Blackhawk
Wingman
  
Posts: 906
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation: 11
|
RE: AMERICA’S FASTEST-GROWING CLASS OF MILLIONAIRES? Public Employees.
Again, this is misdirection. The retirement plans aren't going to go bankrupt because of workers. They'll go bankrupt because of the much more highly paid administrators and elected officials taking a much bigger slice of the same plans.
California's current governor already makes over 400k+ a year from his combined pensions from different offices he's held over the years. He ran on, and passed, some major benefit and pension reductions for state government employees.
Biggest change is no more "spiking" by management. People would work lower level admin jobs for 40 years, be chief for a day, then try to retire at a chief's salary. No more of that.
The auto industry bankruptcies resulted in retirement benefits being substatially cut by the bankruptcy courts. There was a movement for cities across the US to follow this model and declare bankruptcy so they could immediately cut retirement benefits... but when you go into bankruptcy court all the payola and corruption gets exposed first, like in the case of the city of Bell, California. So now elected officials look at the convictions still going on with even more investigations of Bell's books reaching further and further back into the past and are no longer talking about the bankruptcy option with the same enthusiasm.
And worse, what looked like a perfect way to cut only worker's benefits while leaving administrators and elected benefits untouched instead turns out to cut all ways.
Oakland's public schools have been under bankruptcy court administration for 12+ years and still can't weed out the corruption. Whole lot of Principals for a day, district administrators for a day, years and years of bad administration that took everything they could while leaving nothing for the actual teachers doing the work.
Meanwhile the university of California system is a series of do nothing administrative offices used by the Democrat party to park officials at absurdly high salaries between elections --which is why Janet Napolitano is suddenly chancelor at 400k+ annual salary with no qualifications for the job whatsoever. Paid for by ever higher student tuition.
"Alpha children wear grey. They work much harder than we do, because they're so frightfully clever. I'm awfully glad I'm a Beta, because I don't work so hard. And then we are much better than the Gammas and Deltas. Gammas are stupid. They all wear green, and Delta children wear khaki. Oh no, I don't want to play with Delta children. And Epsilons are still worse. They're too stupid to be able to read or write. Besides they wear black, which is such a beastly color. I'm so glad I'm a Beta."
--Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
(This post was last modified: 05-20-2014 09:29 AM by Blackhawk.)
|
|
| 05-20-2014 09:12 AM |
|
The following 4 users Like Blackhawk's post:4 users Like Blackhawk's post
Dr. Howard, Samseau, DVY, Deuce Anna Half
|
Dr. Howard
International Playboy
     
Posts: 5,822
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 72
|
RE: AMERICA’S FASTEST-GROWING CLASS OF MILLIONAIRES? Public Employees.
(05-20-2014 09:12 AM)Blackhawk Wrote: Again, this is misdirection. The retirement plans aren't going to go bankrupt because of workers. They'll go bankrupt because of the much more highly paid administrators and elected officials taking a much bigger slice of the same plans.
California's current governor already makes over 400k+ a year from his combined pensions from different offices he's held over the years. He ran on, and passed, some major benefit and pension reductions for state government employees.
Biggest change is no more "spiking" by management. People would work lower level admin jobs for 40 years, be chief for a day, then try to retire at a chief's salary. No more of that.
The auto industry bankruptcies resulted in retirement benefits being substatially cut by the bankruptcy courts. There was a movement for cities across the US to follow this model and declare bankruptcy so they could immediately cut retirement benefits... but when you go into bankruptcy court all the payola and corruption gets exposed first, like in the case of the city of Bell, California. So now elected officials look at the convictions still going on with even more investigations of Bell's books reaching further and further back into the past and are no longer talking about the bankruptcy option with the same enthusiasm.
And worse, what looked like a perfect way to cut only worker's benefits while leaving administrators and elected benefits untouched instead turns out to cut all ways.
Oakland's public schools have been under bankruptcy court administration for 12+ years and still can't weed out the corruption. Whole lot of Principals for a day, district administrators for a day, years and years of bad administration that took everything they could while leaving nothing for the actual teachers doing the work.
Meanwhile the university of California system is a series of do nothing administrative offices used by the Democrat party to park officials at absurdly high salaries between elections --which is why Janet Napolitano is suddenly chancelor at 400k+ annual salary with no qualifications for the job whatsoever. Paid for by ever higher student tuition.
Good point, spiking is a badass move for the individual but terrible for the system.
When I worked for the government a guy fooled the administration, that despite being a field agent for 30 years, that all of a sudden, a year after he is eligible to retire that he REALLY wants to move to the state capital and take up a head office position.
2 weeks in he's just like "fuck you guys, you fucked me over for years, now its my turn, I'm retiring" and walks out the door with a pension that is now calculated on income that is 20,000 per year higher because he worked a certain job for 2 weeks.
I was impressed, but shit like that destroys the pension for everyone else.
Defined benefit pensions require people to be civil and willing to 'take one for the team' which people don't do anymore, hence they are so screwed up.
Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
|
|
| 05-20-2014 09:34 AM |
|
|
Sp5
Banned
Posts: 2,696
Joined: Feb 2013
|
RE: AMERICA’S FASTEST-GROWING CLASS OF MILLIONAIRES? Public Employees.
First, as was noted before, a million ain't jack shit nowadays. Any reasonably diligent and competent middle class household can have a million dollars in accrued wealth by the time the head-of-household is 50.
Second, all of the noise about public sector compensation masks the fact that private sector compensation is flat or falling. Fifty years ago, the pensions and other benefits in the public sector were compensation for lower salaries than the private sector.
Now, with NAFTA, other trade pacts, the resulting decline of manufacturing in the USA, weakened unions, illegal immigration, outsourcing, offshoring, automation, etc., private sector wages have been flat or declining. Squeezing more work for less money and less benefits. Shareholder return dictates. Remember, if corporations are persons, they are basically psychopaths which have no other values than shareholder return in today's environment. It's not like the 1950s when boards and management could apply other values.
The public sector is almost the only place where a person of average or below average cognitive skills can make a decent living nowadays. The rest of the private sector jobs for average and below average people have been cut up into 15-20 hour a week part-time, minimum wage jobs with no benefits. Contrast that with a job for, say, a public sector courthouse or school janitor or lunchroom attendant. If those jobs haven't been privatized, the worker will have a full time job at a livable wage with medical insurance and some kind of pension.
Getting private sector employees to blame public sector workers whose wages have continued to rise in tandem with GDP per capita is a way to hide that their wages have NOT risen in tandem with productivity growth and the company's revenue. The difference between falling or flat wages and rising revenue is called "more profit."
Classic propaganda technique, scapegoating.
|
|
| 05-20-2014 10:18 AM |
|
The following 5 users Like Sp5's post:5 users Like Sp5's post
Dr. Howard, Brodiaga, iknowexactly, Deuce Anna Half, BlueOcean
|
Sp5
Banned
Posts: 2,696
Joined: Feb 2013
|
RE: AMERICA’S FASTEST-GROWING CLASS OF MILLIONAIRES? Public Employees.
(05-20-2014 10:37 AM)Samseau Wrote: A million dollars isn't jack shit? That's easily in the top .1%. What the hell are you guys talking about?
A million doesn't feel as rich as it used to, because of inflation, but put things in perspective. The average income in the USA is $44,321.67.
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/cola/AWI.html
How do you think the average people feel? Things are getting more expensive every year and they feel lucky if they can keep their house and car.
I am not talking about a million in income, but a million in assets - wealth, which has been the standard definition of "millionaire."
It's not really hard to build a million in wealth with a middle class income by age 50, especially in real estate. Of course, these are "paper millionaires" who are not very liquid.
Pension benefits can rack up a big present value. For example, the present value of my military pension payable at age 60 is around half a million. The present value of my Social Security benefits are another $400,000 or so.
That is the kind of "millionaire" the OP was referencing.
Edit: The fact you are confused about what is being talked about shows that this is an effective propaganda theme. Talking about a $2800 a month payment is not as inflammatory as "millionaires!!!"
(This post was last modified: 05-20-2014 11:27 AM by Sp5.)
|
|
| 05-20-2014 11:12 AM |
|
|
redpillrage33
Banned
Posts: 188
Joined: Oct 2013
|
RE: AMERICA’S FASTEST-GROWING CLASS OF MILLIONAIRES? Public Employees.
There is a reckoning coming for public sector pensioners in both the US and Canada. Because of the fact that the population is age-heavy (i.e. more older people than younger people) the defined-benefit pension schemes that are most public sector pensions are in essence and effect, Ponzi schemes.
Also, it is fundamentally unfair for the public sector to demand that the private sector workers must save for everyone's retirement.
Read this little ditty about a year ago: http://www.amazon.ca/Pension-Ponzi-Bankr...1118098730
Was written in 2011. The authors estimated that the unfunded liabilities of Canada's public sector pensions would double the national debt (then about $650 million). That was before the unfunded liabilities of our universal "free" healthcare system was added into the mix as well. Pretty scary stuff.
Only 1 out of 5 workers in Canada is in the public sector (unacceptably huge, but still a minority). Are the private sector workers going to go bankrupt for 20% of the population, or is something going to change and change hard?
|
|
| 05-20-2014 11:47 AM |
|
|