bait-material, but sometimes gets full support by the comment section. They pull it off, because they can always excuse themselves to address a "lower" even sexist segment of society. Too bad that this kind of "sexism" is pure truth. Forbes, The Times & NY Beta Times have to pull the high-brow party line.

And it its possible that the author is independently wealthy and he does not give a shit about getting fired. A man on alimony payments and mortgaged to the hilt seldom rebels.

Post: #75

Quote:Bill Frezza won’t be keeping his gig as a Forbes contributor after he wrote a controversial article entitled “Drunk Female Guests Are the Gravest Threat to Fraternities” that didn’t sit well with readers. The piece was quickly taken down — although a cached version is still available — and a spokesperson for Forbes confirmed to the New York Daily News that Frezza will no longer contribute to the site.

Of course it "didn't sit well with readers". Hardcore politically-incorrect (dare I say socially unacceptable) truth rarely ever does. That's why there's almost always a shitstorm about what gets written on RoK, /r/TheRedPill, and the like.

Feminists don't like having the truth of their nature revealed and will fight tooth-and-nail to deny that truth when it comes to light. If you can't make coherent rebuttals (protip: they can't) then your only other option is attempting to silence dissent as we have seen here.