Post: #51

Blacking out is when you completely lose all memory from a period of time. Browning out is when you have some memories, with pieces missing.

Post: #52

(09-25-2013 10:25 AM)Hencredible Casanova Wrote:  Ok. Now this is truly fucked up. Where is the outrage that she contacted this dude's employer because he no longer wanted to see her after a couple dates? I guess we don't know - nor may we ever - if the dude got fired. But in my opinion this is far, far more serious than that Pax "controversy."

One of the older DC playboys should hit this girl up and feign interest only to eventually play her because of what she did. Who's up for that?

Now do you see the danger everyone was talking about with the Pax situation? He may have been offensive, but the precedent of women getting a man fired for non-work related personal reasons was set.

This is what happens when running and tattling to a man's employer becomes normalized as a way for women to "punish" him for a perceived slight.

Post: #53

(09-25-2013 07:27 AM)Architekt Wrote:  

(09-25-2013 06:59 AM)Roosh Wrote:  She passed on medical school to write this:

Probably a good thing she never became a doctor

I seriously doubt she ever got close to be accepted to medical school on her academic merits.

To ace the MCAT and have the GPA from a decent college competive enough to get into med school requires a fair amount of discipline and time management, two things which this girl obvsiously does not have.

Her dad is most likely a doctor that might have been able to help her get into medical school. But never on her own merits.

Doing a background search in her name, she has never had any utility turned on using the name "Quin Pu" or "Quin Woodward" or "Q Pu" or "Q Woodward"

I still can't find out who her dad is, but it is safe to say that he is, and has been, paying her bills for her entire life.

Post: #54

Yeah, this shit's getting to be enough, so I propose the following:

The next time the opportunity presents itself - where a name and employer are known - why not flood the employer with negative info the same way women do? Twitter, Facebook, email, you name it. Bad reputations damage companies regardless of gender and I don't think women have evolved enough during the course of their empowerment to realize that.

It doesn't take firing, all that matters is word going out. For the right talkative HR dimwit to catch word and spread it around the office. Women value social status and the opinions of others more than anyone, so why not swing directly at the nutsack.

I know it's below our level, but two can play this fucking game. Pretty tired of reading stories of women ruining careers over hurt feelings.

Post: #55

(09-25-2013 06:59 AM)Roosh Wrote:  She passed on medical school to write this:

Oh this is just a cliffhanger that sets up an even more provocative story about her car keys.

Post: #56

(09-25-2013 11:45 AM)Blick Mang Wrote:  Yeah, this shit's getting to be enough, so I propose the following:

The next time the opportunity presents itself - where a name and employer are known - why not flood the employer with negative info the same way women do? Twitter, Facebook, email, you name it. Bad reputations damage companies regardless of gender and I don't think women have evolved enough during the course of their empowerment to realize that.

It doesn't take firing, all that matters is word going out. For the right talkative HR dimwit to catch word and spread it around the office. Women value social status and the opinions of others more than anyone, so why not swing directly at the nutsack.

I know it's below our level, but two can play this fucking game. Pretty tired of reading stories of women ruining careers over hurt feelings.

She needs to be stopped and taught a hard valuable lesson about fucking with a man's job over hurt feelings.

This is exactly the type of female that left to her own devices will be FILING FALSE RAPE CHARGES against a man with 24 months from now. Bet your bottom dollar on that.

Post: #57

Does this bitch even have a day job? How does one even live in DC (she's not from there) without a job or being in school?

I can see that some guys have taken the initiative of trashing her two books in the Amazon reviews section. Good shit.

Post: #58

Good call about leaving her really bad one star reviews on her books. To leave a review, all you need is an amazon account. Here are the links again. If we all take the 5 minutes to leave her a one star review, we can really make a difference here. Consider it your good deed for the day.

(09-24-2013 09:58 PM)lurker Wrote:  Her books: http://www.amazon.com/Type-A-Quin-Woodwa...oodward+pu
http://www.amazon.com/digfast-Quin-Woodw...oodward+pu

Post: #59

(09-25-2013 01:08 PM)master_thespian Wrote:  Good call about leaving her really bad one star reviews on her books. To leave a review, all you need is an amazon account. Here are the links again. If we all take the 5 minutes to leave her a one star review, we can really make a difference here. Consider it your good deed for the day.

(09-24-2013 09:58 PM)lurker Wrote:  Her books: http://www.amazon.com/Type-A-Quin-Woodwa...oodward+pu
http://www.amazon.com/digfast-Quin-Woodw...oodward+pu

Done and done

Post: #60

I don't condone of leaving fake negative reviews... because it has been done on me.

Post: #61

I took the time to ensure the reviews were "helpful to me". Thank you!

Post: #62

Well, i read enough of her blog that I am satisfied that her writing is garbage, so I consider it to be a legit review and not really that fake. I imagine she just recycles some of her blog stories of her life to try to sell them in book form as 'memoirs'. I would leave a negative review of her blog if it was possible.

So I think negative reviews of her books are fine if you really genuinely think her writing is bad. I imagine if you wanted to be totally honest you could say "I haven't read this book, but i have read this girls blog and the same stories from her blog are in her memoirs so my review is more reflective of the writing in her blog".

Post: #63

(09-25-2013 11:35 AM)scorpion Wrote:  Now do you see the danger everyone was talking about with the Pax situation? He may have been offensive, but the precedent of women getting a man fired for non-work related personal reasons was set.

This is what happens when running and tattling to a man's employer becomes normalized as a way for women to "punish" him for a perceived slight.

I never disagreed with you guys that the act of running your mouth to someone's employer just for being butthurt for personal reasons is inappropriate.

I was just emphasizing how reckless Pax was in the way he went about sharing his private views whereas you guys were emphasizing what his enemies did to him.

In this situation, I don't think any reasonable person would describe what the guy did as being remotely tied to his place of employment. He even took great care to not offend the chick when he lost interest in her. She clearly didn't mind the sexting from his company phone when she thought he was interested, but now that she's no longer wanted it's an issue to raise to his employer? Fucking crazy.

Post: #64

(09-25-2013 01:32 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I don't condone of leaving fake negative reviews... because it has been done on me.

Your "real audience" doesn't care about those neg reviews. Since you have many positive ones, the neg ones that clearly comes from haters generates helpful controversy IMO. At the end of the day, what you do provides value.

This is a key difference from the "work" of this worthless cunt. She has no fans to begin with. This exercise in narcissism that she calls "memoirs" have no value whatsoever. Trashing them with bad reviews will hopefully put an end to her unrealized ambitions to become a legitimate journalist.

Let's nip this one in the bud!

Post: #65

(09-25-2013 01:53 PM)Hencredible Casanova Wrote:  Let's nip this one in the bud!

Post: #66

(09-25-2013 01:32 PM)Roosh Wrote:  I don't condone of leaving fake negative reviews... because it has been done on me.

Yeah but did you ever try to get a girl fired because she rejected you?

Imagine if all of us on RVF went apeshit every time a girl rejected us, trying to get the girls fired and otherwise ruin their livelihood. It would be nonstop.

These sluts need to learn.

Post: #67

I don't think she has a job at all or at least doesn't work under someone. That's the only way I can make sense of how she can wantonly fuck with someone's livelihood in this manner. Probably living off daddy's money.

Post: #68

Half these bitches would be on the corner selling Street Sense if it wasn't for daddy's money. Rents in the city are unaffordable on Susy NGO's and Sally Nonprofit's salary.

Post: #69

Brightline Interactive

http://www.brightlineinteractive.com/our...y/theteam/

CEO's Twitter:

https://twitter.com/Erik_Muendel

VP's Twitter:

https://twitter.com/SamSantarelli

Post: #70

(09-25-2013 06:34 AM)samsamsam Wrote:  How could she possibly have 125 friends? Is she counting her fat friends as 5 friends each?

+1 rep point for truly heartless and brutal one -liners.

Oh, that's good. You're killing me. Heeehehheheheheheh.
5 each.. brutal ruthless. hahahhahahahahhahh

(09-25-2013 06:34 AM)samsamsam Wrote:  ...she definitely wanted to get away from her abusive father.
She probably ate him.

Oh man, I'm going to die. If you keep cracking me up I am going to suffocate, much as if she had SAT ON ME.
And READ FROM HER EPL book at length.


mmhhahahhahahaah

Post: #71

(09-25-2013 02:33 PM)WhaddupBoosh Wrote:  Brightline Interactive

http://www.brightlineinteractive.com/our...y/theteam/

CEO's Twitter:

https://twitter.com/Erik_Muendel

VP's Twitter:

https://twitter.com/SamSantarelli

Nice find. I wonder why she wouldn't post anonymously if her personal info is that public.

Post: #72

(09-25-2013 11:36 AM)Gold Doubloon Wrote:  I still can't find out who her dad is, but it is safe to say that he is, and has been, paying her bills for her entire life.

Her dad needs to send her back to China for awhile to get reoriented.

Post: #73

She looks like a fat Asian Jay Leno. Worthless cunt whose delusion is only matched by her arrogance. My take away points to this little anecdote are:

1. Dude should not have been banging this fat bitch in the first place. Proof once again that fat, ugly chicks are more evil and dangerous than good-looking ones. If you think they're going to be nice and grateful because you're dumptster diving in the sexual marketplace, think again. Never aim low. You'll regret it. Some bad game for going after the fatty. Fatties need to be avoided, period.

2. You don't dump a chick by text message. There's no way to soften the blow with soothing consolation language. No way to run interference. No way to gauge the threat level she may pose. You just can't do that. In that possibly fragile and unstable state, you need to be there. Not for her, but for you.

3. No sending pictures of your junk. And no porno pictures in any way, shape, form. Period. Ever. Texts and emails are there to set up meetings that lead to sex. That's about it...they're not for big dialogue, not for soul-searching, not for self-actualization.

Protect ya neck. That's my take.

Post: #74

(09-25-2013 07:17 AM)JohnKreese Wrote:  I've come to the conclusion that the guy didn't actually sext her. She probably has a friend with a name similar to his who sent something around the same time that he did. She got the names confused!

This friend sent her a picture of the "dinner" that she had had that night:

Naturally, she assumed that the message was a sext.

Topped off with a marathon session of this crap which she obviously emulated her life after.

   

Post: #75

PR Director! My sides!