Post: #1

Have any of you tried Roosh’s pet store opener before? I started using it today for the first time. Most of my interactions went like this:

Me: Do you know where the nearest pet store is?
Her: Huh?
Me: (I repeat my self)
Her: “Oh sorry, I don’t know.” *Here she would smile or appear to start moving*
Me: I was just hoping that I’d end up stumbling on one, but it seems impossible. No pet stores.
Her: Sorry, I really don’t know.
Me: If i knew it was gonna be this hard finding one, I would have just used google before I left the house. But now I’m kinda stuck.
Her: I don’t know sorry. *Still making eye contact*

Here i’d like to say why I’m looking for a pet store but it would seem weird seeing as the only thing she said are “sorry” and “I don’t know”. So instead, I say..

Me: Okay thanks anyway, don’t worry about it. *Leave*

Other typical approaches include her using her phone to find a pet store, this kinda sucked because she focused on her phone and didn’t give eye contact. Another is her giving me directions to a store. I’ve had maybe 3 approaches where the girl started moving after she said I don’t know. I’ve done about 10-15 approaches today and most I would leave before dropping a bait. So I didn’t get any numbers.

I leave the interaction, even though she’s making eye contact, i feel like she wants to leave, even though she's not communicating that. So I leave before it ends.

Any advise will help

p.s. this is my first time trying Roosh's material

Post: #2

A situational opener about her/the environment would work much better for you during daygame.

Post: #3

She was probably in a rush. Roosh emphasizes gaming in more relaxed/chill environments, like a city street on the weekends when people are just casually shopping.

Post: #4

I know there's different visions going on in the whole Direct vs Indirect debate, but I've found that if you want to game in crowded street going Direct from the back works better. I know the double take that you just did!! When I was first given the advice on going Direct from the back, I said no way I want to see the face first!!

But after doing it, going Direct from the back works way better then the Indirect pet store opener. I've fond that the attention span of women on the street is so short that they need Direct game and know what you're all about right away. As long as you're in shape, funny and can talk without interruption, you'll get # for sure, especially within 15 approaches unless something is off in your vibe

But like Roosh mentions in Day Bang, the flake ratio will be considerably higher than going indirect. I find that I prefer getting more # and try to turn them around than having a pet convo all the time and getting few #.

I can tell you that going direct is a bit hard, but extremely exciting. I keep the pet opener ready when I see a nice one walking towards me on a quiet street. Regarding going Direct, Daygame.com is a great resource for that.

Post: #5

(03-09-2014 05:42 PM)Captain Gh Wrote:  I know there's different visions going on in the whole Direct vs Indirect debate, but I've found that if you want to game in crowded street going Direct from the back works better. I know the double take that you just did!! When I was first given the advice on going Direct from the back, I said no way I want to see the face first!!

But after doing it, going Direct from the back works way better then the Indirect pet store opener. I've fond that the attention span of women on the street is so short that they need Direct game and know what you're all about right away. As long as you're in shape, funny and can talk without interruption, you'll get # for sure, especially within 15 approaches unless something is off in your vibe

But like Roosh mentions in Day Bang, the flake ratio will be considerably higher than going indirect. I find that I prefer getting more # and try to turn them around than having a pet convo all the time and getting few #.

I can tell you that going direct is a bit hard, but extremely exciting. I keep the pet opener ready when I see a nice one walking towards me on a quiet street. Regarding going Direct, Daygame.com is a great resource for that.

I've started pickup with direct, SimplePickup style. I've done 100 approaches since I started in September last year. Not many I know, it's because I feel weird when I do them. I didn't get great results, plenty of numbers but only got 1 lay and 1 make out so far from it. My opening is "Hey..I noticed you walking and I thought you we're cute so I had to say Hi."

I really don't like going direct, it makes me feel like a wierdo doing it during the day. This is why I'm trying indirect, because it feels a lot more natural.

Post: #6

(03-09-2014 06:50 PM)NothingIsRealLife Wrote:  

(03-09-2014 05:42 PM)Captain Gh Wrote:  I know there's different visions going on in the whole Direct vs Indirect debate, but I've found that if you want to game in crowded street going Direct from the back works better. I know the double take that you just did!! When I was first given the advice on going Direct from the back, I said no way I want to see the face first!!

But after doing it, going Direct from the back works way better then the Indirect pet store opener. I've fond that the attention span of women on the street is so short that they need Direct game and know what you're all about right away. As long as you're in shape, funny and can talk without interruption, you'll get # for sure, especially within 15 approaches unless something is off in your vibe

But like Roosh mentions in Day Bang, the flake ratio will be considerably higher than going indirect. I find that I prefer getting more # and try to turn them around than having a pet convo all the time and getting few #.

I can tell you that going direct is a bit hard, but extremely exciting. I keep the pet opener ready when I see a nice one walking towards me on a quiet street. Regarding going Direct, Daygame.com is a great resource for that.

I've started pickup with direct, SimplePickup style. I've done 100 approaches since I started in September last year. Not many I know, it's because I feel weird when I do them. I didn't get great results, plenty of numbers but only got 1 lay and 1 make out so far from it. My opening is "Hey..I noticed you walking and I thought you we're cute so I had to say Hi."

I really don't like going direct, it makes me feel like a wierdo doing it during the day. This is why I'm trying indirect, because it feels a lot more natural.

Hey I totally get you about how you feel!! I went through the same thing! But as a time investment perspective, I find that it's better to go direct than indirect. I also went through a period when I stopped going direct and just went indirect in street game.

But hey keep on going indirect since that's how you feel right now. As time went on, I just developed the frame that these streets belong to me when I'm out gaming and that my reasons for approaching were as legitimate as anybody else being outside, even more since I'll be walking & running like crazy. And in your case you already got laid from it!! As you get more experience, you'll approach less and get more numbers

Just analyse your results to see if it's worth it for you to keep on going indirect. I absolutely love going Indirect in student coffee shops so that might be something to look forward for you. Going Indirect in coffee shops or bookstores are simply the best!

I would select those two way above indirect street game!! One last thing, I saw in your profile that you're currently in the UK!! The UK is the capital of Daygame, so you might run into girls that have been approached by the very best, so you might need to have really tight game for some results!!

Post: #7

(03-09-2014 04:51 PM)deathtofatties Wrote:  She was probably in a rush. Roosh emphasizes gaming in more relaxed/chill environments, like a city street on the weekends when people are just casually shopping.

Word. Girls sitting down and relaxing in public squares, lawns and university campuses are always a good bet too.

Post: #8

First read.. /thread-31002-...#pid609679

Then read.. /thread-32411.html

Optional.. /thread-27791-...#pid529270