Post: #51

As soon as you wear a hello kitty outfit you may as well sign off to being some spinsters future rag doll.

Good god.

Post: #52

I can't really add anything new since the posters have covered most of the good stuff but I must reiterate that women and white-knights are unable to *see* the world outside of their own one-dimensional view. They expect *everyone* to think, breathe, sleep, and eat like them.

Tuth points out how most of the negative feedback he receives is similar and they respond to the article with the exact same kind of negativity. The irony. It is delicious.

And this one comment stood out to me:

Quote:"There are real problems in the world..." And of course, from his ignorant, douchebag perspective, none of those problems involve women, apparently. This article is a waste of space - not only is this guy just a useless troll, the questions being asked are so completely lame it's painful.

Paging 2Wycked!

Post: #53

This is our boy James:




Edit: Ahhh... Days beat me to it.

Post: #54

(11-26-2013 04:51 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Below is a pic of him I found on his FB feed that's begging for a meme. I saved a copy in case he makes it private:

Girls with eating disorders are out his league.

Post: #55

(11-26-2013 01:46 PM)redpillrage33 Wrote:  ...women who have 100% control of their emotions and mental capacities

Somewhere there is a Buddhist monk who has spent the last thirty years leading a simple life of quiet contemplation of the universe and his place in it. And that guy only has like 80% control over his emotions. Yet this broad thinks that she, and a whole bunch of other western women, have a 100%? That has to be a serious mental delusion.

Post: #56

Lookout Tuth, this guys is serious. Mister mittens already has his boxing gloves on.

Post: #57

(11-26-2013 05:01 PM)thedude3737 Wrote:  This is our boy James:




Edit: Ahhh... Days beat me to it.

Damn! That didn't take long.

Post: #58

Definitely a guy who'd jack to manga.

Post: #59

Post: #60

Post: #61

Really, Roosh needs to get a photographer shoot him jumping out of an airplane in a tuxedo or wrestling an aligator, these pics just doesnt say "I dont give a fuck about shit" loud enough,

Post: #62

(11-26-2013 04:02 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 03:54 PM)thedude3737 Wrote:  And the white knight mangina award goes to:

Quote:James McKenna · Hull High School
14 Ways I Am Going To Pummel This Dude Into The Ground If I Ever Catch Him In Public.

This got 19 likes.

19 likes for fulfilling traditional gender stereotypes of being aggressively-violent?

Male aggression is totally cool as long as it's being wielded by women against men of their choosing.

Post: #63

Post: #64

Post: #65

The guy has a beard and describes himself as a genius on his linked in.

Can you say "Delusional Hipster" boys and girls? I knew ya could.

Now, I have a question. Is this the guy who thinks he's respecting women by not hitting on them when he fixes their Apple product or does he hit on every one of them and creep them out? I say he switched from latter to former and became a white knight at the same time. Either way, he desperately hopes some woman will thank him for his skills with a date or even a wink.


@germanico

Roosh is a former scientist. He minimizes entropy by expending less energy.

Post: #66

Recommended in the side links of the article: "19 Reasons You Should Get A Pixie Cut (If You've Always Wanted One)."

Post: #67

(11-26-2013 07:35 PM)JimNortonFan Wrote:  The guy has a beard and describes himself as a genius on his linked in.

Can you say "Delusional Hipster" boys and girls? I knew ya could.

Now, I have a question. Is this the guy who thinks he's respecting women by not hitting on them when he fixes their Apple product or does he hit on every one of them and creep them out? I say he switched from latter to former and became a white knight at the same time. Either way, he desperately hopes some woman will thank him for his skills with a date or even a wink.


@germanico

Roosh is a former scientist. He minimizes entropy by expending less energy.

^^^^
Really good point. And I'm going to write the below scredd for feminists and White Knights who might be lurking, so I hope some of you won't take offense (it's for the greater good).

This guy's Linkedin profile shows he didn't attend college but spent his time working at an auto auction and Best Buy. Meanwhile Roosh was a scientist while I hold a degree from an "honors college" and spent twenty years in Blue Pill newspaper-land. From what I gather, a lot of this board holds various degrees and prestige jobs.

Since feminists value credentials so much, what does it tell you that the men who have the degrees and power jobs are on this board, but ones that don't are defending you?

I know degrees and college are mostly useless crap, but it says something when the types of "credentialed" guys these women would have previously married are on here giving them a big "FUCK YOU" and not playing their game. Wake up, Jezebel crowd. Looks like today's version of men who married your moms are just not into you and have morphed into something else. I bet there are scads of well-paid accountants, programmers, and business owners on here as well.

Sorry if I offended anyone who didn't do the college BS; as I said I'm making a larger point as it relates to feminists, whose dating pool is getting smaller by the day.

Post: #68

Lots of good inside humor in that interview. The forum influence is unmistakable.

Post: #69

(11-26-2013 01:46 PM)redpillrage33 Wrote:  Typical blue-pill tripe from the comments: "I imagine you need 'vulnerable' women because women who have 100% control of their emotions and mental capacities wouldn't go near you with a goddamn barge pole."

Why does the average blue-pill woman (who are no doubt the majority of them) think those traits are attractive? Maybe in a man, not in a woman.

I'm saddened by how modern society consistently tells women they have to possess traditionally male traits to be worthy and attractive.

Dear blue-pill women of the world: Having some vulnerability is linked to your femininity, lacking which you tend to be more masculine (read unattractive to the majority of mailes). Also, we men get you are emotional creatures. You have evolved over hundreds of thousands of years to be so. 50 years of gender equity in western society does not mean you can simply turn that off. Also, you should ask yourselves the question whether you really want to?

Sigh.

EDIT: Not to mention that the commenter implies she is one of the chosen women who have full control over her emotions and then goes on to completely undermine that by the bitchy tone of the post, but I digress...

Hmmm, I think I would enjoy the company of a woman who has 100% control over her emotions and mental capacities. If she was hot, I'd probably be agreeable to banging her.

Too bad that no such woman exists.

Post: #70

@Days of Broken Arrows

College was supposed to brainwash us into the values of the Cathedral. For some of us, it helped us learn to think, especially to read scholarly papers. The problem is the same that the USSR faced. Scientists were some of the biggest dissidents in the USSR. They couldn't train people to think and not question the system. So, the Cathedral tanks the economy by destroying education, returning women to pre-feminism status or it lets guys become educated and then ignore the Jezebel crowd. It's over feminists, it's over. Get over it.

Post: #71

I liked the sly, baiting references that only RVF members would really appreciate, like:

"Putting my liberal arts education to good use"....
"All over it like a girl on an I-phone"
"ordering food from an Indian restaurant (!!)"...
"We at ROK work in a big building overlooking a golf course..."

Just precious, all around.

And the comments were more of the same Nightfall hysteria. I guess even referring to women as "females" is now considered offensive.

Post: #72

(11-26-2013 10:33 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  And the comments were more of the same Nightfall hysteria. I guess even referring to women as "females" is now considered offensive.

That's been a big feminist thing for years now, along with them getting upset when men call them "girls" instead of "women." It's yet another expression of feminist narcissism. Whereas most normal people don't give a shit and see the words as synonyms, feminists think by calling them "girls" or "females" that you're not taking them seriously and degrading them as sex objects (read: you're puncturing their false identity and reminding them that nobody cares about their clown college degree and/or paper-pushing job).

It's also an expression of just how immature girls are these days. Like Days of Broken Arrows and AnonymousBosch pointed out in the other thread, no one has ever told these girls to keep a stiff upper lip, shut up and stop taking everything personally. Part of being an adult is knowing when to fight and when to let things slide, but these girls fly off the hook every time they perceive their "honor" to be slighted. Vomiting your feelings, your every stupid thought into the public sphere is now thought of as a girl's birthright. They may be legal adults, but they're mentally still children.

Because of this, I've made a point in my blog posts to always refer to feminist/unfeminine women as "girls" or "females," and only using "women" to describe girls who are submissive and feminine. It's one of the easiest ways to get under their skin.

Interestingly enough, some younger girls from more traditional cultures actually get offended if you call them "women," because girliness is associated with youth while "woman" is associated with being old and ugly. A Bosnian girl I briefly dated in college got upset when I called her a "woman" once, and I think the same thing holds true for Russians as well, though I've only heard about it through secondhand sources.

Post: #73

Post: #74

(11-26-2013 10:33 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  And the comments were more of the same Nightfall hysteria. I guess even referring to women as "females" is now considered offensive.

(11-26-2013 10:54 PM)Matt Forney Wrote:  That's been a big feminist thing for years now, along with them getting upset when men call them "girls" instead of "women." It's yet another expression of feminist narcissism. Whereas most normal people don't give a shit and see the words as synonyms, feminists think by calling them "girls" or "females" that you're not taking them seriously and degrading them as sex objects (read: you're puncturing their false identity and reminding them that nobody cares about their clown college degree and/or paper-pushing job).

Or what's worse, womyn. I'll never forget the day I was corrected on my pronunciation of "women" because it "standardises the idea that womyn are somehow derivative from men" and that this goes back to the myth of Adam's rib and blah blah patriarchy.

(The wikipedia link shows the correct, gender-neutral etymology of "men" and "women", information available to anyone at any time.)

That said, this thread, and the interview which sparked it, made my entire day. Good work.

Post: #75

(11-26-2013 10:54 PM)Matt Forney Wrote:  

(11-26-2013 10:33 PM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  And the comments were more of the same Nightfall hysteria. I guess even referring to women as "females" is now considered offensive.

That's been a big feminist thing for years now, along with them getting upset when men call them "girls" instead of "women." It's yet another expression of feminist narcissism. Whereas most normal people don't give a shit and see the words as synonyms, feminists think by calling them "girls" or "females" that you're not taking them seriously and degrading them as sex objects (read: you're puncturing their false identity and reminding them that nobody cares about their clown college degree and/or paper-pushing job).

It's also an expression of just how immature girls are these days. Like Days of Broken Arrows and AnonymousBosch pointed out in the other thread, no one has ever told these girls to keep a stiff upper lip, shut up and stop taking everything personally. Part of being an adult is knowing when to fight and when to let things slide, but these girls fly off the hook every time they perceive their "honor" to be slighted. Vomiting your feelings, your every stupid thought into the public sphere is now thought of as a girl's birthright. They may be legal adults, but they're mentally still children.

Because of this, I've made a point in my blog posts to always refer to feminist/unfeminine women as "girls" or "females," and only using "women" to describe girls who are submissive and feminine. It's one of the easiest ways to get under their skin.

Interestingly enough, some younger girls from more traditional cultures actually get offended if you call them "women," because girliness is associated with youth while "woman" is associated with being old and ugly. A Bosnian girl I briefly dated in college got upset when I called her a "woman" once, and I think the same thing holds true for Russians as well, though I've only heard about it through secondhand sources.

An old girlfriend used to teach small children.

The biggest insult to these 4-6 year old kids was being called "kid" or worse "baby"

One kid would whine and the other would say "you're such a baaaaaby" and they'd meltdown.