(06-12-2017 02:39 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:(06-10-2017 07:34 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote: I'm a few chapters into the book. It's very interesting and it really makes you think. I believe that it's based on real science, because the author mentions that the book is a layman's version of the full research which is in another book.
But the main question that keeps popping into my mind as I read it is :
If women are so ruled by their biology (even more so considering that the sperm wars happen inside of her and therefore her biology controls her more than men's biology controls men), then at what point can women be held accountable for their actions?
I have a huge hatred for the idea of letting women get away with doing bad stuff, but, if they really are ruled that much by their biology, I now find myself torn between understanding (and even sympathizing - I'd hate to have something inside me causing me to be so irrational and dishonest) and wanting bad women to be held responsible for what they do.
A good way to understand women is to recognize that they are literally (sophisticated) children. But now it seems that they are possessed too. Add to that the fact that people generally let their actions slide, and what have you got? An entitled, possessed, childish nightmare.
Anyway here's a link to the book on slideshare :
https://www.slideshare.net/homebwoi/sper...obin-baker
If you join you can download the pdf. I couldn't find an audio version of it but if you download Natural Reader it will read it. It's not perfect but it's quite good.
The book and concept have been discredited. But the general honest answer to all of this is to treat women like children. IE no voting.
How has it been discredited?
RooshV.com