Post: #1

Alot of my Greek American cousins have mad game and are strait up players! My cousin Mike told me they use a 1 to 4 scale instead of the traditional 1 to 10...so it goes like this...a 1 is untuochable..that means like a really gross you out kinda deal...A 2 is called blowjobable..means you would you know...A 3 is fuckable... ofcourse we all know what that is kinda...A 4 is assholable.. That means anything goes! Even really things I wont type...she hot as fuck..and youre all in...I cant tell you what the difference is between a 5 or 6 but i can tell you what it is between 3 and 4.....

Post: #2

Heh, that's an interesting scale. I just use 1-5 now, instead of that 1-10 nonsense, too much variance.

-A 1 is a monster would have to rape me to get me to have sex with it. (Standard 1-3)
-I'd have to be pretty drunk or desperate to sleep with a 2. This type of girl probably has a moderate weight issue (NOT OBESE), possibly a butter or a cougar. You definitely don't advertise that you slept with these girls. (Standard 4-5)
-3's are your average girl, the kind you willingly date, and in a past life I would introduce to family and friends. Nothing wrong with these girls, IMO. (Standard 6-7)
-The next step up is the 4, who you want to show off. This is the type of girl you see and think, she's pretty hot, I wonder what she'd look like doused in my cum? (Standard 8-9)
-A 5 is just like a 4, but also has money. (Standard 10)

Regrettably, I've subjected my dick to a 2 "once or twice", but I tend to stay in the 3 range, with the occasional 4 here and there. Anyway, I've never understood the 1-10 system, as it spreads things out too much, and what sane guy in his right mind bangs a real low # on the 1-10 scale anyway?

Post: #3

For me it's simple.

10- There is no 10. A 10 is just a 9 with makeup, heels, a hot outfit, etc
9- Hot as balls. The hottest of the hot.
8- Pretty. Very datable.
7- Good looking. Datable, but I'll probably get disinterested after a few dates.
6- Average/bland looking.
5- Ugly.
4 and below- Run and hide.

Post: #4

(03-27-2011 02:58 AM)ZTheGreat Wrote:  For me it's simple.

10- There is no 10. A 10 is just a 9 with makeup, heels, a hot outfit, etc
9- Hot as balls. The hottest of the hot.
8- Pretty. Very datable.
7- Good looking. Datable, but I'll probably get disinterested after a few dates.
6- Average/bland looking.
5- Ugly.
4 and below- Run and hide.

Why is 5 ugly? 5 is the mean of the 1-10 scale. So a 5 would be a an average-looking girl. It's a bell curve, 5 is the middle, and to the right are the prettier girls (with 10's obviously being very rare due to the laws of normal distribution).

Post: #5

(03-27-2011 12:09 AM)el mechanico Wrote:  Alot of my Greek American cousins have mad game and are strait up players! My cousin Mike told me they use a 1 to 4 scale instead of the traditional 1 to 10...

For last five or so years I use 1 to 2 scale. 2 is someone I'll fuck, 1 is someone I will not. Couldn't get simpler than that.

Post: #6

(03-27-2011 02:58 AM)ZTheGreat Wrote:  For me it's simple.
4 and below- Run and hide.

Right there shows why there's no need for 10 numbers. Although his definition of a 10 was terrible, IMO.

Post: #7

1 to 4: Ranges from mandatory euthanasia to turn and run really, really fast.
5: Borderline Acceptable; would bang once in a dry spell if no one found out.
6: Acceptable; would bang but just a few times.
7: Attractive; would bang, but would only date if she had good intangibles.
8: Very Attractive; would bang and would date.
9: Hot; would bang and would date even if she was boring, stupid, lame or evil.
10: Perfect; basically a 9 with airbrushing, proper lighting, a nice outfit, money, a great personality etc.,

Post: #8

I find the 1-10 scale pretty useless, since you rarely see the extremes (when was the last time you saw an actual 1 or a 10?) and because so many chicks fall into the 6-8 range.

I went through a period where I was using the academic grade system (A through F). But, I found that it was: 1) idiotic; and 2) the same as the 1-10 (every girl was a fucking B or C+).

My system these days is a little more nuanced--and therefore complicated--but involves the sort of areas we all look for.

Race
Age
Exponents (height/weight/frame size)
Body Highlights (ass/tits/legs)
Face Highlights (eyes/nose/lips)
Intangibles (speak multiple languages/cooks)
Negatives (multiple piercings/visible tattoos/ghetto speech)

Every area gets a "rating" based on my individualized tastes and preferences. It's basically like card counting in blackjack: a plus/minus system with a raw score at the end.

Post: #9

I'm experimenting with the 1-1000 scale. It allows for very fine accuracy.