Post: #26

In all my life I never thought I'd see the words "bj" and "Lego" in the same sentence.

Post: #27

It's such a waste, too, because this particular slut could have been quite tasty. A serious ass on her -- if anyone has ever seen a John Leslie film, they'd know what he would do with filming that ass slowly going up and down stairs. It would be enraging in the extreme.

Instead, she's turned herself into a tat monster. It's a minor tragedy -- and when multiplied by the tens of millions, not really so minor.

Post: #28

(02-05-2014 12:28 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Strike 1: Fake tits that look ridiculous.

Strike 2: Tattoos (no explanation needed).

Strike 3: Ugly, arrogant "punk" hair.

Strike 4: "Buy me shit?" WTF?!?!

Wait, there can't be four strikes. I'm out. I give up. If this is what today's younger guys are jerking to, I am genuinely worried for our future.

Exactly. A girl can have a rockin' set of tits and my dick would think I'd want to bang her, but it's not enough for me when paired with deliberate uglification and a cunty attitude. It's not like she'd be the only pussy available in any situation. Throw in the fact that she does porn, and she's just a bunch of issues waiting to infect your life. It honestly does kill any desire - because I've been around the block enough to know what these girls are like.

I watched the clip, and the faces she pulls trying to be sexy are simply fucking ridiculous. She convinced that her bangability is far beyond her level of attractiveness, so her interaction with the camera is all narcissistic performance. "I know I'm hot." A while ago I mentioned that it's the 6's and 7's with inflated self-perception who are the bitches, not the 9's? This is a perfect example. Female arrogance is masculine. Female cynicism - buy me things - is wearing. Give me a girl who feels genuine joy for life any day.

I've mentioned before my pet hate is girls who are artificial about their sexuality - the younger ones now all seem to have studied porn and start performing like porn stars the moment you start having sex, because they're so insecure in their sexuality that they think by acting like a porn slut, they'll keep a man. You know how much we respect sluts.

WNB. Would Not Contract Hep C.

Post: #29

Quote:I suspect that most guys who say WNB to this chick, say so because they can only connect with relatively conservative girls, because they are still rather conservative ( still have traces of beta) guys. No hate here either, because I too have a hard time building a connection to this type. But would I reject an opportunity? Hell no!

I can understand this. There are definitely people on the internet who say "2/10 Would Not Bang" at even the slightest flaw in a woman. But I'm gonna draw the line here.

This woman looks like a human/lizard crossbreed, complete with scaly-looking tattoos. I wouldn't be so much worried about Hep C as I would having to take a trip to the vet.

Post: #30

I look at women with a more positative objectible attitude. You guys see a skillrex and say grody. I see skillrex and think Mad Max fantasy fullfilled. You guys see tats and think grody. I see tats and think of fucking a Georgia O' Keefe painting. You guys see fake titties and think grody. I see fake tits and see leaving my mark in Silicone Valley.

Remember, when life gives you lemons. But as AB pointed out, wnb a porn star. Infection rates are too high. Still nice to look at though. She has a cute face. Cryin' shame, really.

Post: #31

A large part of the appeal of porn and Playboy* is seeing the imaginary girl-next-door go wild.

Seeing someone who looks like a circus freak go wild is not as exciting. It's expected. That, more than anything, is what puts me off this woman.

I'm not getting how these women who look like assembled futuristic robots have fans and make money. So much for that old song that described the former high school crush as the "Angel in the centerfold." These days, it's more like the "Biker chick in the centerfold." Not quite the same, IMO.

* I read once that Playboy was only a moderate success until they took a break from featuring pictorials of models and "starlets" and did a topless study of an average secretary. Then sales exploded, so they continued along these lines. Can't find a source online for this, though.

Post: #32

(02-05-2014 03:46 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  A large part of the appeal of porn and Playboy* is seeing the imaginary girl-next-door go wild.

Seeing someone who looks like a circus freak go wild is not as exciting. It's expected. That, more than anything, is what puts me off this woman.

Exactly. I want to be the man who brings out the *genuine* wildness in her, wildness that she didn't even know she possessed. If she's already there to this degree, I'd either assume a bunch of other men have already shown her that, or that she was sexually-abused or raped when she was younger.

You guys might see 'easy lay': I just see 'damage', and the whirlwind of emotional drama that goes with it.

This chick is simply jaded and cynical, and uses her sexuality to manipulate men. She's emotionally-dead inside, and how she chooses to disfigure her body is clear evidence of that: "Stay away, I'm damaged."

Of course other sites don't bag out girls like this - most guys are so thirsty they don't realise they even have options.

Post: #33

(02-05-2014 06:04 AM)Mage Wrote:  I suspect that most guys who say WNB to this chick, say so because they can only connect with relatively conservative girls, because they are still rather conservative ( still have traces of beta) guys.

The difference comes down to what a man can handle. Blue pill men connect with timid conservative girls because they are easy to control. As you go deeper into red pill thinking, you want a challenge and a girl that can keep up with your lifestyle. Porn star chick is probably a party animal that loves booze, drugs, other girls, and fast cars. That's fine, but you have to have the frame to keep a lid on things, or shit will spin out of control. The difference, in dog terms, is yorkies and dobermans. Start with the small breeds an work your way up.

Post: #34

I see what you're saying Ali, but I'm a man who is always working towards my goals, and would never rate pussy above what I'm trying to achieve for myself, and if women think achieving your goals would result in attracting a higher-value woman than her, they will deliberately-attempt sabotage.

It's not about frame. Some women are uncontrollable, and you weigh up the value they'll add to your life with the constant timesuck of keeping them in line. I've seen too many strong men around me fall because they invited a tornado into their home.

The other thing: I discovered my dad's Playboy collection as a kid. Quality 60's and early 70's girls-next-door, shot in soft-focus, airbrushed to perfection.

It means I respond to girls like this:





Me not wanting to bang a skillrex-haired, tattooed porn slut isn't bragging. I mean there's no physical or sexual attraction there. She's a thing, and things don't make my dick hard.

Post: #35

I have to join the "would not bang" side. She looks like a bad horror movie monster, not to mention completely artificial. I'd rather bang a fat chick than her, and that says a lot.

Post: #36

Getting slightly off-topic: The biggest problem with the popularity of women like this is their influence on average women.

Maybe the woman here can cover herself in tatts and get fake breasts and remain attractive to a lot of men. The standard woman cannot. She wrecks what was impressive (or passable) about her body in the first place.

I've seen this happen with a few women I know. They remain single up until their late thirties. They look awful now. They also have a shitload of thirsty losers salivating over them. Yet they can't find "a boyfriend" who will "commit," esp. when it comes to having kids.

You'd think a bell would ring in their heads telling them the decisions they made repelled the very men who were catches and attracted the losers. But they just can't make this connection.

So, their only solutions is to dig their hold even deeper: more tattoos, more cats, more yoga, more vegan bullshit, more obnoxiousness, and "you go, girl" from their gal pals.

Post: #37

(02-05-2014 04:37 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  It's not about frame. Some women are uncontrollable, and you weigh up the value they'll add to your life with the constant timesuck of keeping them in line. I've seen too many strong men around me fall because they invited a tornado into their home.

I never met a woman that couldn't be controlled by a firmly planted boot heel.


Seriously though, these aren't girls you wanna bring home to momma. They are the ones you throw on the back of a badlander seat and run with the big dogs for the weekend. Do that with a good girl and now you have one more jaded chick we all bitch about. I separate the two and don't drag solid chicks into my whisky tango lifestyle. And yes, crazy bitches is playing with fire, but being red pill means pushing the limits. I did once invite a tornado into my home, and almost ended up on a long federal vacation. But what doesn't kill you only makes you stronger, and I am next level b/c of it.

Post: #38

Ali, not everyone wants to think of dealing with a simple slut as something like running the Ironman triathlon. For those who do -- God bless them, they're what makes America strong!

But I just want to enjoy a slut with a nice smooth skin unmarred with hideous tats, with perfect luscious long blow job hair, and a soft feminine body. Someone who has a little blush in her face and a little flush on the skin as she falls to her knees and stares at what's before her -- not someone who will swear like a sailor telling me to "jam that fucking cock down my throat". Is that too much to ask?

Post: #39

I grew in the Deep South with my white devil dick in dozens of cute, feminine, blonde, sane, girls that acted like a blowjob was an act of Hitler. These chicks don't arouse me anymore. I'd get more pleasure fucking a fleshlight. I want to come home to a stoned whore with another girl in the bed. I want a girl that can handle a firearm, take care of her on shit and not cry like fucking retard over the littlest shit. Riding the pussy carousel make you jaded.

Post: #40

(02-05-2014 03:35 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  I look at women with a more positative objectible attitude. You guys see a skillrex and say grody. I see skillrex and think Mad Max fantasy fullfilled. You guys see tats and think grody. I see tats and think of fucking a Georgia O' Keefe painting. You guys see fake titties and think grody. I see fake tits and see leaving my mark in Silicone Valley.

Remember, when life gives you lemons. But as AB pointed out, wnb a porn star. Infection rates are too high. Still nice to look at though. She has a cute face. Cryin' shame, really.

The Blahba gets philosophical about the nature of beauty. Well said...and honor of the Mad Max reference, I want you to listen to this on-point Road Warrior parody. Guess whose dubbed voice this is?

Post: #41

(02-05-2014 04:46 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  I never met a woman that couldn't be controlled by a firmly planted boot heel.

Until she cuts your dick off in your sleep. Bitches are sneaky like that.

Quote:not someone who will swear like a sailor telling me to "jam that fucking cock down my throat". Is that too much to ask?

I love it when they're shy and awkward sexually. Emotionally-vulnerable response = femininity.

Post: #42

I think DT had a post about this. These types of girls are like owning a really dangerous pet. They're a lot of fun, but you need A game all the time. One slip up and things go bad immediately.

Also, I think these girls are easier to control than "normal" girls. Regular chicks get hit on by players and average dudes. Most guys are too scared to even approach a Christy Mack type girl.

A good friend of mine is a hardcore suicide girl, she's hot, has posed in "art erotica" material, is bi, does a mountain of drugs, and is hyper sexual. Dudes literally masturbate over her, but rarely approach or they hit her with the weakest game imaginable. She was on my lap making out with another girl one time when I guy nervously approached, stared, and then turned around and shuffled off.

If you're into drugs, partying, or extreme living these girls are easy. Essentially you need to walk the walk to get them. I've been smashing these types of party girls since I was 18. They're ruthless to anyone who can't put them in there place.

Although I only date regular chicks, I think that suicide girls are a lot of fun to party with and bang. While it's hard to explain, I think they're the most "red pill" of all women. They like manly men, a lot of them think regular girls act stupid, many of them don't buy into traditional society values like marriage, and they are far more direct. Also, I've never met an actual suicide girl* who actually cared about feminism or things like that. They just like drugs, banging other chicks, and getting dominated.

* i.e. They live the life and are not simply a chick who got a stupid haircut or tattoo.

(02-05-2014 04:05 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

(02-05-2014 06:04 AM)Mage Wrote:  I suspect that most guys who say WNB to this chick, say so because they can only connect with relatively conservative girls, because they are still rather conservative ( still have traces of beta) guys.

The difference comes down to what a man can handle. Blue pill men connect with timid conservative girls because they are easy to control. As you go deeper into red pill thinking, you want a challenge and a girl that can keep up with your lifestyle. Porn star chick is probably a party animal that loves booze, drugs, other girls, and fast cars. That's fine, but you have to have the frame to keep a lid on things, or shit will spin out of control. The difference, in dog terms, is yorkies and dobermans. Start with the small breeds an work your way up.

Post: #43

Pussy isn't some magical contraption. Repetition makes anything old. After awhile you start looking for the thrill, or different attributes in chicks to keep it interesting. Accent, big nose, beauty mark, missing limbs, monster tits, ect. Once you hit a certain number, you'll know what I mean. I believe Fisto wrote something about it during his SEA tear.

Post: #44

^^

- The erosion of all youthful beauty and innocence is the tragedy of womanhood. Deliberately-speeding up the process is evidence of insanity, and the resulting bitterness and cynicism will consume her and everything around her.

- Willful self-destruction is simply self-destruction. I find nothing to celebrate in it. It's like celebrating sloth.

- I'm never after an 'easy' bang. It's the thrill of the chase and the art of the dance for me.

- If 'easy' is what matters, then why isn't everyone screwing thirsty fat chicks?

- I don't need disfigurement. My reason to bang is beauty. I've never gotten bored of it.

Post: #45

I respect these party girls cause at least they're up front and honest about the lifestyle. You know what your getting from day 1. I'll also go on and say if you did marry, you might have a better chance of surviving divorce. Unlike a wolf in sheep's clothing:

/thread-32797.html

^^^The 'innocent' girls are in it to win it, and will milk you for everything. From experience of mine and others. Party girl will be fine with a little drama and some cash to go away, unlike undercover girl, that will be playing the victim card and crying in the lawyers office.

Post: #46

(02-05-2014 08:13 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  I really and truly hate tats on chicks and always have.

Doesn't mean I won't bang em, pics posted here previous confirm that, but it does turn my desire down a notch or two.

This for both.

Post: #47

While an occasional tattoo is ignorable, when a girl has full patches of her skin done like that it just reminds me of a skin disease. Leprosy just doesn't do it for me.

Post: #48

I would happily - happily fuck that chick - skrillex and tats or not she's bangable.

STR - maybe? LTR - fuck no.