Post: #76

The only time I was ever exposed to Tucker was when my ignoramus, slutty, carousel loving, bimbo of a roommate was reading his book and came up to me laughing and said "can you believe this guy...haha...read this" and then I read some passage about him fucking in a hotel pool and being watched.

I never took him seriously because I think that was the only book my roommate read the entire year. The next year, her only book was 50 shades of grey. That was a bulk of his audience...American bimbos. Go Tucker.

My sincere hope is that he gets the beatdown he deserves for fucking with Mike and Roosh. He is like that kid on the playground who no one took seriously because he was obviously full of shit...but then one day he crossed the line with his shit talking and lies...and what was the only response, the only way to give that snot-nosed brat a lesson?....

Post: #77

In the wise words of George Soros:

"Go for the juggular."

Post: #78

Who's Tucker Max?

Post: #79

(07-27-2014 09:43 PM)Goldmund Wrote:  [....] He is like that kid on the playground who no one took seriously because he was obviously full of shit...but then one day he crossed the line with his shit talking and lies...

Ha ha. The insecure kid full of tall tales about how his dad was a pro baseball player and the insecure teenager with tall tales about how he has a Lambo but it's "in storage" can be forgiven because of youth.

A grown man full of tall tales to try and sell books and get on TV and radio is simply a wanton sociopath.

(BTW, can anybody summarize Max's blue pill preaching?)

Post: #80

A graphical representation of Roosh & Mike vs. Tucker Max

Post: #81

The Chicago Sun Times Exposes Tucker Max As A Douchebag
Someone posted a link in the comments section of a previous post to the blog article Sunday Lunch With Tucker Max at the website for the Chicago Sun Times. This blog article was written by a female reporter who followed Tucker Max around for a day when he did a book signing at a Chicago book store. This article clearly shows that Tucker Max's book tour hasn't gone as well he tries to make it seem. According to the author, Tucker Max only signed 41 books at the bookstore. He apparently received $1 for each book signed. After accounting for the cost of parking ($26), he ended the day ahead by only $15. However, after factoring in the cost of renting the SUV he drove to get to the book store, it is obvious that he lost money on the Chicago leg of his book signing tour.

The Chicago Times blog entry was posted in April 2006. Shortly after it went up on the website, the morons who kiss up to Tucker Max started this long message board thread bashing the blog author. Tucker Max and his followers are so delusional that they actually seem to believe that the author wrote the blog entry because she was jealous of Tucker Max because of he is a 'successful writer,' wanted to have sex with Tucker but was distraught when she realized it wasn't going to happen, or is just a man-hating bitch.

Post: #82

[video=youtube]http://[/video]




Tucker Max gets called out on The Opie & Anthony Show



http://tuckermaxdoucebag.blogspot.ca/
A blog dedicated to making fun of Tucker Max, a self-proclaimed ass clown.

Post: #83

I couldn't resist:

Post: #84

Tucker Max is so 2004.

Post: #85

I've never read his book or his website, but I watched his movie quite a few years back.

Have you guys seen it?

My buddy thought it was the best movie ever.......it was fucking horrible.

Terrible movie. Really, really bad.

If he signed off on that thing, he's obviously partially retarded.

Post: #86

This reminds me of when bill Cosby was calling Eddie Murphey telling him not to say filth flarn flarn filth.

Post: #87

(07-27-2014 11:55 PM)RioNomad Wrote:  I've never read his book or his website, but I watched his movie quite a few years back.

Have you guys seen it?

My buddy thought it was the best movie ever.......it was fucking horrible.

Terrible movie. Really, really bad.

If he signed off on that thing, he's obviously partially retarded.

I recently watched - or fast-forwarded mostly - Tucker's movie:




It's available on youtube, since no one cares to enforce copyright with it.

The good part was that it actually included some good Game approaches that the Tucker-character used in the movie.

For example:
Telling the White Knight Cockblocker barkeeper:
" You know, you are right. Make sure and tell your cute waitress collegue that I am an asshole and that she should stay away from me. Will you do that for me?" Heh - that line is actually not bad if you visit the bar again. Blue Bill Knight will lubricate the waitress for you.

But apart from the not so bad negging, banter and natural Game spitting - the movie is pretty much Blue Pill and of course too boring to sit through in the cinema.

- single motherhood is praised via the good-hearted stripper
- marriage and great weddings are taken for granted as wonderful institutions
- there are a multitude of feminist references and statements which make you wonder what Tucker's real thoughts are nowadays

Of course the movie itself looks cheap, the cast is wrong, the stories of his book picked for the movie are not that convincing.
Frankly the movie OLD SCHOOL is way more Red Pill than Tucker's movie - also of course way more funny.

Post: #88

Hilarious; a guy who's life is so fucking boring he had to fabricate stories about drunk shenanigans to entertain double-digit IQ fratbros is calling Roosh a liar...
Never liked him, never believed an ounce of his retarded shtick, will enjoy watching the manosphere finally turn on him. Good riddance.

Post: #89

I remember that ending rant by the main character.

This is the essence of narcissism: he hijacks his friend's wedding and his speech keeps his friend's day all about him.

His insight into his selfishness produces no true change: he begs for forgiveness in way that keeps it all about his self-image.

Fuck Tucker Max.

Post: #90

I scrolled through his website. Where is the actionable advice? I only found stuff like: "don't dress bad, don't smell bad, don't have boring conversations and be awkward." Yeah, no shit.

This project is going to tank by itself for having shitty content.

Post: #91

You can smell the fear of (another) failure emanating from tucker

Post: #92

(07-27-2014 06:07 PM)Roosh Wrote:  My video response about this is almost ready.

Oh shit!! Reminds me of this little gem





Except after I don't think they'll squash the beef afterwords

Post: #93

Tucker max's spiel may have worked in the 90s but his cartoonish simplistic behaviour just looks pitiful now and he is threatened by Roosh who he realises is more successful than him and reaching the demographics he wants.

Roosh is promoting world travel, personal development, the study of philosophy and languages and the improvement of a man's life

Tucker Max is a drunkard screaming 'be an asshole and you'll get loads of chicks' which may have worked 15 years ago.

His Wikipedia notes he has narcissistic personality disorder. I have dealt with people like this before and despite their mental illness they can be very dangerous. They will invent lies about you and will deny anything that makes them look bad.

As the pain of his obscurity scars his soul he lashes out at a man he sees as his better and hence he invents these laughable claims.

Men like Tucker Max have no honour or interest in it. Any appeal to them on what is 'true' or honorable is a useful as asking a rat to learn to appreciate the finer points of Opera. He is a disgusting rat who should be treated like one.

Post: #94

The co-host on the podcast, Professor Geoffrey Miller, is also a conniving tool bag.

He wrote a tweet where he chided fatties for not having self-discipline and later said it was all an experiment for his research project. What a fucking joke. He later retracted saying "My sincere apoplogies to all for that idiotic, impulsive, and badly judged tweet. It does not reflect my true views, values, or standards." The dude didn't have the balls to stand behind his opinion.

This is likely why he's been reduced to shelling out advice with TM.

Other pearls of wisdom from their show:

Tucker:
One of the primary concepts is negging, right? And it’s like, if there’s anyone on earth who’s famous for negging people and making fun of them, it’s fucking me. Okay? So, it’s like, when they do that, I’m always like, you guys are missing the fucking point. This doesn’t make sense. Teasing someone is funny, but the best teasing is always when both of you are in on the joke, not when you’re putting someone else down. They don’t get this, for the most part. As a community, they don’t understand that at all. They think it’s about putting the women down, making her feel shitty so that the woman will then search for your validation.
I have found there’s sort of three types of pick up artists. There are the ones that are complete sociopaths, and I mean that. They are sociopaths, like, diagnosed sociopaths. There are the ones who fit somewhere on the autistic spectrum, like they have Asperger’s or they can’t understand people or whatever. And then there’s the ones who, I think, really, genuinely hate women. Like, have real issues with women, and to them, pick up artist stuff is their way to get over on them. It kind of ties back in with zero-sum game.
You’ve never, ever, ever seen a pick up artist who is a guy who was popular in high school or popular in college or popular anywhere outside of the pick up artist community ever. The approach looking at women as opponents, looking at women as objects, looking at women as things that you have to get over on, right? Think about the way that they talk, the language they use. Seduction. Seduction implies you are getting something out of someone they don’t want to give you. Gain. That implies you have an opponent.
Nils:
There’s a winner and a loser.
Tucker:
Right! There’s a winner and a loser. Bang. Words like that. That’s an offensive action. Bang is the sound a gun makes. I’m not picking shit out. This is not meaningless, guys. Words usually indicate underlying emotional thought. Like, we can go deep into that sort of stuff.



Bang is the sound a gun makes! Jesus.

Post: #95

(07-28-2014 07:36 AM)Lucky Wrote:  Bang is the sound a gun makes! Jesus.

lolol. (Pretending to be) offended at some dude's slang for "fuck" adds another title to this guy's growing resume` of failure: Tumblr SJW. They're the only other group that would claim to be offended at "bang". Not merely claim to be offended, but then also do some soul searching about exactly why he's offended.

lol. I love this guy.

Post: #96

(07-28-2014 07:36 AM)Lucky Wrote:  The co-host on the podcast, Professor Geoffrey Miller, is also a conniving tool bag.

He wrote a tweet where he chided fatties for not having self-discipline and later said it was all an experiment for his research project. What a fucking joke. He later retracted saying "My sincere apoplogies to all for that idiotic, impulsive, and badly judged tweet. It does not reflect my true views, values, or standards." The dude didn't have the balls to stand behind his opinion.

This is likely why he's been reduced to shelling out advice with TM.

Other pearls of wisdom from their show:

Tucker:
One of the primary concepts is negging, right? And it’s like, if there’s anyone on earth who’s famous for negging people and making fun of them, it’s fucking me. Okay? So, it’s like, when they do that, I’m always like, you guys are missing the fucking point. This doesn’t make sense. Teasing someone is funny, but the best teasing is always when both of you are in on the joke, not when you’re putting someone else down. They don’t get this, for the most part. As a community, they don’t understand that at all. They think it’s about putting the women down, making her feel shitty so that the woman will then search for your validation.
I have found there’s sort of three types of pick up artists. There are the ones that are complete sociopaths, and I mean that. They are sociopaths, like, diagnosed sociopaths. There are the ones who fit somewhere on the autistic spectrum, like they have Asperger’s or they can’t understand people or whatever. And then there’s the ones who, I think, really, genuinely hate women. Like, have real issues with women, and to them, pick up artist stuff is their way to get over on them. It kind of ties back in with zero-sum game.
You’ve never, ever, ever seen a pick up artist who is a guy who was popular in high school or popular in college or popular anywhere outside of the pick up artist community ever. The approach looking at women as opponents, looking at women as objects, looking at women as things that you have to get over on, right? Think about the way that they talk, the language they use. Seduction. Seduction implies you are getting something out of someone they don’t want to give you. Gain. That implies you have an opponent.
Nils:
There’s a winner and a loser.
Tucker:
Right! There’s a winner and a loser. Bang. Words like that. That’s an offensive action. Bang is the sound a gun makes. I’m not picking shit out. This is not meaningless, guys. Words usually indicate underlying emotional thought. Like, we can go deep into that sort of stuff.

Jesus, these guys are faggots. That shit is seriously a few steps away from jizzabel crap. It's not even like they're subtly trying to poison manosphere ideas with feminism, it's painfully obvious and out in the open.

Post: #97

(07-28-2014 07:52 AM)darklightdispatch Wrote:  

(07-28-2014 07:36 AM)Lucky Wrote:  Other pearls of wisdom from their show:

Tucker:
One of the primary concepts is negging, right? And it’s like, if there’s anyone on earth who’s famous for negging people and making fun of them, it’s fucking me. Okay? So, it’s like, when they do that, I’m always like, you guys are missing the fucking point. This doesn’t make sense. Teasing someone is funny, but the best teasing is always when both of you are in on the joke, not when you’re putting someone else down. They don’t get this, for the most part. As a community, they don’t understand that at all. They think it’s about putting the women down, making her feel shitty so that the woman will then search for your validation.

Jesus, these guys are faggots. That shit is seriously a few steps away from jizzabel crap. It's not even like they're subtly trying to poison manosphere ideas with feminism, it's painfully obvious and out in the open.

The main difference between them and Jezebel is that with Jezebel, it's plausible they actually believe the shit coming out of their mouths or are just acting out emotionally. With TM, you know that he knows better and is deliberately, consciously misrepresenting for his own benefit. It's Hugo Schwyzer syndrome.

Post: #98

What a washed-up bitch poseur this guy is. I look forward to watching his new project tank.

Post: #99

I've been procrastinating with homework and clicking around to find more about this and discovered that Danger and Play has written a thorough post outlining TM's bullshit and lies regarding the manosphere and demonstrating that TM can be sued for defaming Roosh.

Post: #100

Did TM get into some kind of trouble and this new venture of his is, like, his penance or something? How can a guy go from detailing a multitude of (alleged) insane antics to being "offended" by the word "bang" (when used in the Roosh-esque context)?

Either that or he has failed epically to accurately read the game market in 2014.