Post: #51

(08-02-2018 07:35 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  I was visiting /pol/ and found this picture.

and her talking about her White boyfriends.

For some reason they are making a huge deal about it. Does this really impact your life in any way? The NYT remains trash, and I doubt any of the fans of NYT's News Entertainment (a la wrestling) would drop it over a few silly tweets by their tech editor.

The media matters, but it is better to focus on getting more honest, red-pilled, courageous, unbiased and/or right-wing ideas to the populace, instead of complaining about one [silly] individual is saying.

Since this is the RVF, I guess WB the one on my left, WNB the one on the right.

Great Find!

Maybe he just wasn't Chad enough. He's probably not that tall given her probable height.

Post: #52

(08-02-2018 12:50 PM)yankeetravels Wrote:  This Jeong girl is 1 of 3 things:

1. A hapa

2. She used to be around a lot of men with yellow fever or that have been to SEA/NEA regularly

3. A girl that's been pumped and dumped by quite a few white guys back in her prime days

I found the white tweets pretty funny to be honest as a white guy. This is as funny an attempt to trigger white guys as changing the Cleveland Indians to the Cleveland Caucasians. I don't want her fired, because I don't think anyone should be fired over old tweets (I just made a thread about this exact subject) so I'd be a hypocrite wanting her gone. But, it still could be useful to point out leftist logic about going after people for old tweets.

Guaranteed she fantasizes about being dominated by a high value white man.

Post: #53

I don't think she is a racist, but she has dangerous attitudes to fair trials and media accountablity. KiA has found a lot of stuff.



And she's 100% behind people being destroyed for wrongthink.

Post: #54

The story is not about this racist twit. The story is that the NYT loves her. Do they have a shred of credibility left?

Post: #55

No, she is a racist.

The issue though is equality. One of the hotep guys said it best, the issue here is why is racism towards whites applauded?

Whites are the least racist people in earth, and all non-whites are more racist by definition.

But the purpose here is she needs to be punished for her racism, just as any white would.

That's what equality feels like.

If you don't, it is an explicit statement that there is no pursuit of equality. If whites give up an ideal of equality, then they will only pursue supremacy, not the fictional garbage BLM asserts, but the shit that see a lot of other people get hurt.

I wouldn't want to wake that sleeping giant.

Post: #56

Someone needs to ask her why she is targeting white people with her criticism when half a million of her own people are up in arms over a paltry 1000 Muslims on an island off the coast of their country.

Post: #57

Just take it at face value.

If a member of some other group, let's imagine a gay Jewish black man who illegally immigrated from Mexico, whatever, was harassing me with racist/sexist remarks about being a white male, and I lost my temper and retaliated by unloading slurs of my own, would the New York Times show me any mercy at all?

Not a chance in hell.

Post: #58

Reminder that real nordic looking chads like us need to bang these sub-6 asians or they will be forced to date a white soyboy.

Can't have that folks.

Chad boyfriends for frumpy asian girls!

Post: #59

New York Times Bigot Sarah Jeong Repeatedly Trashed the New York Times

Quote:The New York Times went out on a limb to defend its new hire, Sarah Jeong, after the far-left writer’s long history of racist tweets drew public attention. Since then, more posts have surfaced showing Jeong’s history of trashing the very newspaper that now defends her.
Before being hired to serve on the paper’s editorial board, Jeong made a hobby of publicly trashing the New York Times and its columnists. As Jeong said in 2013:

Jeong’s ham-fisted excuse for her racist tweets, which include multiple tweets comparing white people to dogs and another expressing “joy” in being “cruel to old white men,” was that she was “imitating the rhetoric” of trolls who attacked her. The New York Times uncritically repeated that excuse in its statement defending Jeong. It’s unclear how her attacks on the paper follow the same logic, unless there’s some hitherto unknown pro-Times sentiment among the web’s trolling communities.

As recently as last year, Jeong was making flippant, celebratory comments about a lawsuit against her future employer.

In addition to apparently celebrating lawsuits against the Times, Sarah Jeong also had a habit of publicly trashing its most prominent columnists. Her most recent comments were made little over a year ago.

According to a 2014 tweet, Jeong would happily fire every centrist and moderate conservative who pens columns for the Times.

She really doesn’t like Nicholas Kristof. Or David Brooks.

Jeong also seems to harbor a particular dislike for longtime New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman.

I wonder what Friedman thinks about Jeong being on the editorial board?

Post: #60

This is the first thing she's said that I whole heartedly agree with. Tom Friedman is a specious,vapid, raging moron with a penchant for nonsensical alliteration s and allegory.


http://delong.typepad.com/egregious_mode...edman.html

There's a few gems there.

Quote:"The walls had fallen down and the Windows had opened, making the world much flatter than it had ever been--but the age of seamless global communication had not yet dawned."

How the fuck do you open a window in a fallen wall? More to the point, why would you open a window in a fallen wall? Or did the walls somehow fall in such a way that they left the windows floating in place to be opened? Four hundred and 73 pages of this, folks. Is there no God?

Friedman is also the guy who claimed every few months for about seven years running that the next three months or so were the crucial period of time that would determine the fate of Iraq.

Post: #61

I can't keep up. Is the NYT making an editorial pivot toward hating the NYT?

So... I should... Subscribe?

Post: #62

This is like the US Marines hiring an Al-Qaeda suicide bomber as a drill instructor!

Post: #63

The ((())) and Yellow coalition would be a formidable one.

Post: #64

I don't get it. How she did she get accepted into Harvard Law School? For someone with so much hatred and a lot of negative views/criticisms toward America and white race, she obviously has an agenda.

Edit. Berkeley sure did a good job of brainwashing her.

Post: #65

Setting aside the content of her tweets, how can a national "newspaper of record" stand behind a TECHNOLOGY and INTERNET editor/board member who in 2014 still didn't understand that her words are forever on the internet? Was not smart enough to delete Twitter before she accepted her position and the announcement went public? She has been anointed an expert on the internet, yet was too stupid to post her opinions anonymously? NYT is essentially admitting their tech reporting is worthless (as as such, so is their entire paper).

Post: #66

Her trash talk is sort of a turn on honestly.

Post: #67

I want to say WNB because she's a frumpy 5. But based on these tweets I just know she would fuck like a mental patient as long as you're very white and very mean to her.

So WB I guess as long as her hair isn't short and pink anymore and she pinky swears not to accuse me of rape.

By the way fellow Straight White Males™, I can't recommend enough keeping an eye out on instagram or other social media for black/mixed girls that post this kind of stuff all day. I've banged a few 9's in my life, but I basically never pull those bangs up in the mental fap-bank. The slightly mentally ill BLM/Afrocentric/whatever Eritrean 7 with braids though? Those bangs were life changing.

Post: #68

Asian people are so smart that they send the crazy ones in the West.

Its the chinese way of doing business, I send you my crap while I am cleaning my place.

Post: #69

Before she cut and dyed her hair, WB. With short and pink hair, WNB.

But yeah, she is incredibly dumb for someone who went to Harvard Law.

Post: #70

Hopefully this shows people who may have not figured it out already that the NYT has an agenda to fulfil.

Can't see how this person went to Harvard Law though, I know a few people who've gone there and regardless of political affiliation / beliefs, they wouldn't be posting this kind of trash on Twitter.

Post: #71

(08-04-2018 11:57 AM)budoslavic Wrote:  I don't get it. How she did she get accepted into Harvard Law School? For someone with so much hatred and a lot of negative views/criticisms toward America and white race, she obviously has an agenda.

Edit. Berkeley sure did a good job of brainwashing her.

Same way anyone gets into Harvard. The correct combination of a "Preftigious" background, rich family, and suitability for their agenda.

Post: #72

(08-05-2018 09:06 AM)Labienus Wrote:  But yeah, she is incredibly dumb as expected for someone who went to Harvard Law.

Fixed it for you.

Post: #73

This woman does not hate white people (white men), she's infatuated with them.

Post: #74

(08-04-2018 02:21 PM)iop890 Wrote:  I want to say WNB because she's a frumpy 5. But based on these tweets I just know she would fuck like a mental patient as long as you're very white and very mean to her.

It's redpill 101. The men she claims to hate are the ones her hindbrain is telling her to bang. She probably treats every other race of men, including her own, with complete indifference.

(08-05-2018 01:22 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  

(08-04-2018 11:57 AM)budoslavic Wrote:  I don't get it. How she did she get accepted into Harvard Law School? For someone with so much hatred and a lot of negative views/criticisms toward America and white race, she obviously has an agenda.

Edit. Berkeley sure did a good job of brainwashing her.

Same way anyone gets into Harvard. The correct combination of a "Preftigious" background, rich family, and suitability for their agenda.

Daily reminder that the great mind that produced this tweet graduated from Harvard:



SoViEt YuGoSlAvIa

Post: #75