Post: #76

Post: #77

2wycked gtfo posting pix of lindie west. I would not bang lindie west, but the other two are totally bangable, would spend most of my time on the one with the silver pants and green top

Post: #78

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

Also, would you eat that pussy if it meant you could bang all 4 of her friends?

if i could fuck the 4 hot friends first, then go down on the fatty for 30 minutes, i could do it, otherwise i don't think i could physically get aroused if i had to go down on a fat chick for 30 minutes.

Post: #79

(01-16-2014 04:09 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  

Shit bro, this would be like fucking the borg collective. Do you think that Lindy West could be converted and convinced to lose weight after a healthy dose of alpha semen?

Post: #80

Kinda off topic, but not..

You're banging a 9 and a 6.

If you go for the typical porno finish, where you're banging chick A in the doggy position, and chick B lays her head down on A's ass waiting for their reward...

Who gets the camera position, the pretty one or the not as pretty one?

Post: #81

WIA, why on earth would you just limit the money shot to just one of them? tell both to get on their knees and put their heads together so you can soak both of them. I have never had a threesome, but I imagine that is what I would try

Post: #82

(01-16-2014 02:49 PM)master_thespian Wrote:  WIA, why on earth would you just limit the money shot to just one of them? tell both to get on their knees and put their heads together so you can soak both of them. I have never had a threesome, but I imagine that is what I would try

Haha, I guess I was thinking like a director.

Post: #83

The pretty one takes the shot and the ugly one licks her clean.

Post: #84

(01-16-2014 09:05 AM)007 Wrote:  

(01-16-2014 04:09 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  

Shit bro, this would be like fucking the borg collective. Do you think that Lindy West could be converted and convinced to lose weight after a healthy dose of alpha semen?

I find the probability of that ever happening rather... dubious.

Post: #85

(01-16-2014 06:42 AM)master_thespian Wrote:  

(01-06-2014 03:40 PM)assman Wrote:  Need to up the ante in here.



Your choice of the slim friend plus the hippo. No need for cunnilingus (as that would put everyone here out, I hope), but you do need to fuck that pussy, assuming your dick is long enough to even reach the hole. And you have to bang her in missionary and you have to keep your eyes open.

Any takers?

if i could fuck the 4 hot friends first, then go down on the fatty for 30 minutes, i could do it, otherwise i don't think i could physically get aroused if i had to go down on a fat chick for 30 minutes.

I would tell the dinosaur to lay down and undress, then I would take the first girl on the left and put her on top of the dinosaur to cover up the body and face while I'm fucking her.

Post: #86

(01-16-2014 04:09 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  

Moved from posting pics of trannies to Lindy west, cant say its much of an improvement.

Post: #87

^ Also, that's not how Lindy West looks anymore.

Before you ask, she HAS NOT improved: http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/xZ0SahIup...Lindy+West

EDIT: I think she may be in a deliberate race to the bottom with Lena Duhnam. The winner gets the "Frumpiest of All Time" award.

Post: #88

(01-16-2014 04:09 AM)2Wycked Wrote:  

Nah, no way. They would thn go on Jezebel about how I have a small dick and cry after sex.

I have a reputation to keep.

Post: #89

I don't see how the physical attractiveness of the other guy has anything to do with whether or not I would bang a chick with him. As long as he doesn't do any faggy shit like try to hold eye contact with me while it's going on I don't mind running a train with him.

Post: #90

Lol this is a great thread haha.

I remember one time my buddy and I were banging this trophy wife at the same time, which was totally alright not a big deal at all she was blowing him at the same time, but then at some point she's on her back and he MOUNTS her face and I'm practically forced to stare at his white ass as I'm fucking her. Derp

Post: #91

0 for 3? (La Covacha)

Post: #92

(01-17-2014 12:24 PM)jariel Wrote:  0 for 3? (La Covacha)

Um, duh. Any two of these, or all three if possible. Can't say that all the faces are great, but the bodies are all banging. We've all hit worse than every one of them.

Post: #93

(01-17-2014 12:24 PM)jariel Wrote:  0 for 3? (La Covacha)

No Jariel. Please stop posting pics of these horrid, ugly specimens. They belong in a zoo, you are making my eyes bleed.

By the way, we need a "Latina 10" thread.

Post: #94

Would you tap this?

Post: #95

(01-21-2014 09:44 PM)Suits Wrote:  Would you tap this?

Without a doubt

Post: #96

(01-21-2014 09:46 PM)pheonix500000 Wrote:  Without a doubt

Specially with the pigtails.

Post: #97

Would bang the girls in posts 93 and 95 with no questions. I also second Germanico's suggestion for a Latina 10 thread.

Post: #98

is a threesome with fatties better than no threesome ever in your life?

Post: #99

(01-21-2014 09:44 PM)Suits Wrote:  Would you tap this?

No to both.

Some awkward looking faces in this particular photo.

But I suspect the one on the left could move up a bunch of points with diff angle, hair, makeup, etc.

Post: #100

(01-21-2014 11:00 PM)Richiavelli Wrote:  is a threesome with fatties better than no threesome ever in your life?

I was hoping you would ask.



Would checking off the threesome box be worth it?