Forum homeGamesearch

How to get laid on okcupid like a boss

馃搫 Rendered from the archive database (the original static capture of this page wasn't kept). Content is complete; styling is simplified.
Pages: 1 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
Mess O. 路 2017-05-14 10:55:00 路 #6151
^^^ Way head of ya on that one. Me an' my bud sat in front of my 'experiment' profile for an hour last night. I've never heard someone laugh so much. He simply couldn't believe the material. How about 20 messages in the first 3 minutes?
Vaun 路 2017-05-14 16:14:00 路 #6152
(05-14-2017 10:55 AM)Mess O. Wrote:  ^^^ Way head of ya on that one. Me an' my bud sat in front of my 'experiment' profile for an hour last night. I've never heard someone laugh so much. He simply couldn't believe the material. How about 20 messages in the first 3 minutes?

Yeah the views and messages just started rolling in with one really obvious clip art pic from Google Images. I deleted the account after 30 minutes. Full on real emails of guys typing out their life stories. It was pretty sad. It really gives you a perspective what an actual attractive girl might experience, with a live profile for months. It makes you think what is wrong with these attractive girls who you see on apps for months and months, or even years. With all of that attention, she can't even find one guy? I went on to look at my competition. There is some competition, but I would say 1 in 30, or more profiles, look like actual guys I would compete with.

Fellas, dont put up a pic of you 1) with your child and 2) with your GI Joes. Yes that was one mans profile.
Mess O. 路 2017-05-14 21:45:00 路 #6153
Might be worth starting a thread on this.
Jack_Smith 路 2017-05-15 09:56:00 路 #6154
(05-14-2017 04:14 PM)Vaun Wrote:  I went on to look at my competition. There is some competition, but I would say 1 in 30, or more profiles, look like actual guys I would compete with.

I did this on Ashley Madison. Totally blew up. Had to shut down the whole thing within a day or so. One poor schlumph messaged me around 30 times in the space of an hour. Grown ass man, veteran, graduate degreed, successful professional. One pathetic needy ass message after another, all the way down to "OK, so I guess you're not going to respond, but please just give me a chance." Fuckn faggot. I just wanted to bitch slap that motherfucker.

Everybody prattles on and on about how it's a woman's market and women have soooo many choices and the deck is staked against men. This is horseshit and a misunderstanding of the marketplace. Yes, women do have easy access to an abundance of online male attention. Garbage attention. From amongst which it is virtually impossible to discern the quality dick, if there is any at all.

Quality dick is scarce. Be the quality dick.
...
griffinmill 路 2017-05-15 10:07:00 路 #6155
(05-15-2017 09:56 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote:  Yes, women do have easy access to an abundance of online male attention. Garbage attention. From amongst which it is virtually impossible to discern the quality dick, if there is any at all.

Correct.

I was talking with an online prospect on the phone who had just joined one of the dating sites. She said that she had given a guy her number and he had found her on Facebook and messaged her there. No idea why he didn't just call her, or message her on the dating site, but his sole intent must have been to increase the creep factor by about a gazillion.

What did he message her? He sent her a video of him jerking off.

These autistic men have saturated the marketplace with this shit that has never worked for them in the past, but they'll keep trying, and while they keep trying they'll clog up the inbox of every 4 and above within a 100-mile radius.
Vaun 路 2017-05-15 16:35:00 路 #6156
(05-15-2017 09:56 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote:  
(05-14-2017 04:14 PM)Vaun Wrote:  I went on to look at my competition. There is some competition, but I would say 1 in 30, or more profiles, look like actual guys I would compete with.

I did this on Ashley Madison. Totally blew up. Had to shut down the whole thing within a day or so. One poor schlumph messaged me around 30 times in the space of an hour. Grown ass man, veteran, graduate degreed, successful professional. One pathetic needy ass message after another, all the way down to "OK, so I guess you're not going to respond, but please just give me a chance." Fuckn faggot. I just wanted to bitch slap that motherfucker.

Everybody prattles on and on about how it's a woman's market and women have soooo many choices and the deck is staked against men. This is horseshit and a misunderstanding of the marketplace. Yes, women do have easy access to an abundance of online male attention. Garbage attention. From amongst which it is virtually impossible to discern the quality dick, if there is any at all.

Quality dick is scarce. Be the quality dick.
...

Thats why I dont really even care much about about women at all right now. At 41 I have over 700 testosterone naturally, and a hyper-active fully functioning libido. I've always been like this though, either want to fight or fuck most days. But I am at this point where the pursuit is so boring I can barely bring myself to it. After watching these thirsty ass guys, and to think even less than I year ago I was one of those guys messaging girls multiple times like that, its changed something in me. To the point where I dont really give a fuck and let girls walk on me all the time, that I dont pursue at all after we have sex for the first time, or it gets to be anything remotely hard to set up a date.
DimeBait 路 2017-05-15 16:54:00 路 #6157
I know its been said before but I must reiterate:

Always, always cross-reference the phone number w/ FaceBook! It doesn't work all the time, but when it does, their profile is usually set to public. These catfishing bishes are real out here!
Damn, I don't understand how they think they're gonna trick a guy into the poossy. WTF? Like I'm going to magically overlook that Jabadahut body because of your amazing personality.

And for the cat wondering why/how so many bishes are giving out their phone # these days, most are aware of how easily callers/texters can be blocked so the risk is low.
Delta 路 2017-05-15 19:24:00 路 #6158
(05-15-2017 09:56 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote:  Everybody prattles on and on about how it's a woman's market and women have soooo many choices and the deck is staked against men. This is horseshit and a misunderstanding of the marketplace. Yes, women do have easy access to an abundance of online male attention. Garbage attention. From amongst which it is virtually impossible to discern the quality dick, if there is any at all.

Quality dick is scarce. Be the quality dick.

I disagree. Let's say that in a typical month, a woman is messaged by 100 different guys, 10 of whom are "quality dick." Even though almost every guy who messaged her was a dreg, she still has no shortage of viable suitors to choose from, and can easily fill up her weekends with dates if she wants.

Meanwhile, your typical month is 3 messages from girls, 0 of whom are decent. THAT'S a shortage.

Scarcity of quality men is nothing more than an illusion created by the awe-inspiring quantity of thirsty schlubs carpet-bombing girls' inboxes.
griffinmill 路 2017-05-16 08:32:00 路 #6159
Texting back-and-forth with a hot prospect for a few days, tons of pictures exchanged.

She hits me up on Thursday night to tell me she's "bored" and that I should call her. I unfortunately miss the text but get back to her the next day.

No response.

I call her that evening.

No response.

I text her one last time to tell her I'll try her again later.

I never hear from this girl again.
Jack_Smith 路 2017-05-16 09:40:00 路 #6160
(05-15-2017 09:56 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote:  Everybody prattles on and on about how it's a woman's market and women have soooo many choices and the deck is staked against men. This is horseshit and a misunderstanding of the marketplace. Yes, women do have easy access to an abundance of online male attention. Garbage attention. From amongst which it is virtually impossible to discern the quality dick, if there is any at all.

Quality dick is scarce. Be the quality dick.

(05-15-2017 07:24 PM)Delta Wrote:  I disagree. Let's say that in a typical month, a woman is messaged by 100 different guys, 10 of whom are "quality dick." Even though almost every guy who messaged her was a dreg, she still has no shortage of viable suitors to choose from, and can easily fill up her weekends with dates if she wants.

Correct. And 90% of those dates are going to be shit for the woman from a mating perspective. Or maybe 80%, if she has above average selection skills. If you doubt this, go talk to some women.


(05-15-2017 07:24 PM)Delta Wrote:  Scarcity of quality men is nothing more than an illusion created by the awe-inspiring quantity of thirsty schlubs carpet-bombing girls' inboxes.

You seem to hold a narrow understanding of "scarcity," wherein "quality dick" can only be understood as "scarce" with respect to a specific girl if the number of quality dicks in her potential dating universe is less than the number required to book a month's worth of dates, which you put at 10. From the woman's perspective, the same problem exists if she cannot readily discern "quality dick" (10) from gen pop (90), and she cannot. A low signal/noise ratio (10/90) creates scarcity in the presence of quality. This is the essential nature of the digital age. Obviously.


(05-15-2017 07:24 PM)Delta Wrote:  Meanwhile, your typical month is 3 messages from girls, 0 of whom are decent. THAT'S a shortage.

Please don't try to put your scarcity on me. I just checked OKC and have 5 matches/msgs in the last 30 days, all fuckable, the oldest of which is 15 years my junior. The youngest is a 19 year old asian sub girl. I assure you that you WB. I should logon more often.
questor70 路 2017-05-16 11:01:00 路 #6161
(05-16-2017 09:40 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote:  90% of those dates are going to be shit for the woman from a mating perspective.

So how do you convince women that somehow you're gonna be different?
DimeBait 路 2017-05-16 12:10:00 路 #6162
(05-16-2017 11:01 AM)questor70 Wrote:  
(05-16-2017 09:40 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote:  90% of those dates are going to be shit for the woman from a mating perspective.

So how do you convince women that somehow you're gonna be different?

Aw this, grasshopper, is the quintessential reason we're all here!

When I connect online, I send a message saying let's cut to the chase and give her my phone [Google voice] number. 90% of the time they call. I often hear how much they respect the straight-to-the-point-ness. Once I got them on the phone, 90% lead to meet-ups unless they have a shit personality I don't even bother asking. I use the phone convo to screen for fun and good personality type chicks. If the bish is socially awkward, silent, no back n forth banter, I leave em be.
ziggystardust 路 2017-05-16 18:53:00 路 #6163
(05-16-2017 09:40 AM)Jack_Smith Wrote:  You seem to hold a narrow understanding of "scarcity," wherein "quality dick" can only be understood as "scarce" with respect to a specific girl if the number of quality dicks in her potential dating universe is less than the number required to book a month's worth of dates, which you put at 10. From the woman's perspective, the same problem exists if she cannot readily discern "quality dick" (10) from gen pop (90), and she cannot. A low signal/noise ratio (10/90) creates scarcity in the presence of quality. This is the essential nature of the digital age. Obviously.

TLDR;

[Image: c4jt321.png]

Quote:don't try to put your scarcity on me. I just checked OKC and have 5 matches/msgs in the last 30 days, all fuckable, the oldest of which is 15 years my junior. The youngest is a 19 year old asian sub girl. I assure you that you WB. I should logon more often.

By all means continue to feed the beast because of a mere 5 matches in a month who will likely all flake.
Mess O. 路 2017-05-18 09:56:00 路 #6164
If I see another skydiving pic, I think I'm just gonna delete the fuckin' thing.
DimeBait 路 2017-05-18 11:33:00 路 #6165
(05-18-2017 09:56 AM)Mess O. Wrote:  If I see another skydiving pic, I think I'm just gonna delete the fuckin' thing.

In addition to the infamous "hiking" and "gun range" pics. It's almost scary how predictable most bishes are. They aren't looking at other chicks profiles, so they're just socially programmed to post the same BS pics.
MY DETROIT PLAYAS 路 2017-05-18 11:42:00 路 #6166
Think about it though

Those are activities they think us guys would find interesting about them

It's like 'sure it's cool that I can take you to the gun range every now and again'...but all the average men is really checking for is if she is fit and cute

Shit, there's SIF's who can shoot a bow and arrow perfectly straight...I'd rather have Betty Crocker than Davy Crockett
griffinmill 路 2017-05-18 12:04:00 路 #6167
(05-18-2017 11:42 AM)MY DETROIT PLAYAS Wrote:  Think about it though

Those are activities they think us guys would find interesting about them

Certain degree of projection too. That's what they're looking for in a man; adventure, risk-taker. Just like a lot of these women proudly list themselves as being "sarcastic". They like assholery in men, and think that's what we're looking for too.
MY DETROIT PLAYAS 路 2017-05-18 12:13:00 路 #6168
(05-18-2017 12:04 PM)griffinmill Wrote:  
(05-18-2017 11:42 AM)MY DETROIT PLAYAS Wrote:  Think about it though

Those are activities they think us guys would find interesting about them

Certain degree of projection too. That's what they're looking for in a man; adventure, risk-taker. Just like a lot of these women proudly list themselves as being "sarcastic". They like assholery in men, and think that's what we're looking for too.

Agree
Mess O. 路 2017-05-18 12:17:00 路 #6169
All good points. I'm just sick of seeing the same shit over and over.
[email聽protected] /* */ 路 2017-05-18 12:22:00 路 #6170
(05-18-2017 09:56 AM)Mess O. Wrote:  If I see another skydiving pic, I think I'm just gonna delete the fuckin' thing.

Haha you mean you don't like those pics where their faces are flapping in the wind? Cheeks stretched back, teeth bared like some kind of fucking Jello Monster with teeth?

Dear whores: Those aren't attractive pics.
Mess O. 路 2017-05-18 12:25:00 路 #6171
And how about that 'pose in front of rainbow angel wings painted on steel door' shot?
DimeBait 路 2017-05-18 12:42:00 路 #6172
Man, I've had several fatties try to catfish me lately. If there are no full-body shots, I don't even bother responding.
Mess O. 路 2017-05-20 01:14:00 路 #6173
Just logged on tonight, and there's 6 messages in the inbox. Must be a world record for a dude.
Jack_Smith 路 2017-05-20 08:40:00 路 #6174
(05-18-2017 12:42 PM)DimeBait Wrote:  Man, I've had several fatties try to catfish me lately. If there are no full-body shots, I don't even bother responding.

My teenage nephew, who has >1000 matches, says automatic next for -

Any filter applied to main pic
Sunglasses/Glasses in Main Pic
Group Main Pic
Any Food Pic
No body pic
No Bio
>3 miles away
questor70 路 2017-05-20 08:47:00 路 #6175
(05-18-2017 09:56 AM)Mess O. Wrote:  If I see another skydiving pic, I think I'm just gonna delete the fuckin' thing.

Add to the list:

-handstands at the beach (why the fascination?)
-selfies next to mayan/aztec pyramids
-selfies sucking down a margarita out of a giant glass
-car selfies (typically duckface with sunglasses or with bratty kids in back)
-public restroom mirror selfies where you can see the stalls (real classy)
-affirmation (or don't f*ck with me) text images
-cartoon overlays (dog face, cat face, princess tiara)
-face half cutoff or covered in hair (what are you hiding??)

Ones I don't see often because most women realize it's stupid, but they do occur:

-women making stupid faces (cross eyes, tongue sticking out, squinting eyes)
-giving the middle finger (who would want to date someone that standoffish and bitchy????)
Pages: 1 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73