Post: #26

(05-07-2017 05:13 PM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  I wonder, have feminists considered the effect that white demographic collapse will have on their own movement, which mostly consists of college-educated, upper-middle class white women? How will they replenish their own ranks? It seems like they could become victims of their own success.

Weren't there some utopian christian groups in the 19th century that wiped themselves out because they decided that all fucking was sinful?

Post: #27

(05-08-2017 06:57 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

(05-07-2017 05:13 PM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  I wonder, have feminists considered the effect that white demographic collapse will have on their own movement, which mostly consists of college-educated, upper-middle class white women? How will they replenish their own ranks? It seems like they could become victims of their own success.

Weren't there some utopian christian groups in the 19th century that wiped themselves out because they decided that all fucking was sinful?

You mean like the Shakers?

Post: #28

(08-01-2014 12:09 PM)Lizard King Wrote:  It's a jizzebel article, and I have only scan read it, but it is beyond terribly written and I can't even work out if it is for or against feminism. It was linked to in the article posted by the OP.

It's a pro-feminist attempt at satire condemning the #WomenAgainstFeminism movement.

Satire is very difficult to write. The author of the piece has failed miserably.

Post: #29

Chanty Binx type of Feminazis are in trouble because:

-Since 2008, manufacturing careers aren't coming back, causing millions of young men in Canada & USA to lose that one chance to work in a career which was set for life.

-Since 2008, savers and investors are negatively affected when the Federal Reserve/Central Bank institutions in Canada, USA, euro-zone, enacted low-interest rates and quantitative easing to "enhance" the Depression Deflation economy after the Great Financial Collapse of 2008-2009. This leads to Inflation which erodes the investment of the average saver.

-Instead of actually creating career growth, the excess money supply didn't really create any substantial decrease in the unemployment rate, but was causing Asset Bubbles in Real Estate & Stock Market. Low interest rates also encouraged the gov'ts of the West to spend more, which strangely co-incided with the increase of Slutwalk wave of feminism from 2010-present day.

-Further to this, the excess cash was funneled into non-profits and universities to enforce Draconian anti-male laws which would make even a woman "feeling" uncomfortable a criminal offence, even if the man accused is not even in the city of alleged offense.

-On the contrary, female teachers who are overpaid compared to private sector wages are taking underage cock up their ass and having their dirty, filthy pussies eaten by boys and girls who were forced to attend school under a Nanny State law which can cause the caregivers to be at risk of state violence if they don't send their offspring to a public school.

-Nowadays, men can't even meet up for a Happy Hour without being libelled as rape supporters/rape apologists/rapists, etc., but Instagram Hoe Port-A-Potty Dubai Bitchez are not questioned at the airport where they earned their 100,000$ of cash, despite that the US Anti-Money Laundering Act, FATCA, etc. creates a fucking hell for men who want to withdraw at least $5,000 of their own savings at a given time without being reported on a database for suspected criminal activity.

-Feminazis are likely to work in fields which are gov't supported, in other words, lavish careers with benefits at the expense of the taxpayer, along with investors (printing excess cash supply leads to Inflation, which is another form of taxation to reduce the spending power of the consumer).

Post: #30

The dire state of the sexual economy for men, whereby increasing numbers of guys are getting completely shut out in western nations without any play whatsoever, will in and of itself cause many men to be receptive to the redpill and to find themselves regular visitors to sites such as Chateau Heartisse and RVF.

Post: #31

(05-09-2017 10:12 AM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  

(05-08-2017 06:57 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

(05-07-2017 05:13 PM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  I wonder, have feminists considered the effect that white demographic collapse will have on their own movement, which mostly consists of college-educated, upper-middle class white women? How will they replenish their own ranks? It seems like they could become victims of their own success.

Weren't there some utopian christian groups in the 19th century that wiped themselves out because they decided that all fucking was sinful?

You mean like the Shakers?

Wow - interesting group. Their demise began when they let a woman take over the sect and it was a matriarchy after that. Celibacy and matriarchy are probably the two most moronic things that they could do. Also they were lucky they were not wiped out by some hostile Indian tribe - guess the mainstream patriarchs of the early settlers/USA protected them, but they could not protect them from their own idiocy.

Post: #32

(05-10-2017 07:25 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

(05-09-2017 10:12 AM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  

(05-08-2017 06:57 PM)BortimusPrime Wrote:  

(05-07-2017 05:13 PM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  I wonder, have feminists considered the effect that white demographic collapse will have on their own movement, which mostly consists of college-educated, upper-middle class white women? How will they replenish their own ranks? It seems like they could become victims of their own success.

Weren't there some utopian christian groups in the 19th century that wiped themselves out because they decided that all fucking was sinful?

You mean like the Shakers?

Wow - interesting group. Their demise began when they let a woman take over the sect and it was a matriarchy after that. Celibacy and matriarchy are probably the two most moronic things that they could do. Also they were lucky they were not wiped out by some hostile Indian tribe - guess the mainstream patriarchs of the early settlers/USA protected them, but they could not protect them from their own idiocy.

Shaker Wood Furniture Aesthetics were on point though. Matriarchy didn't want sex, but got lots of wood in the bedroom anyway.

Post: #33

(05-10-2017 11:00 AM)TheOllam Wrote:  Shaker Wood Furniture Aesthetics were on point though. Matriarchy didn't want sex, but got lots of wood in the bedroom anyway.

I was wondering about that. They obviously attracted some men and grew through new converts until the US civil war. Some had families and I am certain that some men found refuge there. My bet is that quite a few very poor men either fled as slaves (yes - plenty of white slaves at that) or left some terrible conditions in factories or factory towns. Creating furniture and having a quiet place to live was probably fine. They also had a communist system of everyone owning everything. Frankly those buggers survived on pure idealism way longer than they otherwise should have. It seems to me that it operated on a strange scam of getting new idealistic converts who worked for food and board while they made money selling the furniture thus keeping the colony afloat. That ended until the industrialized competition of the north made them too hard to compete. And certainly neither the communist leadership, the matriarchal leadership and the celibate lifestyle did not help. On the other hand monasteries can survive on that alone, but they are not led and directed by women.