Post: #51

Engaging in an argument with a woman that went to an ivy school because she was deemed intelligent enough (to then be told she's the salvation for humanity and her twat is made out of cold pressed latinum for 4 years) destroys her as potential mate for any but the most emasculated betas out there. Even if you can destroy her with logic each and every time. It wears on the soul. Oh and when you do, you can be sure you won't be getting any that night.

I'm tired of the fight. It wears on you. You can have an unentitled, intelligent woman that admires you. The issue is most of the women who are really intelligent have been coddled for so long that they think they're gold.

They're their own worst enemies.

Post: #52

I like being dominate in my relationships with women. I want there to be no doubt I am the intelligent one with the superior brains and education and career and money. Her job is to be pretty and agreeable and to look up to me. I'm not going to get that from an uptight Ivy Leaguer.

I'm not into alpha chicks. They kill my boner.

Post: #53

(08-08-2014 05:26 AM)Deluge Wrote:  

(08-08-2014 05:05 AM)Ethan Amarante Wrote:  

(08-07-2014 11:33 PM)Deluge Wrote:  No one wants an over-educated feminist snarky bitch, but keep in mind the greater the gap in intelligence between you and another person, the harder it is to communicate with them. The general rule is if your two standard deviations apart in IQ (i.e 30 points), you're pretty much fucked. You're going to best get along with people of the same intellectual caliber as yourself. No more, no less.

That's very interesting - where did you get that figure of two standard deviations from?

From research on gifted children.

I've checked out your link but can't find anything about the figure of two standard deviations specifically. Do you remember exactly where it came from?

Don't worry if you're unsure, but I have an interest in the field and haven't come across this before, but would very much like to.

Post: #54

I like dumb girls and smart girls.. it doesn't matter I can emotionally own them and stop what I don't like. My problem is the initial part of seduction. Once I'm in at all I'm feckin in

Post: #55

Strangely enough, all of my relationships have had an extreme intelligence gradient learning more towards smarter than me. In my past I've had a hair dresser, a PhD biomedical engineering student, and a med student on a full ride for a heart surgeon career.

My favorite relationships are with women who appreciate what I bring to the table. I love how the girl I'm seeing now gets blown away when I explain some concept to her. I don't know of she really learns from them, but there's a quiet admiration I pickup.

With the smart ones, they always get dazzled by my ability to bull$hit. Yes I remember my basic science.

Post: #56

I thought about some of the women I've gone out with in the past couple years:

PhD in a science field and professor at one of the top universities in the USA
A maid for a hotel
Masters degree from Columbia
A pastry chef at a restaurant
B.S. in Chemical Engineering
A secretary (oops, I'm sorry, "executive assistant")
Self employed property manager
International biotech Sales person

Despite their differences in education, they are more similar than different. The same maddening irrational and capricious female behavior exists in all of them.

The maid and pastry chef were the most fun and pleasant and agreeable though.

Post: #57

I was about to say the exact same thing before I just read your post, Menace. I just told my friend the other day, you want to talk politics and get an interesting take? You call me. Forget that BS about talking to the girl about it. Who cares. Does she do things for you or provide things that you can't (or are harder for you to)? Then she's fulfilling the role. Usually, the smarter, more interesting ones are more masculine. An unfortunate tradeoff unless you can hit the sweet spot of original, intelligent and passing the boner test ...