Post: #76

(06-15-2014 12:01 PM)kosko Wrote:  

(06-15-2014 01:33 AM)RawGod Wrote:  Who would want Desiree Giffard (that is, Desiree Jeanine Giffard) as a marriage and family therapist? Hope potential employers do their due diligence and find out she "hates men".

Unfortunately her bosses whom are likely female probably hold the same views. These people either go into to field with contempt of men and to change/control then, or they go in dullisonal into thinking try can change the lives of men (for the better.. Subjective as to what "better" is) the become jaded and grow contempt as they see how the system is broken and rigid to do anything. Most all end up in the same place and with cats in the end. Every girl I know in SJW/social work type settings has shitty relationships with men or simply has lots of cats.

Jesus Kosko, you fucking nailed it. 30 seconds with google and I get this

Quote:Desiree Giffard, a senior women studies major and active member of F.O.R.C.E. (Feminist Organization Reclaiming Consciousness and Equality) - See more at: http://www.daily49er.com/uncategorized/2...aCMh5.dpuf

And then this.
http://media.pussyandpooch.com/profile/DesireeGiffard

She's an active member of a cat rescue organization.

Post: #77

If someone knows which organization licenses Desiree Giffard, I might do a little investigative journalism on them. I'd be curious to find out if she is a lone man-hater or representative of something systemic.

Post: #78

(06-16-2014 12:39 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  If someone knows which organization licenses Desiree Giffard, I might do a little investigative journalism on them. I'd be curious to find out if she is a lone man-hater or representative of something systemic.

Her facebook lists her as an intern, so she's probably not licensed.

This cracks me up: http://www.pandora.com/profile/desiree.giffard

Her musical tastes run to Frank Sinatra, Dean Martin, & Elvis. These guys are the archetype of the playboy cad!

Quote:Desiree Jeanine likes The Lady Is A Tramp by Frank Sinatra 26 Days ago

Slut shaming!

Forget Chris Gethard, this chick is entertaining.

Post: #79

(06-12-2014 10:26 PM)2Wycked Wrote:  I love how progressives are the biggest defenders of the status-quo: Guys, just shut the fuck up, buy your flatscreens, and just stop trying to pretend you actually have a set of balls.

Progressives and socialists are the conservatives now. They support government like conservatives of the past. They should be called the right wing.

Post: #80

- It's not impossible he's had bad experience with people claiming to represent MRA's.
- He didn't say where exactly he went there are shitty places on the internet.
- He's your average white suburbanite slob, the masses are almost primed to find anything this archetype say or does hilarious, think Homer Simpson.

Post: #81

You can't say therapist without "rapist"

Post: #82

(06-12-2014 10:34 PM)Travesty444 Wrote:  I love this guy trying to dole advice on becoming normal.

Slouched posture, queer voice, nervous smile.

Also bad skin, poorly dressed, and not an ounce of muscle on his sickly frame.

Post: #83

Holy shit, that's one of the worst tattoos I've ever seen.

She was pretty beat to begin with, I guess a six. The tat drops her another few points, and I'm sure once she opens her mouth she'll drop even further.

Post: #84

The vast majority of women that are involved in animal rescue in a hands on way tend to be off their rockers. Don't ask me how I know this but I guarantee you it's true.

Post: #85

Wait...is his name really "Get hard?"
I thought it was just a play on his real name
You can't make this shit up...

Post: #86

It looks like the criticism is getting to him:

https://twitter.com/ChrisGethard/status/...6252849152

Post: #87

(06-19-2014 10:25 AM)Roosh Wrote:  It looks like the criticism is getting to him:

https://twitter.com/ChrisGethard/status/...6252849152

I think one of the problem is that he seems to misunderstand the manosphere and lumps everyone together.

That happens if you rely only on mainstream media to assess a movement.

Even some public Red Pill women & MRAs don't get some Players and PUAs on why the heck they are doing what they are doing.

We should have an article on the parts of the Manosphere for showing to people the different beliefs out there:

- MRAs who deny Game
- MRAs who do not deny Game, but do not care
- MGTOWs who deny Game
- MGTOWs who do not deny Game, but just don't care
- Traditionalists who just want to return to the old ways (usually Christian)
- Game aware married men & using it in LTR only
- Game aware Christian Men & using Chrstian Game
- Game aware men who want to be better with women & self-improve
- PUAs & full blown Players
- Players as a lifestyle using Game
- Professionals PUAs
- Crazies who deny Game, use some knowledge of Female psychology and just hate everyone - women, men with Game, men successful w. Women (PUAHate)
- Any mixture of the above, but usually Game-awereness & acceptance of female psychology is a key point

Lumping together a married Christian man w Game, an international Playboy who is having fun with a basement-dwelling incel who is trolling for life is indeed a feat only the mainstream media can pull off.

Post: #88

(06-19-2014 10:25 AM)Roosh Wrote:  It looks like the criticism is getting to him:

https://twitter.com/ChrisGethard/status/...6252849152

His bio:

Quote:Either the worst at success or the best at failure.

Post: #89

He made a response video to Ramzpaul:



My thoughts.

Post: #90

(06-19-2014 10:25 AM)Roosh Wrote:  It looks like the criticism is getting to him:

https://twitter.com/ChrisGethard/status/...6252849152

He's actually being reasonable, and *this* close to listening to us.

Quote:"My fundamental observation that drives me nuts is the manosphere seems hell bent on self-validating and that seems to make it a safe haven for a lot of really unnecessary and violent speech, which doesn't, from my perspective, seem to be anything about actually empowering men or instilling confidence in them, but has a lot more to do with unnecessarily lashing out at women for no reason. Basically, it seems to be a place for real venom of an actually dangerous kind of get validated. That's the part I can never, ever support or understand."

Chris: to understand, reverse the sexes, and replace 'Manosphere' with Feminism, (and its standard bearers, HuffPo, Slate, Jezebel).

Listen to the constant demands for men to offer supplication and adoration from women who are bitter, angry, dismissive and contemptuous of the male sex, whom have the gall to claim to be suffering under the patriarchy, despite living in the first world and being privileged enough to attend university, work in mainstream media, and live in gentrified urban bubbles away from true poverty and hardship.

Meanwhile, the exploited minorities their comfort is built on are making their clothes in sweatshops, cleaning their houses and raising their children, whilst the poor are growing their food.

Their cries are simply those of the bored, entitled children of privilege.

Hell, Without broken male supplicants, being 'good men' by doing the grunt work for the women, how would Jezebel keep functioning? Look at their office:



Keep playing your part Chris, and be the dehumanised tool they see you as.

Post: #91

Quote:[we are] frat bro's who just happen to know how to program computers

Usually, it's only people who thought they should be more popular in life who rag on "frats and sororities."

That video is just one, long rambling piece about how he feels superior to Ramzpaul. He makes alot of puffery over gaining confidence, but Gethard's approach to getting confidence is pretending pain, anger or any emotions simply don't exist.

Post: #92

Did a post on this myself at my own blog.

We are starting to get into the "they fight you" phase. Expect the usually ignorant shaming tactics to increase.

Granted I think there's a bit too much bitching about women in the manosphere myself, but to these people if you criticize women in any way shape or form you are a misogynist. These people see it everywhere. To them, a few bad jokes are evidence of a deep societal misogyny, so you can just guess how something thoroughly unorthodox like the manosphere would be.

Also Chris, on the off-chance you're reading this (snicker), seriously, talk from your chest, not your throat. Your voice tones just sound impotent and most people are going to just brush you off as being worthless on that alone.

Post: #93

RamZPaul's response to Gethard

Post: #94

(06-19-2014 12:48 PM)runsonmagic Wrote:  He made a response video to Ramzpaul:



My thoughts.

The comments section is brutal. RamZPaul sent over his shock troops to obliterate Get-Soft.

But seriously... that was the gayest PC blue pill rant ever.

Post: #95

This little twerp looks like he needs 2 hands just to pick up a 5 lb dumbbell -- absolutely sickening..

Post: #96

That Gethard video is telling.

Take away our adversaries' ability to be smug and dismissive, and what do they have?

Nothing!

They have no rational arguments. It's all judgey, smug, religious stuff.

Post: #97

(06-20-2014 01:14 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  They have no rational arguments. It's all judgey, smug, religious stuff.

Progressives are just Christians who don't believe in God and the parts of the bible they disagree with. It's the same old puritanical morality at its core, hence the need for judgement of others so they can feel morally-superior.

I could link to a bunch of Victorian Era Social Crusaders who are making the same arguments as now: 'Slavery is wrong', 'Double standards for slut-shaming', 'Women are paid less', 'Men are incapable of raising good boys', 'Single mothers shouldn't be shamed'.

140 years on, and we haven't grown past this. The Church didn't collapse - it simply mutated.

Post: #98

Is this a Rich Moranis lookalike contest?

Post: #99

(06-12-2014 11:13 PM)JohnKreese Wrote:  How is he 34?

On a side note, Woody Allen (the real one) must be laughing his ass off as he bangs out another 20 year-old bird (mortgage completely paid off, of course).

Yes- he's like the bad millennial cartoon imitation of Woody Allen with out getting hot pussy.


Someone call up Mystery, and tell him he needs to reboot "The Pickup Artist" and get this guy on as a contestant.

There should be a redpill version of "Queer Eye For The Straight Guy" that takes these kinds of guys and turns them into charismatic macks.

It could be called "Straight Eye for The Queer Guy"

Post: #100

Chris Gethard wrote: "My fundamental observation that drives me nuts is the manosphere seems hell bent on self-validating and that seems to make it a safe haven for a lot of really unnecessary and violent speech, which doesn't, from my perspective, seem to be anything about actually empowering men or instilling confidence in them, but has a lot more to do with unnecessarily lashing out at women for no reason."

1). No speech is ever "unecessary." Ever. If someone feels the need to say it, it's necessary for them. This is the lowest way to try and invalidate someone and shows how little he thinks of men. Think about that word: unnecessary.

2). Where is the violent speech he speaks of? Not here. Not on the MRA sites, as far as I know. I have been in the manosphere since around 2005, and never have I seen wanton threats.

Or by "violent speech" does he simply mean criticism of women? Is that where we are now? That any criticism of women makes such people feel "unsafe" (the new buzzword) and is therefore violent?

It's a nice ploy to try to put a group of people above reproach, but it's backfiring. People are now going back to seeing women as the fragile, wilting flowers of the Victorian Era who can't handle criticism or intellectual disagreements. And, for argument's sake, even if it the speech here was "violent," we could point out feminist sites or even some sports blogs that fit that description.

AnonymousBosch just wrote that "Progressives are just Christians who don't believe in God..." and he's right. The reaction to anything anti-feminist is like the irrational orgy of hate than met John Lennon when he made that "bigger than Jesus" comment.

If Chris is reading, I'd like him to link to specific examples of "violent speech" in the manosphere. Don't throw out accusations without examples.